Startseite Rechtswissenschaften Vicarious Liability Restricted for Intentional Torts in English Law: Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Vicarious Liability Restricted for Intentional Torts in English Law: Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB

  • Achas K Burin ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Dezember 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB, a sexual abuse case, is the latest UK Supreme Court judgment on vicarious liability. This case note is critical of the substantive judgment, as well as the court’s method of arriving at it. The case note argues that the Supreme Court allowed the appeal on tenuous grounds. Further, the practical effect of the judgment is unwelcome. As a result of this case, it will be harder for survivors of sexual abuse to demonstrate vicarious liability because they will find it difficult to show a naturally close connection between intentional torts and authorised employment activities. Lastly, the case note criticises the Supreme Court’s treatment of the facts and the language it used.


Note

Thanks to the anonymous reviewers and to the editor of this Journal for their comments. Thanks also to Craig Allen, Shreya Atrey, Charlotte Elves, Hayley Hooper, Nina Ross, Samantha Sebastian-Dieckmann, Leah Trueblood, and Faridah Zaman for their helpful input.


Published Online: 2024-12-05
Published in Print: 2024-11-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 15.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jetl-2024-0017/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen