Temporal adverbials, negation and finiteness in Dutch as a second language: A scope-based account

Abstract

This study investigates the acquisition of post-verbal (temporal) adverbials and post-verbal negation in L2 Dutch. It is based on previous findings for L2 French that post-verbal negation poses less of a problem for L2 learners than post-verbal adverbial placement (Hawkins, Towell, Bazergui, Second Language Research 9: 189–233, 1993; Herschensohn, Minimally raising the verb issue: 325–336, Cascadilla Press, 1998). The current data show that, at first sight, Moroccan and Turkish learners of Dutch also have fewer problems with post-verbal negation than with post-verbal adverbials. However, when a distinction is made between different types of adverbials, it seems that this holds for adverbials of position such as ‘today’ but not for adverbials of contrast such as ‘again’. To account for this difference, it is argued that different types of adverbial occupy different positions in the L2 data for reasons of scope marking. Moreover, the placement of adverbials such as ‘again’ interacts with the acquisition of finiteness marking (resulting in post-verbal placement), while there is no such interaction between adverbials such as ‘today’ and finiteness marking.