Startseite To think that constructions and Japanese towa/nante constructions
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

To think that constructions and Japanese towa/nante constructions

  • Yuji Hatakeyama EMAIL logo , Kensuke Honda und Kosuke Tanaka
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. September 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

English has what is called ‘the to think that construction’, in which the subordinate clause (the to-infinitive clause) is used as if it were an independent clause (e.g., To think that she could be so ruthless!). This paper shows that the to think that construction can be divided into two types depending on the contents of the that clauses: one is the “recall” type, in which the that clauses represent a speaker’s knowledge (i.e., his/her past event or experience); and the other is the “surprise” type, in which the that clauses describe an event at the speech time which the speaker regards as unbelievable. This paper further shows that the “surprise” type of the to think that construction corresponds to the Japanese exclamatory sentence, or the towa/nante construction such as Kodomo-ni anna koto-o iw-are-ru {towa/nante}! ‘(Lit.) That my child should say such a thing!’.


Corresponding author: Yuji Hatakeyama, Department of Biotechnology and Life Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-26 Nakamachi, Koganei City, 184-8588, Japan, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to three anonymous JJL reviewers and the editor for their many constructive comments and suggestions. Their constructive criticism has been especially important in improving the quality of this paper. Our special thanks also go to Colleen Dalton, our informant, for giving us insightful comments on the to think that construction. Remaining inadequacies are of course our own.

References

Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011Suche in Google Scholar

Honda, Masatoshi & Keita Igarashi. 2015. To think that koobun-no kinoo-ni tuite [On the function of the to think that construction]. Eigo Gohoo Bunpoo Kenkyuu 22. 135–150.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Suche in Google Scholar

Iori, Isao, Shino Takanasi, Kumiko Nakanishi & Toshihiro Yamada. 2001. Cyuujyookyuu o Osieru tame no Nihongo Bunpoo Handobukku [Japanese handbook for teachers of intermediate and advanced learners of Japanese]. Tokyo: Suriieenettowaaku.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Benita Cruickshank & Roz Ivanič. 2017. An A-Z of English grammar & usage (Sixteenth impression). London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Maeda, Mitsuru. 2015. Koobunka-no syatei-to bunpooka [The range of constructionalization and grammaticalization]. Eigo Gohoo Bunpoo Kenkyuu 22. 37–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Sawada, Harumi. 2006. Modaritii [Modality]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Suche in Google Scholar

Sawada, Harumi. 2014. Gendai Imikaishaku Koogi [Modern lectures on meaning and interpretation]. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-21
Accepted: 2021-10-16
Published Online: 2022-09-21
Published in Print: 2022-11-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jjl-2022-2059/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen