Home Estimations of GNSS receiver internal delay using precise point positioning algorithm
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Estimations of GNSS receiver internal delay using precise point positioning algorithm

  • Natchapan Pothikunkupatarak , Thayathip Thongtan and Chalermchon Satirapod EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 20, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Random and systematic errors affect navigation satellite observations on both pseudo-range and carrier phase. These errors are originated at satellites, propagation path and receivers. This study focuses on the GNSS receiver internal delay determination resulting from the receiver’s electronics circuit. The characterisation of the delay in the GNSS geodetic receivers is essential to enhance the accuracy for the time transfer and time comparisons as part of GNSS integrity chain determinations. The purpose of GNSS receiver internal delay at the National Institute of Metrology (Thailand), NIMT, is to estimate the characteristics and performances of the GNSS geodetic receiver used for international time comparisons. The experiments are simultaneously observed GNSS satellites by a GPS and a GNSS receivers and two separate antennas with short baseline (around 6 metres), where both receivers are connected to the identical external caesium frequency standard maintained as time and frequency standard of Thailand. The GPS receiver is well-defined for its receiver internal delay on the pseudo-range observation of C1, through comparisons using an internationally recognised method, while the geodetic GNSS receiver is to be defined on its receiver internal delay. These experiment observations started from 26 December 2017 to 17 January 2018 at NIMT, Pathumthani, Thailand. The determined unknowns are receiver position, receiver clock offset, tropospheric delay through the geodetic technique of static Precise Point Positioning observations with Bernese GNSS software version 5.2. Later the receiver internal delay of NIMT is computed and analysed. The receiver internal delay on GPS C1 code is successfully characterised, resulted as 346.0 nanoseconds as of this experiment.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank NIMT managements, Dr Sivinee Sawatdiaree and Dr Chaiwat Jassadajin for allowing us to study on international time transfer and write this article. We also thank our colleagues at GISTDA, Ms Darunee Promchot, Mr Chaiyaporn Kitpracha and Ms Patumphon Pungpet, for their kind helps and collaborations, especially on this GNSS geodetic receiver.

References

[1] BIPM Circular T: Explanatory supplement of BIPM Circular T, ftp://ftp2.bipm.org/pub/tai/publication/notes/explanatory_supplement_v0.1.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[2] BIPM calibrations of time transfer equipment, https://www.bipm.org/jsp/en/TimeCalibrations.jsp.Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. El-Rabbany, Introduction to GPS, the Global Positioning System, Artech House, pp. 50–51, second edition, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. J. Huang, GPS calibration of NIMT, NMLS and VMI equipment with respect to TL G1 (1013-2017), BIPM report 1013-2017, September 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[5] FTP server of the BIPM time department, https://www.bipm.org/en/bipm-services/timescales/time-ftp/Circular-T.html.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Yang, Training book part 1, International training workshop on BeiDou technology and its applications, Wuhan Hubei, China, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[7] P. Defraigne and G. Petit, CGGTTS-Version 2E: an extended standard for GNSS Time Transfer, Metrologia, 2015.10.1088/0026-1394/52/6/G1Search in Google Scholar

[8] IGS products, http://www.igs.org/products.Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. J. G. Teunissen and A. Kleusberg, GPS for geodesy, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, second edition, pp. 194–203, 1998.10.1007/978-3-642-72011-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] IERS Conventions, http://tai.bipm.org/iers/convupdt/convupdt.html.Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Thongtan, P. Tirawanichakul and C. Satirapod, Precise receiver clock offset estimations according to each Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) timescales, Artificial Satellites, 52(4), pp. 99–108, 2017.10.1515/arsa-2017-0009Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-06-01
Accepted: 2018-09-09
Published Online: 2018-09-20
Published in Print: 2019-01-28

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jag-2018-0020/html
Scroll to top button