Startseite A Degree Distribution Optimization Algorithm for Image Transmission
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A Degree Distribution Optimization Algorithm for Image Transmission

  • Wei Jiang EMAIL logo und Junjie Yang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Oktober 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Luby Transform (LT) code is the first practical implementation of digital fountain code. The coding behavior of LT code is mainly decided by the degree distribution which determines the relationship between source data and codewords. Two degree distributions are suggested by Luby. They work well in typical situations but not optimally in case of finite encoding symbols. In this work, the degree distribution optimization algorithm is proposed to explore the potential of LT code. Firstly selection scheme of sparse degrees for LT codes is introduced. Then probability distribution is optimized according to the selected degrees. In image transmission, bit stream is sensitive to the channel noise and even a single bit error may cause the loss of synchronization between the encoder and the decoder. Therefore the proposed algorithm is designed for image transmission situation. Moreover, optimal class partition is studied for image transmission with unequal error protection. The experimental results are quite promising. Compared with LT code with robust soliton distribution, the proposed algorithm improves the final quality of recovered images obviously with the same overhead.

Funding statement: Funding: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 61401269, 61371125, 61205081), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (14ZR1417400), Shanghai Technology Innovation Project (10110502200, 11510500900), Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (12ZZ176, 13YZ105), Project of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (10PJ1404500), Leading Academic Discipline Project of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (J51303).

References

1. Byers JW, Luby M, Mitzenmacher M, Rege A. A digital fountain approach to reliable distribution of bulk data. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM’98, 1998, pp. 56–67.10.1145/285243.285258Suche in Google Scholar

2. Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS): Mobile Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS): Protocols and Codecs, 3GPP TS 26.346, Version 6.3.0, Release 6, December 2005.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB): Transmission system for handheld terminals (DVB-H), ETSI EN 302 304 V1.1.1, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Luby M. LT codes. Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Vancouver, Canada, 2002, pp. 271–80.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Hyytiä E, Tirronen T, Virtamo J. Optimal degree distribution for LT codes with small message length. INFOCOM, Anchorage, AK, 6–12, May, 2007, pp.2576–80.10.1109/INFCOM.2007.324Suche in Google Scholar

6. Yen KK, Liao YC, Chen CL, Chang HC. Modified robust soliton distribution (MRSD) with improved ripple size for LT codes. IEEE Commun Lett 2013;17:976–9.10.1109/LCOMM.2013.040913.130136Suche in Google Scholar

7. Hussain I, Xiao M, Rasmussen L. Regularized variable-node LT codes with improved erasure floor performance. IEEE Information Theory and Applications (ITA) Workshop, San Deigo, USA, 10–15,Feb. 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Jafarizadeh S, Jamalipour A. An exact solution to degree distribution optimization in LT codes. IEEE WCNC’14 Track 1 (PHY and Fundamentals), Istanbul, 6–9, April, pp. 764–8, 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Bodine EA, Cheng MK. Characterization of Luby Transform codes with small message size for low-latency decoding. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Beijing, China, 19–23, May, 2008, pp. 1195–9.10.1109/ICC.2008.233Suche in Google Scholar

10. Hyytia E, Tirronen T, Virtamo J. Optimal degree distribution for LT codes with small message length. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2007), Anchorage, AK, 6–12, May, 2007, pp. 2576–80.10.1109/INFCOM.2007.324Suche in Google Scholar

11. Hyytia E, Tirronen T, Virtamo J. Optimizing the degree distribution of LT codes with an importance sampling approach. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Rare Event Simulation (RESIM 2006), Bamberg, Germany, 8–10, Oct. 2006, pp. 64–73.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Chen C-M, Chen Y-P, Shen T-C, Zao JK. On the optimization of degree distributions in LT code with covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Barcelona, 18–23 July, 2010, pp. 3531–8.10.1109/CEC.2010.5586202Suche in Google Scholar

13. Chen C-M, Chen Y-P, Shen T-C, Zao JK. Optimizing degree distributions in LT codes by using the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Barcelona, 18–23 July, 2010, pp. 3635–42.10.1109/CEC.2010.5586340Suche in Google Scholar

14. Tsai P-C, Chen C-M, Chen Y-Ping. Sparse degrees analysis for LT codes optimization. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence,Brisbane, QLD, June 10–15, 2012, pp. 1–6.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Hansen N, Ostermeier A. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: the covariance matrix adaptation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Nagoya, 2–22, May, 1996, pp. 312–17.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Auger A, Hansen N. Performance evaluation of an advanced local search evolutionary algorithm. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), Edinburgh, UK, 2–5, Sept. 2005, pp. 1777–84.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Auger A, Hansen N. A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2005), Edinburgh, UK, 2–5 Sept. 2005, pp. 1769–76.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Vukobratovic D, Stankovic V, Sejdinovic D, Fagoonee L, Xiong Z. Scalable data multicast using expanding fountain codes. IEEE Trans Multimedia 2009;11:1094–104. Special Issue: Quality-Driven Cross-Layer Design for Multimedia.10.1109/TMM.2009.2026087Suche in Google Scholar

19. Hellge C, Schierl T, Wiegand T. Receiver driven layered multicast with layer-aware forward error correction. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), SanDeigo, CA, 12–15, Oct. 2008, pp. 2304–7.10.1109/ICIP.2008.4712252Suche in Google Scholar

20. Cataldi P, Grangetto M, Tillo T. Sliding-window raptor codes for efficient scalable wireless video broadcasting with unequal loss protection. IEEE Trans Image Process 2010;vol. 19:1491–503.10.1109/TIP.2010.2042985Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Bogino M, Cataldi P, Grangetto M, Magli E, Olmo G, Sejdinovic D, et al. Expanding window fountain codes for unequal error protection. Proc. 41st Asilomar Conf., Pacific Grove, Xi’an, China, 14-16, Sept, 2007, pp. 1020–4.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-9-29
Accepted: 2015-11-2
Published Online: 2016-10-6
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2015-0079/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen