Genitivus of denomination with nomen, cognomen and praenomen
-
Felicia Logozzo
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to collect and classify the occurrences of genitivus of denomination with praenomen, nomen, cognomen, in significant literary and epigraphic texts of the Latin literature and epigraphy, investigating the complex relation between syntax and semantics starting from the idea of “constructional gradience,” and thus to highlight the different behaviors of local and personal names.
Appendix
Genitivi of denomination from the analyzed corpus (not already quoted in the paper)
Valerius Maximus, Memorabilia
1, 8, 10 Coelae Euboeae nomen obtinet
3, 3, 1 cum aeternae gloriae cognomine Scaeuolae reddidit
4, 1, 4 Publicolae nomen adesecutus est
4, 3, ext. 4 cognomen Invicti adsecutus
4, 4, 10 cognomen Dotatae invenerit
5, 10 ext. 1 ad Olympii Iouis cognomen ascendit
6, 9, 4 cognomen Allobrogici sibimet ac posteris peperit
8, 5, 6 Isaurici cognomen adiecit
8, 15, 5 Coruini cognomen usurpat
9, 14, 4 alter … cognomen Spintheris traxit, alter
Velleius Patercolus, Historiae
1, 11, 2 cui ex uirtute Macedonici nomen inditum erat
2, 5, 1 Gallaeci cognomen meruit
2, 11, 2 meritum ex uirtute ei cognomen Numidici inditum
2, 15, 3 qui meritum cognomen Pii consecutus erat
2, 27, 5 Felicis nomen adsumpsit
2, 96, 1 Gai ac Lucii nominibus adoptauerat
Tacitus, Historiae
1, 47 decernitur Othoni tribunicia potestas et nomen Augusti
1, 62 nomen Germanici Vitellio additum
1, 89 Augustae nomine honoravit
2, 90 abnuentique nomen Augusti
2, 96 suppresso Vespasiani nomine
Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae
16, 5, 2 cui Censorii cognomentum indidit
16, 12, 25 ad Serapionis transtulit nomen
16, 12, 32 Caesaris nomen suscepi
17, 13, 33 Sarmatici cognomentum
22, 12, 2 inserere Parthici cognomentum ardebat
26, 6, 20 Pseudophilippi nomen euectus
31, 10, 20 per castra, quibus Felicis Arboris nomen est
References
Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Adams, James N. 1976. A typological approach to Latin word order. Indogermanische Forschungen 81. 70–99.Suche in Google Scholar
Baron, Irène, Michael Herslund & Finn Sørensen. 2001. Dimensions of possession. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.47Suche in Google Scholar
Bennett, Charles E. 1914. Syntax of Early Latin, vol. 2: The cases. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Suche in Google Scholar
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1983. Genitive and dative possessors in Latin. In Simon C. Dik (ed.), Advances in functional grammar, 55–91. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar
Cipriano, Palmira. 1988. Nomen. In Enciclopedia Virgiliana, vol. 4. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Suche in Google Scholar
Crane, Gregory (dir.). 1987-. PDL=Perseus Digital Library. Medford/Somerville (MA): Tufts University. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/.Suche in Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens. 2006. Latin word order. Structured meaning and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181685.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Francois Thomas. 1953. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Gross, Gaston & Sophie de Pontonx (eds.). 2004. Verbes supports: Nouvel état des lieux. Special issue of Linguisticae Investigationes 27 (2). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/li.27.2Suche in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession. Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 83]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581908Suche in Google Scholar
Jezek, Elisabetta. 2004. Types et degrés de verbes supports en italien. In G. Gross & S. de Pontonx (eds.), Verbes supports: Nouvel état des lieux. Special issue of Linguisticae Investigationes 27 (2), 185–201. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/li.27.2.04jezSuche in Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. 2003. Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In Frans Plank (ed.), Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe, 621–722. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197075.4.621Suche in Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. 2004. “Maria’s ring of gold”: Adnominal possession and non-anchoring relations in the European languages. In Ji-yung Kim, Barbara H. Partee & Yury A. Lander (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 155–181. Amherst, MA: BookSurge Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Karl F. Stegmann. 1912. Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache II, vol. 1. Hannover: Hansche Buchhandlung.Suche in Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu, Johann B. Hofmann & Anton Szantyr. 1963. Lateinische Grammatik. Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Suche in Google Scholar
Longrée, Dominique. 1990. À propos du concept d’apposition: Les constructions rex Ancus et urbs Roma. L’Information Grammaticale 45. 8–13.10.3406/igram.1990.1947Suche in Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta. 2011. Coexisting structures and competing functions in genitive word order. In Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds.), The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, variation, and change, 223–240. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.171.15magSuche in Google Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta. 2013. Synchronic gradience and language change in Latin genitive constructions. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 177–199. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.133.08magSuche in Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules. 1922. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine, Tome I: Les groupes nominaux. Paris: Champion.Suche in Google Scholar
Orlandini, Anna. 1995. Il riferimento del nome. Un’analisi semantico-pragmatica del nome latino. Bologna: CLUEB.Suche in Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, Aldo Luigi. 1989. Appunti per una teoria del nome proprio. In Alessandra Avanzini (ed.), Problemi di onomastica semitica meridionale, 15–70. Pisa: Giardini. (=In Scritti inediti e sparsi, I. Padova: Unipress. 2004. 335–396).Suche in Google Scholar
Prosdocimi, Aldo Luigi. 2015. Le Tavole Iguvine, II. Preliminari all’interpretazione. La testualità: Fatti e metodi. Firenze: Olschki.Suche in Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1977. Constraints on coordination. Language 53. 269–281.10.2307/413057Suche in Google Scholar
Serbat, Guy. 1996. Grammaire fondamentale du Latin VI. Louvain: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga. 2014. The noun phrase in Classical Latin prose. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004265684Suche in Google Scholar
Springer, Lawrence A. 1958. Aulus Gellius: On historical and descriptive linguistics. The Classical Journal 54 (3). 121–128.Suche in Google Scholar
Urbanová, Daniela & Juraj Franek. Forthcoming. Il campo semantico di “nomen” nelle tavole defixionum. In Proceedings of Latin Vulgaire – Latin Tardif, 11th International Conference on Late and Vulgar Latin, Oviedo (September 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Viti, Carlotta. 2010. Observations on genitive word order in Latin. In Olga Spevak (ed.), Le syntagme nominal en latin. Nouvelles contributions Actes de l’atelier du Centre Alfred Ernout, Université de Paris-Sorbonne, 11 octobre 2008, 73–92. Paris: Harmattan.Suche in Google Scholar
Wünsch, Richard. 1914. Anmerkungen zur lateinischen Syntax. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 69. 123–138.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Quintilian and the progymnasmata to develop writing ability and gather communication rules
- Genitivus of denomination with nomen, cognomen and praenomen
- “Depraved subjects and the maliciousness of objects,” i.e. quirky objects
- The dico form: An autonymous marker
- Septimus casus: the history of a misunderstanding from Varro to the late Latin grammarians
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Quintilian and the progymnasmata to develop writing ability and gather communication rules
- Genitivus of denomination with nomen, cognomen and praenomen
- “Depraved subjects and the maliciousness of objects,” i.e. quirky objects
- The dico form: An autonymous marker
- Septimus casus: the history of a misunderstanding from Varro to the late Latin grammarians
