Home Precision point positioning with additional baseline vector constraint
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Precision point positioning with additional baseline vector constraint

  • Wantong Chen and Zhenghui Shang ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 13, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Traditional precise point positioning (PPP) based on undifferenced ionosphere-free linear combination of observations has many advantages such as high accuracy and easy operation. PPP usually uses the Kalman Filter (KF) to estimate state vector. However, the positioning performance depends on the accuracy of the kinematic model and initial value. The inaccurate kinematic model or initial value will lead to filter performance degradation or even divergence. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes a PPP method with an additional baseline vector constraint, which uses the direction information and length information of the baseline to correct the estimated position of the receiver. By reducing the error covariance matrix of the float solution, the algorithm improves the accuracy of the float solution. By using the collected real GPS static and kinematic data, the performance of the traditional model and the proposed model in this paper are compared. It is shown that the additional baseline vector constraint improves the PPP solution effectively in comparison with that of traditional PPP model. Additionally, the contribution of the additional constraint is up to the accuracy of the prior information.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 3122018D012

Award Identifier / Grant number: 19JCQNJC00800

Funding statement: This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Program No. 3122018D012). This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City under Grant 19JCQNJC00800.

References

[1] Abdel-Salam M A. Precise point positioning using un-differenced code and carrier phase observations. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada (2005).Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bahadur B, Nohutcu M. PPPH: a MATLAB-based software for multi-GNSS precise point positioning analysis. GPS Solutions 22.4 (2018): 113.10.1007/s10291-018-0777-zSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Choy S, Bisnath S, Rizos C. Uncovering common misconceptions in GNSS Precise Point Positioning and its future prospect. GPS Solutions 21.1 (2017): 13–22.10.1007/s10291-016-0545-xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Guo F, Zhang X, Wang F. Adaptive robust Kalman filtering for precise point positioning. Measurement Science and Technology 25.10 (2014): 105011.10.1088/0957-0233/25/10/105011Search in Google Scholar

[5] Guo F, Zhang X, Wang F. Performance enhancement for GPS positioning using constrained Kalman filtering. Measurement Science and Technology 26.8 (2015): 085020.10.1088/0957-0233/26/8/085020Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gupta N. Mathematically equivalent approaches for equality constrained Kalman Filtering. Biogeosciences 7.1 (2009): 81–93.Search in Google Scholar

[7] He K, Xu T, Förste C, et al. GNSS precise kinematic positioning for multiple kinematic stations based on a priori distance constraints. Sensors 16.4 (2016): 470.10.3390/s16040470Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Jiang C Y, Zhang Y A. Some results on linear equality constrained state filtering. International Journal of Control 86.12 (2013): 2115–2130.10.1080/00207179.2013.801565Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jiang C Y, Zhang Y A. Reduced-order Kalman filtering for state constrained linear systems. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 24.4 (2013): 674–682.10.1109/JSEE.2013.00078Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jiang W, Chen S, Cai B, et al. A multi-sensor positioning method-based train localization system for low density line. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 67.11 (2018): 10425–10437.10.1109/TVT.2018.2869157Search in Google Scholar

[11] Li P, Zhang X, Zuo X. Mathematic Model and Performance Comparison Between Ionosphere-free Combined and Uncombined Precise Point Positioning. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University 5 (2013): 13.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Liu Y, Li J, Zhu D. Application of adaptive Kalman filter restricted by road information to vehicle-borne navigation. Geomatics Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ 33 (2008): 828–830.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rabbou M A, El-Rabbany A. Precise Point Positioning using Multi-Constellation GNSS Observations for Kinematic Applications. Journal of Applied Geodesy 9.1 (2015).10.1515/jag-2014-0021Search in Google Scholar

[14] Shi J, Gao Y. A comparison of three PPP integer ambiguity resolution methods. GPS solutions 18.4 (2014): 519–528.10.1007/s10291-013-0348-2Search in Google Scholar

[15] Simon D. Kalman filtering with state constraints: a survey of linear and nonlinear algorithms. IET Control Theory & Applications 4.8 (2010): 1303–1318.10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0032Search in Google Scholar

[16] Simon D, Chia T L. Kalman filtering with state equality constraints. IEEE transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 38.1 (2002): 128–136.10.1109/7.993234Search in Google Scholar

[17] Ubolkosold P, Knedlik S, Edwan E, et al. Constrained-trajectory based GPS/INS integration for reliable position and attitude determination. 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. (2007): 2923–2926.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wang L S, Chiang Y T, Chang F R. Filtering method for nonlinear systems with constraints. IEE Proceedings-Control Theory and Applications 149.6 (2002): 525–531.10.1049/ip-cta:20020799Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wen C, Cai Y, Liu Y, et al. A reduced-order approach to filtering for systems with linear equality constraints. Neurocomputing 193 (2016): 219–226.10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.020Search in Google Scholar

[20] Zhang X, Pan Y, Zuo X, et al. An improved robust Kalman filtering and its application in PPP. Geomatics Inf Sci Wuhan Univ 40.7 (2015): 858–864.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Xu S, Xiong Y, Wang D, et al. Kinematic Precise Point Positioning Algorithm with Constraint Condition. China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2016 Proceedings: Volume III. Springer, Singapore, 2016.10.1007/978-981-10-0940-2_47Search in Google Scholar

[22] Yang C, Blasch E. Kalman filtering with nonlinear state constraints. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 45.1 (2009): 70–84.10.1109/ICIF.2006.301553Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-08
Accepted: 2020-05-03
Published Online: 2020-05-13
Published in Print: 2020-07-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 27.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2020-0006/html
Scroll to top button