A comprehensive review on underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) systems: present and future prospective
-
Vivek Arya
Abstract
Underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) is a compelling technology for a small, high-speed, and cost-effective underwater communication solution due to its low latency, high bandwidth, and enhanced security attributes. UWOC is a widely accepted technology in several maritime industrial services, significantly contributing to the early detection of floods, tsunamis, natural calamities, real-time data streaming, and military/naval tactical operations. Thus, in this work, a comprehensive review on UWOC systems is studied considering the impact of path loss owing to water turbulence, misalignment, and attenuation effects. A deep study of existing work, its architecture, challenges, applications, and future scope is illustrated. This study realized that UWOC scenarios can be regarded as a substitute to fulfill the need of high throughput and huge data communications like imaging, video transmission, real-time, high-speed sensor networks, etc.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.
References
1. Kariya, A, Tanaka, K, Kobori, F, Kuwahara, K, Hayashida, S, Kodama, T. Class 1 eye-safe formally invisible underwater optical wireless communication system. IEEE Photon J 2024;16:7302812. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2024.3426284.Search in Google Scholar
2. Al-Kinani, A, Wang, CX, Zhou, L, Zhang, W. Optical wireless communication channel measurements and models. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2018;20:1939–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2018.2838096.Search in Google Scholar
3. Garg, AK, Janyani, V, Batagelj, B, Zainol Abidin, NH, Abu Bakar, MH. Hybrid FSO/fiber optic link based reliable & energy efficient WDM optical network architecture. Opt Fiber Technol 2021;61:102422.10.1016/j.yofte.2020.102422Search in Google Scholar
4. Saeed, N, Celik, A, Alouini, MS, Al-Naffouri, TY. Performance analysis of connectivity and localization in multi-hop underwater optical wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 2019;18:2604–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2018.2878672.Search in Google Scholar
5. Abdelhady, AM, Amin, O, Alouini, MS, Shihada, B. Revolutionizing optical wireless communications via smart optics. IEEE Open J Commun Soc 2022;3:654–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3164790.Search in Google Scholar
6. Salam, R, Srivastava, A, Bohara, VA, Ashok, A. An optical intelligent reflecting surface-assisted underwater wireless communication system. IEEE Open J Commun Soc 2023;4:1774–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/ojcoms.2023.3303190.Search in Google Scholar
7. Willner, AE, Zhou, H, Su, X, Song, H, Pang, K, Song, H. Utilizing structured modal beams in free-space optical communications for performance enhancement. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 2023;29:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstqe.2023.3306636.Search in Google Scholar
8. Kumar, LB, Krishnan, P. Multi-hop convergent FSO-UWOC system to establish a reliable communication link between the islands. Opt Commun 2020;474:126107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126107.Search in Google Scholar
9. Imoize, AL, Adedeji, O, Tandiya, N, Shetty, S. 6G Enabled smart infrastructure for sustainable society: opportunities, challenges, and research roadmap. Sensors 2021;21:1–58.10.3390/s21051709Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Kanellopoulos, D, Sharma, VK, Panagiotakopoulos, T, Kameas, A. Networking architectures and protocols for iot applications in smart cities: recent developments and perspectives. Electron 2023;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12112490.Search in Google Scholar
11. Plastras, S, Tsoumatidis, D, Skoutas, DN, Rouskas, A, Kormentzas, G, Skianis, C. Non-terrestrial networks for energy-efficient connectivity of remote IoT devices in the 6G era: a survey. Sensors 2024;24:1–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24041227.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
12. Zhang, J, Gao, G, Wang, B, Guan, X, Yin, L, Chen, J, et al.. Background noise resistant underwater wireless optical communication using faraday atomic line laser and filter. J Light Technol 2022;40:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2021.3118447.Search in Google Scholar
13. Chen, Z, Tang, X, Sun, C, Li, Z, Shi, W, Wang, H, et al.. Experimental demonstration of over 14 AL underwater wireless optical communication. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2021;33:173–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2020.3048786.Search in Google Scholar
14. Zhang, Z, Lai, Y, Lv, J, Liu, P, Teng, D, Wang, G, et al.. Over 700 MHz –3 dB bandwidth UOWC system based on blue HV-LED with T-Bridge pre-equalizer. IEEE Photon J 2019;11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2019.2910090.Search in Google Scholar
15. Zhang, Y, Wei, Z, Liu, Z, Cheng, C, Wang, Z, Tang, X, et al.. Optical communication and positioning convergence for flexible underwater wireless sensor network. J Light Technol 2023;41:5321–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2023.3264023.Search in Google Scholar
16. Uppalapati, A, Naik, RP, Krishnan, P. Analysis of M-QAM modulated underwater wireless optical communication system for reconfigurable UOWSNs employed in river meets ocean scenario. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2020;69:15244–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvt.2020.3037342.Search in Google Scholar
17. Vahabi, S, Daneshvar, A, Eslaminejad, M, Dashti, SE. CBDS2R: a cluster-based depth source selection routing for underwater wireless sensor network. IEEE Trans Signal Inf Process over Networks 2023;9:468–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsipn.2023.3299108.Search in Google Scholar
18. Jamali, MV, Akhoundi, F, Salehi, JA. Performance Characterization of relay-assisted wireless optical CDMA networks in turbulent underwater channel. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 2016;15:4104–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2016.2533616.Search in Google Scholar
19. Khalighi, M-A, Hamza, T, Bourennane, S, L´eo, P, Opderbecke, J. Underwater wireless optical communications using silicon photo-multipliers. IEEE Photon J 2017;9:7905310. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2017.2726565.Search in Google Scholar
20. Sun, H, Zhang, L, Jiang, R, Tang, X. A proof-of-concept demonstration of scintillating fiber based underwater wireless-fiber communication system. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2025;37:609–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2025.3541826.Search in Google Scholar
21. Tong, T, Gao, G, Wang, Z, Zhang, J, Ma, Z. Dynamic threshold decision for real-time underwater wireless optical communication under turbulence. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 2025;37:641–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2025.3541222.Search in Google Scholar
22. Mohammadi, M, Mobini, Z, Galappaththige, D, Tellambura, C. A comprehensive survey on full-duplex communication: current solutions, future trends, and open issues. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2023;25:2190–244. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2023.3318198.Search in Google Scholar
23. Zhang, D, N’doye, I, Ballal, T, Al-Naffouri, TY, Alouini, MS, Laleg-Kirati, TM. Localization and tracking control using hybrid acoustic-optical communication for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Internet Things J 2020;7:10048–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.2995799.Search in Google Scholar
24. Shaaban, K, Shamim, MHM, Abdur-Rouf, K. Visible light communication for intelligent transportation systems: a review of the latest technologies. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Ed) 2021;8:483–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2021.04.005.Search in Google Scholar
25. Furqan Ali, M, Jayakody, DNK. SIMO-underwater visible light communication (UVLC) system. Comput Netw 2023;232:109750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109750.Search in Google Scholar
26. Elamassie, M, Member, A, Uysal, M. Vertical underwater visible light communication links: channel modeling and performance analysis. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2020;19:6948–59.10.1109/TWC.2020.3007343Search in Google Scholar
27. Guo, Y, Kong, M, Alkhazragi, O, Sait, MA, Kang, CH, Ashry, I, et al.. Current trend in optical internet of underwater things. IEEE Photon J 2022;14:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2022.3195700.Search in Google Scholar
28. Qi, Z, Zhao, X, Pompili, D. Polarized OFDM-based pulse position modulation for high-speed wireless optical underwater communications. IEEE Trans Commun 2023;71:7163–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2023.3315313.Search in Google Scholar
29. Ata, Y, Baykal, Y, Gokce, MC. Analysis of optical wireless MIMO communication in underwater medium. IEEE Internet Things J 2024;11:20660–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2024.3371112.Search in Google Scholar
30. Trichili, A, Park, KH, Zghal, M, Ooi, BS, Alouini, MS. Communicating using spatial mode multiplexing: potentials, challenges, and perspectives. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 2019;21:3175–203. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2915981.Search in Google Scholar
31. Kodama, T, Sanusi, MABA, Kobori, F, Kimura, T, Inoue, Y, Jinno, M. Comprehensive analysis of time-domain hybrid pam for data-rate and distance adaptive UWOC system. IEEE Access 2021;9:57064–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3071467.Search in Google Scholar
32. Nawaz, SJ, Sharma, SK, Mansoor, B, Patwary, MN, Khan, NM. Non-coherent and backscatter communications: enabling ultra-massive connectivity in 6G wireless networks. IEEE Access 2021;9:38144–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3061499.Search in Google Scholar
33. Lopez, OLA, Alves, H, Souza, RD, Montejo-Sanchez, S, Fernandez, EMG, Latva-Aho, M. Massive wireless energy transfer: enabling sustainable IoT toward 6G Era. IEEE Internet Things J 2021;8:8816–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2021.3050612.Search in Google Scholar
34. Ahmad, R, Wazirali, R, Abu-Ain, T. Machine learning for wireless sensor networks security: an overview of challenges and issues. Sensors 2022;22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134730.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
35. Isaia, C, Michaelides, MP. A review of wireless positioning techniques and technologies: from smart sensors to 6G. Signals 2023;4:90–136. https://doi.org/10.3390/signals4010006.Search in Google Scholar
36. Mukhopadhyay, SC, Tyagi, SKS, Suryadevara, NK, Piuri, V, Scotti, F, Zeadally, S. Artificial intelligence-based sensors for next generation IoT applications: a review. IEEE Sens J 2021;21:24920–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2021.3055618.Search in Google Scholar
37. Sharma, A, Sharma, V, Jaiswal, M, Wang, HC, Jayakody, DNK, Basnayaka, CMW, et al.. Recent trends in AI-based intelligent sensing. Electron 2022;11:1–39. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11101661.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
