Home Telehealth in opioid use disorder treatment: policy considerations for expanding access to care
Article Open Access

Telehealth in opioid use disorder treatment: policy considerations for expanding access to care

  • Auguste Niyibizi EMAIL logo , Arman Haveric and Giselle Irio
Published/Copyright: November 20, 2023

Abstract

The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008 was intended to address the online diversion of controlled substances. However, it inadvertently limited access to care for patients seeking medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). During the COVID-19 pandemic, temporary flexibility in telemedicine prescriptions for MOUD were implemented. Now, with the conclusion of the public health emergency, policymakers need to develop strategies to maintain some of the lifted restrictions in order to maintain increased access to care for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). One potential solution to address these issues is the implementation of a hybrid model combining outpatient clinics and telemedicine. This model offers the opportunity to maintain the benefits of telemedicine while ensuring comprehensive and safe care for OUD patients.

For the last two decades, the United States has been facing an opioid epidemic resulting in close to 2.7 million individuals diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) [1]. This highlights the critical need to guarantee access to life-saving treatment. Buprenorphine and methadone, FDA-approved opioid agonist medications, are recognized as the gold standard for OUD treatment due to their demonstrated efficacy in higher treatment retention rates, reducing opioid use, and preventing the transmission of HIV and Hepatitis C [2]. Meta-analysis confirmed that patients on methadone or buprenorphine maintenance therapy for OUD have a significantly decreased risk of death during treatment [3]. However, regulations imposed by the state, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) have restricted prescribing and dispensing practices of these controlled substances, therefore creating treatment barriers [3].

One example of these regulations includes The Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008, which mandates an in-person evaluation before a clinician can prescribe controlled substances. This law was passed after a California teenager overdosed on opioids that he had bought online without being formally evaluated by a physician [4]. While this law initially targeted online diversion of controlled substances and restricted online pill mills, it poses challenges for patients with limited access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) clinics, particularly those patients residing in rural areas [4].

Interestingly, the Haight Act does provide limited exceptions that allow clinicians to prescribe controlled substances via telemedicine. The Attorney General and Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) possess the authority to establish rules enabling clinicians to prescribe medication through telemedicine without an in-person evaluation, subject to certain conditions [5, 6]. This exception was granted in response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency declared by the HHS Secretary on January 31, 2020 [5]. The authorization allowed the use of audio or video telemedicine encounters to ensure continuity of care while adhering to social distancing guidelines.

This flexibility has been a source of research focusing on whether these modifications have compromised treatment plans or led to adverse outcomes. Postpandemic research thus far has concluded that telemedicine does not lead to unnecessary or inefficient healthcare services. In fact, a recent study found that telemedicine is comparable to in-person care [7]. A pilot study conducted by Weintraub et al. [4] looking at the first 177 patients treated in the telemedicine program over 15 months, revealed that buprenorphine treatment through telemedicine in rural settings is effective in retaining patients in treatment and helping them maintain abstinence, with retention rates exceeding 50 % after a year. Another study found that the incorporation of videoconferencing in 101 new MOUD outpatient programs resulted in 88 % of patients retaining their appointments, compared to a 77 % retention rate during the previous month when only in-person visits were available [8]. Thus, the use of flexible telehealth platforms alongside standard treatment methods often yielded even better treatment outcomes [8].

These implications are significant, particularly for addressing OUD in rural and remote areas where access to qualified physicians is limited and where opioid misuse is a critical concern. Telemedicine can offer several advantages, including enhanced convenience, reduced travel time to and from clinics, and cost savings. As a result, the utilization of synchronous video conferencing via telemedicine has proven effective in increasing access to and usage of buprenorphine by overcoming geographical and logistical barriers [8]. In line with these findings, and with the conclusion of the Public Health COVID-19 Emergency, on March 1, 2023, the DEA proposed expanding access to the prescription of controlled substances via telemedicine [9].

It is important to recognize the DEA as an important stakeholder in this policy. Its primary mission is to enforce controlled substance laws and regulations of the United States, including combating illegal manufacture, distribution, and trafficking of controlled substances to ultimately protect the public. SAMHSA, on the other hand, is responsible for leading efforts to advance behavioral health and reduce the impact of substance abuse and mental illness on individuals, families, and communities. SAMHSA works to fund and support prevention, treatment, and recovery programs for individuals with substance abuse and mental health disorders. These two large stakeholders have played an important role in the recent legislation that sought to increase access to the scope of telemedicine practice.

One of these includes the introduction of the Telehealth Response for E-prescribing Addiction Therapy Services Act (or TREATS Act) in 2021 [9]. This act advocates for the prescription of certain controlled substances for telehealth-based healthcare (TBH), specifically endorsing the tele-prescription of MOUD without mandating an in-person evaluation [1]. Furthermore, in January 2022, the American Telemedicine Association, with support from numerous professional organizations and telehealth stakeholders, called upon Congress to take several key actions: extend telehealth waivers until 2024, compel HHS to conclude telehealth evaluations to inform telehealth legislation by the end of 2023, and introduce evidence-based permanent telehealth legislation in 2024 [1].

