References

Aljaafreh, A. & J. P. Lantolf. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal 78(4). 471–483.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & N. Storch. 2016. Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783095056Search in Google Scholar

Choi, H. & N. Iwashita. 2016. Interactional behaviors of low-proficiency learners in small group work. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.05choSearch in Google Scholar

Donato, R. 1994. Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33–56. NJ: Ablex, Norwood.Search in Google Scholar

Dongyu, Z., Fanyu & D Wanyi. 2013. Sociocultural theory applied to second language learning: Collaborative learning with reference to the Chinese context. International Education Studies 6(9). 165–174.10.5539/ies.v6n9p165Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, A. F. 2012a. Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, par, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(1). 40–58.10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, A F. 2012b. Collaborative dialogue in learner–Learner and learner–Native speaker interaction. Applied Linguistics 33(3). 229–256.10.1093/applin/ams002Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, A. F. 2014. Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work. Language Teaching Research 18(4). 1–24.10.1177/1362168813519730Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Dobao, A. F. 2016. Peer interaction and learning: A focus on the silent learner. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 33–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.02ferSearch in Google Scholar

Foster, P. & A. S. Ohta. 2005. Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classroom. Applied Linguistics 26(3). 402–430.10.1093/applin/ami014Search in Google Scholar

Gillies, R. M. 2015. Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research 76. 178–189.10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Hedge, T. 2005. Resource books for teachers: Writing. 2nd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, K. I. 2015. Peer Interaction: A Compromise or a Necessity?. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics 15(2). 85–99.Search in Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L. 1983. Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45. 819–828.10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819Search in Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L. & S. E. Bruun. 1983. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44. 78–94.10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. 2008. The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal 92(1). 114–130.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. & K. McDonough. 2008. The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research 12(2). 211–234.10.1177/1362168807086288Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Kuiken, F. & I. Vedder. 2002. The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research 37(2002). 343–358.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00009-0Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J.P. & S.L. Thorn. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lapkin, S., M. Swain & M. Smith. 2002. Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. The Modern Language Journal 86(4). 485–507.10.1111/1540-4781.00157Search in Google Scholar

Leeser, J. M. 2004. Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research 8(1). 55–81.10.1191/1362168804lr134oaSearch in Google Scholar

Lin, C. C., H. Chan & H. Hsiao. 2011. EFL students’ perceptions of learning vocabulary in a computer-supported collaborative environment. TOJET 10(2). 91–99.Search in Google Scholar

Long, M. H. 1985. Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (eds.), Input in second language acquisition, 377–393. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

2009. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 5^th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Maftoon, P. & N. Ghaffori. 2009. A comparative study of the effect of homogenous and heterogeneous collaborative interaction on the development of EFL learners’ writing skill. The Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1). 127–158.Search in Google Scholar

McArdle, G., K.D. Clements & K. H. Lendi 2005. The free rider and cooperative learning groups: Perspectives from faculty members. (n.p.). Retrieved from www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492459.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. 1992. Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moranski, K. & P. D. Toth. 2016. Small-group meta-analytic talk and Spanish L2 development. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 291–316. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.12morSearch in Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & J. Tian. 2010. Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research 14(4). 397–419.10.1177/1362168810375364Search in Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. 2000. Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 51–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pallant, J. 2007. SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS version 15. 3rd. England: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pica, T. 1994. Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?. Language Learning 44(3). 493–527.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.xSearch in Google Scholar

Roberts, T. S. & J. M. McInnerney. 2007. Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology & Society 10(4). 527–268.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, M. & S. Ballinger. 2016. Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 1–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge. U.K: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shekary, M. & M. Tahririan. 2006. Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. The Modern Language Journal 90. 557–573.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00504.xSearch in Google Scholar

Storch, N. 2002. Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning 52(1). 119–158.10.1111/1467-9922.00179Search in Google Scholar

Storch, N. 2005. Collaborative writing: Product, process and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing 14(3). 153–173.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Storch, N. 2007. Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research 11(2). 143–159.10.1177/1362168807074600Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, 125–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 2000. The Output Hypothesis and Beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. & S. Lapkin. 1998. Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 320–337.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.xSearch in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty, and J. Williams (eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, 64–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. & S. Lapkin. 2001. Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing, 99–118. Harlow, UK: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. & S. Lapkin. 2002. Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37(3). 285–304.10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5Search in Google Scholar

Thorne, S. L. 2000. Second language acquisition theory and the truth (s) about relativity. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 219–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. 2000. From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, J. 2001. The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System 29. 325–340.10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7Search in Google Scholar

Young, A. & D. J. Tedick. 2016. Collaborative dialogue in a two-way Spanish/English immersion classroom. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 135–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.45.06youSearch in Google Scholar

Zeng, G. & S. Takatsuka. 2009. Text-based peer-peer collaborative dialogue in a computer mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System 37. 434–446.10.1016/j.system.2009.01.003Search in Google Scholar