An osteopathic assessment of lower extremity somatic dysfunctions in runners
-
Abbey Santanello
, Mikhail Volokitin
Abstract
Context
Runners often experience acute/chronic pain due to pre-existing structural somatic dysfunction and/or acquired various overuse injuries of the lower extremity, specifically affecting the ligaments, tendons, muscles, and bones. Common structural and function dysfunctions include but are not limited to patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), Achilles tendonitis, iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), ligamentous and muscle tears, muscle sprains/strains, stress fractures, pes planus, plantar fasciitis, and shin splints.
Objectives
The purpose of this study is to assess the correlation between acute and chronic pain, overuse injuries, and observational and palpatory findings upon evaluation to establish common trends of somatic dysfunctions and determine possible etiology of the pain/injury.
Methods
A total of 103 individuals were recruited (54.4% female, 45.6% male) aged 23–67 years old who consistently run at least 1 mile each week. They were categorized based on their weekly mileage – Novice (1–5 miles per week), Moderate (6–15), Advanced (15+) – with the intention to have a diversity of running types and to assess the data at various levels of commitment to running. The average was 7.8 miles/week with the range at 1 to 28 miles per week. The subjects included Touro students and individuals in the community. A history was collected through an anonymous survey on the individual’s running habits, chronic/acute injuries, and any other relevant medical information. Data analyzing investigators were blinded to subjects’ identifying information. Additionally, an osteopathic assessment was performed by two student investigators for reliability purposes and conducted under supervision by a board-certified osteopathic physician.
Results
Analysis of the data suggested an existing correlation between the number of somatic dysfunctions and years of running. A slight correlation was found between somatic dysfunctions and miles per week, sports injuries, time per week, and lower extremity pain. Finally, statistical correlations were also identified between the presence of pes planus and limb length discrepancy with three distinct muscular hypertonicities.
Conclusions
Runners’ pains and injuries of the lower extremity are complex, and injury treatment and prevention is equally multifaceted. An association was found between both pes planus and limb length discrepancy with lower extremity muscle hypertonicity, suggesting the interrelated nature of these somatic dysfunctions. The survey concluded that many runners continue to run in pain and/or after significant injury but do not necessarily capitalize on existing support such as fitted shoes, custom arches, and osteopathic treatment that may help to minimize their risk of or treat injury. The intention of the research is to bring awareness to practitioners to the most common somatic dysfunctions such that they can recommend runners to obtain gait analyses and/or osteopathic treatments, which may not only alleviate injuries faster but also prevent future injury.
In the United States alone, nearly 40 million people run regularly, with more than 10 million running at least 100 days every year. Running has been identified as one the most popular sports essential for health maintenance and physical fitness; however, it has been associated with many chronic injuries. Upwards of 50 % of runners report an injury annually, and most injuries are due to overuse [1].
Runners often experience acute and/or chronic pain due to pre-existing structural somatic dysfunction or acquired overuse injuries of the lower extremity, affecting the ligaments, tendons, muscles, and bones. Common structural and function dysfunctions include but are not limited to patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), Achilles’ tendonitis, iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS), ligamentous and muscle tears, muscle sprains/strains, stress fractures, pes planus, plantar fasciitis, and shin splints. The most common overuse injuries, which includes tendinopathies, ITBS, plantar fasciitis, and stress fractures, make up 30–90 % of all musculoskeletal disorders seen in athletes, and research is often targeting these areas [2]. Although intrinsic factors such as anatomy, gender, and age do affect running injuries, there are several extrinsic running factors that can be managed that influence injury prevention and rehabilitation.
The purpose of this study was to assess these extrinsic factors through the lens of osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM). This included but is not limited to the correlation between acute and chronic pain, overuse injuries, and observational and palpatory findings upon evaluation. A founding principle of osteopathic medicine is that structure governs function, which is to say that each part of the body is designed to function efficiently, and in times of injury or damage, the body cannot operate optimally.
The combination of a qualitative osteopathic assessment and survey of the common somatic dysfunctions, etiology of the injuries, and extrinsic factors such as fittings for running shoes and dietary/hydration requirements was the basis of this comprehensive study. At the conclusion of the data collection period, qualitative correlations were analyzed between observational and palpatory findings, coupled with survey results, to potentially identify somatic dysfunction trends in pain/injury etiology.
Ultimately, the objective is to utilize these findings to develop and recommend improved treatment plans for runners such as training regimen modifications, stretching techniques, specific isometric therapeutic exercises, shock absorption insoles, heel lifts, supinators, and other modalities with goals to maximize prevention and rehabilitation and minimize relapse and compensatory injuries.
Methods
This study was reviewed and approved by the Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB #HSIRB_2018). The study was submitted to the Clinical Trial Registry (#NCT05132894) before subject accrual. The study was awarded the Touro Student Research Fellowship grant, which supported materials fees for the study. Participants were not rewarded for participating in the study.
The subjects included Touro students and individuals in the community. Subjects were recruited via verbal contact and social media marketing. Due to COVID-19 and limitations with in-person assessments, data collection took place over approximately a 4-month period (November 2021 to February 2022) followed by data analysis. Every subject signed a written electronic consent, which was collected by one of the team members.
A survey was developed by the research team to collect a history of the individual’s running habits (including but not limited to shoe brand, running surface, cross-training activities, and distance), chronic/acute injuries, and any other relevant medical information (Supplementary Material). The survey was created based on a review of several physical therapy questionnaires that also seek to gather a holistic view of the runner and their history of injuries. The survey was anonymous and administered via a tablet at the time of OMM physical assessment. All 103 participants completed it, but this survey was not linked to physical assessments.
Following the survey, an osteopathic assessment (Supplementary Material) was conducted and supervised by an osteopathic physician and/or a second student for validity purposes. The examinations lasted less than 10 min each. There was no risk of any kind in participation in this study. Participation in the study was strictly voluntary.
After completion of both the survey and the clinical assessment, discrete quantitative statistical analyses were performed. The main objective was to perform correlation studies to identify dependence of variables with significance mainly with the clinical assessment. Subjective analysis of the survey was employed to gain a better understanding and context of the population examined.
Results
Osteopathic assessment results
For this phase of the study, 103 individuals were recruited (54.4 % female, 45.6 % male) aged 23–67 years old who consistently run at least 1 mile each week. They were categorized based on their weekly mileage – Novice (1–5 miles per week), Moderate (6–15), and Advanced (15+) – with the intention to have a diversity of running types and to assess the data at various levels of commitment to running. The average was 7.8 miles/week with a range at 1–28 miles per week.
In our preliminary analysis of the data, we determined that with our participants, there is no correlation between years running and the number of somatic dysfunctions, so this running categorization was not included in the full analysis. There is a slight correlation between the number of somatic dysfunctions and miles run per week, p=0.03, with the alpha value set at p<0.05 for significance. This statistic guided the subjective assessment of the survey in accordance with the intention of the research.
Overall, we identified two structural dysfunctions – pes planus and limb length discrepancy – that we would analyze further in relation to three muscular hypertonicities.
Correlation between the presence of pes planus and piriformis hypertonicity with percentage of total.
Correlation between the presence of pes planus and piriformis hypertonicity | ||
---|---|---|
Somatic dysfunction | Participants | Percentage of total |
Both | 42 | 40.8 % |
Pes planus | 23 | 22.3 % |
Piriformis hypertonicity | 23 | 22.3 % |
Neither | 15 | 14.6 % |
Total | 103 | 100 % |
After completion of the preliminary analysis, the number of participants was expanded in the second phase for statistical significance and to focus on evaluating specific somatic dysfunction correlations found in our primary assessment. Additionally, the survey provided a more comprehensive review of runners’ habits and history. Two of the most common somatic dysfunctions – pes planus (flat-footedness) and limb length discrepancy – are analyzed below.
Pes planus
In the expanded research phase with 103 participants, 63.1 % of participants demonstrated unilateral or bilateral pes planus. Among all of the participants with unilateral or bilateral pes planus (total 65 individuals), 64.6 % of them were found to also have unilateral or bilateral piriformis hypertonicity (Table 1).
Of all participants with unilateral or bilateral pes planus (total 65 individuals), 63.1 % of them were found to also have unilateral or bilateral quadriceps hypertonicity (Table 2). Among all participants with unilateral or bilateral pes planus (total 65 individuals), 67.9 % of them were found to also have unilateral or bilateral hamstrings hypertonicity, which is the highest correlation of all somatic dysfunctions tested (Table 3).
Correlation between the presence of pes planus and quadriceps hypertonicity with percentage of total.
Correlation between the presence of pes planus and quadriceps hypertonicity | ||
---|---|---|
Somatic dysfunction | Participants | Percentage of total |
Both | 41 | 39.8 % |
Pes planus | 24 | 23.3 % |
Quadriceps hypertonicity | 18 | 17.5 % |
Neither | 20 | 19.4 % |
Total | 103 | 100 % |
Correlation between the presence of pes planus and hamstrings hypertonicity with percentage of total.
Correlation between the presence of pes planus and hamstrings hypertonicity | ||
---|---|---|
Somatic dysfunction | Participants | Percentage of total |
Both | 44 | 42.7 % |
Pes planus | 21 | 20.4 % |
Hamstrings hypertonicity | 27 | 26.2 % |
Neither | 11 | 10.7 % |
Total | 103 | 100 % |
In conclusion, among the 65 participants with pes planus, 33 (50.7 %) had hypertonicity of all three muscle groups (piriformis, quadriceps, and hamstrings). A total of 18 participants (27.7 %) had 1-2 muscle hypertonicities present. Finally, 14 of the 65 participants (21.5 %) with pes planus experienced no hypertonicity in the muscle groups.
Limb length discrepancy
In this analysis, 65.0 % of our participants demonstrated a limb length discrepancy upon clinical assessment. Among all participants with limb length discrepancy (total 67 participants), 67.1 % were also found to have unilateral or bilateral piriformis hypertonicity (Table 4), 58.2 % were also found to have unilateral or bilateral quadriceps hypertonicity (Table 5), and 77.6 % of them were also found to have unilateral or bilateral hamstrings hypertonicity, which is the highest correlation of all somatic dysfunctions assessed (Table 6).
Correlation between the presence of limb length discrepancy and piriformis hypertonicity with percentage of total.
Correlation between the presence of limb length discrepancy and piriformis hypertonicity | ||
---|---|---|
Somatic dysfunction | Participants | Percentage of total |
Both | 45 | 43.7 % |
Limb length discrepancy | 22 | 21.4 % |
Piriformis hypertonicity | 20 | 19.4 % |
Neither | 16 | 15.5 % |
Total | 103 | 100 % |
Correlation between the presence of limb length discrepancy and quadriceps hypertonicity with percentage of total.
Correlation between the presence of limb length discrepancy and quadriceps hypertonicity | ||
---|---|---|
Somatic dysfunction | Participants | Percentage of total |
Both | 39 | 37.9 % |
Limb length discrepancy | 28 | 27.2 % |
Quadriceps hypertonicity | 20 | 19.4 % |
Neither | 16 | 15.5 % |
Total | 103 | 100 % |
Correlation between the presence of limb length discrepancy and hamstrings hypertonicity with percentage of total.
Correlation between the presence of limb length discrepancy and hamstrings hypertonicity | ||
---|---|---|
Somatic dysfunction | Participants | Percentage of total |
Both | 52 | 50.5 % |
Limb length discrepancy | 15 | 14.6 % |
Hamstrings hypertonicity | 20 | 19.4 % |
Neither | 16 | 15.5 % |
Total | 103 | 100 % |
In conclusion, out of the 67 participants with a limb length discrepancy, 33 (49.2 %) had hypertonicity of all three muscle groups (piriformis, quadriceps, and hamstrings), while 23 participants (34.3 %) had 1-2 muscle hypertonicities present. Finally, only 11 of the 67 participants with pes planus (16.4 %) experienced no hypertonicity in the muscle groups. This suggests the interrelatedness and compensatory mechanism of musculature possibly influenced by the presence of a limb length discrepancy.
Survey results
In addition to the osteopathic assessment, a survey was conducted to gather information on the extrinsic factors that can affect a runner’s acute/chronic injuries, rehabilitation, and prevention. Because these extrinsic factors play an essential role in the overall health of the runner, it was important to gauge the knowledge and background of the participants.
In the survey, 47.5 % of all participants complained of existing lower extremity pain in some capacity yet continue to run with this chronic pain and/or overuse injury. Similarly, 48 % of the participants continue to run for recreation and physical health despite experiencing a sports injury in the past including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, fibular fractures, spondylolisthesis, various joint sprains, and several other examples.
Regarding running shoes, only 32.0 % of runners in the study have previously been fitted and had their gait analyzed for specific running shoes. Among all participants, 60.1 % do not count the miles they put on their running shoes before purchasing a new pair, 63.1 % of runners are familiar with the stability and support level in the shoe, and 17.4 % utilize some form of support such as knee braces, K2 tape, or shoe arches. Only 7.7 % utilize custom shoe arches, despite 63.1 % of participants with pes planus.
Finally, nutrition was subjectively assessed asking how often diet and hydration factor into a participant’s running regimen (1=lowest, 5=highest). The average diet rating was 3.3 and hydration rating 3.8 on a scale of 1–5. Albeit subjective, the study qualitatively suggests that diet and hydration are considered, but there is room for improvement and varies on the individual.
Discussion
Pes planus, commonly known as flat-footedness or low arches, is the loss of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot, resulting in a majority of the foot making contact with the ground. Dysfunction of the arch complex can alter the biomechanics of the lumbar spine and lower extremity, causing an increased risk of pain and injury. Pes planus can be either congenital or acquired.
Anatomically, the posterior tibial tendon supports the arch and plantar flexion of the foot, so pes planus is often the result of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (Figure 1). In the expanded research phase with 103 participants, 63.1 % of participants demonstrated unilateral or bilateral pes planus, which exceeds the national average of pes planus, which is estimated to be 20–37 % [3]. In runners, the lack of an arch can especially strain lower extremity muscles and puts the runner at an increased risk of injury [4].

Weight-bearing lateral X-ray showing the measurement of calcaneal pitch, which is an angle of the calcaneus and the inferior aspect of the foot, with different sources giving different reference points. A calcaneal pitch of less than 17° or 18° indicates flat feet. Image by Mikael Häggström, MD. Public domain (CC0 1.0).
Limb length discrepancy of the lower extremity, also known as limb length discrepancy, is a difference in the length of an individual’s legs. This can be congenital in nature or a result of illness or injury to the lower extremity that causes the discrepancy over time.
Anatomically, the femur and/or the tibia is shorter than the other due to fracture, infection, congenital malformation, idiopathic, or of another known cause. However, if the cause is functional, the length of the bones is the same but appears unequal due to pelvic misalignment or muscle imbalances that strengthen one side of the spine, hip, and pelvis more than the other (Figure 2).

The image depicts postural compensation for limb length discrepancy. While the spine may compensate over time, the effect of the pelvic side shift and leg rotation can cause more immediate muscle spasm and hypertonicity. Image by LuluCustom, https://dr-abbie.com/factsheets/short-leg-syndrome.
This discrepancy may affect upwards of 75 % of the population, thus causing an increased risk of lower back, pelvis, and leg pain. In the analysis, 65.0 % of our participants demonstrated a limb length discrepancy upon assessment [5].
Based on the statistics and qualitative data above, it can be concluded that the etiology of acute/chronic pain and injuries to the lower extremity are commonly multifaceted and compensatory in nature due to the foundational osteopathic principle that structure and function are reciprocally interrelated. Additionally, from the survey, the study gleaned that despite these injuries, individuals continue to run but do not necessarily apply the benefits of certain extrinsic factors that have the potential to reduce pain and minimize the risk of overuse or compensatory injury.
For individuals with pes planus, it can cause your leg to roll inward or internally rotate, forcing the piriformis muscle to become hypertonic and poorly function, causing your hip to roll inward, thus hurting your knees and feet and affecting your quadriceps and hamstrings. Through overuse, the strain on your feet can cause your lower extremity muscles to spasm. A change in the normal posture and positioning of the foot may be the result of somatic dysfunction within the structure of the foot itself, or due to injury or instability of the foot’s stabilizing ligaments. These adjustments may have a profound effect on the patient’s posture and gait, and may result in compensatory somatic dysfunction elsewhere, such as in the lower extremities or in the pelvis or lumbar region [6].
According to the data presented, this theory supporting pes planus may influence the hypertonicity seen in the major muscle groups of the lower extremity. Of note, since the body is a system of complex interconnected structures and functions, the cause of flat feet and hypertonicity could go either way or be cyclical in nature.
For these individuals, it is especially important that they obtain a shoe fitting, a gait analysis, and custom arch support to provide the necessary structure to their foot to reduce pain and compensatory spasm or injury to lower-extremity musculature and joints. Additional cross training to stretch muscles and strengthen hips to reduce internal knee rotation and foot overpronation can benefit the runner.
For runners with limb length discrepancy, it could be minimal and asymptomatic or feel like one foot strikes the pavement harder than the other, or the runner simply feels or looks lopsided in their posture. This difference can cause an imbalance in the center of gravity and pain in the lower extremity as muscles and joints will unilaterally take on more stress and cause a compensatory reaction.
According to the data presented, there is a possibility that muscle hypertonicity of the piriformis, quadriceps, and hamstrings with lower extremity pain could partially be attributed to limb length discrepancy.
For individuals with symptoms such as unilateral hip or back pain, they should be evaluated for structural or functional etiology. If the former, a shoe lift can be placed to resolve the unequal limbs. If the latter, the leg responds well to biomechanical orthotic therapy, pelvic realignment, and stretching of the hamstrings and hip rotators [5].
In both cases, the runner will benefit from regular stretching, cross-training, intermittent rest and rehabilitation, and good nutrition and hydration habits. Furthermore, all runners could benefit from osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for assessment and management of somatic dysfunctions to not only resolve injury but also reduce risk of future injury and compensatory injury.
Limitations of this study include a limited sample size partially due to the pandemic and safe access to subjects. Additionally, the data are mainly qualitative in nature, so further research could focus in on specific somatic dysfunctions and apply quantitative measurements (ie, Measurement of the Meary’s Angle for pes planus) [3]. The study would also benefit from a control group to assess somatic dysfunctions in nonrunners. Further study and participation expansion is indicated to confirm qualitative associations in a quantitative manner. With quantitative results, more thorough intervention recommendations, such as arch supports and shoe lifts, could be provided.
Proper management of these extrinsic factors and treatment for common somatic dysfunctions can help to minimize, overcome, and prevent pain and injury in runners.
Conclusions
Runners’ pains and injuries of the lower extremity are complex, and injury treatment and prevention is equally multifaceted. The purpose of this study was to assess these extrinsic factors and common somatic dysfunctions, and we concluded that many runners continue to run in pain and/or after significant injury but do not necessarily capitalize on existing support.
Through an osteopathic assessment, there is an association between both pes planus and limb length discrepancy with lower extremity muscle hypertonicity, suggesting the interrelated nature of these somatic dysfunctions. The survey concluded that many runners continue to run in pain and/or after significant injury but do not necessarily capitalize on existing support such as fitted shoes, custom arches, and osteopathic treatment that may help to minimize their risk of injury or to treat their injury. Under the osteopathic precept that structure and function are interrelated, our intention is that this research will bring awareness to practitioners to the most common somatic dysfunctions such that they can recommend runners to obtain gait analyses and/or osteopathic treatment, which may not only alleviate injuries faster but also prevent future injury.
-
Research ethics: This study was reviewed and approved by the Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine IRB. The ClinicalTrials.gov identification number is NCT05132894, and the submission is sponsored by the Touro College and University System.
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: None declared.
-
Research funding: This study was funded by a grant from the Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine for the Student Research Fellowship.
-
Data availability: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
1. Van Mechelen, W. Running injuries: a review of the epidemiological literature. Sports Med 1992;14:320–35. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199214050-00004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Wilke, J, Vleeming, A, Wearing, S. Overuse injury: the result of pathologically altered myofascial force transmission? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2019;47:230–6. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000205.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Birhanu, A, Nagarchi, K, Getahun, F, Gebremichael, MA, Wondmagegn, H. Magnitude of flat foot and its associated factors among school-aged children in Southern Ethiopia: an institution -based cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023;24:966. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07082-6.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Mei-Dan, O, Kahn, G, Zeev, A, Rubin, A, Constantini, N, Even, A, et al.. The medial longitudinal arch as a possible risk factor for ankle sprains: a prospective study in 83 female infantry recruits. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26:180–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502600211.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
5. D’Amico, M, Kinel, E, Roncoletta, P. Leg length discrepancy and nonspecific low back pain: 3-d stereophotogrammetric quantitative posture evaluation confirms positive effects of customized heel-lift orthotics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;9:743132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.743132.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Seffinger, MA, editor. Foundations of osteopathic medicine, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0006).
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Cardiopulmonary Medicine
- Review Article
- The negative effects of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and implications for the presurgical examination
- Medical Education
- Original Articles
- The assessment of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in residency: the benefits of a four-year longitudinally integrated curriculum
- The impact of osteopathic recognition on multiple medical specialty residencies in a university-based setting
- Musculoskeletal Medicine and Pain
- Original Article
- An osteopathic assessment of lower extremity somatic dysfunctions in runners
- Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine (OMT)
- Original Article
- Impact of osteopathic manipulative medicine training during graduate medical education and its integration into clinical practice
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Original Article
- Prevalence of pelvic examinations on anesthetized patients without informed consent
- Letter to the Editor
- Addressing confounding factors in the match disparities between DO and MD seniors
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Cardiopulmonary Medicine
- Review Article
- The negative effects of long COVID-19 on cardiovascular health and implications for the presurgical examination
- Medical Education
- Original Articles
- The assessment of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in residency: the benefits of a four-year longitudinally integrated curriculum
- The impact of osteopathic recognition on multiple medical specialty residencies in a university-based setting
- Musculoskeletal Medicine and Pain
- Original Article
- An osteopathic assessment of lower extremity somatic dysfunctions in runners
- Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine (OMT)
- Original Article
- Impact of osteopathic manipulative medicine training during graduate medical education and its integration into clinical practice
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Original Article
- Prevalence of pelvic examinations on anesthetized patients without informed consent
- Letter to the Editor
- Addressing confounding factors in the match disparities between DO and MD seniors