Home Purist norms and language change: ideological approaches and changes from above
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Purist norms and language change: ideological approaches and changes from above

  • Chiara Monaco EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 20, 2025

Abstract

This article focuses on the relationship between ‘change from above’ and ‘change from below’ as intended in the purist tendencies of the Atticist lexicographers of the second century CE. The production of Atticist lexica in the second century CE – as a manifestation of the purist trend that characterized the Greco-Roman world since the first century BCE-sought to reproduce an alleged Classical Greek through the prescription of morphological, lexical and syntactic features. The purists’ attempt to promote a specific kind of language reflected a progressive tendency to use language to construct social categories. The community of educated speakers was defined by the selection of linguistic features that differed from those used by the masses and became distinctive signs of education and elitism. By analyzing examples from these lexica, I will examine the mechanisms purists use to cleanse contemporary language from the changes that have affected the Koine. In order to do this, I will use the frameworks of modern sociolinguistics and, in particular, I will refer to three semiotic processes proposed by Irvine and Gal. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001; Irvine and Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press: 1) Iconization, which is expressed in the association that Atticist lexicographers make between supposedly pure/correct forms and certain social and ethnic groups (e.g., educated people/Attic writers/the ancients, etc.); 2) fractal recursivity, which is reflected in the Atticists’ projection of the opposition “Attic versus barbarian” onto the dualism “Attic versus non-Attic”; and 3) erasure, which is represented by the Atticists’ disregard for linguistic variation and their interpretation of Attic as a monolithic system. This analysis aims to describe the ideological factors that support linguistic purism and the mechanisms behind the prescription of a language consistently detached from contemporary usage.


Corresponding author: Chiara Monaco, Ghent University, Belgium, Europe, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This research has been carried out in the framework of the PRIN 2020 “Metalinguistic texts as a privileged data source for the knowledge of ancient languages” (CUP E63C22000350001) and as part of the FWO Postdoctoral Fellowship 12ZY122N at Ghent University. I thank Dr. Eleonora Serra for her comments on this piece, the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions, and the editors.

References

Aitchison, Jean. 1998. Language change: Progress or decay? 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Alpers, Klaus. 1981. Das attizistische Lexikon des Oros. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110835656Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. forthcoming. Introduction to Everyday communication in antiquity. Frames and framings. In Klaas Bentein (ed.), Everyday communication in antiquity. Frames and framings. Venice: Ca’ Foscari.Search in Google Scholar

Babiniotis, G. 2002. Λεξικό της Νέας Ελληνικής Γλώσσας (LNEG), 2nd edn. Athens: Centre for Lexicography.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2019. Dimensions of social meaning in post-classical Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 19(2). 119–167. https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01902006.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas & Chiara Monaco. 2024. Standardization. In Georgos Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Greek language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU01GV3SGJ2WSB4KHZ3JKQ918MMV.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas & Emmanuel Roumanis. 2024. The power of judgement: A comparison of evaluative stance in the Atticist Lexica of Phrynichus and Moeris. Revue Belge de Philologie et Historie. 1–24.Search in Google Scholar

Caragounis, Chris C. 2010. Atticism. Agenda and achievement. In Chris C. Caragounis (ed.), Greek: A language in evolution: Essays in honour of Antonios N. Jannaris, 153–176. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2004. Out of the bottle: The social life of metalanguage. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage social and ideological perspectives (Language, power and social process 11), 311–322. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110907377.311Search in Google Scholar

Cassio, Albio C. 1993. Parlate locali, dialetti delle stirpi e fonti letterarie nei grammatici greci. In Emilio Crespo, José L. Garcia Ramón & Araceli Striano (eds.), Dialectologica Graeca. Actas del II Coloquio Internacional de Dialectología Griega, 73–90. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

Cassio, Albio C. 2012. Intimations of Koiné in Sicilian Doric: The information provided by the Antiatticist. In Olga Tribulato (ed.), Language and linguistic contact in ancient Sicily, 251–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139248938.013Search in Google Scholar

Coker, Amy. 2018. Galen and the language of old comedy: Glimpses of a lost treatise at Ind. 23b–28. In Caroline Petit (ed.), Galen’s Treatise Περὶ Ἀλυπίας (De indolentia) in context, 63–90. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004383302_005Search in Google Scholar

Cuomo, Andrea M. 2017. Medieval textbooks as a major source for historical sociolinguistic studies of (highregister) Medieval Greek. Open Linguistics 3(1). 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0022.Search in Google Scholar

