Abstract
In the eighteenth century, a period dominated by linguistic correctness, propriety and etiquette, appropriate forms of address are a customary feature in correspondence and a key means by which individuals are able to construct their social identity in light of their relationships with others. In this context, and framed within the fields of historical sociolinguistics and historical sociopragmatics, this paper explores the role of direct address as a socially-governed linguistic practice and as an index of politeness, and the focus lies in intra-speaker variation in the use of personal names and honorifics in the opening, body and subscription parts of the letter. The study is based on a set of 170 private letters written by Mary Hamilton (1756–1816), courtier, diarist and a member of the Bluestocking circle, and the analysis considers notions traditionally connected with pragmatic language use such as distance, power and politeness, bearing in mind other content-dependent factors as well. Overall, the research presented here aims to contribute to a growing body of literature which understands ego-documents as providing a window onto language and society.
Funding source: Arts and Humanities Research Council
Award Identifier / Grant number: AH/S007121/1
Funding source: Xunta de Galicia
Award Identifier / Grant number: Grant ED431C 2021/52
Acknowledgements
Unlocking the Mary Hamilton Papers is a three-year research project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/S007121/1), based at the University of Manchester in collaboration with University of Vigo and the University of York (www.maryhamiltonpapers.alc.manchester.ac.uk). Yáñez-Bouza would also like to acknowledge Grant ED431C 2021/52 (Xunta de Galicia).
References
Anglemark, Linnéa. 2018. “Heav’n bess you, my Dear”: Using the ESDD corpus to investigate address terms in historical drama dialogue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19(2). 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00018.ang.Suche in Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1762. The art of letter-writing, divided into two parts. London: printed for T. Osborne.Suche in Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1768. The complete letter-writer. Containing familiar letters on the most common occasions in life. Edinburgh: printed by John Reid.Suche in Google Scholar
Baggerman, Arianne & Rudolf Dekker. 2018. Jacques Presser, ego-documents and the personal turn in historiography. The European Journal of Life Writing 7. 90–110. https://doi.org/10.5463/ejlw.7.263.Suche in Google Scholar
Baker, Frank. 1980. The works of John Wesley, Vol. 25: Letters, I: 1721–1739. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bannet, Eve T. 2005. Empire of letters: Letter manuals and transatlantic correspondence, 1680–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Barton, David & Nigel Hall (eds.). 2000. Letter writing as a social practice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/swll.9Suche in Google Scholar
Bijkerk, Annemieke. 2004. Yours sincerely and Yours affectionately: On the origin and development of two positive politeness markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(2). 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.08bij.Suche in Google Scholar
Brant, Clare. 2006. Eighteenth-century letters and British culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-74050-5Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Suche in Google Scholar
Buyle, Anouk. 2021. Dear, my dear, my lady, your ladyship: Meaning and use of address term modulation by my. Pragmatics 31(1). 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19024.buy.Suche in Google Scholar
Carter, John. 1773. A practical English grammar … Or, a plain and easy guide to speaking and writing the English language with accuracy and correctness. Leeds: printed for John Binns.Suche in Google Scholar
Coulombeau, Sophie. 2021. This is not a love story. History Today 71(10). 64–75.Suche in Google Scholar
Coulombeau, Sophie, David Denison & Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (eds.). In preparation. Mary Hamilton and polite society: Social circles, Reading practices and language change in eighteenth-century England.Suche in Google Scholar
Crawley, Lisa. 2014. A life recovered: Mary Hamilton 1756–1816. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 90(2). 27–46. https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.90.2.3.Suche in Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Michael Haugh. 2021. (Im)politeness and sociopragmatics. In Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár & Marina Terkourafi (eds.), Handbook of sociopragmatics, 315–339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.018Suche in Google Scholar
Dekker, Rudolf (ed.). 2000. Egodocuments and history. Autobiographical writing in its social context since the Middle Ages. Hilversum: Verloren.Suche in Google Scholar
De la Serre, Jean Puget. 1673. The secretary in fashion or, an elegant and compendious way of writing all manner letters, 5th edn. London: printed for Peter Parker.Suche in Google Scholar
Denison, David & Tino Oudesluijs. In preparation. Reconstructing Mary Hamilton’s social networks. In Sophie Coulombeau, David Denison & Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (eds.), Mary Hamilton and polite society: Social circles, Reading practices and language change in eighteenth-century England.Suche in Google Scholar
Denison, David, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza & Tino Oudesluijs. Forthcoming. Editing The Mary Hamilton Papers (c.1740–c.1850). In Javier Calle-Martín & Jesús Romero-Barranco (eds.), Corpora and language change in Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Dilworth, H. W. 1758. The familiar letter-writers or young secretary’s complete instructor. London: printed for G. Wright.Suche in Google Scholar
Gardner, Anne-Christine. 2016. “he is certainly a very clever Man”: Self-corrections in Lady Mary Hamilton’s first diary. Paper presented at the 19th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, 22–26 August.Suche in Google Scholar
Gardner, Anne-Christine. In preparation. Self-corrections as indexes of social relationships: Observations from Mary Hamilton’s correspondence with Frances Burney and the Dowager Duchess of Portland (1781–1789). In Sophie Coulombeau, David Denison & Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (eds.), Mary Hamilton and polite society: Social circles, Reading practices and language change in eighteenth-century England.Suche in Google Scholar
Häcker, Martina. 2019. Kinship or friendship? The word cousin as a term of address for non-relatives in Middle English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20(1). 96–131. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17005.hac.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, S. 1758. A complete introduction to the art of writing letters; universally adapted to all classes and conditions of life. London: printed for Henry Dell, and J. Staples.Suche in Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2011. Positive and negative face as descriptive categories in the history of English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1–2). 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.08juc.Suche in Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2020. Politeness in the history of English. From the Middle Ages to the present day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108589147Suche in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Leitner, Magdalena. 2015. Conflicts in Early Modern Scottish letters and law-courts. University of Glasgow, Doctoral thesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Leitner, Magdalena & Andreas H. Jucker. 2021. Historical sociopragmatics. In Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár & Marina Terkourafi (eds.), Handbook of sociopragmatics, 687–709. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108954105.035Suche in Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Suche in Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred. 2006. Abbreviations in Early Modern English correspondence. In Marina Dossena & Susan Fitzmaurice (eds.), Business and official correspondence: Historical investigations, 107–128. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2017. English politeness and class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316336922Suche in Google Scholar
Navest, Karlijn. 2004. A painter’s will to please: Reynolds’ use of yours affectionately/yours sincerely. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 4. http://www.hum2.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/reynolds%20letters.htm.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 1998. By him that loves you: Address forms in letter written to sixteenth-century social aspirers. In Antoinette Renouf (ed.), Explorations in corpus linguistics, 147–157. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653658_013Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2002. Youre moder send a letter to the: Pronouns of address in private correspondence from Late Middle to Late Modern English. In Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Variation past and present: VARIENG studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen, 135–155. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2003. Family first: Address and subscription formulae in English family correspondence from the fifteenth to the seventeenth century. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, 147–176. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.107.08nevSuche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2004a. Address in Early English correspondence: Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2004b. Inside and out: Forms of address in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century letters. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(2). 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.2.07nev.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2004c. Accessing politeness axes: On forms of address and terms of reference in early English correspondence. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 2125–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2009. Altering distance and defining authority: Person reference in Late Modern English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.05nev.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2010a. Keeping up appearances: Facework in self- and addressee-oriented person reference. In Jonathan Culpeper, Dániel Z. Kádár & Jim O’Driscoll (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 147–173. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2010b. Politeness. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical Pragmatics, 419–450. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110214284.6.419Suche in Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Minna Palander-Collin & Tanja Säily (eds.). 2018. Patterns of change in 18th-century English. A sociolinguistic approach. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.8Suche in Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in early English correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 541–601. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.35.28nevSuche in Google Scholar
Nurmi, Arja & Minna Nevala. 2010. The social space of an eighteenth-century governess: Modality and reference in the private letters and journals of Agnes Porter. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English, 163–189. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.195.08nurSuche in Google Scholar
Oudesluijs, Tino. Forthcoming. “No criticism or remarks & pray burn it as fast as you read it”. Exploring copying practices in Mary Hamilton’s private correspondence. In Luisella Caon, Moragh Gordon & Thijs Porck (eds.), Unlocking the history of English. Pragmatics, prescriptivism and text types. Proceedings of ICEHL-21, 7–11 June 2021, Leiden. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Suche in Google Scholar
Oudesluijs, Tino & Nuria Yáñez-Bouza. Forthcoming. Constructing identities and negotiating relationships in late eighteenth-century England: Mary Hamilton and her correspondents at court. International Journal of English Studies 23(2).10.6018/ijes.558721Suche in Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 2009. Patterns of interaction: Self-mention and addressee inclusion in the letters of Nathaniel Bacon and his correspondents. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 53–74. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.183.05palSuche in Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. Forms of address in early English correspondence. In Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 167–181. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004653030_011Suche in Google Scholar
Seabra-Dacosta, Carla. 2017. Epistolary writing in the eighteenth century: Terms of address and self-corrections. Universidade de Vigo, MA dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker. 2016. Forms of address. In Carole Hough (ed.), Oxford handbook of names and naming, 427–437. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.54Suche in Google Scholar
The Mary Hamilton Papers (c.1740 – c.1850) . Compiled by David Denison, Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Tino Oudesluijs, Cassandra Ulph, Christine Wallis, Hannah Barker and Sophie Coulombeau. University of Manchester. 2019–2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48420/21687809.Suche in Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1999. Of formulas and friends: Expressions of politeness in John Gay’s letters. In Guy A. J. Tops, Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds.), Thinking English grammar. To honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus, 99–112. Louvain: Peeters.Suche in Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2006. “Disrespectful and too familiar”? Abbreviations as an index of politeness in eighteenth-century letters. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Nikolaus Ritt, Herbert Schendl & Dieter Kastovsky (eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000, 229–247. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2011. The bishop’s grammar. Robert Lowth and the rise of prescriptivism in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579273.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2014. In search of Jane Austen: The language of the letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945115.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.). 2013. Touching the past. Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/ahs.1Suche in Google Scholar
Whyman, Susan. 2009. The pen and the people: English letter writers, 1660–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199532445.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2013. British colonial office correspondence on the Cape Colony (1820–1821): Metatextual keywords vs. analytic categories. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49(3). 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2013-0015.Suche in Google Scholar
Yáñez Bouza, Nuria. Forthcoming. By Miranda, Mary Hamilton, Mrs Dickenson – Self-reference in Late Modern English private correspondence. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 124(2).10.51814/nm.122282Suche in Google Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. In preparation. ‘Directions for addressing persons of all ranks’ in late eighteenth-century letter-writing manuals.Suche in Google Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria & Tino Oudesluijs. Forthcoming. ‘My dearest friend … Ever Yours – Mary Hamilton’: Exploring forms of address in the late Georgian period. In Javier Calle-Martín & Jesús Romero Barranco (eds.), Corpora and language change in Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Flipping the script? Native-speaker linguists and colonial orthographies in nineteenth-century Senegal
- ‘My dearest Clara … my dear friend’ – Personal Names and direct address in Mary Hamilton’s private correspondence
- Finnish reported speech and Swedish intratextual translations in 17th-century court records
- Academic writing and identity: evaluative discourse in academic papers across cohorts of 20th century linguists
- Developing a standard in lower-class Scottish writing: pauper petitions as a source for nineteenth-century lower-class Scottish language
- Book Reviews
- Lenore A. Grenoble & Jessica Kantarovich: Reconstructing Non-Standard Languages: A socially-anchored approach (IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 52)
- Karen Bennett & Angelo Cattaneo: Language Dynamics in the Early Modern Period (Multilingualism, Lingua Franca and Translation in the Early Modern Period)
- Joshua R. Brown: The Verticalization Model of Language Shift: The Great Change in American Communities
- Markus Schiegg: Flexible Schreiber in der Sprachgeschichte. Intraindividuelle Variation in Patientenbriefen (1850–1936) (Germanistische Bibliothek 75)
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Flipping the script? Native-speaker linguists and colonial orthographies in nineteenth-century Senegal
- ‘My dearest Clara … my dear friend’ – Personal Names and direct address in Mary Hamilton’s private correspondence
- Finnish reported speech and Swedish intratextual translations in 17th-century court records
- Academic writing and identity: evaluative discourse in academic papers across cohorts of 20th century linguists
- Developing a standard in lower-class Scottish writing: pauper petitions as a source for nineteenth-century lower-class Scottish language
- Book Reviews
- Lenore A. Grenoble & Jessica Kantarovich: Reconstructing Non-Standard Languages: A socially-anchored approach (IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 52)
- Karen Bennett & Angelo Cattaneo: Language Dynamics in the Early Modern Period (Multilingualism, Lingua Franca and Translation in the Early Modern Period)
- Joshua R. Brown: The Verticalization Model of Language Shift: The Great Change in American Communities
- Markus Schiegg: Flexible Schreiber in der Sprachgeschichte. Intraindividuelle Variation in Patientenbriefen (1850–1936) (Germanistische Bibliothek 75)