Abstract
The paper examines the relationship between vowel quantity, syllable structure and lexical stress in Latin through a quantitative analysis carried out on a corpus of literary texts taken from Cicero’s Epistulae ad familiares and Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis. Each word of the corpus was split into syllables and phonemes. Then, the corpus was annotated with phonological and prosodic information pertaining to vowel length, syllable structure, stress and word length. Finally, the data collected were analyzed at different levels. The results are discussed in light of the findings of a previous analysis carried out on dictionary entries, confirming a close correlation between syllable structure and lexical stress, since the great majority of stressed syllables are heavy both in the literary corpus and in the dictionary. Moreover, long vowels are more frequently found in open and stressed syllables, particularly in paroxytones. The data suggest that the process leading to the loss of vowel quantity was already active (at least in some strata of Roman society) in the Latin of the Classical age, since a prosodic template similar to that occurring in many Romance developments emerges even in literary Latin texts.
References
Adams, James N. & Nigel Vincent. 2016. Early and Late Latin: Continuity or change? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316450826Search in Google Scholar
Allen, William S. 1978. Vox Latina: The pronunciation of Classical Latin, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620348Search in Google Scholar
Barchi, Serena & Lucia Tamponi. Forthcoming. Shaping shapes. Sicilicus and other diacritics in Latin epigraphy. In Giovanbattista Galdi, Simon Aerts & Alessandro Papini (eds.), Varietate delectamur: Multifarious approaches to synchronic and diachronic variation in Latin. Selected papers from the 14th International Colloquium on Late and Vulgar Latin (Ghent, 2022). Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In John A. Goldsmith (ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631201267.1996.00008.xSearch in Google Scholar
Cser, András. 2009. The phonology of Classical Latin. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
De Felice, Irene. 2018. Strutture sillabiche nel lessico latino. In Lidia Costamagna, Alessandro Marcaccio, Stefania Scaglione & Barbara Turchetta (eds.), Mutamento linguistico e biodiversità. Atti del XLI Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, 235–241. Roma: Il Calamo.Search in Google Scholar
Dietsch, Rudolf (ed.). 1911. M. Tulli Ciceronis Epistolae selectae. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Sam Rosenthall. 1999. Phonetics and phonology of main stress in Italian. Phonology 16. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675799003681.Search in Google Scholar
Fattori, Marco. 2021. What are we talking about when we talk about ‘iambic shortening’? A review of the primary evidence. Studi e Saggi Linguistici 59(2). 97–132.Search in Google Scholar
Fattori, Marco. 2022. Studi su accento e correptio iambica in Plauto. Bologna: Pàtron.Search in Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. 2011. Latin prosody and metrics. In James Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 92–104. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343397.ch7Search in Google Scholar
Herman, József. 1968. Statistique et diachronie: Essai sur l’évolution du vocalisme dans la latinité tardive. Word 24. 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1968.11435528.Search in Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1969. Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. Band 1: Einleitung und Vokalismus. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783111377377Search in Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano. 1956. La ‘geminatio vocalium’ nelle iscrizioni latine. Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa 25. 124–135.Search in Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2011. Syllable, segment and prosody. In Martin Maiden, John C. Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, 50–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.004Search in Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2015. Vowel length from Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1985. Modelli e misure ritmiche. La durata vocalica in italiano. Bologna: Zanichelli.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1999. The Latin syllable. In Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter (eds.), The syllable: Views and facts, 285–310. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110806793.285Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 2000. Sulla massimalità dei piedi trocaici: Il caso del latino. Lingua e Stile 35(3). 387–416.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 2006. L’algoritmo accentuale latino nel confronto di due teorie fonologiche. In Renato Oniga & Luigi Zennaro (eds.), Atti della Giornata di Linguistica Latina, 133–158. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 2015. Talking stones. Phonology in Latin inscriptions? Studi e Saggi Linguistici 58(2). 39–63.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 2016. Prosodic structure. In Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds.), The Oxford guide to the Romance languages, 484–494. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199677108.003.0026Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 2018. On Cicero’s fine-grained perception of the prosodic features in Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 17(2). 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2018-0007.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna & Irene De Felice. 2019. Patterns of prosodic distribution of Latin long vowels. In Nigel Holmes, Marijke Ottink, Josine Schrickx & Maria Selig (eds.), Lemmata linguistica latina. Vol. 1: Words and sounds, 436–452. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110647587-027Search in Google Scholar
Mester, Armin. 1994. The quantitative trochee in Latin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12. 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00992745.Search in Google Scholar
Müller, Konrad. 1995. Petronii Arbitri Satyricon reliquiae. Stuttgart & Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Pocket Oxford Latin Dictionary. 2012. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191739583.001.0001/acref-9780191739583 (accessed 1 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1975. Latin-Romance phonology: Prosodics and metrics. Munich: Fink.Search in Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1988. Non-linear phonology in diachronic perspective; stress and word structure in Latin and Italian. In Pier Marco Bertinetto & Michele Loporcaro (eds.), Certamen phonologicum. Papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting, 421–432. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Search in Google Scholar
Vineis, Edoardo. 1984. Problemi di ricostruzione della fonologia del latino volgare. In Edoardo Vineis (ed.), Latino volgare, latino medioevale, lingue romanze: Atti del convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, 45–62. Pisa: Giardini.Search in Google Scholar
Wesenberg, D. Albert. 1885. Marci Tullii Ciceronis epistolae, vol. 1. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael. 2009. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin (2020, 2nd edition). Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar
Winge, Johan. 2015. Automatic annotation of Latin vowel length. Uppsala: Uppsala University thesis. https://cl.lingfil.uu.se/exarb/arch/winge2015.pdf (accessed 1 June 2022).Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Multiplication, addition, and subtraction in numerals: formal variation in Latin’s decads+ from an Indo-European perspective
- A distributional analysis of vowel quantity in a corpus of Latin texts
- Eichner’s law in Latin, Greek and beyond: some neglected evidence
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Multiplication, addition, and subtraction in numerals: formal variation in Latin’s decads+ from an Indo-European perspective
- A distributional analysis of vowel quantity in a corpus of Latin texts
- Eichner’s law in Latin, Greek and beyond: some neglected evidence