Startseite How do characters perceive their world? Representation of perception from traditional past-tense narrative to contemporary present-tense narrative
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

How do characters perceive their world? Representation of perception from traditional past-tense narrative to contemporary present-tense narrative

  • Eri Shigematsu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 4. April 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper investigates representation of perception in the novel. While many critics have great interests in the conceptual level of consciousness, namely characters’ thoughts, they have paid little attention to the perceptual level of consciousness. Characters’ perceptions are important, as they often lead to their cognitive activities, making up their experiences described in narrative. The narrative technique for representing perception that has been studied is what is called represented perception: a narrative technique for rendering a character’s perceptions without explicitly indicating his/her act of perception. However, as in the case of thought representation, there are more ways to represent fictional perception according to the degree of mediacy. This paper suggests a linguistic paradigm for perception representation, examining more mediate and im-mediate ways of representing perception with some historical insights, and reveals the varied importance of perception in the history of the novel.


Corresponding author: Eri Shigematsu, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan, E-mail:

Funding source: JSPS KAKENHI

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20K21959

  1. Research funding: This study was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant no. 20K21959).

References

Atwood, Margaret. 2013 [2003]. Oryx and Crake. London: Virago Press.10.1515/9781942401223-049Suche in Google Scholar

Austen, Jane. 2003 [1816]. Emma. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann. 1981. Reflective and non-reflective consciousness in the language of fiction. Poetics Today 2(2). 61–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772190.Suche in Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 1980. ‘Represented perception’: A study in narrative style. Poetics 9(4). 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(80)90028-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 1992. The historical present in Charlotte Brontë’s novels: Some discourse functions. Style 26(2). 221–244.Suche in Google Scholar

Casparis, Christian Paul. 1975. Tense without time: The present tense in narration. Bern: Franke.Suche in Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent minds: Narrative modes for presenting consciousness in fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691213125Suche in Google Scholar

Damsteegt, Theo. 2004. The present tense in modern Hindi fiction. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.10.1163/9789004486102Suche in Google Scholar

Damsteegt, Theo. 2005. The present tense and internal focalization of awareness. Poetics Today 26(1). 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-26-1-39.Suche in Google Scholar

Defoe, Daniel. 2011 [1722]. Moll Flanders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/owc/9780192805355.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Dickens, Charles. 2008 [1850]. David Copperfield. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/owc/9780199536290.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624582Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174220Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gills & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Fehr, Bernhard. 1938. Substitutionary narration and description: A chapter in stylistics. English Studies 20. 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00138383808596675.Suche in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 1993. The fictions of language and the languages of fiction. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 1996. Towards a ‘natural’ narratology. London: Routledge.10.1515/jlse.1996.25.2.97Suche in Google Scholar

Fludernik, Monika. 2003. Chronology, time, tense and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature 12(2). 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947003012002295.Suche in Google Scholar

Hernadi, Paul. 1972. Dual perspective: Free indirect discourse and related techniques. Comparative Literature 24(1). 32–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1769380.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2001. The English present tense. English Language and Linguistics 2(2). 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674301000235.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short. 20072 [1981]. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Mansfield, Katherine. 2002 [1922]. The Garden Party. In Angela Smith (ed.), Katherine Mansfield selected stories, 336–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McHale, Brian. 1978. Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics & Theory of Literature 3. 249–287.Suche in Google Scholar

Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2012. The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends: The Past + now in language and literature. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Swetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 177–197. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.014Suche in Google Scholar

Pallarés-García, Elena. 2012. Narrated perception revisited: The case of Jane Austen’s Emma. Language and Literature 21(2). 170–188.10.1177/0963947011435862Suche in Google Scholar

Pallarés-García, Elena. 2014. Narrated perception and point of view in the novels of Jane Austen. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Palmer, Alan. 2004. Fictional minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rock, Irvin. 1984. Perception. New York: Scientific American Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Rundquist, Eric. 2014. How is Mrs Ramsay thinking? The semantic effects of consciousness presentation categories within free indirect style. Language and Literature 23(2). 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947014530771.Suche in Google Scholar

Rundquist, Eric. 2017. Free indirect style in modernism: Representations of consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lal.29Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Wolf. 2010. Narratology: An introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226324Suche in Google Scholar

Semino, Elena & Mick Short. 2004. Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203494073Suche in Google Scholar

Shigematsu, Eri. 2018a. Defoe’s psychological realism: The effect of directness in indirect consciousness representation categories. Language and Literature 27(2). 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947018782008.Suche in Google Scholar

Shigematsu, Eri. 2018b. The language of experience: Representations of perception in the novel. Studies in Modern English 34. 27–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Shigematsu, Eri. 2019. Authenticity and creation of selves in Defoe’s fictional autobiographies: Representation of consciousness in retrospective narratives. Hiroshima: Hiroshima University PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Sotirova, Violeta. 2004. Connectives in free indirect style: Continuity or shift? Language and Literature 13(3). 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947004044872.Suche in Google Scholar

Sotirova, Violeta. 2011. D.H. Lawrence and narrative viewpoint. London & New York: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Sotirova, Violeta. 2013. Consciousness in modernist fiction: A stylistic study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137307255Suche in Google Scholar

Stanzel, Franz Karl. 1984. A theory of narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-04-04
Published in Print: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 29.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jls-2022-2049/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen