Learnability issues in L2 Japanese: Prosody and ambiguity resolution

References

Ananth, Priya & Masaaki Kamiya. 2015. The effect of prosody on disambiguation: A case of universal quantifier and negation. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition (1). 97–122.Suche in Google Scholar

Beckman, Mary E & Janet B Pierrehumbert. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255–309. Great Britain.10.1017/S095267570000066XSuche in Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2009. Praat: doing phonetics by computer, version 5.1.19Suche in Google Scholar

Carrasco, Marisa. 2011. Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research 51(13). 1484–1525.10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.012Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, Eun Seon. 2013. Sources of difficulty in L2 scope judgments. Second Language Research 29(3). 285–31010.1177/0267658312464969Suche in Google Scholar

Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Bryan Donaldson, Amanda C. Edmonds, Audrey Liljestrand Fultz & Rebeca A. Petrush. 2008. Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30(4). 453–480.10.1017/S0272263108080728Suche in Google Scholar

Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Amanda C. Edmonds, Audrey Liljestrand Fultz & Claire Renaud. 2010. Modularity of L2 sentence processing: Prosody, context, and morphology in relative clause ambiguity in English-French interlanguage. Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop, 13–27.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2016. Salience, cognition, language complexity, and complex adaptive Systems. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(2). 341–351.10.1017/S027226311600005XSuche in Google Scholar

Fultz, Audrey Liljestrand. 2008. The use of prosody for disambiguation in English-French interlanguage. Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, 130–139.Suche in Google Scholar

Goss, Seth. 2018. A critical pedagogy of lexical accent in L2 Japanese: insights into research and practice. Japanese Language and Literature 52(1). 1–24.Suche in Google Scholar

Gualmini, Andrea. 2004. Some knowledge children don’t lack. Linguistics 42(5). 957–982.10.1515/ling.2004.034Suche in Google Scholar

Gualmini, Andrea. 2005/2006. Some facts about quantification and negation one simply cannot deny: A reply to Gennari and MacDonald. Language Acquisition 13, 363–370.10.1207/s15327817la1304_5Suche in Google Scholar

Hopp, Holger. 2009. The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12(4). 463–483.10.1017/S1366728909990253Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kubozono, Haruo. 1988. The organization of Japanese prosody. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Suche in Google Scholar

McDonough, Kim & Pavel Trofimovich. 2017. Salience and novel L2 pattern learning. In Susan Gass, Patti Spinner & Jennifer Behney (eds.), Salience in second language acquisition, 147–164, New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315399027-8Suche in Google Scholar

Musolino, Julien, Stephen Crain & Rosalind Thornton. 2000. Navigating negative quantificational space. Linguistics. 38(1). 1–32.10.1515/ling.38.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Musolino, Julien & Jeff Lidz. 2002. Preschool logic: Truth and felicity in the acquisition of quantification. Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 406–416.Suche in Google Scholar

Musolino, Julien & Jeff Lidz. 2006. Why children aren’t universally successful with quantification? Linguistics 44(4). 817–852.10.1515/LING.2006.026Suche in Google Scholar

Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2007. Prosody and scope interpretations of the topic marker wa in Japanese. In Chungmin Lee & Matthew Gordon, (eds.), Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation, 177–193. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4796-1_10Suche in Google Scholar

O’Brien, Mary Grantham, Carrie. N. Jackson & Christine E. Gardner. 2014. Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(1). 27–70.10.1017/S0142716412000252Suche in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B & Mary E. Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Poser, Willam. 1984. The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. MIT doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Franziska Günther. 2016. Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1110, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110.Suche in Google Scholar

Shport, Irina. A. 2008. Acquisition of Japanese pitch accent by American learners. In Patrick Heinrich & Yuko Sugita (eds.), Japanese as foreign language in the age of globalization, 165–187. Bobingen: Druck: Kessler Verlagsdruckerei.Suche in Google Scholar

Shport, Irina A. 2015. Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naive English listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138(1). 307–318.10.1121/1.4922468Suche in Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2011. Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1). 1–33.10.1075/lab.1.1.01sorSuche in Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella & Ludovica Serratrice. 2009. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13: 1–16.10.1177/1367006909339810Suche in Google Scholar

Snedeker, Jesse & John C. Trueswell. 2003. Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language 48, 103–130.10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3Suche in Google Scholar

Syrett, Kristen, Georgia Simon & Kirsten Nisula. 2014. Prosodic disambiguation of scopally ambiguous quantificational sentences in a discourse context. Journal of Linguistics 50, 453–493.10.1017/S0022226714000012Suche in Google Scholar

Tsimpli, Ianthi & Antonella Sorace. 2006. Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax–semantics and syntax–discourse phenomena. Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), 653–664.Suche in Google Scholar

VanPatten, Bill & Alessandro G. Benati 2010. Key terms in second language acquisition. London: Continuum Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vendetti, Jennifer J. 1994. The influence of syntax on prosodic structure in Japanese. In Jennifer J. Venditti (ed.), Papers from the linguistics laboratory, Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 44, 191–223. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Vendetti, Jennifer J. 2005. The J_ToBI model of Japanese intonation. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 172–200. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Venditti, Jennifer J., Sun-Ah Jun & Mary E. Beckman. 1996. Prosodic cues to syntactic and other linguistic structures in Japanese, Korean, and English. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 287–311. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Venditti, Jennifer J., Kikuto Maekawa & Mary E. Beckman. 2008. Prominence marking in the Japanese intonation system. In Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 456–512. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.013.0017Suche in Google Scholar