Startseite Wirtschaftswissenschaften Estimating Market Power in Agricultural Industries Using the Production Function Approach: Evidence from the Philippines
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Estimating Market Power in Agricultural Industries Using the Production Function Approach: Evidence from the Philippines

  • Gabriel Angelo B. Domingo ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Januar 2026

Abstract

Market power represents distortions that hinder the efficient allocation of resources within an economy. The significance of measuring such distortions is particularly pronounced in Philippine agriculture which has been subject to periodic food affordability crises. This paper is the first to directly quantify markups and assess returns to scale for agricultural suppliers and manufacturers. Using establishment-level surveys for Philippine agricultural suppliers and manufacturers from 2012 to 2018, I estimate a national average markup parameter for suppliers and manufacturers through production function regressions. I use panel data models to consistently estimate output elasticities for materials’ expenditure with which I back out theory-consistent markups and scale economies separately for agricultural suppliers and manufacturers. For suppliers, I find average markups of 8 % and constant returns to scale. For agricultural manufacturers, I find markups above 50 % and modest but statistically significant increasing returns to scale of 11 %. These estimates are consistent with the theoretical relationship between markups, profits, and returns to scale. Estimates of fixed costs over time inform us that markups are a more important factor keeping profit rates elevated for manufacturing than for upstream suppliers.

JEL Classification: D22; D43; L70; L11; O12; O13; Q12

Corresponding author: Gabriel Angelo B. Domingo, University of the Philippines Diliman, School of Economics, 168 Osmeña Avenue, Diliman, 1101 Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines, E-mail:

Appendix

CPBI and ASPBI Sections for Module A and Module C Included in the Dataset

This is the PSIC listing for module A and C:

see Appendix Table 1.

Appendix Table 1:

PSIC Sections for Module A and Module C (Agriculture Manufacturers only).

Module A Module C
Crop And Animal Production, Hunting And Related Service Activities - 01 Manufacture Of Food Products −10
Forestry And Logging - 02 Manufacture Of Beverages −11
Fishing And Aquaculture - 03

Number of Firms in the Sample by Number of Years

see Appendix Figure 1.

Appendix Figure 1: 
Count of establishments by No. of Years.
Appendix Figure 1:

Count of establishments by No. of Years.

Using COGS Based Material Expenditure

see Appendix Table 2.

Appendix Table 2:

Panel data models, aggregated PSIC-5 with COGS materials expenditure full Sample.

First diff FE
L-K 0.391 0.401
(0.071) (0.092)
M-K 0.358 0.299
(0.057) (0.139)
Num.Obs. 318 318
R2 0.558 0.513

References

Abegaz, Berhanu, and Arnab K. Basu. 2011. “The Elusive Productivity Effect of Trade Liberalization in the Manufacturing Industries of Emerging Economies.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 47 (1): 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2753/ree1540-496x470101.Suche in Google Scholar

Ackerberg, Daniel A., Kevin Caves, and Garth Frazer. 2015. “Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators.” Econometrica 83 (6): 2411–51. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta13408.Suche in Google Scholar

Aldaba, Rafaelita. 2005. “Assessing Competition in Philippine Markets.”. PIDS Discussion Paper No. 2005-24.Suche in Google Scholar

Allen, Treb. 2014. “Information Frictions in Trade.” Econometrica 82 (6): 2041–83. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta10984. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43616907.Suche in Google Scholar

Amador, João, and Ana Cristina Soares. 2014. “Competition in the Portuguese Economy: Estimated Price Cost Margins Under Imperfect Labor Markets.” ECB Working Paper Series 1751.10.2139/ssrn.2535749Suche in Google Scholar

Arellano, Manuel, and Stephen Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.Suche in Google Scholar

Barrett, Christopher B., Reardon Thomas, Johan Swinnen, and David Zilberman. 2021. “Agri-Food Value Chain Revolutions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” Journal of Economic Literature 60 (4): 1316–1377, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201539.Suche in Google Scholar

Basu, Susanto. 2019. “Are Price-Cost Markups Rising in the United States? A Discussion of the Evidence.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (3): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.3.3.Suche in Google Scholar

Bellemare, Marc F., Jeffrey R. Bloem, and Sunghun Lim. 2022. “Chapter 89 - Producers, Consumers, and Value Chains in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” In Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 6, edited by Christopher B. Barrett, and David R. Just, 4933–96. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesagr.2022.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Blundell, Richard, and Stephen Bond. 2000. “GMM Estimation with Persistent Panel Data: An Application to Production Functions.” Econometric Reviews 19 (3): 321–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930008800475.Suche in Google Scholar

Bordey, F. H., J. C. Beltran, I. A. Arida, A. C. Litonjua, M. G. C. Lapurga, and W. B. Collado. 2018. “Narrowing the Yield and Cost Gaps: A Comparative Efficiency of Rice Farming in the Philippines.” In Philippine Journal of Crop Science (Philippines). Crop Science Society of the Philippines (CSSP).Suche in Google Scholar

Briones, Roehlano. 2019. “Competition in the Rice Industry: An Issues Paper.” Philippine Competition Commission Issues Paper, No. 1. https://www.phcc.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/PCC-Issues-Paper-2019-01-Competition-in-the-Rice-Industry-An-Issues-Paper.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Crepon, Bruno, Rozen Desplatz, Jacques Mairesse, and Rozen Desplatz. 2005. “Price-Cost Margins and Rent Sharing: Evidence from a Panel of French Manufacturing Firms.” Annales d’Economie et Statistique 79–80 (January): 583–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/20777589.Suche in Google Scholar

De Loecker, Jan, Jan Eeckhout, and Unger Gabriel. 2020. “The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications*.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 135 (2): 561–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz041.Suche in Google Scholar

Digal, Larry N. 2010. “Market Power Analysis: The Case of Poultry Industry in the Philippines.” Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 23 (1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2011.534025.Suche in Google Scholar

Digal, Larry N. 2011. “Market Power in the Philippine Retail and Processed Food Industry.” Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 23 (4): 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2011.621818.Suche in Google Scholar

Digal, Larry N., and Fredoun Z. Ahmadi-Esfahani. 2002. “Market Power Analysis in the Retail Food Industry: A Survey of Methods.” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 46 (4): 1–26. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aareaj/118596.html.10.1111/1467-8489.00193Suche in Google Scholar

Dillon, Brian, and Chelsey Dambro. 2017. “How Competitive are Crop Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 99 (5): 1344–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax044.Suche in Google Scholar

Dobbelaere, Sabien. 2004. “Estimation of Price-Cost Margins and Union Bargaining Power for Belgian Manufacturing.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 (10): 1381–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Dobbelaere, Sabien, and Jacques Mairesse. 2013. “Panel Data Estimates of the Production Function and Product and Labor Market Imperfections.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 28 (1): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1256.Suche in Google Scholar

Griliches, Zvi, and Jacques Mairesse. 1995. Production Functions: The Search for Identification. Working {{Paper}}. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w5067Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Robert. 1988. “The Relation Between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (5): 921–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/261570. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1837241.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Robert. 1990. Invariance Properties of Solow’s Productivity Residual. w3034. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w3034Suche in Google Scholar

Intal, Ponciano, Leah Francine Cu, and Jo Anne Illescas. 2012. “Rice Prices and the National Food Authority.” PIDS Discussion Paper 2012-27: 155.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinsohn, James. 1993. “Testing the Imports-as-Market-Discipline Hypothesis.” Journal of International Economics 35 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(93)90002-F.Suche in Google Scholar

Levinsohn, James, and Amil Petrin. 2003. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables.” The Review of Economic Studies 70 (2): 317–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3648636.Suche in Google Scholar

Mataia, Alice, Jesusa Beltran, Rowena Manalili, Bethzaida Catudan, Nefriend Francisco, Adrielle Flores, et al.. 2020. “Rice Value Chain Analysis in the Philippines: Value Addition, Constraints, and Upgrading Strategies.” Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development 17 (December): 19. https://doi.org/10.37801/ajad2020.17.2.2.Suche in Google Scholar

Medalla, Erlinda, Francis Quimba, and Maureen Rosellon. 2020. “Competition in Philippine Markets: A Scoping Study of the Manufacturing Sector.”. PCC Issues Paper No. 5, Series of 2020.Suche in Google Scholar

Olley, G. Steven, and Ariel Pakes. 1996. “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry.” Econometrica 64 (6): 1263–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171831.Suche in Google Scholar

Reeder, M. 2000. “Asymmetric Prices: Implications on Trader’s Market Power in Philippine Rice.” Journal of Philippine Development 27 (1): 49–69, https://doi.org/10.62986/pjd2000.27.1c.Suche in Google Scholar

Roodman, David. 2009. “A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 71 (1): 135–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Santos, Mercedes, Menerva Clemente, and Arneil Gabriel. 2018. “A Comparative Analysis of Farmgate and Regulated Prices of Palay in Nueva Ecija, Philippines: A Policy Revisited.” Open Journal of Social Sciences 06 (January): 50–68. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.63005.Suche in Google Scholar

Silvapulle, Param, and Sisira Jayasuriya. 1994. “Testing for Philippines Rice Market Integration: A Multiple Cointegration Approach.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 45 (3): 369–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1994.tb00411.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Umali, D. L., and B. Duff. 1992. “The Philippine Rice Marketing System: Implications for Grain Quality Improvement.” In Consumer Demand for Rice Grain Quality: Terminal Report of IDRC Projects, 175–98. IRRI.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-07-01
Accepted: 2025-12-22
Published Online: 2026-01-07

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jafio-2025-0019/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen