Epilogue: Historical sociolinguistics and the classical languages

References

Adamik, Béla. 2012. In search of the regional diversification of Latin: Some methodological considerations in employing the inscriptional evidence. In Frédérique Biville, Marie-Karine Lhommé & Daniel Vallat (eds.), Actes du IXe Colloque International sur le Latin Vulgaire et Tardif, Lyon, 2–6 septembre 2009, 123–139. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée Jean Pouilloux.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 1995. The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: An interim report. The Journal of Roman Studies 85. 86–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/301059.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2003. The New Vindolanda writing-tablets. Classical Quarterly 53(2). 530–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/53.2.530.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843433Search in Google Scholar

Anipa, Kormi. 2012. The use of literary sources in historical sociolinguistic research. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 170–190. Chichester, West Sussex, UK & Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Belke, Horst. 1973. Literarische Gebrauchsformen. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2013. Register and the diachrony of post-classical and Early Byzantine Greek. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’histoire 91(1). 5–44. https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.2013.8407.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2015a. The Greek documentary papyri as a linguistically heterogeneous corpus: The case of the ‘Katochoi of the Sarapeion’ archive. Classical World 108(4). 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1353/clw.2015.0052.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2015b. The Greek of the fathers. In Ken Parry (ed.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to patristics, 456–470. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118438671.ch31Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2019. Dimensions of social meaning in Post-classical Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 19(2). 119–167. https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01902006.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2020. The distinctiveness of syntax for varieties of post-classical and Byzantine Greek: Linguistic ‘upgrading’ from the third century BCE to the tenth century CE. In Klaas Bentein & Mark Janse (eds.), Varieties of post-classical and Byzantine Greek, 381–414. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110614404-016Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2023a. A typology of variations in the ancient Greek epistolary frame (I–III AD). In Georgios Giannakis, Emilio Crespo, Jesús de la Villa & Panagiotis Filos (eds.), Historical linguistics and classical philology, 429–472. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111272887-018Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2023b. The textualization of women’s letters from Roman Egypt: Analyzing historical framing practices from a multi-modal point of view. In Klaas Bentein & Yasmine Amory (eds.), Novel perspectives on communication practices in antiquity: Towards a historical social-semiotic approach, 89–112. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004526525_009Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. 2024. Genre. In Georgios Giannakis, Panagiotis Filos, Brian Joseph & Theodoros Markopoulos (eds.), Encyclopedia of Greek language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Bentein, Klaas. Forthcoming. Registerial hybridity in an early Byzantine official archive: Making a case for historical diaglossia. In Klaas Bentein & Andrea Massimo Cuomo (eds.), Correctness under comparison: Negotiating linguistic norms in Greek from the Imperial Roman until the later Byzantine period (I–XV AD). Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar

Broux, Yanne. 2015. Graeco-Egyptian naming practices: A network perspective. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 55(3). 706–720.Search in Google Scholar

Bru, Mathilde M. S. 2024. A study of variation and change in the Greek Lexicon of the post-classical period. London: University College London dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Celano, G. G. A. 2019. The dependency treebanks for Ancient Greek and Latin. In M. Berti (ed.), Digital classical philology: Ancient Greek and Latin in the digital revolution, 279–298. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110599572-016Search in Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2015a. Language and society in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139047944Search in Google Scholar

Clackson, James. 2015b. Latinitas, Ἑλληνισμός and standard languages. Studi e Saggi Linguistici LIII. 309–330.Search in Google Scholar

Dahlgren, Sonja, Alek Keersmaekers & Joanne Stolk. 2022. Language contact in historical documents: The identification and co-occurrence of Egyptian transfer features in Greek documentary papyri. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8(2). 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2021-0004.Search in Google Scholar

Dana, Madalina. 2021. La correspondance grecque privée sur plomb et sur tesson: Corpus épigraphique et commentaire historique. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.10.17104/9783406774423Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, Mass.; Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1). 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828.Search in Google Scholar

Elspass, Stephan. 2012. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169. Chichester, West Sussex, UK & Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Judith T. Irvine. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001.Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 2023. Language ideologies. In Oxford research Encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessible at https://oxfordre.com/linguistics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-996?p=emailAM53PvH8O8886&d=/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-996 (accessed 10 January 2025).Search in Google Scholar

García-Vidal, Tamara. 2023. Contextualising third-wave historical sociolinguistics. International Journal of English Studies 23(2). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.595251.Search in Google Scholar

Gastgeber, Christian. 2017. Aspects of variations in Byzantine Greek documents of the Patriarchal chancellery of Constantinople (14th c.). Open Linguistics 3(1). 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie & Stefan Grondelaers. 2022. Not anything goes. In Karen V. Beaman & Gregory R. Guy (eds.), The coherence of linguistic communities, 203–220. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003134558-16Search in Google Scholar

Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie & Jacques Van Keymeulen. 2016. Implicational scales in colloquial Belgian Dutch. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 24(1). 62–82.10.1515/dialect-2016-0004Search in Google Scholar

Graaf, Evelien de, Silvia Stopponi, Jasper K. Bos, Saskia Peels-Matthey & Malvina Nissim. 2022. AGILe: The first lemmatizer for Ancient Greek inscriptions. In Proceedings of the thirteenth language resources and evaluation conference, 5334–5344. Marseille, France: European Language Resources Association.Search in Google Scholar

Grondelaers, Stefan & Roeland van Hout. 2016. How (in)coherent can standard languages be? A perceptual perspective on co-variation. Lingua 172–173. 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.012.Search in Google Scholar

Halla-aho, Hilla. 2018. Scribes in private letter writing: Linguistic perspectives. In Jennifer Cromwell & Eitan Grossman (eds.), Scribal repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the early Islamic period, 227–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. & Tamara García-Vidal. 2018. Persona management and identity projection in English medieval society: Evidence from John Paston II. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4(1). 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0027.Search in Google Scholar

Holton, David, Geoffrey C. Horrocks, Marjolijne Janssen, Tina Lentarē, Iō Manōlessou & Notis Toufexis. 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Medieval and Early Modern Greek. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316632840Search in Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 2010. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers, 2nd edn. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. & Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2021. Cross-cultural pragmatics. Cambridge: University Press.10.1017/9781108954587Search in Google Scholar

Janse, Mark. 2020. The sociolinguistic study of Ancient Greek and Latin. ARCTOS 54. 333–355.10.71390/arctos.110095Search in Google Scholar

Jansen-Sieben, Ria. 1989. La littérature utilitaire moyen-néerlandaise. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire 67. 543–550. https://doi.org/10.3406/rbph.1989.3679.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Lawrence. 2010. The literary heritage as language: Atticism and the Second Sophistic. In Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language, 468–482. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444317398.ch31Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. A. L. 1985. Some features of the speech of Jesus in Mark’s Gospel. Novum Testamentum 27(1). 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853685x00148.Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. 2001. Discursive technologies and the social organization of meaning. Folia Linguistica 35(1–2). 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2001.35.1-2.79.Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Planned and unplanned discourse. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax, 51–80. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368897_004Search in Google Scholar

Rafiyenko, Dariya & Ilja Seržant. 2022. Ideology and identity in grammar: A diachronic-quantitative approach to language standardisation processes in Ancient Greek. In Johannes Müller (ed.), Connectivity matters! Social, environmental and cultural connectivity in past societies, 187–208. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rickford, John Russell. 2019. Implicational scales. In Variation, versatility and change in sociolinguistics and creole studies, 120–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316091142.008Search in Google Scholar

Royce, Terry D. 2007. Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Wendy Bowcher & Terry D. Royce (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–109. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Ruffini, Giovanni. 2008. Social networks in Byzantine Egypt. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511552014Search in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert. 2016. Historicizing diaglossia. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(1). 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12165.Search in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert & Andreas Krogull. 2021. The observee’s paradox: Theorizing linguistic differences between historical ego-documents. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 122(1–2). 284–318. https://doi.org/10.51814/nm.101806.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W. 2004. Investigating variation and change in written documents. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 67–96. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756591.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2023. Language in culture. Lectures on the social semiotics of language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009198813Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Winnie. 2024. Spelling variation in Greek letters from Oxyrhynchus 50–350 AD. Oxford: Oxford University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2). 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1076/ejes.5.2.139.7309.Search in Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2000. Sociohistorical linguistics and the observer’s paradox. In Dieter Kastovsky & Arthur Mettinger (eds.), The history of English in a social context: A contribution to historical sociolinguistics, 441–462. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110810301.441Search in Google Scholar

Vatri, Alessandro. 2019. Stilistica e parametri di variazione linguistica nella retorica greca. In Andreas Willi & Philippe Derron (eds.), Formes et fonctions des langues littéraires en Grèce ancienne: Neuf exposés suivis de discussions, Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique, Tome LXV, 143–184. Genève: Fondation Hardt.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Wal, Marijke J. & Gijsbert Rutten. 2013. Ego-documents in a historical sociolinguistic perspective. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.1.01walSearch in Google Scholar