Startseite The development and initial validation of LexCombi 2: a research-oriented elicitation instrument for L2 learners’ productive collocation knowledge
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The development and initial validation of LexCombi 2: a research-oriented elicitation instrument for L2 learners’ productive collocation knowledge

  • Dale Brown ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Juli 2025

Abstract

Collocations are ubiquitous in language and important in successful second language (L2) use. Yet L2 learners’ knowledge of collocations, particularly their productive knowledge, is often considered inadequate. To further understanding of how learners’ productive collocation knowledge develops, effective methods of accessing and assessing this knowledge are necessary. To date, validated instruments for measuring productive collocation knowledge are lacking and ad hoc tools that appear to have undergone limited development prevalent. This paper therefore reports on the development of an instrument for measuring L2 learners’ productive collocation knowledge. Starting with an existing instrument that was considered promising, the paper sets out how a series of iterative trialling and development studies were undertaken to assess the instrument and enhance its validity. With revisions to its format, scoring and cues, a summative evaluation of the new form of the instrument, LexCombi 2, is described, and an initial evaluation of LexCombi 2’s validity given.


Corresponding author: Dale Brown, Institute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 920-1192, Japan, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Jon Clenton for comments on an earlier version of this paper.

  1. Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study, or their legal guardians or wards.

  3. Author contributions: The author has accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Bahns, Jens & Moira Eldaw. 1993. Should we teach EFL students collocations? System 21(1). 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251x(93)90010-e.Suche in Google Scholar

Barfield, Andy. 2009. Exploring productive L2 collocation knowledge. In Tess Fitzpatrick & Andy Barfield (eds.), Lexical processing in second language learners, 95–110. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.30945670.12Suche in Google Scholar

Benson, Morton, Evelyn Benson & Robert F. Ilson (eds.). 2009. The BBI combinatory dictionary of English, 3rd edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.bbiSuche in Google Scholar

Bestgen, Yves. 2017. Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence. System 69. 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Bestgen, Yves & Sylviane Granger. 2014. Quantifying the development of phraseological competence in L2 English writing: An automated approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Bonk, William J. 2000. Testing ESL learners’ knowledge of collocations (Report No. FL 801 384). ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442309.Suche in Google Scholar

Chapelle, Carol A. & Erik Voss. 2013. Evaluation of language tests through validation research. In Anthony Kunnan (ed.), The companion to language assessment, 1079–1097. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla110Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, Vivian. 1999. Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33(2). 185–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717.Suche in Google Scholar

Crowther, Jonathan, Sheila Dignen & Diana Lea (eds.). 2002. Oxford collocations dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark & Dee Gardner. 2010. A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Ding, Chen, Barry Lee Reynolds, Csaba Z. Szabo & Griet Boone. 2025. Assessing English language learners’ collocation knowledge: A systematic review of receptive and productive measurements. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63(2). 833–856. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0163.Suche in Google Scholar

Durrant, Philip. 2014. Corpus frequency and second language learners’ knowledge of collocations: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(4). 443–477. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.4.01dur.Suche in Google Scholar

Durrant, Philip & Norbert Schmitt. 2009. To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47(2). 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Edmonds, Amanda, Jon Clenton & Hosam Elmetaher. 2022. Exploring the construct validity of tests used to assess L2 productive vocabulary knowledge. System 108. 102855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102855.Suche in Google Scholar

Evert, Stefan. 2008. Corpora and collocations. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 1212–1248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213881.2.1212Suche in Google Scholar

Fan, May. 2009. An exploratory study of collocational use by ESL students – a task based approach. System 37(1). 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Tess. 2007. Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17(3). 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00172.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Frankenberg-Garcia, Ana. 2018. Investigating the collocations available to EAP writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 35. 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar

González Fernández, Beatriz & Norbert Schmitt. 2015. How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? The effects of frequency and amount of exposure. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 166(1). 94–126. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.03fer.Suche in Google Scholar

Handl, Susanne & Eva-Maria Graf. 2010. Collocation, anchoring, and the mental lexicon – an ontogenetic perspective. In Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susanne Handl (eds.), Cognitive foundations of linguistic usage patterns, 119–147. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110216035.119Suche in Google Scholar

HarperCollins. 2004. Collins wordbanks online. Available at: http://www.collins.co.uk/corpus/corpussearch.aspx.Suche in Google Scholar

Henriksen, Birgit. 2013. Research on L2 learners’ collocational competence and development – a progress report. In Camilla Bardel, Christina Lindqvist & Batia Laufer (eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis. Amsterdam: EUROSLA.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Abingdon: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Howarth, Peter. 1998a. The phraseology of learners’ academic writing. In A. P. Cowie (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications, 161–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198294252.003.008Suche in Google Scholar

Howarth, Peter. 1998b. Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 19(1). 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.1.24.Suche in Google Scholar

Hsu, Jeng-Yih Tim & Chu-Yao Chiu. 2008. Lexical collocations and their relation to speaking proficiency of college EFL learners in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal 10(1). 181–204.Suche in Google Scholar

JACET Word List Revision Committee. 2003. JACET list of 8000 basic words. Tokyo: JACET.Suche in Google Scholar

Ježek, Elisabetta. 2016. The lexicon: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kiss, George R., Christine Armstrong, Robert Milroy & J. Piper. 1973. An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In A. J. Aitken, Richard W. Bailey & N. Hamilton-Smith (eds.), The computer and literary studies, 153–165. Edinburgh: University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Koizumi, Rie. 2015. Second language vocabulary assessment studies: Validity evidence and future directions. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 4(1). 36–46. https://doi.org/10.7820/vli.v04.1.koizumi.Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, Batia & Tina Waldman. 2011. Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning 61(2). 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Senyung & Sun-Young Shin. 2021. Towards improved assessment of L2 collocation knowledge. Language Assessment Quarterly 18(4). 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1908295.Suche in Google Scholar

Linacre, John Michael. 2014. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program user’s guide. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.Suche in Google Scholar

Linacre, John Michael. 2015. Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program (Version 3.9). Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.Suche in Google Scholar

McIntosh, Colin (ed.). 2009. Oxford collocations dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Meara, Paul & Tess Fitzpatrick. 2000. Lex30: An improved method of assessing productive vocabulary in L2. System 28(1). 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00058-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Meara, Paul & James Milton. 2003. X_Lex, the Swansea levels test. Swansea: Express.Suche in Google Scholar

Meara, Paul & Imma Miralpeix. 2006. Y_Lex: The Swansea advanced vocabulary test. v2.05. Swansea: Lognostics.Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, James. 2009. Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692092Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, James, Jo Wade & Nicola Hopkins. 2010. Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In Rubén Chacón-Beltrán, Christián Abello-Contesse & Maria del Mar Torreblanca-López (eds.), Insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning, 83–97. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.29308428.9Suche in Google Scholar

Mollin, Sandra. 2009. Combining corpus linguistic and psychological data on word co-occurrences: Corpus collocates versus word associations. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5(2). 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2009.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. 2006. BNC-based word lists. Victoria University of Wellington. Available at: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation.Suche in Google Scholar

Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2005. Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.14Suche in Google Scholar

Nizonkiza, Déogratias. 2012. Quantifying controlled productive knowledge of collocations across proficiency and word frequency levels. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 2(1). 67–92. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.1.4.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Donnell, Matthew Brook, Ute Römer & Nick C. Ellis. 2013. The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing: Investigating effects of frequency, association, and native norm. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(1). 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.07odo.Suche in Google Scholar

Paquot, Magali & Sylviane Granger. 2012. Formulaic language in learner corpora. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32. 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000098.Suche in Google Scholar

Purpura, James E., James Dean Brown & Rob Schoonen. 2015. Improving the validity of quantitative measures in applied linguistics research. Language Learning 65(S1). 37–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12112.Suche in Google Scholar

Qian, David D. 2002. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning 52(3). 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193.Suche in Google Scholar

Revier, Robert Lee. 2009. Evaluating a new test of whole English collocations. In Andy Barfield & Henrik Gyllstad (eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations, 125–138. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230245327_10Suche in Google Scholar

Saito, Kazuya. 2020. Multi- or single-word units? The role of collocation use in comprehensible and contextually appropriate second language speech. Language Learning 70(2). 548–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12387.Suche in Google Scholar

Saito, Kazuya & Yuwei Liu. 2021. Roles of collocation in L2 oral proficiency revisited: Different tasks, L1 vs. L2 raters, and cross-sectional vs. longitudinal analyses. Second Language Research 38(3). 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320988055.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Siyanova, Anna & Norbert Schmitt. 2008. L2 learner production and processing of collocation: A multi-study perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review 64(3). 429–458. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.429.Suche in Google Scholar

Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna & Stefania Spina. 2020. Multi-word expressions in second language writing: A large-scale longitudinal learner corpus study. Language Learning 70(2). 420–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12383.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Sara A. 2021. Exploring knowledge of transparent and non-transparent multi-word phrases among L2 English learners living in an anglophone setting. System 101. 102590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102590.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonbul, Suhad, Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs & Ahmed Masrai. 2023. Second language productive knowledge of collocations: Does knowledge of individual words matter? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45(2). 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000341.Suche in Google Scholar

Stæhr, Lars Stenius. 2008. Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal 36(2). 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975.Suche in Google Scholar

Voss, Erik. 2012. A validity argument for score meaning of a computer-based ESL academic collocational ability test based on a corpus-driven approach to test design. Ames, USA: Iowa State University Doctoral Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Ying & Philip Shaw. 2008. Transfer and universality: Collocation use in advanced Chinese and Swedish learner English. ICAME Journal 32. 201–232.Suche in Google Scholar

West, Michael. 1953. A general service list of English words. London: Longman, Green and Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry. 2003. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Benjamin D. & John Michael Linacre. 1994. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 8(3). 370.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-09-29
Accepted: 2025-06-06
Published Online: 2025-07-17

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2024-0271/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen