Security challenges from physical to network layers in satellite free-space optical communication
-
Indu Bala
Abstract
Satellite-based free-space optical (FSO) communication has emerged as a transformative paradigm, offering spectrum-efficient connectivity with ultra-high bandwidth to support bandwidth-intensive applications and enable global coverage. As compared to the conventional RF systems, FSO provides distinct advantages such as high data rates, interference immunity, and license-free operation. Despite its unique characteristics like narrow optical beams, dynamic orbital environments, and increasing architectural complexity, there exist diverse security vulnerabilities across multiple protocol layers. In this paper, a comprehensive review on the security issues in satellite FSO systems, spanning the physical, data link, and network layers is provided. Critical threats and vulnerabilities at each layer are analyzed, followed by a discussion of state-of-the-art countermeasures, including physical-layer security mechanisms, adaptive beam control, advanced cryptographic schemes, quantum key distribution, and AI-driven anomaly detection. Key challenges, such as scalability, trust management, atmospheric impairments, and post-quantum security, are also highlighted as pressing concerns for future FSO networks. Furthermore, the chapter offers insights and design recommendations for developing intelligent, secure, and resilient satellite-based FSO communication infrastructures capable of addressing evolving cyber security threats while maintaining high performance.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Kumari, M, Arya, V, Realization of high-speed OWC links by incorporating hybrid OCDMA and MDM scheme for HAP-to-satellite applications, Opt Quant Electron, 56, 546, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-06226-1, 2024.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Sliti, M, Mrabet, M, Ammar, L. A survey of jamming vulnerabilities in free space optical communication systems and mitigation techniques. Opt Quant Electron 2024;56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06356-0.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Kumari, M, Banawan, M, Arya, V, Mishra, SK. Investigation of OFDM-based HS-PON using front-end LiFiSystem for 5G networks. Photonics 2023;10:1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10121384.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Mrabet, M, Sliti, M. Performance analysis of FSO communications in desert environments. Opt Quant Electron 2024;56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-024-06315-9.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Shiu, YS, Chang, S, Wu, H-C, Huang, S, Chen, H-H. Physical layer security in wireless networks: a tutorial. IEEE Wireless Commun 2011;18:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/mwc.2011.5751298.Suche in Google Scholar
6. H Kaushal, VK Jain, S Kar, Free space optical communication. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3691-7.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Kaushal, H, Kaddoum, G. Optical communication in space: challenges and mitigation techniques. Commun Surv Tutorials, IEEE 2016;19:57–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2016.2603518.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Lopez-Martinez, FJ, Gomez, G, Garrido-Balsells, JM. Physical-layer security in free-space optical communications. IEEE Photon J 2015;7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2015.2402158.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Li, B, Fei, Z, Zhou, C, Zhang, Y. Physical-layer security in space information networks: a survey. IEEE Internet Things J 2019;7:33–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2019.2943900.Suche in Google Scholar
10. Zou, D, Xu, Z. Information security risks outside the laser beam in terrestrial free-space optical communication. IEEE Photon J 2016;8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2016.2607699.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Kaymak, Y, Rojas-Cessa, R, Feng, J, Ansari, N, Zhou, M, Zhang, T, et al.. A survey on acquisition, tracking, and pointing mechanisms for mobile free-space optical communications. Commun Surv Tutorials IEEE 2018;20:1104–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2018.2804323.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Garai, M, Sliti, M, Elfikky, A. Ground-to-satellite FSO communication: evaluating modulation techniques under cloud and turbulence. Jordanian Int J Comput Inf Technol 2025;11:.10.5455/jjcit.71-1735327157Suche in Google Scholar
13. Churnside, JH. Aperture averaging of optical scintillations in the turbulent atmosphere. Appl Opt 19821991;30. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.30.001982.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Khalighi, MA. Challenges and solutions in free-space optical satellite networks. Commun Surv Tutorials IEEE 2022;24:512–50.Suche in Google Scholar
15. M Sliti, W Abdallah. Jamming attack detection in optical UAV networks. In: 2018 20th international conference on transparent optical networks (ICTON). Bucharest, Romania: IEEE; 2018:1–5 pp.10.1109/ICTON.2018.8473921Suche in Google Scholar
16. Arya, V, Garg, T, Al-Khafaji, HMR. SIW leaky wave antenna for THz applications. Electronics 2023;12:1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081839.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Amirabadi, MA, Kahaei, MH, Nezamalhosseini, SA. Deep learning based detection technique for FSO communication systems. Phys Commun 2020;43:101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2020.101229.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Qi, X, Ma, J, Wu, D, Liu, L, Hu, S. A survey of routing techniques for satellite networks. Int J Commun Network Inf 2016;1:66–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03391581.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Zhuo, M, Liu, L, Zhou, S, Tian, Z. Survey on security issues of routing and anomaly detection for space information networks. Sci Rep 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01638-z.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Tedeschi, P, Sciancalepore, S, Di Pietro, R. Satellite-based communications security: a survey of threats, solutions, and research challenges. Comput Netw 2022;216:109246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109246.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Wei, X, Yuan, J, Hu, R, Wang, H, Liu, X, Liu, D, et al.. BiTrust: hybrid trust management for secure data transmission in LEO satellite networks. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2025.3567619.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Trinh, PV. Quantum-secured routing for space optical networks. J Opt Commun Netw IEEE/OSA 2022;14:678–91.Suche in Google Scholar
23. Arya, V. Robust image compression algorithm using discrete fractional cosine transform. WSEAS Trans Syst Control 2022;17:25–33. https://doi.org/10.37394/23203.2022.17.3.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Kaushal, H. Handover management in LEO satellite networks: a security perspective. IEEE Trans Aero Electron Syst 2022;58:1024–39.Suche in Google Scholar
25. NIST. Post-quantum cryptography standardization. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2023:800–208 pp.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Giambene, G. Scalable key management for mega-constellations. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 2022;21:3456–70.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Zhang, Y. Blockchain-based decentralized authentication for satellite networks. IEEE Internet Things J 2022;9:9876–90.10.1109/JIOT.2022.3161047Suche in Google Scholar
28. Shor, PW. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms. SIAM J Comput 1997;26:1484–509. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0097539795293172.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Liao, SK, Cai, WQ, Liu, WY, Zhang, L, Li, Y, Ren, JG, et al.. Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 2017;549:43–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23655.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
30. 3GPP. Integration of non-terrestrial networks in 5G security. Technical Report 2023;33.926.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Boneh, D, Franklin, M. Identity-based encryption from the weil pairing 2001;2139:213–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44647_13. CRYPTO 2001, LNCS.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Xiao, L. AI-Driven adaptive key management for satellite networks. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2023;18:1125–39.Suche in Google Scholar
33. Djordjevic, GT. Physical-layer authentication for FSO communications. IEEE Photon J 2022;14:1–14.Suche in Google Scholar
34. Huang, K, Carulli, JM, Makris, Y. Counterfeit electronics: a rising threat in the semiconductor manufacturing industry. 2013 IEEE international test conference (ITC); 2013:1–4.10.1109/TEST.2013.6651880Suche in Google Scholar
35. Ruhrmair, U, Van Dijk, M. PUFs in security protocols: attack models and security evaluations. IEEE Symp Secur Priv 2013:286–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2013.27 Suche in Google Scholar
36. Kocher, P, Horn, J, Fogh, A, Genkin, D, Gruss, D, Haas, W, et al.. Spectre attacks: exploiting speculative execution. IEEE Symp Secur Priv 2019:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/sp.2019.00002 Suche in Google Scholar
37. Arteaga-Diaz, P, Cano, D, Fernandez, V. Practical side-channel attack on free-space QKD systems with misaligned sources and countermeasures. IEEE Access 2022;10:82697–705. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3196677.Suche in Google Scholar
38. Yu, FTS, Tai, A. Information leakage through a passive optical channel. Opt Commun 1975;14:51–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(75)90056-5.Suche in Google Scholar
39. Blatt, T. Anti-satellite weapons and the emerging space arms race. Harv Int Rev 2020;41:29–34.Suche in Google Scholar
40. Vorontsov, M, Weyrauch, T, Carhart, G, Beresnev, L. Adaptive optics for free space laser communications. Lasers, Sources, and Related Photonic Devices 2010:LSMA1. https://doi.org/10.1364/lsc.2010.lsma1.Suche in Google Scholar
41. Huffmire, T. FPGA security: from features to capabilities. IEEE Security & Privacy 2021;19:76–85.10.1109/MSEC.2021.3077374Suche in Google Scholar
42. Zhou, L. FPGA-based beam steering for secure FSO links. IEEE Photon Technol Lett 2022;34:423–6.Suche in Google Scholar
43. Guri, M. Air-gap electromagnetic covert channel. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 2023;21:2127–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdsc.2023.3300035.Suche in Google Scholar
44. Siddique, IM. Detection and analysis of anomalous behavior in on-orbit satellites using AI algorithms. Deleted Journal 2024;2:6–17. https://doi.org/10.48001/jofsn.2024.226-17.Suche in Google Scholar
45. Krelina, M. The prospect of quantum technologies in space for defence and security. Space Policy 2023;65:101563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2023.101563.Suche in Google Scholar
46. Arya, V, Kumari, M, Sharma, N, Singh, P. Investigation of VLLC-OCDM system for intelligent transport applications. 2023 3rd Asian conference on innovation in technology (ASIANCON). India: Ravet IN; 2023:1–4.10.1109/ASIANCON58793.2023.10270601Suche in Google Scholar
47. Falco, G, Gordon, NG. A zero-trust satellite services marketplace enabling space infrastructure as a service. IEEE Access 2024;12:71066–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3403483.Suche in Google Scholar
48. Arya, V, Garg, T. Leaky wave antenna: past and present. In: Singh Mer, KK, Semwal, VB, Bijalwan, V Crespo, RG. (eds) Proceedings of Integrated Intelligence Enable Networks and Computing. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Singapore: Springer; 2021.10.1007/978-981-33-6307-6_24Suche in Google Scholar
49. Yeh, C-H, Chang, Y-J, Chow, C-W, Lin, W-P. Utilizing polarization-multiplexing for free space optical communication transmission with security operation. Opt Fiber Technol 2019;52:101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2019.101992.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
