Influence of learners’ prior knowledge, L2 proficiency and pre-task planning on L2 lexical complexity

References

Biber, D. 1988. Linguistic features: Algorithms and functions in variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Suche in Google Scholar

Bui, G., M. Ahmadian & A. M. Hunter. 2019. Spacing effects on repeated L2 task performance. System 81. 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.12.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Bui, G. & Z. Huang. 2018. L2 fluency as influenced by content familiarity and planning: Performance, methodology and pedagogy. Language Teaching Research 22(1). 94–114.10.1177/1362168816656650Suche in Google Scholar

Bui, G. & P. Skehan. 2018. Complexity, fluency and accuracy. In J. Liontas (ed.), TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1–7. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0046Suche in Google Scholar

Bui, H. Y. G. 2014. Task readiness: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence from topic familiarity, strategic planning, and proficiency levels. In P. Skehan (ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance, 63–94. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.5.03gavSuche in Google Scholar

Bulté, B. & A. Housen. 2012. Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Investigating complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, 21–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.32.02bulSuche in Google Scholar

Bygate, M. 1996. Effects of task repetition: Appraising the developing language of learners. In J. Willis & D. Willis (eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching, 136–146. Oxford: Heinemann.Suche in Google Scholar

Bygate, M. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of language. In M. Bygate, M. Swain & P. Skehan (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing, 23–48. London, UK: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Bygate, M. (ed.). 2018. Learning language through task repetition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.11Suche in Google Scholar

Crookes, G. 1989. Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(4). 367–383.10.1017/S0272263100008391Suche in Google Scholar

Daller, H., J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller (eds.). 2007. Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667268Suche in Google Scholar

Daller, H., R. Van Hout & J. Treffers-Daller. 2003. Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals. Applied Linguistics 24(2). 197–222.10.1093/applin/24.2.197Suche in Google Scholar

De Bot, K. 1992. A bilingual production model: Levelt’s speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics 13. 1–24.10.1093/applin/13.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. & L. Katona. 1992. Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing 9. 187–206.10.1177/026553229200900206Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (ed.). 2005. Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2009. The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 474–509.10.1093/applin/amp042Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2017. Task-based language teaching. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 108–125. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676968-7Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2019. Task preparedness. In Z. Wen & M. Ahmadian (eds.), Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy: In honor of Peter Skehan, 15–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.13.02ellSuche in Google Scholar

Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner & A.-G. Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods 41. 1149–1160.10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149Suche in Google Scholar

Foster, P. & A. M. Hunter. 2016. When it’s not what you do but the way that you do it. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), SLA research and materials development for language learning, 280–298. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Foster, P. & P. Skehan. 1996. The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research 3(3). 215–247.10.1177/136216889900300303Suche in Google Scholar

Foster, P. & G. Wigglesworth. 2016. Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36. 98–116.10.1017/S0267190515000082Suche in Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C. 2001. Psychological statistics using SPSS for windows. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Gass, S., A. Mackey, M. Fernandez & M. Alvarez-Torres. 1999. The effects of task repetition on linguistic output. Language Learning 49. 549–580.10.1111/0023-8333.00102Suche in Google Scholar

Gilabert, R. 2007. The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and (+/- here-and-now): Effects on oral production. In M. Garcia-Mayo (ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning, 44–68. London: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853599286-006Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Spoken and written language. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martine. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Housen, A. & F. Kuiken. 2009. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 461–473.10.1093/applin/amp048Suche in Google Scholar

Jackson, H. & E. Z. Amvela. 2007. Words, meaning and vocabulary: An introduction to modern English lexicology. 2nd edn. London: Continuum.10.5040/9781350934047Suche in Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. 2002. Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19(1). 57–84.10.1191/0265532202lt220oaSuche in Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. 2013. Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity. Language Learning 63(suppl. 1). 87–106.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00739.xSuche in Google Scholar

Kormos, J. 2006. Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuiken, F. & I. Vedder. 2008. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 17(1). 48–60.10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, K. & S. A. Crossley. 2015. Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings and application. TESOL Quarterly 49(4). 757–786.10.1002/tesq.194Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & P. Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16. 307–322.10.1093/applin/16.3.307Suche in Google Scholar

Laurén, U. 2002. Some lexical features of immersion pupils’ oral and written narration. Lund University Working Papers in Linguistics 50. 63–78.Suche in Google Scholar

Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lynch, T. & J. Maclean. 2000. Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research 4. 221–250.10.1177/136216880000400303Suche in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Malvern, D. & B. Richards. 2002. Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19(1). 85–104.10.1191/0265532202lt221oaSuche in Google Scholar

Malvern, D. D. & B. J. Richards. 2007. Validity and threats to the validity of vocabulary assessment. In H. Daller, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Dallers (eds.), Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge, 79–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667268.007Suche in Google Scholar

McCarthy, P. M. & S. Jarvis. 2010. MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods 42(2). 381–392.10.3758/BRM.42.2.381Suche in Google Scholar

Meara, P. & H. Bell. 2001. P_Lex: A simple and effective way of describing the lexical characteristics of short L2 texts. Prospect 16(3). 5–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Mehnert, U. 1998. The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20. 83–108.10.1017/S0272263198001041Suche in Google Scholar

Michel, M. 2013. The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex oral L2 tasks. The Modern Language Journal 97(1). 178–195.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01431.xSuche in Google Scholar

Michel, M. 2017. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in L2 production. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, 50–68. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315676968-4Suche in Google Scholar

Michel, M., F. Kuiken & I. Vedder. 2007. The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. IRAL 45. 241–259.10.1515/iral.2007.011Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, J. 2004. Comparing the lexical difficulty of French reading comprehension exam tests. The Language Learning Journal 30(1). 5–11.10.1080/09571730485200171Suche in Google Scholar

Norouzian, R. & L. Plonsky. 2018. Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A. cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research 34(2). 257–271.10.1177/0267658316684904Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30. 555–578.10.1093/applin/amp044Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, L. 1999. Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21. 109–148.10.1017/S0272263199001047Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, L. 2005. What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, 77–109. Amsterdam: John Bejamins.10.1075/lllt.11.07ortSuche in Google Scholar

Pallant, J. 2013. SPSS survival manual. 5th edn. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rahimpour, M. & F. Hazar. 2007. Topic familiarity effect on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of L2 oral output. The Journal of Asia TEFL 4(4). 191–211.Suche in Google Scholar

Read, J. 2000. Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732942Suche in Google Scholar

Robinson, P. 2001. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task productions: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22(1). 27–57.10.1093/applin/22.1.27Suche in Google Scholar

Segalowitz, N. 2010. Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203851357Suche in Google Scholar

Sheppard, C. 2006. The effects of instruction directed at the gaps second language learners noticed in their oral production. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Auckland.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. 1996. Second language acquisition and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching, 17–30. Oxford: Heinemann.Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. 2003. Task-based instruction. Language Teaching 36. 1–14.10.1017/S026144480200188XSuche in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. 2009. Lexical performance by native and non-native speakers on language learning tasks. In B. Richards, H. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller (eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application, 107–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230242258_7Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (ed.). 2014. Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.5Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, P. 2018. Second language task-based performance. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315629766Suche in Google Scholar

Skehan, P., X. Bei, Q. Li & Z. Wang. 2012. The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research 16(2). 170–187.10.1177/1362168811428414Suche in Google Scholar

Tajima, M. 2003. The effects of planning on oral performance of Japanese as a foreign language. Unpublished Dissertation. Purdue University.Suche in Google Scholar

Tavakoli, P. & P. Skehan. 2005. Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language, 239–277. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11.15tavSuche in Google Scholar

Ure, J. 1971. Lexical density and register differentiation. In G. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (eds.), Applications of linguistics, 443–452). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Z. 2014. On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance, 27–62. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.5.02wanSuche in Google Scholar

Wendel, J. 1997. Planning and second language narrative production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Japan: Temple University.Suche in Google Scholar

Wigglesworth, G. 1997. An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse, Language Testing 14(1). 85–106.10.1177/026553229701400105Suche in Google Scholar

Yuan, F. & R. Ellis. 2003. The effects of pre-task and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics 24(1). 1–27.10.1093/applin/24.1.1Suche in Google Scholar