Contribution of satellite altimetry in modelling Moho density contrast in oceanic areas

References

[1] Abrehdary, M.; Sjöberg, L.E.; Bagherbandi, M.; Sampietro, D. Towards the Moho depth and Moho density contrast along with their uncertainties from seismic and satellite gravity observations. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 2017, 11(4), 231–247.10.1515/jag-2017-0019Search in Google Scholar

[2] Abrehdary, M.; Sjöberg, L.E.; Bagherbandi, M. Modelling Moho depth in ocean areas based on satellite altimetry using Vening Meinesz–Moritz’method. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2015a, 51(2), 137–149.10.1007/s40328-015-0116-6Search in Google Scholar

[3] Abrehdary, M.; Sjöberg, L.E.; Bagherbandi, M. Combined Moho parameters determination using CRUST1.0 and Vening Meinesz-Moritz model. Journal of Earth Science, 2015b, 26(4), 607–616.10.1007/s12583-015-0571-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] Abrehdary, M. Recovering Moho parameters using gravimetric and seismic data, Doctoral dissertation. 2016, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Aitken, A.; Salmon, M.; Kennett, B. Australia’s Moho: A test of usefulness of gravity modelling for the determination of Moho depth. Tectonophysics, 2013, 609, 468–479.10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.049Search in Google Scholar

[6] Andersen, O.B.; Knudsen, P. The role of satellite altimetry in gravity field modelling in coastal areas. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy, 2000 Jan 1, 25(1), 17–24.10.1016/S1464-1895(00)00004-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bassin, C.; Laske, G.; Masters, T.G. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. EOS Trans AGU, 2002, 81, F897.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bagherbandi, M.; Sjöberg, L.E. Improving gravimetric-isostatic models of crustal depth by correcting for non-isostatic effects and using CRUST2.0. Earth Sci. Rev., 2013, 117, 29–39.10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bai, Y.; Williams, S.E.; Müller, R.D.; Liu, Z.; Hosseinpour, M. Mapping crustal thickness using marine gravity data: Methods and uncertainties Crustal thickness by gravity inversion. Geophysics, 2014 Mar 1 79(2), G1-0.10.1190/geo2013-0270.1Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bott, M.H.P. The Interior of the Earth, Edward Arnold Publs., 1971, London, 316.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Carlson, R.L.; Raskin, G.S. Density of the ocean crust. Nature, 1984 Oct, 311(5986), 555.10.1038/311555a0Search in Google Scholar

[12] Deng, X.; Griffin, D.A.; Ridgway, K.; Church, J.A.; Featherstone, W.E.; White, N.J.; Cahill, M. Satellite altimetry for geodetic, oceanographic, and climate studies in the Australian region. In: Coastal altimetry (2011, pp. 473–508). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-12796-0_18Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hwang, C; Parsons, B. An optimal procedure for deriving marine gravity from multi-satellite altimetry. J Geophys Int, 1996, 125, 705–719.10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb06018.xSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Eshagh, M.; Hussain, M.; Tenzer, R.; Romeshkani, M. Moho density contrast in central Eurasia from GOCE gravity gradients. Remote Sensing, 2017, 8, 418, 1–18.10.3390/rs8050418Search in Google Scholar

[15] Goodacre, A.K. Generalized structure and composition of the deep crust and upper mantle in Canada. J. Geophys. Res., 1972, 77, 3146–3160.10.1029/JB077i017p03146Search in Google Scholar

[16] Laske, G.; Masters, G.; Ma, Z.; Pasyanos, M.E. Update on CRUST1.0-A 1-degree global model of Earth’s crust. Geophys. Res. Abstr., 2013, 15, EGU2013-2658.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Mariani, P.; Braitenberg, C.; Ussami, N. Explaining the thick crust in Paraná basin, Brazil, with satellite GOCE gravity observations. J. South Am. Earth Sci., 2013, 45, 209–223.10.1016/j.jsames.2013.03.008Search in Google Scholar

[18] Müller, R.D.; Sdrolias, M.; Gaina, C.; Roest, W.R. Age, spreading rates, and spreading asymmetry of the world’s ocean crust. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2008 Apr 1, 9(4).10.1029/2007GC001743Search in Google Scholar

[19] Niu, F.; James, D.E. Fine structure of the lowermost crust beneath the Kaapvaal craton and its implications for crustal formation and evolution. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2002, 200, 121–130.10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00584-8Search in Google Scholar

[20] Pavlis, N.K.; Factor, J.K.; Holmes, S.A. Terrain-related gravimetric quantities computed for the next EGM. In: Proceedings of the 1^st International Symposium of the International Gravity Field Service vol. 18 (2007, pp. 318–323). Harita Dergisi, Istanbul.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rapp, R.H. A comparison of altimeter and gravimetric geoids in the Tonga Trench and Indian Ocean areas. Bulletin géodésique, 1980, 54(2), 149–163.10.1007/BF02521244Search in Google Scholar

[22] Reguzzoni, M.; Sampietro, D.; Sansò, F. Global Moho from the combination of the CRUST2. 0 model and GOCE data. Geophysical Journal International, 2013, 195(1), 222–237.10.1093/gji/ggt247Search in Google Scholar

[23] Reguzzoni, M.; Sampietro, D. GEMMA: An Earth crustal model based on GOCE satellite data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2015, 35, 31–43.10.1016/j.jag.2014.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sampietro, D.; Mansi, A.; Capponi, M. Moho depth and crustal architecture beneath the Levant Basin from Global Gravity Field Model. Geosciences, 2018, 8(6), 200.10.3390/geosciences8060200Search in Google Scholar

[25] Root, B.C.; van der Wal, W.; Novák, P.; Ebbing, J.; Vermeersen, L.L. Glacial isostatic adjustment in the static gravity field of Fennoscandia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2015 Jan 1, 120(1), 503–518.10.1002/2014JB011508Search in Google Scholar

[26] Sjöberg, L.E. Solving Vening Meinesz-Moritz inverse problem in isostasy. Geophys. J. Int., 2009, 179, 1527–1536.10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04397.xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] Sjöberg, L.E.; Bagherbandi, M. A method of estimating the Moho density contrast with a tentative application by EGM08 and CRUST2.0. Acta Geophys., 2011, 59, 502–525.10.2478/s11600-011-0004-6Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sjöberg, L.E. On the isostatic gravity anomaly and disturbance and their applications to Vening Meinesz-Moritz inverse problem of isostasy. Geophys. J. Int., 2013, 193, 1277–1282.10.1093/gji/ggt008Search in Google Scholar

[29] Sandwell, D.T.; Müller, R.D.; Smith, W.H.F.; Garcia, E.; Francis, R. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science, 2014, 346(6205), 65–67, doi: 10.1126/science.1258213. Author information and acknowledgments.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Tenzer, R.; Bagherbandi, M.; Gladkikh, V. Signature of the upper mantle density structure in the refined gravity data. Comput. Geosci., 2012, 16, 975–986.10.1007/s10596-012-9298-ySearch in Google Scholar

[31] Tenzer, R.; Bagherbandi, M.; Vajda, P. Global model of the upper mantle lateral density structure based on combining seismic and isostatic models. Geosci. J., 2013, 17, 65–73.10.1007/s12303-013-0009-zSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Tenzer, R.; Chen, W. Regional gravity inversion of crustal thickness beneath the Tibetan plateau. Earth Sci. Inform., 2014, 7, 265–276.10.1007/s12145-014-0146-6Search in Google Scholar

[33] Tenzer, R.; Eshagh, M.; Jin, S. Martian sub-crustal stress from gravity and topographic models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2015a, 425, 84–92.10.1016/j.epsl.2015.05.049Search in Google Scholar

[34] Tenzer, R.; Chen, W.; Jin, S. Effect of Upper Mantle Density Structure on Moho Geometry. Pure Appl. Geophys., 2015b, 172, 1563–1583.10.1007/s00024-014-0960-2Search in Google Scholar

[35] Van der Meijde, M.; Juliá, J.; Assumpcáo, M. Gravity derived Moho for South America. Tectonophysics, 2013, 609, 456–467.10.1016/j.tecto.2013.03.023Search in Google Scholar