Startseite Creation of an intensifier in progress: a study of the Japanese adverb hutuuni
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Creation of an intensifier in progress: a study of the Japanese adverb hutuuni

  • Naomi H. McGloin EMAIL logo und Moeko Watanabe EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. April 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper examines the emergent new usage of the Japanese adverb hutuuni. For most speakers of Japanese, this adverb means ‘ordinarily, usually, normally’, but among young adult speakers of Japanese, it has come to be used as an intensifier. Based on blog and conversation data as well as two surveys, the paper identifies wide ranging new senses of hutuuni, such as ‘very’, ‘fairly/pretty’, ‘contrary to or more than what I expected’, ‘not flattery’, and ‘honestly, speaking a true mind’. Focusing on its intensifier function, Imoto, Ryō. 2011. ‘Futsūni kawaī’-kō [A study of ‘Futsūni cute]. Shōgaku Ronshū 79(4). 59–75 proposes a scale analysis. Noticing that hutuuni typically occurs in a context where the expected level is set low, he argues that the function of hutuuni is to upgrade the level to the hutuu ‘standard’ level. He states that the intensifier usage is not the result of the semantic change of hutuu. The present study, on the other hand, suggests that the intensifier usage of hutuuni involves both syntactic and semantic change. Syntactically, hutuuni which is a verb modifier has come to modify adjectives, which has contributed to its new intensifier function. Semantically, we propose two possible paths to a degree word/intensifier for hutuuni, in line with the framework of the ‘subjectification’ and ‘intersubjectification’ of meaning proposed in Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Corresponding authors: Naomi H. McGloin, Department of Asian Languages and Cultures, University of Wisconsin-Madison (Emeritus), Van Hise Hall, 1220 Linden Dr., Madison, WI53706, USA, E-mail: ; and Moeko Watanabe (Svare), Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA95616, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the valuable comments we received from Shigeko Okamoto, Maki Kawada, Ragnar Svare and an anonymous reviewer. The earlier version of this paper was presented at the American Association of Teachers of Japanese Spring Conference, March 15, 2012, and also at the 26th meeting of the Central Association of Teachers of Japanese, Oct. 31-Nov. 1, 2015.

Appendix: Relevant 2016 survey results

veryfairly prettyunexpect-edlymore than I thoughtnot flatteryhonestlyas I thoughtgenerally thoughtnot use
Ex 720.3%44.6%14.9%13.5%0%2.7%2.7%1.4%0%
Ex 816.2%47.3%2.7%8.1%0%4.0%6.8%1.4%13.5%
Ex 939.2%17.6%8.1%6.8%1.4%14.9%1.4%0%10.8%
Ex 1025.7%31.1%0%0%4.1%39.2%0%0%0%
Ex 111.4%13.5%0%0%1.4%63.5%2.7%0%17.6%
Ex 129.5%9.5%0%0%1.4%58.1%14.9%4.0%2.7%
Ex 1318.9%23.0%0%0%0%39.2%5.4%2.7%10.8%
Ex 140%12.2%27.0%13.5%4.1%40.5%2.7%0%0%
Ex 151.4%12.2%45.9%20.3%2.7%12.2%4.1%1.4%0%
Ex 166.8%31.1%1.4%1.4%24.3%20.3%4.1%10.8%0%
Ex 179.5%16.2%2.7%5.4%33.8%18.9%6.8%4.1%2.7%
Ex 1925.7%24.3%4.0%1.4%24.3%17.6%1.4%1.4%0%
  1. The percentages shown are the percentages of the respondents’ choice for a particular meaning in a particular context. So, 20.3% for ‘very’ for Ex. 7 means that 20.3% of the respondents (74 in total for this question) chose ‘very’ as the meaning of hutuuni in example (7).

References

Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29. 554–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110877786Suche in Google Scholar

Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse. 2016. The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20(2). 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674315000428.Suche in Google Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions SV1. 29.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & David Wilkins. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3). 546–592. https://doi.org/10.2307/417135.Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy & Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Tanya Mathews & Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, 127–144. Ithaca: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.08heiSuche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Imoto, Ryō. 2011. ‘Futsūni kawaī’-kō [A study of ‘Futsūni cute]. Shōgaku Ronshū 79(4). 59–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 1999. From event structure to scalar structure: Degree modification in deverbal adjectives. In Tanya Mathews & Devon Strolovitch (eds.), Proceedings from semantics and linguistic theory 9, 163–180. Ithaca: CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2820Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071.Suche in Google Scholar

Kitahara, Yasuo. 2005. Zokudan! Mondai na Nihongo [Problematic Japanese: A sequel]. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Suche in Google Scholar

Lorenz, Gunther. 2002. Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 143–161. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.11lorSuche in Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald. 2006. Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18. 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394506060133.Suche in Google Scholar

McGloin, Naomi. 1996. Subjectification and adverbs in Japanese. In Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki & Susan Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 5, 287–299. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Suche in Google Scholar

Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2008. Introduction to special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674308002591.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24. 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0388-0001(01)00038-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Nishimura, Emi. 2016. ‘Futsūni kawaī’ saikō: takai teido o arawasu to kaishaku sareru fukushiteki seibun ‘futsūni’ no shinyōhō ni kanshite [‘Futsūni kawaī’ reconsidered: On the new usage of an adverbial constituent ‘futsūni’ that is interpreted to express high degree]. Eigogaku Eibeibungaku Ronshū 42. 43–63.Suche in Google Scholar

Ohashi, Hiroshi. 2006. The Development of an English intensifier phrase: A corpus-based study. English Linguistics 23(2). 403–432. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.23.403.Suche in Google Scholar

Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12(1). 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.1.47.Suche in Google Scholar

Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674308002645.Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan. 1993. Corpus evidence of language change: The case of the intensifier. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 177–192. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.64.12parSuche in Google Scholar

Powell, Mava Jo. 1992. The systematic development of correlated interpersonal and metalinguistic uses in stance adverbs. Cognitive Linguistics 3. 75–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1992.3.1.75.Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Svartvik Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Sakakibara, Yoshimi. 2013. What does the Japanese adverb futsūni mean? A paper presented at the 2013 thursday seminar of the American Association of Teachers of Japanese.Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65. 31–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/414841.Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009Suche in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2012. The status of onset contexts in analysis of micro-changes. Language and Computers 76. 221–255.10.1163/9789401207935_012Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-04-02
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jjl-2021-2033/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen