Home Pioneering the future: incorporating lifestyle medicine tools in osteopathic medical education
Article Open Access

Pioneering the future: incorporating lifestyle medicine tools in osteopathic medical education

  • Shipra Bansal and Jay H. Shubrook EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 18, 2025

Abstract

The role of lifestyle has taken a renewed importance in disease prevention and chronic disease management. Osteopathic medicine has long focused on comprehensive, holistic care for our patients, and the tenets support the role of lifestyle medicine (LM) in osteopathic clinical care. In this commentary, the authors make the argument for incorporating LM more formally into the clinical curriculum at colleges of osteopathic medicine and will draw parallels with these two programs.

In the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, the role of lifestyle in preventing and managing chronic diseases is gaining increased recognition. Lifestyle medicine (LM), an emerging area of practice, focuses on addressing six key areas: nutrition, physical activity, stress management, sleep, social connection, and avoiding risky substances. Research is continually supporting the idea that these pillars are critical to good health. In this paradigm shift toward holistic patient care, colleges of osteopathic medicine stand at the forefront, uniquely positioned to integrate LM education and lead the way in preparing students for twenty-first century medical practice. The authors propose that integrating LM in the curriculum of COMs is an important opportunity. This manuscript will develop the case for this integration.

Osteopathic medicine, with its emphasis on treating the whole person rather than just the disease, has long championed the principles of LM. The first tenet of osteopathic medicine states that patients are an inseparable unit of body, mind, and spirit [1]. In a parallel manner, the six pillars of LM include physical nourishment such as nutrition and exercise as well as mental components of stress management, social connection, and sleep [2].

Andrew Taylor Still, MD, DO, deeply trusted in the innate wisdom of the human body. The second tenet states that the body has the capacity to heal when given the opportunity to do so. Approximately 150 years later, we are now aware of the solid scientific basis underlying this tenet. LM physicians work to provide the correct environment for the body to treat and often reverse many chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. Even in cases of cancer, modulating lifestyle factors have been shown to improve the odds of recovery and remission [3].

Another key founding principle of both osteopathic and LM is the concept of “wellness.” Osteopathic medicine emphasizes the importance of health promotion and preventive care. Similarly, LM strives toward optimizing individual well-being beyond aiming for just the absence of disease. It strives to allow the body to flourish when given the correct conditions.

Moreover, colleges of osteopathic medicine (COMs) are renowned for their holistic approach to medical education. COMs place a strong emphasis on hands-on training and fostering a collaborative relationship between physicians and patients. LM prioritizes patient education and shared decision-making. It provides clinicians with practical techniques for behavior change, utilizing a “coach approach” to partner with patients in reaching their longer-term goals.

Common ground in philosophy and practice

Central to osteopathic practice are the five models of osteopathic care, which provide a framework for understanding health and guiding treatment interventions [1]. These models encompass various aspects of the patient-provider relationship, the body’s self-regulatory mechanisms, and the impact of lifestyle factors on health outcomes. Following is an exploration of how LM can provide concrete tools within these models to achieve homeostasis.

In a 2016 commentary in the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, David Drozek, DO, spoke of the synergy between osteopathic and lifestyle approaches to optimizing health [4]. In this commentary, we add to this vision by further exploring the complement of the two frameworks from the perspective of the five models of care.

Biomechanical model

The biomechanical model focuses on the musculoskeletal system and its role in maintaining overall health and well-being. It recognizes that structural imbalances, such as misalignments or restrictions in the musculoskeletal system, can impact the body’s ability to function optimally. Physicians can utilize osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to restore alignment and function. OMT is a powerful tool in providing immediate relief of pain and in assisting the body to realign itself, whereas lifestyle approaches can assist in longer-term relief of pain and decreased chance of re-injury.

By integrating lifestyle tools, physicians can provide guidance to decrease overall inflammation within the musculoskeletal system and assist patients in minimizing tightness in the system via physical activity and stress reduction techniques. At a more granular level, research shows that anti-inflammatory dietary patterns are significantly associated with reduced markers of inflammation [5], 6]. More importantly, dietary patterns that reduce inflammation are associated with reduced risk of musculoskeletal pain [7], 8].

Respiratory–circulatory model

The respiratory–circulatory model emphasizes the importance of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems in maintaining health and vitality. It recognizes that efficient oxygenation and circulation are essential for delivering nutrients and removing waste products from tissues. OMT is integral to improving respiratory mechanics to optimize oxygenation and lymph movement.

Complementing with a lifestyle approach can provide patients with mechanisms to optimize endothelial function, including vasodilation and the production of factors that prevent hypercoagulability. LM’s focus on changes that reduce inflammation can decrease excessive mucus production in the respiratory system. Together, the approaches can optimize oxygenation and circulation.

From a nutritional perspective, diets rich in soluble fiber and phytosterols reduce cholesterol levels significantly [9], 10]. Also, nitrate-rich whole foods such as dark leafy greens and beets improve oxygenation by increasing plasma nitric oxide levels [11], 12]. Providing these resources for patients in addition to OMT can further support the body to achieve homeostasis.

Neurological model

The neurological model acknowledges the central and peripheral nervous systems’ role in regulating the body’s physiological processes and responding to internal and external stimuli. It recognizes that neurological imbalances can manifest as pain, dysfunction, or altered sensations. Osteopathic physicians skillfully utilize OMT to reduce neural tension and enhance neurological resilience. OMT can also treat nerve dysfunction by reducing irritation.

Infusing a lifestyle approach offers clinicians the skills to provide specific breathing and/or mindfulness techniques and to apply specific suggestions founded in any of the six pillars to regulate mood further. Restful and restorative sleep is one of the pillars of LM and is central to daily cycle homeostasis. Disruption of the normal diurnal sleep cycle can trigger a stress response and increase sympathetic nervous system activity with many downstream adverse effects.

Social connectedness also plays an important role within this model. Studies indicate that assisting patients to build strong social relationships can improve the risk of premature mortality more than other factors such as maintaining a normal body mass index (BMI), abstaining from alcohol, or obtaining the pneumococcal vaccine [13].

Bioenergetic model

The bioenergetic model focuses on the body’s inherent capacity for self-regulation and healing. It recognizes that the body’s energy systems, including cellular metabolism and bioelectric fields, play a vital role in maintaining health and responding to stressors. OMT and LM tools can optimize inherent self-regulation. For example, by releasing tensions in fascia or by releasing restriction, OMT can improve the flow of energy through the body. In promoting better nutrition, physical activity, and restorative sleep, lifestyle approaches assist in optimizing metabolic function and decrease inflammatory burdens that may be barriers to high energy levels [14], 15].

With LM approaches, physicians may guide patients nutritionally to improve their microbiome. Such shifts decrease overall inflammation in the system, modulate mood, and improve mitochondrial function [16], 17].

Biopsychosocial-spiritual model

The biopsychosocial-spiritual model takes a comprehensive approach to health and well-being, considering the interconnectedness of biological, psychological, social, and spiritual factors. It recognizes that these dimensions influence each other and collectively contribute to an individual’s health outcomes. Utilizing patient-centered care, touch, and compassionate communication, osteopathic providers enhance healing.

LM approaches mental and spiritual well-being by addressing topics such as social connectedness and sense of purpose routinely with patients. Data on the importance of social connection, especially in relation to other life factors, is well supported [13], 18]. Additionally, working with patients to recognize a sense of purpose improves health outcomes and longevity [19]. However, for some patients, a physical approach to mental health may be most important. In this realm, practitioners can work on increasing activity to improve neuroplasticity, increase mood, and modulate cortisol responses [20], 21].

Summary of the five models of care

In summary, utilizing the most recent science around lifestyle management in conjunction with the five models of care will promote behaviors that support musculoskeletal health, cardiovascular and respiratory function, neurological resilience, energy dynamics, and holistic well-being. LM has packaged an approach to health that allows osteopathic physicians to efficiently apply it within the five models of care in addressing the root causes of illness and promoting optimal health and vitality.

Incorporating lifestyle medicine into curriculum

While the science supporting lifestyle medicine is solid, and it is usually first-line treatment for our most common chronic conditions, its incorporation into medical education has been slow. The impact is that trainess do not feel optimally prepared to provide lifestyle-based care to patients [22], [23], [24]. Because of the natural parallels between osteopathy and LM, colleges of osteopathic medicine are uniquely equipped to provide this needed training.

There are several pathways to integrate LM into undergraduate medical education (UME). At least 15 colleges of osteopathic medicine across the United States already have Lifestyle Medicine Interest Groups (LMIGs) recognized by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (ACLM). LMIGs are seen as a way to introduce students to LM before integration into the core curriculum may be possible. Within the curricula, several programs offer culinary medicine experiences and have incorporated additional hours of nutritional content, and many are finding it a natural extension to discuss stress reduction alongside osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM).

An academic pathway is also available for students. Colleges of osteopathic medicine can gain credit for instructional hours covering LM and become certified by the ACLM. This allows students who complete requirements during medical school to have completed the didactic portion of national board certification. Students can then complete clinical requirements during residency and sit for the LM board examination once these are complete. This provides students with additional tools to strengthen their whole-person approach. To this end, the authors’ institution has recently become nationally certified and is currently offering the pathway for students to start within their first year of medical school.

AACOM is also leading the charge for more lifestyle-based approaches. In April 2024, they adopted a position statement that wholeheartedly advocates for increased curricular offerings in ‘Food as Medicine’ across all the colleges of osteopathic medicine. Specifically, the statement encourages curricular development that spans across all 4 years of UME, provides hands-on learning activities, and fosters interpersonal collaboration and training in nutritional counseling.

Nationally, LM educators are working to have LM better represented on the national board examinations, such as the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX), to increase student competence in optimally implementing lifestyle-based treatments. The shift toward including more lifestyle-based tools in medical student education has started and will undoubtedly continue to grow as we look to best prepare our students for future practice.

Conclusions

As the healthcare landscape continues to shift toward value-based care and prevention, there is a growing demand for physicians who can address the root causes of disease and promote health at the community level. Colleges of osteopathic medicine, focusing on preventive medicine and holistic care, are uniquely positioned to lead the way in meeting this demand. This infusion can be seamless because LM and osteopathy overlap so greatly. By embedding the tools provided by LM within the rich philosophical basis of the four tenets and the five models of care, colleges of osteopathic medicine can prepare their students to practice medicine in a manner that is highly clinically effective. As we navigate the complexities of modern healthcare, the future of medicine lies in a comprehensive approach that addresses the interconnectedness of lifestyle and health, and osteopathic schools are poised to be at the forefront of this transformative movement.


Corresponding author: Jay H. Shubrook, DO, Professor, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Touro University California, College of Osteopathic Medicine, 1310 Club Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Both authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: ChatGPT was utilized to improve the language.

  5. Conflict of interest: None declared.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Seffinger, MA, Hruby, RJ, Rogers, FJ, et al.. The philosophy of osteopathic medicine. In: Seffinger, MA, editor. Foundations of osteopathic medicine, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwers; 2018:2–18 pp.Search in Google Scholar

2. Pillars of lifestyle medicine. https://lifestylemedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Pillar-Booklet.pdf [Accessed 16 Apr 2024].Search in Google Scholar

3. Sharman, R, Harris, Z, Ernst, B, Mussallem, D, Larsen, A, Gowin, K. Lifestyle factors and cancer: a narrative review. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2024;8:166–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Drozek, D. Lifestyle medicine: a new paradigm embedded in osteopathic principles. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2016;116:500–1. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2016.101.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Hart, MJ, Torres, SJ, McNaughton, SA, Milte, CM. Dietary patterns and associations with biomarkers of inflammation in adults: a systematic review of observational studies. Nutr J 2021;20:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-021-00674-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Mukherjee, MS, Han, CY, Sukumaran, S, Delaney, CL, Miller, MD. Effect of anti-inflammatory diets on inflammation markers in adult human populations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev 2023;81:55–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuac045.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Khamoushi, F, Soleimani, D, Najafi, F, Ahmadi, N, Heidarzadeh-Esfahani, N, Anvari, B, et al.. Association between dietary inflammatory index and musculoskeletal disorders in adults. Sci Rep 2023;13:20302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46429-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Tonelli Enrico, V, Hébert, JR, Mugford, G, Gao, Z, Wang, P, Shivappa, N, et al.. Assessing diet and musculoskeletal pain in adults: results from a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Am J Lifestyle Med 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276231189682.Search in Google Scholar

9. Poli, A, Marangoni, F, Corsini, A, Manzato, E, Marrocco, W, Martini, D, et al.. Phytosterols, cholesterol control, and cardiovascular disease. Nutrients 2021;13:2810. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082810.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Bazzano, LA. Effects of soluble dietary fiber on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary heart disease risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2008;10:473–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-008-0074-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Kurtz, TW, DiCarlo, SE, Pravenec, M, Morris, RC. Functional foods for augmenting nitric oxide activity and reducing the risk for salt-induced hypertension and cardiovascular disease in Japan. J Cardiol 2018;72:42–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.02.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Pinaffi-Langley, AC, Dajani, RM, Prater, MC, Nguyen, HVM, Vrancken, K, Hays, FA, et al.. Dietary nitrate from plant foods: a conditionally essential nutrient for cardiovascular health. Adv Nutr 2024;15:100158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Holt-Lunstad, J, Smith, TB, Layton, JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Memme, JM, Erlich, AT, Phukan, G, Hood, D, et al.. Exercise and mitochondrial health. J Physiol 2021;599:803–17. https://doi.org/10.1113/jp278853.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Margină, D, Ungurianu, A, Purdel, C, Tsoukalas, D, Sarandi, E, Thanasoula, M, et al.. Chronic inflammation in the context of everyday life: dietary changes as mitigating factors. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:4135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Franco-Obregón, A, Gilbert, JA. The microbiome-mitochondrion connection: common ancestries, common mechanisms, common goals. mSystems2 2017;2:e00018–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00018-17.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Hou, K, Wu, ZX, Chen, XY, Wang, JQ, Zhang, D, Xiao, C, et al.. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther 2022;7:135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Umberson, D, Montez, JK. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51:S54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Kim, ES, Chen, Y, Nakamura, JS, Ryff, CD, VanderWeele, TJ. Sense of purpose in life and subsequent physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health: an outcome-wide approach. Am J Health Promot 2022;36:137–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211038545.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Trajkovic, N, Mitic, PM, Baric, R, Bogataj, Š. Editorial: effects of physical activity on psychological well-being. Front Psychol 2023;17:1121976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1121976.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Cefis, M, Chaney, R, Wirtz, J, Méloux, A, Quirié, A, Leger, C, et al.. Molecular mechanisms underlying physical exercise-induced brain BDNF overproduction. Front Mol Neurosci 2023;16:1275924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1275924.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Daley, BJ, Cherry-Bukowiec, J, Van Way, CW3rd, Collier, B, Gramlich, L, McMahon, MM, et al.. Current status of nutrition training in graduate medical education from a survey of residency program directors: a formal nutrition education course is necessary. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016;40:95–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607115571155.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Lianov, L. Physician competencies for prescribing lifestyle medicine. JAMA 2010;304:202. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.903.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Adams, KM, Kohlmeier, M, Zeisel, SH. Nutrition education in U.S. medical schools: latest update of a national survey. Acad Med 2010;85:1537–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eab71b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2024-06-19
Accepted: 2025-01-17
Published Online: 2025-02-18

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 21.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jom-2024-0121/html
Scroll to top button