It is worth noting that both the DEA and SAMHSA have issued statements assuring that the full range of telemedicine flexibility for prescribing will remain in effect until November 11, 2023 [10]. During this period, the DEA will continue its efforts to finalize regulations that facilitate the safe practice of telemedicine, ensuring public health, safety, and effective control against diversion.

Policy recommendations

The hesitance to fully adopt telehealth prescription for MOUD, rooted in concerns such as inadequate Medicare reimbursement rates, diversion-related problems, and privacy issues, can be mitigated through the policy recommendations outlined below.

Hybrid clinic requirement

The health clinic requirement mandates that providers offering telemedicine services for MOUD must have a stand-alone, registered, in-person clinic in addition to their online presence. Online-only clinics should not be permitted to provide telemedicine services for MOUD. The physical clinic should offer comprehensive services, including laboratory tests, social work, medication counseling, and ongoing support in line with current clinical guidelines.

Prescription authority

The physician must be authorized to prescribe the basic class of controlled medications specified on the prescription. In addition, the physician that is affiliated with the clinic would be allowed to prescribe the MOUD whether it be an in-person visit or a telehealth conference. Adhering to current DEA regulations, physicians would only be allowed to prescribe the controlled substance in the state where the physicians hold a DEA registration. This is designed to prevent cross-state prescription.

Patient choice flexibility

The patient would have the option to do the initial consultation and follow-up visits in person or via telemedicine consultation. This approach empowers the patient to select the mode of care that best aligns with their individual needs and circumstances, thereby increasing adherence. This flexibility should be made available for any of the patient’s follow-up appointments.

Monitoring and auditing

Regular monitoring and auditing processes should be implemented to ensure compliance with the hybrid model. Primarily, this would be a process to ensure that the prescribing offices have a physical location and that physicians are registered with their in-state DEA.

Compensation

On-par reimbursement for telemedicine visits and in-person visits should be options that are fully available to the patient. This would require repealing some of the payment parity laws for telemedicine found in certain states. Again, these choices will allow patients to select the treatment options that suit their preferences and requirements.

Conclusions

These policy recommendations would address the DEA’s concern for online pill-mill institutions, diversion, and public safety concerns by ensuring that prescriptions originate from established brick-and-mortar clinics. Simultaneously, they preserve the advantage of telehealth expanding access and providing flexibility to individuals in need of treatment. As demonstrated in the existing literature, postpandemic flexibility and telehealth interventions have shown improvement in treatment retention and outcomes. Hence, these policies align with the findings of these studies while ensuring safe practices that enhance flexibility, broaden access, and promote better health outcomes.


Corresponding author: Auguste Niyibizi, DO, MBA, 801 Ostrum St, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

Dr. Robert Langan, Andy Sandusky, Gabriel Miller, and the American Osteopathic Association Training in Policy Fellowship for their editorial work on this article.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors provided substantial contributions to conception and design; all authors drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content; all authors gave final approval of the version of the article to be published; and all authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

  4. Competing interests: None declared.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Mahmoud, H, Naal, H, Whaibeh, E, Smith, A. Telehealth-based delivery of medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder: a critical review of recent developments. Curr Psychiatr Rep 2022;24:375–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-022-01346-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Mattick, RP, Breen, C, Kimber, J, Davoli, M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2:CD002207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd002207.pub4.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chan, B, Bougatsos, C, Priest, KC, McCarty, D, Grusing, S, Chou, R. Opioid treatment programs, telemedicine and COVID-19: a scoping review. Subst Abuse 2021;43:539–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1967836.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Weintraub, E, Greenblatt, AD, Chang, J, Himelhoch, S, Welsh, C. Expanding access to buprenorphine treatment in rural areas with the use of telemedicine. Am J Addict 2018;27:612–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12805.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Dooling, BCE, Stanley, L. Extending pandemic flexibilities for opioid use disorder treatment: authorities and methods. Minn L Rev Headnotes 2021;106:74.Search in Google Scholar

6. Federal Register: Request Access. unblock.federalregister.gov. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2009/04/06/E9-7698/implementation-of-the-ryan-haight-online-pharmacy-consumer-protection-act-of-2008 [Accessed 12 Aug 2023].Search in Google Scholar

7. Hailu, R, Mehrotra, A, Huskamp, HA, Busch, AB, Barnett, ML. Telemedicine use and quality of opioid use disorder treatment in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2252381. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52381.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Guillen, AG, Reddy, M, Saadat, S, Chakravarthy, B. Utilization of telehealth solutions for patients with opioid use disorder using buprenorphine: a scoping review. Telemed J E Health 2022;28:761–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0308.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. US Congress. S.340 — 117th congress (2021–2022); 2021.Search in Google Scholar

10. Federal Register: Request Access. unblock.federalregister.gov. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/05/10/2023-09936/temporary-extension-of-covid-19-telemedicine-flexibilities-for-prescription-of-controlled [Accessed 5 Oct 2023].Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-21
Accepted: 2023-10-25
Published Online: 2023-11-20

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jom-2023-0215/html
Scroll to top button