Boundary update via resolvent for fluid–structure interaction

References

[1] S. Badia, F. Nobile, and C. Vergara, Fluid–structure partitioned procedures based on Robin transmission conditions, J.Comp. Phys., 227 (2008), 7027–7051.10.1016/j.jcp.2008.04.006Suche in Google Scholar

[2] S. Badia, F. Nobile, and C. Vergara, Robin-Robin preconditioned Krylov methods for fluid–structure interaction problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 198 (2009), No. 33, 2768–2784.10.1016/j.cma.2009.04.004Suche in Google Scholar

[3] S. Badia, A. Quaini, and A. Quarteroni, Modular vs. non-modular preconditioners for fluid–structure systems with large added-mass effect, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 197 (2008), No. 49, 4216–4232.10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.018Suche in Google Scholar

[4] H. Baek and G. Karniadakis, A convergence study of a new partitioned fluid–structure interaction algorithm based on fictitious mass and damping, J.Comp. Phys., 231 (2012), No. 2, 629–652.10.1016/j.jcp.2011.09.025Suche in Google Scholar

[5] J. Banks, W. Henshaw, and D. Schwendeman, An analysis of a new stable partitioned algorithm for FSI problems. Part I: Incompressible flow and elastic solids, J.Comp. Phys., 269 (2014), 108–137.10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.006Suche in Google Scholar

[6] J. Banks, W. Henshaw, and D. Schwendeman, An analysis of a new stable partitioned algorithm for FSI problems. Part II: Incompressible flow and structural shells, J.Comp. Phys., 268 (2014), 399–416.10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Y. Bazilevs, V.M. Calo, Hughes T.J.R, and Y. Zhang, Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory algorithms and computations, Comput. Mech., 43 (2008), 3–37.10.1007/s00466-008-0315-xSuche in Google Scholar

[8] A. Bonito, R. Nochetto, and M. Pauletti, Dynamics of biomembranes: effect of the bulk fluid, Math. Model. Natur. Phenom., 6 (2011), No. 5, 25–43.10.1051/mmnp/20116502Suche in Google Scholar

[9] H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Universitext, Springer, New York, 2011.10.1007/978-0-387-70914-7Suche in Google Scholar

[10] M. Bukač, S. Čanić, R. Glowinski, J. Tambača, and A. Quaini, Fluid–structure interaction in blood flow capturing non-zero longitudinal structure displacement, J.Comp. Phys., 235 (2012), 515–541.10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.033Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. Bukac and B. Muha, Stability and convergence analysis of the extensions of the kinematically coupled scheme for the fluid–structure interaction, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 54 (2016), No. 5, 3032–3061.10.1137/16M1055396Suche in Google Scholar

[12] M. Bukač, I. Yotov, and P. Zunino, An operator splitting approach for the interaction between a fluid and a multilayered poroelastic structure, Numer. Meth. Partial Difer. Equ., 31 (2015), No. 4, 1054–1100.10.1002/num.21936Suche in Google Scholar

[13] E. Burman and M. Fernández, Stabilization of explicit coupling in fluid–structure interaction involving fluid incompressibility, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 198 (2009), 766–784.10.1016/j.cma.2008.10.012Suche in Google Scholar

[14] E. Burman and M. Fernández, An unfitted Nitsche method for incompressible fluid–structure interaction using overlapping meshes, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 279 (2014), 497 – 514.10.1016/j.cma.2014.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

[15] P. Causin, J. F. Gerbeau, and F. Nobile, Added-mass effect in the design of partitioned algorithms for fluid–structure problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 194 (2005), No. 42-44, 4506–4527.10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.005Suche in Google Scholar

[16] C. M. Colciago, S. Deparis, and A. Quarteroni, Comparisons between reduced order models and full 3D models for fluid–structure interaction problems in haemodynamics, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 265 (2014), 120–138.10.1016/j.cam.2013.09.049Suche in Google Scholar

[17] W. G Dettmer and D. Perić, A new staggered scheme for fluid–structure interaction, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 93 (2013), No. 1, 1–22.10.1002/nme.4370Suche in Google Scholar

[18] D. R. Durran, Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics with Applications to Geophysics, 2nd ed., Texts in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 32, Springer, New York, 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-6412-0Suche in Google Scholar

[19] L. Failer and T. Wick, Adaptive time-step control for nonlinear fluid–structure interaction, J.Comp. Phys., 366 (2018), 448–477.10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.021Suche in Google Scholar

[20] M. Fernández, Incremental displacement-correction schemes for incompressible fluid–structure interaction: stability and convergence analysis, Numerische Mathematik, 123 (2013), No. 1, 21–65.10.1007/s00211-012-0481-9Suche in Google Scholar

[21] M. Fernández, J-F. Gerbeau, and C. Grandmont, A projection semi-implicit scheme for the coupling of an elastic structure with an incompressible fluid, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 69 (2007), No. 4, 794–821.10.1002/nme.1792Suche in Google Scholar

[22] M. Fernández and J. Mullaert, Convergence and error analysis for a class of splitting schemes in incompressible fluid–structure interaction, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 36 (2016), No. 4, 1748–1782.10.1093/imanum/drv055Suche in Google Scholar

[23] A. Figueroa, S. Baek, C. Taylor, and J. Humphrey, A computational framework for fluid–solid-growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 198 (2009), No. 45, 3583–3602.10.1016/j.cma.2008.09.013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] C. Figueroa, I. Vignon-Clementel, K. Jansen, T. Hughes, and C. Taylor, A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 195 (2006), No. 41-43, 5685–5706.10.1016/j.cma.2005.11.011Suche in Google Scholar

[25] D. Forti, M. Bukac, A. Quaini, S. Canic, and S. Deparis, A Monolithic Approach to Fluid–Composite Structure Interaction, J. Sci. Comp., (2016), 1–26.10.1007/s10915-017-0363-5Suche in Google Scholar

[26] D. F. Griffiths and J. M. Sanz-Serna, On the scope of the method of modified equations, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comp., 7 (1986), No. 3, 994–1008.10.1137/0907067Suche in Google Scholar

[27] D. F. Griffiths and D. J. Higham, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations. Initial Value Problems, Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series, Springer-Verlag, 2010.10.1007/978-0-85729-148-6Suche in Google Scholar

[28] G. Guidoboni, R. Glowinski, N. Cavallini, and S. Čanić, Stable loosely-coupled-type algorithm for fluid–structure interaction in blood flow, J.Comp. Phys., 228 (2009), No. 18, 6916–6937.10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.007Suche in Google Scholar

[29] A. Guzel and W. Layton, Time filters increase accuracy of the fully implicit method, BIT Numer. Math., 58 (2018), No. 2, 301–315.10.1007/s10543-018-0695-zSuche in Google Scholar

[30] A. Guzel and C. Trenchea, The Williams step increases the stability and accuracy of the hoRA time filter, Appl. Numer. Math., 131 (2018), 158–173.10.1016/j.apnum.2018.05.003Suche in Google Scholar

[31] A. Guzel and C. Trenchea, The Williams step increases the stability and accuracy of the hoRA time filter, Appl. Numer. Math., 131 (2018), 158–173.10.1016/j.apnum.2018.05.003Suche in Google Scholar

[32] E. Hairer, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 31, Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] M. Heil, A. Hazel, and J. Boyle, Solvers for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction problems: segregated versus monolithic approaches, Comput. Mech., 43 (2008), No. 1, 91–101.10.1007/s00466-008-0270-6Suche in Google Scholar

[34] W. Hundsdorfer and J. Verwer, Numerical Solution of Time-Dependent Advection–Diffusion–Reaction Equations, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 33, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.10.1007/978-3-662-09017-6Suche in Google Scholar

[35] W. Layton, Y. Li, and C. Trenchea, Recent developments in IMEX methods with time filters for systems of evolution equations, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 299 (2016), 50–67.10.1016/j.cam.2015.09.038Suche in Google Scholar

[36] R. J. LeVeque, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, 2-nd ed., Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1992.10.1007/978-3-0348-8629-1Suche in Google Scholar

[37] M Lukáčová-Medvid'ová, G Rusnáková, and A Hundertmark-Zaušková, Kinematic splitting algorithm for fluid–structure interaction in hemodynamics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 265 (2013), 83–106.10.1016/j.cma.2013.05.025Suche in Google Scholar

[38] O. Oyekole, C. Trenchea, and M. Bukac, A Second-Order in Time Approximation of Fluid-Structure Interaction Problem, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 56 (2018), No. 1, 590–613.10.1137/17M1140054Suche in Google Scholar

[39] C. S. Peskin, Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart, J.Comp. Phys., 25 (1977), No. 3, 220–252.10.1016/0021-9991(77)90100-0Suche in Google Scholar

[40] A. Quaini and A Quarteroni, A semi-implicit approach for fluid–structure interaction based on an algebraic fractional step method, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 17 (2007), No. 6, 957–985.10.1142/S0218202507002170Suche in Google Scholar

[41] R. D. Ruth, A canonical integration technique, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. (1983), 2669–2671.10.1109/TNS.1983.4332919Suche in Google Scholar

[42] R. Van Loon, P. D. Anderson, J. De Hart, and F. P. T. Baaijens, A combined fictitious domain/adaptive meshing method for fluid–structure interaction in heart valves, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 46 (2004), No. 5, 533–544.10.1002/fld.775Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Z. Wang, N. Wood, and X. Xu, A viscoelastic fluid–structure interaction model for carotid arteries under pulsatile flow, J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Engrg, 31 (2015), No. 5.10.1002/cnm.2709Suche in Google Scholar

[44] R. F. Warming and B. J. Hyett, The modified equation approach to the stability and accuracy analysis of finite-difference methods, J.Comp. Phys., 14 (1974), 159–179.10.1016/0021-9991(74)90011-4Suche in Google Scholar

[45] Y. Yu, H. Baek, and G. Karniadakis, Generalized fictitious methods for fluid–structure interactions: analysis and simulations, J.Comp. Phys., 245 (2013), 317–346.10.1016/j.jcp.2013.03.025Suche in Google Scholar