Abstract
The comic poet Lucilius proposed several orthographic prescriptions in the ninth book of his Satirae, written in the period 115–110 BC. In dealing with this topic, Lucilius severely criticized Accius’ statements on orthography, refusing his proposals of doubling vowels (“geminatio vocalium”) and overgeneralization of <ei> for /i:/. Lucilius’ prescriptions, which were borrowed by the philosopher Nigidius Figulus a century later, clearly follow the iconical principles of the pseudo-Stoic συμπάσχειν-theory. In this paper a new interpretation of the orthographic iconicity in Lucilius’ and Nigidius’ doctrine is proposed, with reference to the case morphemes of *-ŏ- and *-ā- stems. As a matter of fact, “thickening” and “thinning” of the letter-forms (addĕre vs tenuāre, pinguis vs tenuis) can be satisfactorily explained only by taking account of <EI> and<I>spellings in a cursive script (namely <III> vs <I>). Finally, the key to explain the technical terms tenuis ‘thin’ vs pinguis ‘thick’ is traced back to an ancient metaphor of the wool-spinning practices.
References
Adams, J. N. 2016. An anthology of informal Latin 200 BC – AD 900. Fifty texts with translation and linguistic commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139626446Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, A. R. 1906. EI-readings in the Mss of Plautus. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 37. 73–86.10.2307/282702Search in Google Scholar
Ax, W. 2011. Quintilians Grammatik (“Inst. orat.” 1,4–8). Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110254556Search in Google Scholar
Belardi, W. 1984. Gli allofoni di /l/ latino dalla protostoria alla fase romanza. In W. Belardi,P. Cipriano, P. Di Giovine & M. Mancini (eds.), Studi latini e romanzi in memoria di Antonino Pagliaro, 63–110. Roma: Dipartimento Studi Glottoantropologici.Search in Google Scholar
Belardi, W. 1985. Filosofia grammatica e retorica nel pensiero antico. Roma: Ed. dell’Ateneo.Search in Google Scholar
Belardi, W. 1990. Aspetti del linguaggio e della lingua nel pensiero degli Stoici. III. Il fondamento del metodo etimologico di Trifone. Rendiconti Morali dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei s. 9, V, 1. 91–97.Search in Google Scholar
Belardi, W. & P. Cipriano. 1990. Casus interrogandi. Nigidio Figulo e la teoria stoica della lingua. Viterbo-Roma: Ist. di Studi Romanzi, Univ. Tuscia-Dipart. Studi Glottoantropol.-Univ. Sapienza.Search in Google Scholar
Bernardi Perini, G. 1982. Il sistema eterografico di Nigidio Figulo (frr. 35–38 Swoboda). Orpheus 3. 1–33.Search in Google Scholar
Bernardi Perini, G. 1983 [recte 1984]. Le riforme ortografiche latine di età repubblicana. AIΩN 5. 141–169.Search in Google Scholar
Bernardi Perini, G. 2008. Le Notti Attiche di Aulo Gellio. Vol. II. Torino: UTET.Search in Google Scholar
Biddau, F. 2008. Q. Terentii Scauri De orthographia, introduzione, testo critico e commento. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar
Bischoff, B. 1986. Latin palaeography. Antiquity and Middle Ages, 2nd rev. edn. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Brambach, W. 1868. Die Neugestaltung der lateinischen Orthographie in ihrem Verhältniss zur Schule. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Breed, B. W. 2018. Lucilius’ Books. In B. W. Breed, E. Keitel & R. Wallace (eds.), Lucilius and satire in second-century BC Rome, 57–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316995334.003Search in Google Scholar
Calboli, G. 1993. Cornifici Rhetorica ad Herennium. Introduzione, testo critico, commento, Seconda edn. Bologna: Pàtron.Search in Google Scholar
Cavazza, F. 1999. Aulo Gellio, Le Notti Attiche, Libro XIII, capitoli XIX–XXXI, introduzione, testo latino, traduzione e note. Bologna: Zanichelli.Search in Google Scholar
Cencetti, G. 1954. Lineamenti di storia della scrittura latina. Bologna: Pàtron.Search in Google Scholar
Cencetti, G. 1970 [1940]. Gli archivi dell’antica Roma nell’età repubblicana, in Id. Scritti archivistici, 171–220. Roma: Il Centro di Ricerca Editore.Search in Google Scholar
Cencetti, G. 1995 [1957]. Ricerche sulla scrittura latina nell’età arcaica. In Id. Scritti di paleografia, 135–169. Dietikon-Zürich: Urs Graf.Search in Google Scholar
Chahoud, A. 2019. Lucilius on Latin spelling, grammar, and usage. In G. Pezzini & B. Taylor (eds.), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World, 46–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108671972.003Search in Google Scholar
Charpin, F. 2002. Lucilius, Satires. t. II. Livres IX–XXVIII. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Cipriano, P. 1985. La scrittura dei fonemi di timbro [i] secondo Nigidio Figulo e Varrone. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 70. 38–49.Search in Google Scholar
Clackson, J. & G. Horrocks. 2007. The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Colson, F. H. 1921. The fragments of Lucilius IX. on ei and i. The Classical Quarterly 15. 11–17.10.1017/S000983880000029XSearch in Google Scholar
Corssen, W. 1868. Über Aussprache, Vokalismus und Betonung der lateinischen Sprache. Zweite umgearb. Ausg. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Dangel, J. 1990. Accius grammairien? Latomus 49. 35–58.10.3719/weed.35.Suppl_49Search in Google Scholar
Della Casa, A. 1962. Nigidio Figulo. Roma: Ed. dell’Ateneo.Search in Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1981. La filologia latina dalle origini a Varrone, 2a ed. riveduta. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar
De Martino, M. 2004. La connotazione grafica di Catone per /-M#/ secondo Quintiliano, Inst. Or., I, 7, 23 e IX, 4, 39: un “falso malinteso”? Indog Forsch 109. 269–310.10.1515/16130405.269Search in Google Scholar
De Martino, M. 2006. Noctes Atticae, XIII, 26 e il presunto “equivoco” di Gellio: riaperto il caso del “casus interrogandi”. Indog Forsch 111. 192–226.10.1515/9783110186505.192Search in Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. 2010a. L’insegnamento dell’ortografia latina fra Tardoantico e alto Medioevo: teorie e manuali. In L. Del Corso & O. Pecere (eds.), Libri di scuola e pratiche didattiche. Dall’Antichità al Rinascimento. t. I., 229–291. Cassino: Ed. Univ. di Cassino.Search in Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. 2010b. Problemi di grafia e pronunzia del latino nella trattatistica ortografica tardoantica. In P. Anreiter & M. Kienpointner (eds.), Latin linguistics today, 57–74. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität.Search in Google Scholar
De Paolis, P. 2013. Recta scriptura e recte scribendi scientia: l’ortografia latina in epoca imperiale fra prassi e insegnamento. In F. Biddau (ed.), Die Geheimen Mächte hinter der Rechtschreibung. L’ortografia e i suoi poteri forti. Erfahrungen im Vergleich. Esperienze a confronto, 35–53. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Desbordes, F. 1990. Idées romaines sur l’écriture. Lille: Presses Univ. de Lille.Search in Google Scholar
Di Napoli, M. 2011. Velii Longi De orthographia, introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Hildesheim: Weidmann.Search in Google Scholar
Eussner, A. 1886a. Rev. of Hertz 1884–1885. Wochenschrift f. klassische Philologie, 3. Jahrg.n. 13. 389–396.Search in Google Scholar
Eussner, A. 1886b. Rev. of Hertz 1885. Literarisches Centralblattt f. Deutschland, Jhg. 1886n. 14. 474–476.Search in Google Scholar
Fiske, G. C. 1920. Lucilius and Horace. A study in the classical theory of imitation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Search in Google Scholar
Funaioli, H. 1907. Grammaticae Romanae fragmenta. Vol. prius. Lipsiae: in aed. Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Garcea, A. 2002. César et l’alphabet: un fragment du. De Analogia. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 24. 147–164.10.3406/hel.2002.2176Search in Google Scholar
Garcea, A. 2019. Nigidius Figulus’ naturalism between grammar and philosophy. In G. Pezzini & B. Taylor (eds.), Language and Nature in the Classical Roman World, 79–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108671972.004Search in Google Scholar
Goidànich, P. G. 1906. Note di esegesi e critica di testi grammaticali latini. Rivista di Filologia e d’Istruzione Classica 34. 35–56.Search in Google Scholar
Havet, L. 1911. Manuel de critique verbal appliquée aux textes latins. Paris: Hachette & Cie.Search in Google Scholar
Hertz, M. 1872. Auli Gellii Noctium Atticarum libri XX. Volumen alterum. Lipsiae: sumpt. et typis Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Hertz, M. 1885. Auli Gellii Noctium Atticarum libri XX. Pars posterius. Berolini: impensis Wilh. Hertz (Libreriae Besserianae).Search in Google Scholar
Hertz, M. 1886. Auli Gellii Noctium Atticarum libri XX. Editio minor altera. 2 voll. Lipsiae: in aed. Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Hertz, M. 1894. Supplementum apparatus Gelliani. Jahrbuucher für classische Philologie. 21. Supplement. Leipzig: Teubner. 1–48.Search in Google Scholar
Hosius, C. 1903. A. Gellii Noctium Atticarum libri XX. Vol. alterum. Lipsiae: in aedibus Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Kent, R. G. 1911. Lucilius on EI and I. The American Journal of Philology 32. 272–293.10.2307/288617Search in Google Scholar
Kent, R. G. 1913. Zu den orthographischen Regeln des Lucilius. Glotta 4. 299–302.Search in Google Scholar
Krenkel, W. 1970. Lucilius, Satiren lat. u. deutsch. 1. Teil. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004663596Search in Google Scholar
Lazzeroni, R. 1997 [1956]. La geminatio vocalium nelle iscrizioni latine. In Id. Scritti scelti, 279–292. Pisa: Giardini.Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, A. 2010. La philologie romaine archaïque. Avènement, développement, prolongements. Berlin: Éd. univ. européennes.Search in Google Scholar
Leumann, M. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 5. Aufl. Neuausg. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. 1894. The Latin language. An historical account of Latin sounds, stems, and flexions. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar
Lo Monaco, F. 2012. Cicerone palinsesto. In P. De Paolis (ed.), Manoscritti e lettori di Cicerone tra Medioevo e Umanesimo. Atti del III Simposio Ciceroniano, 1–20. Cassino: Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale-Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia.Search in Google Scholar
Lommatzsch, E. 1908. Zur lateinischen Orthographie: ei für ī auf lateininischen Inschriften der Kaiserzeit. Archiv f. lateinische Lexikographie u. Grammatik mit Einschluss des älteren Mittellateins 15. 129–137.Search in Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. 2015. Vowel length from Latin to Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656554.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mackensen, L. 1896. De Verrii Flacci libris orthographicis. Commentationes Philologae Ienenses 6(2). 1–62. Lipsiae: in aedibus Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2006. “Dilatandis litteris”: uno studio su Cicerone e la pronunzia rustica. In R. Bombi, G. Cifoletti, F. Fusco, L. Innocente & V. Orioles (eds.), Studi linguistici in onore di Roberto Gusmani, 1023–1046. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2008 [recte 2010]. Scritture e lingue nel Lazio protostorico e nell’ager Faliscus: un bilancio. AIΩN 30(III). 193–297.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2015. Ricerche sulla prosodia del latino d’Africa. Studi e Saggi linguistici 53. 355–397.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2016. I grammatici, lo standard e il latino arcaico. In M. Benedetti, C. Bruno, P. Dardano & L. Tronci (eds.), Grammatiche e grammatici. Teorie, testi e contesti, 85–140. Roma: Il Calamo.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2018a. Essai de stratigraphie linguistique de la Lex XII tabularum. De Lingua Latina, Revue de linguistique latine du Centre Alfred Ernout [En ligne] 16. 1–41.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2018b. Capitoli di grafemica altomedioevale: l’onomastica alfabetica e i trattati De litteris. In G. Ligi, G. Pedrini & F. Tamisari (eds.), Un accademico impaziente. Studi in onore di Glauco Sanga, 425–494. Alessandria: Ed. dell’Orso.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. 2019. Repertori grafici e regole d’uso: il caso del latino<xs>. In L. Agostiniani & M. P. Marchese (eds.), Lingua, testi, storia. Atti della Giornata di Studi in ricordo di Aldo Luigi Prosdocimi, 13–54. Roma: Giorgio Bretschneider.Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. in press a. Linguistica e critica testuale: Nigidio Figulo, fr. 9 Swoboda. Rivista di Filologia e d’Istruzione Classica.10.1484/J.RFIC.5.123628Search in Google Scholar
Mancini, M. in press b. Sui frammenti ortografici di Lucilio: a proposito di alcuni lavori recenti. Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese.Search in Google Scholar
Marache, R. 2002. Aulu-Gelle, Les Nuits Attiques. Livres XI–XV. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. 1960. Studi luciliani. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. 1967. Marii Victorini Ars grammatica. Introduzione, testo critico e commento. Firenze: Le Monnier.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, G. 2018a. On Cicero’s fine-grained perception of the prosodic features in Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 17. 259–278.10.1515/joll-2018-0007Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, G. 2018b. Sul contrasto di quantità vocalica in latino. In R. Bombi & F. Costantini (eds.), Percorsi linguistici e interlinguistici. Studi in onore di Vincenzo Orioles, 397–412. Udine: Forum.Search in Google Scholar
Marouzeau, J. 1910. La graphie EI=I dans le palimpseste de Plaute. In Mélanges offerts à M. Émile Chatelain, 150–154. Paris: Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Marshall, P. K. 1968. A. Gellii Noctes Atticae. 2 voll. Oxonii: e Typographeo Clarendoniano.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, F. 1894. Incerti auctoris de ratione dicendi ad C. Herennium libri IV [M. Tulli Ciceronis ad Herennium libri VI]. Lipsiae: in aed. Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, F. 1904. C. Lucilii carminum reliquiae. Vol. prius. Prolegomena testimonia fasti Luciliani carminum reliquiae indices. Lipsiae: in aed. Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Marx, F. 1905. C. Lucilii carminum reliquiae. Vol. posterius. Commentarius. Lipsiae: in aed. Teubneri.Search in Google Scholar
Nettleship, H. 1886. The study of Latin grammar among the Romans in the first century AD. The Journal of Philology 16. 189–214.10.1017/CBO9781139523684.035Search in Google Scholar
Niedermann, M. 1953. Phonétique historique du latin, IVème éd. revue et augm. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Ch. S. 1980. Semiotica. I fondamenti della semiotica cognitiva. Testi scelti e introdotti da M. Bonfantini, L. Grassi & R. Grazie. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Pepe, L. 1943. Accio, Lucilio e la “geminatio”. Studi italiani di filol classica 20. 105–120.Search in Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. 1999. The language of Early Roman satire: Its functions and characteristics. Proceedings of the British Academy 93. 289–310.Search in Google Scholar
Pisani, V. 1960. Casus interrrogandi. In Hommages à Léon Herrmann, 624–638. Bruxelles & Berchem: Latomus.Search in Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. 2018. Another image of literary Latin language variation and the aims of Lucilius’ satires. In B. W. Breed, E. Keitel & R. Wallace (eds.), Lucilius and satire in second-century BC Rome, 81–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316995334.004Search in Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. & C. Santini. 1999. Orale e scritto. In P. Poccetti, D. Poli & C. Santini (eds.), Una storia della lingua latina. Formazione, usi, comunicazione, 173–234. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, A. L. 1990. Insegnamento e apprendimento della scrittura nell’Italia antica. In M. Pandolfini & A. L. Prosdocimi (eds.), Alfabetari e insegnamento della scrittura in Etruria e nell’Italia antica, 155–301. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, A. L. 2002. Le riforme ortografiche e il (ri)farsi della lingua poetica: da scriba a poeta. In L. Del Tutto, A. L. Prosdocimi & G. Rocca (eds.), Lingua e cultura intorno al 295 a.C.: tra Roma e gli Italici del Nord, 226–251. Roma: Il Calamo.Search in Google Scholar
Ritschl, F. 1878. Kleine philologischer Schriften. IV. Zur lateinischen Inschriften- und Sprachkunde. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar
Rolfe, John C. 1927. Gellius, Attic Nights, Books VI–XIII. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rovai, F. 2016. A proposito di dicae e faciae (Quint. Inst. I 7,11; IX 4,39). Studi e Saggi ling 54. 65–89.Search in Google Scholar
Rusca, L. 2007. Aulo Gellio Notti attiche, lI libri XI–XX. Quinta ediz. Milano: Rizzoli.Search in Google Scholar
Siebenborn, E. 1976. Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien. Studien zur antiken normativen Grammatik. Amsterdam: Grüner.Search in Google Scholar
Skutsch, F. 1909. Lateinische Pronominalflexion. Glotta 1. 303–322.Search in Google Scholar
Somerville, T. 2007. The orthography of the New Gallus and the spelling rules of Lucilius. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 160. 59–64.Search in Google Scholar
Sommer, F. 1909. Lucilius als Grammatiker. Hermes 44. 70–77.Search in Google Scholar
Sommer, F. & R. Pfister. 1977. Handbuch der lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre. Eine Einführung in das sprachwissenschaftliche Studium des Lateins, 4. neubarb. Aufl. Band I: Einleitung und Lautlehre. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Strzelecki, L. 1942. Orthographie B. Lateinisch. In A. Pauly, G. Wissowa, W. Kroll, K. Witte, K. Mittelhaus & K. Ziegler (eds.), Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft: neue Bearbeitung. Vol. 18 2, 1456–1484. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Search in Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E. H. 1940. The pronunciation of Greek and Latin, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America & University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar
Swoboda, A. 1889. P. Nigidii Figuli operum reliquiae, collegit emendavit enarravit quaestiones Nigidianas praemisit. Pragae-Vindobonae-Lipsiae: F. Tempsky-G. Freytag.Search in Google Scholar
Traglia, A. 1978. Etimologia e sinonimia in Nigidio Figulo. In J. Collart (ed.), Varron grammaire antique et stylistique latine, 273–289. Paris: Soc. Éd. “Les Belles Lettres”.Search in Google Scholar
Vine, B. 1993. Studies in archaic Latin inscriptions. Innsbruck: Institut f. Sprachwiss. der Universitäts Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Wachter, R. 2013. Die Entstehung der lateinischen Orthographie im 3. bis 1. Jh. v. Chr. In F. Biddau (ed.), Die Geheimen Mächte hinter der Rechtschreibung. L’ortografia e i suoi poteri forti. Erfahrungen im Vergleich. Esperienze a confronto, 13–33. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Wallace, R. 2011. The Latin alphabet and orthography. In J. Clackson (ed.), A companion to the Latin language, 9–28. Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343397.ch2Search in Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. 1961. Remains of Old Latin. III. Lucilius The Twelve Tables. London & Cambridge, MA: W. Heinimann Ltd & Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Weiss, M. 2009. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor & New York: Beech-Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2018. Critics, compilers, and commentators. An introduction to Roman philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Lucilius and Nigidius Figulus on orthographic iconicity
- Latin learning and instruction as a research field
- Reading, seeing and understanding Latin
- Rethinking the teaching of Latin in the inclusive school
- Staying the distance: Transforming Latin pedagogy at the Open University
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Lucilius and Nigidius Figulus on orthographic iconicity
- Latin learning and instruction as a research field
- Reading, seeing and understanding Latin
- Rethinking the teaching of Latin in the inclusive school
- Staying the distance: Transforming Latin pedagogy at the Open University