Home Literary Studies Dealing with Bodies: The Corporeal Dimension in Sarah Kane’s Cleansed and Martin Crimp’s The Country
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dealing with Bodies: The Corporeal Dimension in Sarah Kane’s Cleansed and Martin Crimp’s The Country

  • Maria Elena Capitani EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 6, 2013

Abstract

This article explores the continuities and discontinuities between Sarah Kane’s and Martin Crimp’s approaches to corporeality. Even if they differ from a variety of points of view, both Cleansed and The Country share a conspicuous concern with figurations of the body as a fraught and disturbing object. Although its horrific tortures are not meant to be performed in a realistic way, Cleansed develops a discourse on the body which is entirely in keeping with ‘experiential’ theatre. This investment in graphic violence starkly contrasts with Crimp’s practice in The Country, in which the corporeal component is more alluded to than openly staged. Yet, despite its allusive and symbolical import, The Country is another viscerally physical play which subtly and disturbingly interweaves several senses. Exemplifying two different possible treatments of the body on the contemporary British stage, these plays make the physical hyperbolically visible yet also remove it from sight, offering different but subtly complementary ways of problematising corporeality and its performance.

About the author

Maria Elena Capitani

Works Cited

Primary Literature

Crimp, Martin. The Country. Plays Two. London: Faber and Faber, 2005. 285–366.10.5040/9780571292493.00000044Search in Google Scholar

Kane, Sarah. Cleansed. Complete Plays. London: Methuen, 2001. 105–151.Search in Google Scholar

4.48 Psychosis. Complete Plays. London: Methuen, 2001. 203–245.Search in Google Scholar

Secondary Literature

Angel-Perez, Élisabeth. Voyages au bout du possible: Les Théâtres du traumatisme de Samuel Beckett à Sarah Kane. Paris: Klincksieck, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Ayache, Solange. “Theatre and Psychoanalysis: Or Jung on Martin Crimp’s Stage. ‘100 Words.’” Sillages critiques 10 (2009). 30 August 2012 <http://sillagescritiques.revues.org/1838.html>.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.Search in Google Scholar

Brusberg-Kiermeier, Stefani. “Cruelty, Violence and Rituals in Sarah Kane’s Plays.” Sarah Kane in Context. Eds. Laurens De Vos and Graham Saunders. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2010. 80–87.Search in Google Scholar

Buse, Peter. “Sollicitations téléphoniques: La Campagne de Martin Crimp.” Le Théâtre anglais contemporain: 1985–2005. Eds. Élisabeth Angel-Perez and Nicole Boireau. Paris: Klincksieck, 2007. 153–168.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Alyson. “Experiencing Kane: An Affective Analysis of Sarah Kane’s ‘Experiential’ Theatre in Performance.” Australasian Drama Studies 46 (2005): 80–97.Search in Google Scholar

Capitani, Maria Elena. “Blurring Ethical Boundaries: (Im)moral Ambiguity in Martin Crimp’s Characters.” Performing Ethos: An International Journal of Ethics in Theatre and Performance 2.1 (2011): 65–68.10.1386/peet.2.1.65_7Search in Google Scholar

– “‘The Treatment Was Wild’: Medicina, desiderio e coscienza in The Country di Martin Crimp.” La Torre di Babele: Rivista di letteratura e linguistica 8 (2012): 213–235.Search in Google Scholar

De Vos, Laurens. Cruelty and Desire in the Modern Theater: Antonin Artaud, Sarah Kane, and Samuel Beckett. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson UP, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

Fordyce, Ehren. “The Voice of Kane.” Sarah Kane in Context. Eds. Laurens De Vos and Graham Saunders. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2010. 103–114.Search in Google Scholar

Marlowe, Sam. Rev. of The Country, by Martin Crimp. What’s On 24 May 2000. Rpt. in Theatre Record 20 (2000): 616.Search in Google Scholar

McEvoy, Wiliam. Rev. of The Country, by Martin Crimp. Sunday Telegraph 21 May 2000. Rpt. in Theatre Record 20 (2000): 617–618.Search in Google Scholar

Middeke, Martin. “Martin Crimp.” The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary British Playwrights. Eds. Martin Middeke, Peter Paul Schnierer, and Aleks Sierz. London: Methuen Drama, 2011. 82–102.Search in Google Scholar

Peter, John. Rev. of Cleansed, by Sarah Kane. Sunday Times 10 May 1998. Rpt. in Theatre Record 18 (1998): 564.Search in Google Scholar

Rees, Catherine. “Sarah Kane.” Modern British Playwriting: The 1990s. Voices, Documents, New Interpretations. Ed. Aleks Sierz. London: Methuen Drama, 2012. 112–137.Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, Graham. About Kane: The Playwright and the Work. London: Faber and Faber, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

“Love Me or Kill Me”: Sarah Kane and the Theatre of Extremes. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

Sierz, Aleks. “‘D’You Really Give My Scribbling That Much Thought?’ Narrative Games in the Plays of Martin Crimp.” Narrative in Drama: Papers Given on the Occasion of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the German Society for Contemporary Theatre and Drama in English. Eds. Merle Tönnies and Christina Flotmann. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2011. 207–225.Search in Google Scholar

– “‘Form Follows Function’: Meaning and Politics in Martin Crimp’s Fewer Emergencies.” Modern Drama 50.3 (2007): 375–393.10.1353/mdr.2007.0061Search in Google Scholar

In-Yer-Face Theatre: British Drama Today. London: Faber and Faber, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

The Theatre of Martin Crimp. London: Methuen Drama, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Voigts-Virchow, Eckart. “‘We Are Anathema’: Sarah Kane’s Plays as Postdramatic Theatre versus the ‘Dreary and Repugnant Tale of Sense.’” Sarah Kane in Context. Eds. Laurens De Vos and Graham Saunders. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2010. 195–208.Search in Google Scholar

Waddington, Julie. “Posthumanist Identities in Sarah Kane.” Sarah Kane in Context. Eds. Laurens De Vos and Graham Saunders. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2010. 139–148.Search in Google Scholar

Wallace, Clare. “Sarah Kane, Experiential Theatre and the Revenant Avant-Garde.” Sarah Kane in Context. Eds. Laurens De Vos and Graham Saunders. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2010. 88–99.Search in Google Scholar

Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-05-06
Published in Print: 2013-05

© 2013 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 3.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcde-2013-0013/html
Scroll to top button