Abstract
This article studies Albert the Great’s conception of reciprocal interiority in the exposition of John 14:10: “Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works” (Bible quotes from the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)). Firstly, the article explores how Albert the Great understands reciprocal interiority as an element of the debate concerning the equality of the Father and of the Son, who, although identical in nature, are different according to the relation, like the one who begets and the one who is begotten. Secondly, it emphasizes the metaphysical solution that Albert borrows from Greek-Arabic neoplatonism, especially from the Liber de causis, so as to refute an objection based on Aristotle’s conception of place. This cultural transfer brings to light how Albert the Great’s Super Iohannem is an innovative melting pot in which Albert imports a new framework from profane sciences, with which to interpret the Gospel of John.
Works Cited
Primary Sources and Modern Commentaries
Albertus, Magnus. 1987. Physica, Editio Coloniensis IV/1: lib. I-IV; IV/2: lib. V–VIII, edited by H. Paul and K. Wilhelm. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Albertus, Magnus. 1899. Enarrationes in Ioannem, Editio Parisiensis XXIV, edited by A. & Æ. Borgnet. Paris: Vivès.Search in Google Scholar
Albertus, Magnus. 1993. De Causis et Processu Universitatis a Prima Causa. Editio Coloniensis XVII/2, edited by W. Fauser. Münster: Aschendorff.Search in Google Scholar
Albertus, Magnus. 2015. Super I librum Sententiarum. Distinctiones 1–3, Editio Coloniensis XXIX/1, edited by M. Burger. Kohlhammer: Aschendorff.Search in Google Scholar
Albertus, Magnus. 2019. Super Iohannem (Ioh. 1, 1-18), Eckhart: Texts and Studies 10, edited by J. Casteigt. Leuven, Paris and Bristol, Connecticut: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar
Biblia cum glossa ordinaria. 1480–1. t. IV. Strasbourg: Adolph Rusch.Search in Google Scholar
Denzinger, H. 2017. Kompendium der Glaubensbekenntnisse und kirchlichen Lehrentscheidungen: Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum, 45. edn. (Erweitete Neuausgabe), edited by Peter Hünermann. Freiburg im Breisgau, Basel and Vienna: Herder.Search in Google Scholar
Glossa ordinaria. 1617. t. V. Antverpiae: Iohannes Keerbergium.Search in Google Scholar
Meister, Eckhart. 1994. Expositio sancti Evangelii secundum Iohannem, edited and trans. by K. Christ, B. Decker, J. Koch, H. Fischer, L. Sturlese, and A. Zimmermann, Die lateinischen Werke III. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Search in Google Scholar
Meister, Eckhart. 1992. Sermones et lectiones super Ecclesiastici cap. 24, 23-31, edited and trans. by J. Koch and H. Fischer, Die lateinischen Werke II. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 229–300.Search in Google Scholar
Proclus Diadochus. 1987. Elementatio Theologica, vol. 5, Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, Series 1, trans. Guillelmus de Morbeka, edited by H. Boese. Leuven: University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Aersten, J. A., and J. Speer, eds. 1998. Raum und Raumvorstellungen im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 25. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802054Search in Google Scholar
Amerini, F, ed. 2014. ‘In Principio erat Verbum’. Philosophy and Theology in the Commentaries of the Gospel of John (II-XIV Century), vol. 11. Archa Verbi. Subsidia. Münster: Aschendorff Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Anzulewicz, H. 2011. “Zwischen Spekulation und Erfahrung. Alberts des Großen Begriff vom Raum.” In Représentations et conceptions de l’espace dans la culture médiévale, Scrinium Friburgense 30, edited by T. Suarez-Nani and M. Rohde, 67–87. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110259438.67Search in Google Scholar
Casteigt, J. 2016. “Le lieu, principe d’individualisation ou d’intériorité réciproque dans le commentaire johannique de Maître Eckhart?” In Performing Bodies. Time and Space in Meister Eckhart and in the Performances and Video Installations of Taery Kim, Eckhart: Texts and Studies 6. eds. C. Wojtulewicz and J. Vinzent, 115–41. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Casteigt, J. 2019a. “Denken in Bildern und durch Bilder: Eckharts Einssein im Anderen.” Divus Thomas 122 (2): 265–95.Search in Google Scholar
Casteigt, J. 2019b. “The self as totum potestativum in Albert the Great’s Works: How Does a Cultural Transfer Lead to a Dynamic Conception of Identity?” In Religious Individualisation: Historical Dimensions and Comparative Perspectives, edited by M. Fuchs, A. Linkenbach, M. Mulsow, B.-C. Otto, R. Bjørn Parson, and J. Rüpke, 345–59. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Casteigt, J. 2019c. Métaphysique et connaissance testimoniale. Une lecture figurale du Super Iohannem (John 1,7) d’Albert le Grand, Eckhart: Texts and Studies 11. Paris and Bristol, Connecticut, Leuven: Peeters.10.2307/j.ctv1q26mhhSearch in Google Scholar
d’Ancona, C. 1989. “Le fonti e la struttura del Liber de causis.” Medioevo 15, 1–38.Search in Google Scholar
d’Ancona, C. 2005. “Les Sentences de Porphyre entre les Ennéades de Plotin et les Éléments de Théologie de Proclus.” In Porphyre, Sentences. Études d’introduction, texte grec et traduction française et commentaire, Histoire des doctrines de l’Antiquité classique XXXIII. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Donati, S. 1998. “Materie und räumliche Ausdehnung in einigen ungedruckten Physikkommentaren aus der Zeit von etwa 1250–1270.” In Raum und Raumvorstellungen im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 25, edited by J. A. Aersten and A. Speer, 17–51. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802054.17Search in Google Scholar
Durand, E. 2005. La Périchôrèse des personnes divines: Immanence mutuelle, réciprocité et communion, Cogitatio fidei 243. Paris: Cerf.Search in Google Scholar
Émery, G. 1995. La Trinité créatrice. Trinité et création dans les commentaires aux Sentences de Thomas d’Aquin et de ses précurseurs Albert le Grand et Bonaventure, Bibliothèque Thomiste. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Enders, M., and R. Kuhl. 2011. “Im Anfang war der Logos…”. Studien zur Rezeptionsgeschichte des Johannesprologs von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, Forschungen zur europäischen Geistesgeschichte 11. Freiburg, Basel and Vienna: Herder.Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, R. L. 2013. Intellectual Traditions at the Medieval University. The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250–1350, vol. 1 Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 108/1. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004231986Search in Google Scholar
Gilson, É. 1998. L’Esprit de la philosophie médiévale, Études de philosophie médiévale. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Imbach, R. 1995. “La Filosofia nel prologo di S. Giovanni secondo S. Agostino, S. Tommaso e Meister Eckhart”, Studi, a cura di Dietrich Lorenz O. P. & Stefano Serafini, 161–82. Roma: Istituo San Tommaso, Pontificia Università S. Tommaso d’Aquino.Search in Google Scholar
Libera, A. de. 1990a. “Albert le Grand et Thomas d’Aquin, interprètes du Liber de causis.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 74: 347–78.Search in Google Scholar
Libera, A. de. 1990b. Albert le Grand et la philosophie, À la recherche de la vérité. Paris: J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Libera, A. de. 1993. La Philosophie médiévale, Premier Cycle. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar
Ringelben, J. 2014. Das philosophische Evangelium. Theologische Auslegung des Johannesevangeliums im Horizont des Sprachdenkens, HUzTh 64. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar
Schnelle, U. 2016. “Philosophische Interpretation des Johannesevangeliums. Voraussetzungen, Methoden und Perspektiven.” In The Prologue of the Gospel of John. Its Literary, Theological, and Philosophical Contexts. Papers read at the Colloquium Ioanneum 2013, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 359, edited by J. G van der Watt, R. A. Culpepper, and U. Schnelle, 159–187. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar
Snyder, S. C. 2012. “Place, Time and the Continuum in Albert’s Physica 4-6.” In A Companion to Albert the Great. Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, Brill’s Companions to the Christian Tradition 38, ed. I. M. Resnick, 188–204. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, T., O. Ribordy, and A. Petagine, eds. 2017. Lieu, Espace, Mouvement: Physique, métaphysique et cosmologie (XIIe-XVIe siècles), Textes et Études du Moyen Âge – TEMA 86, Actes du colloque international Université de Fribourg (Swiss), March 12–14, 2015. Turnhout: Brepols.Search in Google Scholar
van der Watt, J. G., R. A. Culpepper, and U. Schnelle, eds. 2016. The Prologue of the Gospel of John. Its Literary, Theological, and Philosophical Contexts. Papers read at the Colloquium Ioanneum 2013, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament (WUNT) 359. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John
- The Father, the Son, and John on Location in the Farewell Discourse
- The Father in the Son, the Son in the Father in the Gospel of John: Sources and Reception of Dynamic Unity in Middle and Neoplatonism, ‘Pagan’ and Christian
- From the Middle Ages Back to Antiquity: The Reception of the Idea of Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John as Entanglement of Intellectual Traditions
- „Idemität“. Zum Konzept Meister Eckharts in seinem selektiven Kommentar zum Johannesevangelium
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John
- The Father, the Son, and John on Location in the Farewell Discourse
- The Father in the Son, the Son in the Father in the Gospel of John: Sources and Reception of Dynamic Unity in Middle and Neoplatonism, ‘Pagan’ and Christian
- From the Middle Ages Back to Antiquity: The Reception of the Idea of Dynamic Unity in the Gospel of John as Entanglement of Intellectual Traditions
- „Idemität“. Zum Konzept Meister Eckharts in seinem selektiven Kommentar zum Johannesevangelium