Abstract
Motor imagery and actual movement engage similar neural structures, however, whether they produce similar training-related corticospinal adaptations has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to compare changes in strength and corticospinal excitability following short-term motor imagery strength training and short-term strength training. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the contralateral motor cortex (M1) to elicit motor-evoked potentials in the dominant biceps brachii muscle prior to and following 3-week strength training using actual bicep curls or motor imagery of bicep curls. The strength training (n = 6) and motor imagery (n = 6) groups underwent three supervised training sessions per week for 3 weeks. Participants completed four sets of six to eight repetitions (actual or imagined) at a training load of 80% of their one-repetition maximum. The control group (n = 6) were required to maintain their current level of physical activity. Both training groups exhibited large performance gains in strength (p < 0.001; strength training 39% improvement, imagery 16% improvement), which were significantly different between groups (p = 0.027). TMS revealed that the performance improvements observed in both imagery and strength training were accompanied by increases in corticospinal excitability (p < 0.001), however, these differences were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.920). Our findings suggest that both strength training and motor imagery training utilised similar neural substrates within the primary M1, however, strength training resulted in greater gains in strength than motor imagery strength training. This difference in strength increases may be attributed to adaptations during strength training that are not confined to the primary M1. These findings have theoretical implications for functional equivalent views of motor imagery as well as important therapeutic implications.
References
Aagard, P., Simonsen, E., Andersen, J., Magnusson, P., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002). Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. Journal of Applied Physiology, 92, 2309–2318.10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001Search in Google Scholar
Aoyama, T., & Kaneko, F. (2011). The effect of motor imagery on gain modulation of the spinal reflex. Brain Research, 1372, 41–48.10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.023Search in Google Scholar
Beck, S., Taube, W., Gruber, M., Amtage, F., Gollhofer, A., & Schubert, M. (2007). Task-specific changes in motor evoked potentials of lower limb muscles after different training interventions. Brain Research, 1179(51–60).10.1016/j.brainres.2007.08.048Search in Google Scholar
Bonnet, M., Decety, J., Requin, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Mental simulation of an action modulates the excitability of spinal reflex pathways in man. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 221–228.10.1016/S0926-6410(96)00072-9Search in Google Scholar
Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R.,... Fazio, F. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600–602.10.1038/371600a0Search in Google Scholar
Deiber, M., Ibanez, V., Honda, M., Sadato, N., Raman, R., & Hallett, M. (1998). Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography. NeuroImage, 2, 73–85.10.1006/nimg.1997.0314Search in Google Scholar
Del Balso, C., & Cafarelli, E. (2007). Adaptations in the activation of human skeletal muscle induced by short-term isometric resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 103, 402–411.10.1152/japplphysiol.00477.2006Search in Google Scholar
Duchateau, J., & Enoka, R. (2002). Neural adaptations with chronic activity patterns in able-bodied humans. American Journal of Physical Medical & Rehabilitation.10.1097/00002060-200211001-00004Search in Google Scholar
Facchini, S., Muellbacher, W., Battaglia, F., Boroojerdi, B., & Hallett, M. (2002). Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 105, 146–151.10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o004.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fadiga, L., Buccino, G., Craighero, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Pavesi, G. (1999). Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia, 37, 147–158.10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00089-XSearch in Google Scholar
Feltz, D., & Landers, D. (1983). The effect of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Pyschology, 2, 211–220.10.1123/jsp.5.1.25Search in Google Scholar
Fery, Y. (2003). Differentiating visual and kinesthetic imagery in mental practice. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1–10.10.1037/h0087408Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Fimland, M., Helgerrud, J., Gruber, M., Leivseth, G., & Hoff, J. (2009). Functional maximal strength training induces neural transfer to single-joint tasks. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 107, 21–29.10.1007/s00421-009-1096-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Folland, J., & Williams, A. (2007). The adaptations to strength training, morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength training. Sports Medicine, 37(2), 145–168.10.2165/00007256-200737020-00004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Frith, C., & Dolan, R. (1997). Brain mechanisms associated with top-down processes in perception. Philosophical Transcations of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 352, 1221–1230.10.1098/rstb.1997.0104Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Gandevia, S., Wilson, L., Inglis, T., & Burke, D. (1997). Mental rehearsal of motor tasks recruits α – motoneurones but fails to recruit human fusimotor neurones selectively. Journal of Physiology, 505, 259–266.10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.259bc.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Goodwill, A., Pearce, A. J., & Kidgell, D. J. (2012). Corticomotor plasticity following unilateral strength training. Muscle and Nerve.10.1002/mus.23316Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Griffin, L., & Cafarelli, E. (2007). Transcranial magnetic stimulation during resistance training of the tibialis anterior msucle. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 17, 446–452.10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Hashimoto, R., & Rothwell, J. C. (1999). Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research, 125(1), 75–81.10.1007/s002210050660Search in Google Scholar PubMed
He, S., Dum, R., & Strick, P. (1996). Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: motor areas on the medial surface of the hemisphere. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3284–3306.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-05-03284.1995Search in Google Scholar
Hinder, M., Schmidt, M., Garry, M. I., Carroll, T., & Summers, J. J. (2011). Absence of cross-limb transfer of performance gains following ballistic motor practice in older adults. Journal of Applied Physiology, 110, 166–174.10.1152/japplphysiol.00958.2010Search in Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245.10.1017/S0140525X00034026Search in Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1419–1432.10.1016/0028-3932(95)00073-CSearch in Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103–109.10.1006/nimg.2001.0832Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, J., Marstrand, P., & Nielsen, J. (2005). Motor skill training and strength training are associated with different plastic changes in the central nervous system. Journal of Applied Physiology, 99, 1558–1568.10.1152/japplphysiol.01408.2004Search in Google Scholar
Kamen, G., & Knight, C. (2004). Training-related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59, 1334–1338.10.1093/gerona/59.12.1334Search in Google Scholar
Kasai, T., Kawai, S., Kawanishi, M., & Yahagi, S. (1997). Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery. Brain Research, 744, 147–150.10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01101-8Search in Google Scholar
Kidgell, D. J., & Pearce, A. J. (2010). Corticospinal properties following short-term strength training of an intrinsic hand muscle. Human Movement Science, 29, 631–641.10.1016/j.humov.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Kidgell, D. J., Stokes, M., Castricum, T., & Pearce, A. J. (2010). Neurophysiological responses after short-term strength training of the biceps brachii muscle. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 0, 1–10.10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f56794Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Kidgell, D. J., Stokes, M., & Pearce, A. J. (2011). Strength training of one limb increases corticomotor excitability projecting to the contralateral homologous limb. Motor Control, 15,247–266.10.1123/mcj.15.2.247Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Kiers, L., Fernando, B., & Tomkins, D. (1997). Facilitory effect of thinking about movement on magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 744(1), 147–150.Search in Google Scholar
Lackner, E., & Hummelsheim, H. (2003). Motor-evoked potentials are facilitated during perceptual identification of hand position in healthy subjects and stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 648–655.10.1191/0269215503cr660oaSearch in Google Scholar
Lee, M., Gandevia, S., & Carroll, T. (2009). Short-term strength training does not change cortical voluntary activation. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41, 1452–1460.10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181998837Search in Google Scholar
Li, S., Latash, M., & Zatsiosky, V. (2004). Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 273–280.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.003Search in Google Scholar
Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hulsmann, E., Flor, H., & Klose, U. (1999). Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 491–501.10.1162/089892999563553Search in Google Scholar
Morris, T., Spittle, M., & Watt, A. (2005). Imagery in sport. Champaign, Illinois.Search in Google Scholar
Mulder, T., de Vries, S., & Zijlstra, S. (2005). Observation, imagination and execution of an effortful movement: more evidence for a central explanation of motor imagery. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 344–351.10.1007/s00221-004-2179-4Search in Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4Search in Google Scholar
Parsons, L., Fox, P., Downs, J., Glass, T., Hirsch, T., Martin, C.,... Lancaster, J. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375, 54–58.10.1038/375054a0Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, M., Rhea, M., & Alvar, B. (2005). Applications of the dose-response for muscular strength development: A review of meta-analytic efficacy and reliability for designing training prescription. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19, 950–958.10.1519/R-16874.1Search in Google Scholar
Pfurtscheller, G., & Neuper, C. (1997). Motor imgaery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 239, 65–68.10.1016/S0304-3940(97)00889-6Search in Google Scholar
Porro, C., Cettolo, V., Francescato, M., & Baraldi, P. (2000). Ipsilateral involvement of primary motor cortex during motor imagery. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 3059–3063.10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00182.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Ranganathan, V., Siemionow, V., Liu, J., Sahgal, V., & Yue, G. (2004). From mental power to muscle power – gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia, 42, 944–956.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.018Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, S., Pasqualetti, P., Tecchio, F., Pauri, F., & Rossini, P. M. (1998). Corticospinal excitability modulation during mental simulation of wrist movements in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 243, 147–151.10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00088-3Search in Google Scholar
Roth, M., Decety, J., Raybaudi, M., Massarelli, R., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C.,... Jeannerod, M. (1996). Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement: a functional magnetic imaging study. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 1280–1284.10.1097/00001756-199605170-00012Search in Google Scholar
Semmler, J., & Enoka, R. (2000). Neural contributions to changes in muscle strength (Vol. IX). Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470693797.ch1Search in Google Scholar
Shima, N., Ishida, K., Katayama, K., Morotome, Y., Sato, Y., & Miyamura, M. (2002). Cross education of muscular strength during unilateral resistance training and detraining. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 86, 284–294.10.1007/s00421-001-0559-zSearch in Google Scholar
Stephan, K., Fink, G., Passingham, R., Silbersweig, D., Ceballos-Baumann, A., Frith, C., & Frackowiak, R. (1995). Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 373–386.10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.373Search in Google Scholar
Stinear, C. (Ed.). (2010). Corticospinal facilitation during motor imagery. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546251.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Stinear, C., & Byblow, W. (2003a). Motor imagery of phasic thumb abduction temporally and spatially modulates corticospinal excitability. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 909–914.10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00373-5Search in Google Scholar
Stinear, C., & Byblow, W. (2003b). Role of intracortical inhibition in selective and muscle activation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 2014–2020.10.1152/jn.00925.2002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Stinear, C., & Byblow, W. (2004). Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 351–358.10.1007/s00221-004-1851-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Stinear, C., Byblow, W., Steyvers, M., Levin, O., & Swinnen, S. (2006). Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticospinal excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 351–358.10.1007/s00221-005-0078-ySearch in Google Scholar
Van Cutsem, M., Duchateau, J., & Hainaut, K. (1998). Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. Journal of Physiology, 513, 295–305.10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.295by.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Voisin, J., Mercier, C., Jackson, P., Richards, C., & Malouin, F. (2011). Is somatosensory excitability more affected by the perspective or modality content of motor imagery. Neuroscience Letters, 493, 33–37.10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Voti, P., Conte, A., Suppa, A., Iezzi, E., Bologna, M., Anieelo, M.,... Berardelli, A. (2011). Correlation between cortical plasticity, motor learning and BDNF genotype in healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 212, 91–99.10.1007/s00221-011-2700-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Weier, A. T., & Kidgell, D. J. (2012). Strength training with superimposed whole body vibration does not preferentially modulate cortical plasticity. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1–9.10.1100/2012/876328Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Williams, J., Pearce, A. J., Loporto, M., Morris, T., & Holmes, P. (2011). The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability. Behavioural Brain Research.10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.014Search in Google Scholar
Yahagi, S., & Kasai, T. (1999). Motor evoked potentials induced by motor imgaery reveal a functional asymmetry of cortical motor control in left- and right-handed human subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1114–1123.10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00823-XSearch in Google Scholar
Yahagi, S., Shimura, Y., & Kasai, T. (1996). An increase in cortical excitability with no change in spinal excitability during motor imagery. Perceptual Motor Skills, 83, 288–290.10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.288Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Yue, G., & Cole, K. (1992). Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67(5), 1114–1123.10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1114Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Zijdewind, I., Butler, J., Gandevia, S., & Taylor, J. (2006). The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 526–535.10.1007/s00221-006-0570-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of Athletes’ Voluntary Image Speed Use
- Methodological Variations in Guided Imagery Interventions Using Movement Imagery Scripts in Sport: A Systematic Review
- Corticospinal Excitability Following Short-Term Motor Imagery Training of a Strength Task
- Acute Effects of Motor Imagery on Performance and Neuromuscular Control in Maximal Drop Jumps
- Are Intentional Processes with Tool Use Similar for Simulated and Executed Actions?
- Review
- Benefits of Motor and Exercise Imagery for Older Adults
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Article
- A Qualitative Analysis of Athletes’ Voluntary Image Speed Use
- Methodological Variations in Guided Imagery Interventions Using Movement Imagery Scripts in Sport: A Systematic Review
- Corticospinal Excitability Following Short-Term Motor Imagery Training of a Strength Task
- Acute Effects of Motor Imagery on Performance and Neuromuscular Control in Maximal Drop Jumps
- Are Intentional Processes with Tool Use Similar for Simulated and Executed Actions?
- Review
- Benefits of Motor and Exercise Imagery for Older Adults