Deferrari, Roy J. 1969. Lucian’s atticism: The morphology of the verb. Amsterdam: A.M. Hakkert.Search in Google Scholar

Delveroudi, Rea. 1996. La question de la langue et les dialectes du grec moderne (1880–1910). Revue des Etudes Néo-Helléniques 5(2). 221–239.Search in Google Scholar

Dihle, Albert. 1977. Der Beginn des Attizismus. Antike und Abendland 23. 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241358.162.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2003. The meaning of style. Texas Linguistic Forum 47. 41–53.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1). 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Eitel. 1974. Die Ekloge des Phrynichos. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110843149Search in Google Scholar

Frangoudaki, Anna. 2002. Greek societal bilingualism of more than a century. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 157. 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2002.031.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Trevor. 2010. Standard Koine Greek in the Papyri of the third century BC. In Traianos Gagos (ed.), The Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of Papyrology, 25, 197–206. Ann Arbor: Unviersity of Michigan Library.Search in Google Scholar

Gerbi, Giulia. 2022. ἀκολουθεῖν μετ’ αὐτοῦ (Antiatt. α 122, Phryn. Ecl. 330, Σb α 747 [= Phot. α 789]). In Olga Tribulato (ed.), Digital Encyclopedia of atticism. With the assistance of E. N. Merisio.10.30687/DEA/2974-8240/2022/01/021Search in Google Scholar

Hägg, Tomas. 2010. Canon formation in Greek literary culture. In Einar Thomassen (ed.), Canon and canonicity. The formation and use of scripture, 109–128. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hinterberger, Martin. 2007. Die Sprache der byzantinischen Literatur: Der Gebrauch der synthetischen Plusquamperfektformen. In Martin Hinterberger & Elisabeth Schiffer (eds.), Byzantinische Sprachkunst: Studien zur byzantinischen Literatur, gewidmet WolframmHörandner zum 65. Geburtstag, 107–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110918229.107Search in Google Scholar

Hinterberger, Martin. 2021. From highly classicizing to common prose (XIII–XIV CE): The Metaphrasis of Niketas Choniates’ history. In Klaas Bentein & Mark Janse (eds.), Varieties in post-classical and byzantine Greek, 179–200. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110614404-008Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 2017. High and low in Medieval Greek. In Klaas Bentein, Mark Janse & Jorie Soltic (eds.), Variation and change ancient Greek tense, aspect and modality, 219–241. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004315358_011Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. 2002. “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613258.002Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. & Susan Gal. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001.Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. & Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

de Jonge, Casper. 2008. Between grammar and rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on language, linguistics and literature. Leiden-Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004166776.i-456Search in Google Scholar

de Jonge, Casper. 2022. Challenging the canon of the ten attic orators. In Damien Agut-Labordère & Miguel J. Versluys (eds.), Canonisation as innovation. Anchoring cultural formation in the first millennium BC (Euhormos. Greco-Roman studies in anchoring innovation), 218–242. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004520264_009Search in Google Scholar

Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasinski. 2004. Metalanguage social and ideological perspectives (Language, power and social process 11). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110907377Search in Google Scholar

JażdżewskaKatarzyna. 2019. Plutarch and atticism: Herodian, phrynichus, philostratus. In Katerina Oikonomopoulou & Sophia Xenophontos (eds.), A companion to the reception of Plutarch, 66–78. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004409446_006Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Lawrence. 2010. The literary heritage as language: Atticism and the second sophistic. In Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language, 468–482. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444317398.ch31Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Lawrence. 2017. Atticism and Asianism. In Daniel Richter & William Johnson (eds.), The Oxford handbook to the second sophistic, 41–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199837472.013.4Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Lawrence. 2023. Imperial Greek atticism: A culture of Forgery? Phrynichus and the terminology of “authenticity”. In John N. Hopkins & Scott McGill (eds.), Forgery beyond Deceit: Fabrication, value, and the desire for Ancient Rome, 121–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192869586.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Kristiansen, Tore. 2004. Social meaning and norm-ideals for speech in a Danish community. In Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland & Dariusz Galasinski (eds.), Metalanguage social and ideological perspectives (Language, power and social process 11), 167–192. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110907377.167Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Luiselli, Raffaele. 1999. A study of high level Greek in the non-literary Papyri from Roman to Byzantine Egypt. London: University College London PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Mackridge, Peter. 2014. The Greek language since 1750. In Caterina Carpinato & Olga Tribulato (eds.), Storia e storie della lingua greca, 49–72. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.Search in Google Scholar

Matijašić, Ivan. 2018. Shaping the Canons of ancient Greek historiography. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110476279Search in Google Scholar

Markopoulos, Theodore. 2009. The future in Greek from ancient to medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Matthaios, Stephanos. 2010. Koinè et atticisme dans le lexique d’Hésychius. In Questions relatives au changement linguistique. De la Koinè au Grec moderne, 81–96. Thessalonique: Centre de la Langue Grecque.Search in Google Scholar

Matthaios, Stephanos. 2013. Pollux’ Onomastikon im Kontext der attizistischen Lexikographie. Gruppen ‘anonymer Sprecher’ und ihre Stellung in der Sprachgeschichte und Stilistik. In Christine Mauduit (ed.), L’Onomasticon de Pollux: Aspects culturels, rhétoriques et lexicographiques, 67–40. Lyon: Editions Université Jean Moulin.Search in Google Scholar

Macleod, Matthew D. 1977. Syntactical variation in Lucian. Glotta 55. 215–222.Search in Google Scholar

McLelland, Nicola. 2021. Grammars, dictionaries and other metalinguistic texts in the context of language standard. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language standardization, 263–293. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108559249.010Search in Google Scholar

Monaco, Chiara. 2024a. The idea of ‘common Greek’ (κοινόν); a revaluation of Moeris’ Atticist lexicon. Revue Belge de Philologie et Historie 102(1). 35–78.Search in Google Scholar

Monaco, Chiara. 2024b. Atticist views on linguistic variation: The case of Phrynichus’ Eclogue. In Giuseppina di Bartolo & Daniel Koelligan (eds.), Postclassical Greek: Problems and perspectives, 105–136. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783111079172-006Search in Google Scholar

Monaco, Chiara. forthcoming. Atticist syntax: Prescriptive norms on the use of μέλλω and aorist infinitive. In Bentein Klaas, Eleonora Cattafi & Ezra la Roi (eds.), Subordination and insubordination in post-classical Greek. Brill & Leiden: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Montanari, Franco. 2020. History of ancient Greek scholarship: From the beginnings to the end of the Byzantine age. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004430570Search in Google Scholar

Moschonas, Spiros. 2019. From language standards to a standard language: The case of Modern Greek. Diacronia 10. 2–44. https://doi.org/10.17684/i10a142en.Search in Google Scholar

Paton, William. 1918. The Greek anthology. Books 10-12. Loeb classical library 85, Vol. IV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pellettieri, Andrea. 2024. Moeris, Ἀττικιστής. (ed.), Digital Encyclopedia of atticism. With the assistance of E. N. Merisio. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/DEA/2974-8240/2024/02/031 Search in Google Scholar

Pernot, Laurent. 1981. Les Discours Siciliens d’Aelius Aristide. New York: Arno Press.Search in Google Scholar

Porter, James I. 2006. Classical pasts: The classical traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691225395Search in Google Scholar

Probert, Philomen. 2004. Accentuation in old attic, later attic and attic. In John H. M. Penney (ed.), Indo-European perspectives, studies in honour of Anna Morpurgo Davies, 277–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199258925.003.0020Search in Google Scholar

Ritschl, Friedrich W. 1832. Thomae Magistri sive Theoduli monachi ecloga vocum Atticarum. Halle: Libraria Orphanotrophei.Search in Google Scholar

Rochette, Bruno. 2003. Remarques sur l’élaboration de la conscience linguistique des Grecs. Glotta 79. 175–204.Search in Google Scholar

Rochette, Bruno. 2005. La langue comme facteur d’intégration ou d’exclusion. L’Athènes du Ve s. et la Rome de Cicéron. In Maria Gabriella Angeli Bertinelli & Angelo Donati (eds.), Serta antiqua e medievalia VII. Il cittadino, lo straniero, il barbaro, fra integrazione ed emarginazione nell’antichità, 3–20. Roma: G: Bretschneider.Search in Google Scholar

la Roi, Ezra. 2022. The Atticist lexica as metalinguistic resource for morphosyntactic change in Postclassical Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 22. 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-02202001.Search in Google Scholar

Roumanis, Emmanuel. 2021. Atticist lexica and modern Greek dictionaries: A brief comparison of (negative) lexicographical labelling. Tetradio 29. 101–120. https://doi.org/10.21825/tetradio.91888.Search in Google Scholar

Rutherford, William. G. 1881. The new Phrynichus: Being a revised text of the Ecloga of the grammarian Phrynichus. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert, Vosters Rik & Vandenbussche Wim (eds.). 2014. Norms and usage in language history, 1600–1900. A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective (Advances in historical sociolinguistics 3). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.3Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3). 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(03)00013-2.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, Philip T. 1976. Colloquial expressions in Euripides. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, Simon. 1996. Hellenism and empire: Language, classicism and power in the Greek world, 50–250 AD. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198147725.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, George. 1991. Linguistic purism. London & New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Tribulato, Olga. 2018. Le epistole prefatorie dell’Onomasticon di Polluce: Frammenti di un discorso autoriale. Lexis 36. 247–283.Search in Google Scholar

Tribulato, Olga. 2021. (En)listing the good authors: The defence of Greek linguistic variety in the Antiatticist Lexicon. In Rebecca Laemmle, Cédric Scheidegger Laemmle & Katharina Wesselmann (eds.), Lists and catalogues in ancient literature and beyond, 169–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110712230-008Search in Google Scholar

Toufexis, Notis. 2008. Diglossia and register variation in Medieval Greek. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 32. 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1179/174962508x322687.Search in Google Scholar

Ucciardello, Giuseppe. 2018. Insegnamento della sintassi e strumenti lessicografici in epoca paleologa: alcuni esempi. In Conti Bizzarro Ferruccio (ed.), ΛΕΞΙΚΟΝ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΚΗΣ Studi di lessicografia e grammatica greca, 97–124. Napoli: Satura Editrice.Search in Google Scholar

Valente, Stefano. 2015. The Antiatticist: Introduction and critical edition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110404937Search in Google Scholar

Wahlgren, Staffan. 2005. Modern Greek in 10th c. AD. In Vassilios Sabatakakis & Peter Vejleskov (eds.), Filia: Studies in honour of Bo-Lennart Eklund, 177–182. Lund: The authors and the editors.Search in Google Scholar

Wisse, Jakob. 1995. Greeks, Romans, and the rise of atticism. In Jelle, G. J., S. R. Slings & Ineke Sluiter (eds.), Greek literary theory after Aristotle: A collection of papers in honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, 125–134. Amsterdam: University Press Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-02-17
Accepted: 2024-09-23
Published Online: 2025-05-20

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Obituary
  3. In memoriam Prof. William Labov (1927–2024)
  4. Articles
  5. Along the stereotyping road: nineteenth and early twentieth centuries narratives of ukuhlonipha
  6. Gibraltar’s streetnames: an eighteenth-century Western Mediterranean spatial practice of civilian fort-servicers
  7. Historical reconstruction and media representation of the earliest known demand for Romani linguistic rights
  8. Linguistic ideologies, personae and practices in seventeenth-century France
  9. Sacred language ideology for Nomina Sacra between the second and fifth centuries CE
  10. Special collection: Language Change from Above and from Below in Greek and Latin; Guest Editors: Ezra la Roi and Dalia Pratali Maffei
  11. Sources and methods for detecting language change from above and below in Post-Classical Greek and Latin
  12. Doric features in Hellenistic inscribed epigrams: unveiling supra-regional and regional prestige in dialectal change
  13. Purist norms and language change: ideological approaches and changes from above
  14. Choosing how to say ‘a letter’ in a letter: variation between epistula and litterae in the corpus of Ciceronian epistolography
  15. Epilogue: Historical sociolinguistics and the classical languages
  16. Book Reviews
  17. Laurel J. Brinton: Pragmatics in the history of English
  18. Brenda Assendelft: Verfransing onder de loep. Nederlands-Frans taalcontact (1500–1900) vanuit historisch-sociolinguïstisch perspectief [Frenchification under scrutiny. Dutch-French language contact (1500–1900) from a historical-sociolinguistic perspective]
  19. Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, María E. Rodríguez-Gil and Javier Pérez-Guerra: New Horizons in Prescriptivism Research
  20. Caon, Luisella, Moragh S. Gordon and Thijs Porck: Unlocking the history of English: Pragmatics, prescriptivism and text types. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 364
Downloaded on 30.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsl-2024-0014/pdf
Scroll to top button