Home Pain characteristics and imagery ability in patients with familial Mediterranean fever
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Pain characteristics and imagery ability in patients with familial Mediterranean fever

  • Albina Alikaj EMAIL logo , Burcu Dilek , Ahsen Büyükaslan and Serdal Uğurlu
Published/Copyright: February 12, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

Assessing imagery ability could be important for clinicians to understand or speculate on the limit of a patient’s physical ability in chronic pain conditions. We aimed to assess imagery ability that is potentially affected in patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF). In addition, pain characteristics and associational factors between pain and imagery abilities were examined.

Methods

Patients with FMF group (n=30) and control group (n=30) were included into the study. Movement Imagery Questionnaire-3 (MIQ-3) was questioned in both groups to assess imagery ability. McGill Pain Questionnaire Form (MPQ) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) were used to assess pain.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in all sub-scores of the MIQ-3 imagery levels between FMF and the control group (p<0.05). Mean value for PCS was 23.27 ± 12.52 in which 13 (43.3 %) of the patients had higher scores than 30 indicating catastrophic thoughts.

Conclusions

It was determined that the imagery scores of the patients with FMF were lower than the control group. Patients who had catastrophic thoughts showed more scores in IVI scores indicating that the attention processes of these patients to their bodies might be affected. Further large-scale, long-term, prospective, randomized-controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Corresponding author: Albina Alikaj, Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34083, Türkiye, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: The study was approved by the Medipol University Ethics Committee for Non-interventional Clinical Research (No: 10840098-604.01.01-E39988) and registered Clinical Trial with the number NCT04729218. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: AA, BD, AB, SU took part in conception and design; AA, AB data acquisition, analysis of data, drafting of the manuscript; BD, SU, critical revision; AA, BD, AB, SU approved the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved of the preparation of this article.

  4. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Ben-Chetrit, E, Touitou, I. Familial Mediterranean fever in the world. Arthritis Care Res 2009;61:1447–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24458.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Guler, T, Garip, Y, Dortbas, F, Pekin Dogan, Y. Quality of life in Turkish patients with familial Mediterranean fever: association with fatigue, psychological status, disease severity and other clinical parameters. Egypt Rheumatol 2018;40:117–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejr.2017.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

3. Edwards, RR, Calahan, C, Mensing, G, Smith, M, Haythornthwaite, JA. Pain, catastrophizing, and depression in the rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2011;7:216–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2011.2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Neige, C, Lebon, F, Mercier, C, Gaveau, J, Papaxanthis, C, Ruffino, C. Pain, no gain: acute pain interrupts motor imagery processes and affects mental training-induced plasticity. Cereb Cortex 2021;32:640–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab246.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Moriarty, O, McGuire, BE, Finn, DP. The effect of pain on cognitive function: a review of clinical and preclinical research. Prog Neurobiol 2011;93:385–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Hákkinen, A, Kautiainen, H, Hannonen, P, Ylinen, J, Arkela-Kautiainen, M, Sokka, T. Pain and joint mobility explain individual subdimensions of the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) disability index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.019935.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Guillot, A, Collet, C. Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Res Rev 2005;50:387–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.09.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Holmes, P, Calmels, C. A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. J Mot Behav 2008;40:433–45. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.40.5.433-445.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. SooHoo, S, Takemoto, KY, McCullagh, P. A comparison of modeling and imagery on the performance of a motor skill. J Sport Behav 2004;27:349–66.Search in Google Scholar

10. Cumming, J, Williams, SE. Introducing the revised applied model of deliberate imagery use for sport, dance, exercise, and rehabilitation. Mov Sports Sci 2013;82:69–81. https://doi.org/10.3917/sm.082.0069.Search in Google Scholar

11. Guillot, A, Collet, C. Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: a review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2008;1:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840701823139.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gregg, M, Hall, C, Mcgowan, E, Hall, N. The relationship between imagery ability and imagery use among Athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol 2011;23:129–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2010.544279.Search in Google Scholar

13. Martin, KA, Moritz, SE, Hall, CR. Imagery use in sport: a literature review and applied model sport psychologist. Sport Psychol 1999;13:245–68. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.13.3.245.Search in Google Scholar

14. Saruco, E, Guillot, A, Saimpont, A, Di Rienzo, F, Durand, A, Mercier, C, et al.. Motor imagery ability of patients with lower-limb amputation: exploring the course of rehabilitation effects. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2019;55:634–45. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04776-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Touche, RL, Grande-Alonso, M, Cuenca-Martínez, F, Gónzález-Ferrero, L, Suso-Martí, L, Paris-Alemany, A. Diminished kinesthetic and visual motor imagery ability in adults with chronic low back pain. PM and R 2019;11:227–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Yap, BWD, Lim, ECW. The effects of motor imagery on pain and range of motion in musculoskeletal disorders. Clin J Pain 2019;35:87–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000648.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Schwoebel, J, Friedman, R, Duda, N, Coslett, HB. Pain and the body schema. Evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. Brain 2001;124:1157–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.10.2098.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Williams, SE, Cumming, J, Ntoumanis, N, Nordin-Bates, SM, Ramsey, R, Hall, C. Further validation and development of the movement imagery questionnaire. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2012;34:621–46. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.5.621.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Dilek, B, Ayhan, Ç, Yakut, Y. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the movement imagery questionnaire-3: its cultural adaptation and psychometric properties. Neurol Sci Neurophysiol 2020;37:221–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/NSN.NSN_30_20.Search in Google Scholar

20. Melzack, R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277–99.10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Kuǧuoǧlu, S, Aslan, FE, Olgun, N. Turkish version of the McGill Melzack Pain Questionnaire Form (MPQF). Agri 2003;15:47–51.Search in Google Scholar

22. Sullivan, MJL, Bishop, SR, Pivik, J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess 1995;7:524–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524.Search in Google Scholar

23. Ilcin, N, Gurpinar, B, Bayraktar, D, Savci, S, Cetin, P, Sari, I, et al.. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the pain catastrophizing scale among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Phys Ther Sci 2016;28:298–303. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.298.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Stanton, TR, Lin, CWC, Smeets, RJEM, Taylor, D, Law, R, Lorimer Moseley, G. Spatially defined disruption of motor imagery performance in people with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology 2012;51:1455–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Brik, R, Shinawi, M, Kasinetz, L, Gershoni-Baruch, R. The musculoskeletal manifestations of Familial Mediterranean fever in children genetically diagnosed with the disease. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:1416–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6<1416::AID-ART236>3.0.CO;2-6.10.1002/1529-0131(200106)44:6<1416::AID-ART236>3.0.CO;2-6Search in Google Scholar

26. Yocum, DE, Castro, WL, Cornett, M. Exercise, education, and behavioral modification as alternative therapy for pain and stress in rheumatic disease. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 2000;26:145–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-857X(05)70128-9.Search in Google Scholar

27. Wallwork, SB, Leake, HB, Peek, AL, Moseley, GL, Stanton, TR. Implicit motor imagery performance is impaired in people with chronic, but not acute, neck pain. PeerJ 2020;2020:e8553. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8553.Search in Google Scholar

28. Guillot, A, Collet, C. The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery. In: The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546251.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

29. Liu, KPY, Lai, M, Fong, SSM, Bissett, M. Imagery ability and imagery perspective preference: a study of their relationship and age- and gender-related changes. Behav Neurol 2019;2019:7536957. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7536957.Search in Google Scholar

30. Ugurlu, M, Karakas Ugurlu, G, Erten, S, Caykoylu, A. Validity of Turkish form of pain catastrophizing scale and modeling of the relationship between pain-related disability with pain intensity, cognitive, and emotional factors. Psychiatr Clin Psychopharmacol 2017;27:189–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2017.1322672.Search in Google Scholar

31. Penhoat, M, Saraux, A, Le Goff, B, Augereau, P, Maugars, Y, Berthelot, JM. High pain catastrophizing scores in one-fourth of patients on biotherapy for spondylarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 2014;81:235–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

32. Crombez, G, Eccleston, C, Van den Broeck, A, Van Houdenhove, B, Goubert, L. The effects of catastrophic thinking about pain on attentional interference by pain: No mediation of negative affectivity in healthy volunteers and in patients with low back pain. Pain Res Manag 2002;7:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2002/576792.Search in Google Scholar

33. Gracely, RH, Geisser, ME, Giesecke, T, Grant, MAB, Petzke, F, Williams, DA, et al.. Pain catastrophizing and neural responses to pain among persons with fibromyalgia. Brain 2004;127:835–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh098.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-07-10
Accepted: 2024-01-19
Published Online: 2024-02-12

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jirspa-2023-0025/html
Scroll to top button