References

Allwright, Dick & Kathleen M. Bailey. 1991. Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Antaki, Charles. 1994. Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. Maxwell & John Heritage. 1984. Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen & Tom Salsbury. 2004. The organization of turns in the disagreements of L2 learners: A longitudinal perspective. In Diane Boxer & Andrew D Cohen (eds.), Studying speaking to inform second language learning, 199–227. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina B. 2009. Beyond answering: Repeat-prefaced responses in conversation. Communication Monographs 76. 121–143. 10.1080/03637750902828446Search in Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina B. & Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2011. Soliciting accounts with why-interrogatives in conversation. Journal of Communication 61. 94–119.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01528.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bonito, Joseph A. & Robert E. Sanders. 2002. Speaker’s footing in a collaborative writing task: A resource for addressing disagreement while avoiding conflict. Research on Language and Social Interaction 35. 481–514.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_4Search in Google Scholar

Cazden, Courtney B. 2001. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven E. 1992. Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news interview discourse. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 385–418. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven E., John Heritage, Marc N. Elliot & Laurie L. McDonald. 2007. When does the watchdog bark?: Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review 72. 23–41.10.1177/000312240707200102Search in Google Scholar

Coulter, Jeff. 1990. Elementary properties of argument sequences. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence, 181–203. New York: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Cullen, Richard. 2002. Supportive teacher talk: The importance of the F-move. ELT Journal 56. 117–127.10.1093/elt/56.2.117Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Judy. 1984. Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 102–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.009Search in Google Scholar

Dippold, Doris. 2011. Argumentative discourse in L2 German: A sociocognitive perspective on the development of facework strategies. Modern Language Journal 95. 171–187. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01175.xSearch in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1992. Contested evidence in court-room cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2008. The study of second language acquisition. 2nd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2015. Understanding second language acquisition. 2nd. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eriksson, Göran & Johan Östman. 2013. Cooperative or adversarial? Journalists’ enactment of the watchdog function in political news production. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18. 304–324.10.1177/1940161213482493Search in Google Scholar

Firth, Alan & Johannes Wagner. 1997. On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal 81. 285–300.Search in Google Scholar

Fujimoto, Donna. 2010. Agreements and disagreements: The small group discussion in a foreign language classroom. In Gabriele Kasper, Hanh thi Nguyen, Dina Rudolph Yoshimi & Jim K. Yoshioka (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 12. 297–325. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Pauline. 2002. Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1990. Interstitial argument. In Allen D Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. & Charles Goodwin. 1987. Children’s arguing. In Susan U Phillips, Susan Steele & Chirstine Tanz (eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective, 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011Search in Google Scholar

Greatbatch, David. 1992. On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, (268-301), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Allen D. 1990. Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments inconversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, Helmut. 1998. Disagreeing: Sequential placement and internal structure of disagreements in conflict episodes. Text 18. 467–503.10.1515/text.1.1998.18.4.467Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Joan Kelly. 1997. Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education 9. 287–311.10.1016/S0898-5898(97)90003-6Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Eric. 2009. Turn-taking primary speakership during a student discussion. In Hanh thi Nguyen & Gabriele Kasper (eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives, 215–244. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Eric. 2010. Designing an opinion for its (local) context. Human Studies 33, 395–410.10.1007/s10746-010-9167-4Search in Google Scholar

Hauser, Eric. 2013. Task orientation and first language use in foreign language discussions. Pragmatics and Society 4. 285–316.10.1075/ps.4.3.02hauSearch in Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2007. The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings. Modern Language Journal 91. 83–96.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00503.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2009. Practices for dispreferred responses using no by a learner of English. IRAL 47. 95–126.10.1515/iral.2009.005Search in Google Scholar

Hellermann, John & Elizabeth Cole. 2009. Practices for social interaction in the language learning classroom: Disengagements from dyadic task interaction. Applied Linguistics 30. 186–215.10.1093/applin/amn032Search in Google Scholar

Hellermann, John & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2010. On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse 1. 25–45.10.1080/19463011003750657Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444318135Search in Google Scholar

Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline. 2015. Single episode analysis of extended conflict talk sequences in second language classroom discussion. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(2). 231–262.10.1075/jlac.3.2.01hosSearch in Google Scholar

Houck, Noël & Seiko Fujii. 2006. Delay as an interactional resource in native speaker-nonnative speaker academic interaction. In Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig, César Félix-Brasdefer & Alwiya S. Omar (eds.), Pragmatics and language learning, vol. 11. 29–53. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Oh, irony and sequential ambiguity in arguments. Discourse and Society 12. 147–165.10.1177/0957926501012002001Search in Google Scholar

Jacknick, Christine M. 2011. But this is writing: Post-expansion in student-initiate sequences. Novitas-ROYAL 5. 39–54.Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1972. Side sequences. In David N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294–333. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kangasharju, Helena. 1996. Aligning as a team in multiparty conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 26(291-319). 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00051-8Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Knapp, Annelie. 2011. Using English as a lingua franca for (mis-)managing conflict in an international university context: An example from a course in engineering. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 978–990. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2003. Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5. 51–77. 10.1177/14614456030050010301Search in Google Scholar

Koshik, Irene. 2005. Beyond rhetorical questions. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.16Search in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22. 193–216. 10.1017/S0047404500017103Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas W. 1985. How children start arguments. Language in Society 14. 1–29.10.1017/S0047404500010915Search in Google Scholar

Maynard, Douglas W. 1992. On clinician’s complicating recipient’s perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 331–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2004. Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal 4. 501–518. 10.111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.xSearch in Google Scholar

Muntigl, P. & William Turnbull. 1998. Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29. 225–256. 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9Search in Google Scholar

Muntigl, Peter. 2013. Resistance in couples counseling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 49. 18–37. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Myers, Greg. 1998. Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreements in focus groups. Language in Society 27. 85–111. 10.4135/9781446261408Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein & Gordon Wells. 2000. What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21. 376–406. 10.1093/applin/21.3.376Search in Google Scholar

Nguyen, Hanh thi. 2011. Boundary and alignment in multiparty conflict talk. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1755–1771. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. & Alice Spitz. 2008. Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 40. 1661–1686. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Nystrand, Martin. 1997. Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamic of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Evelyne Pochon-Berger. 2011. Developing ‘methods’ for interaction: Across-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In Joan K. Hall, John Hellermann & Simona Pekarek Doehler (eds.), L2 interactional competence and development, 206–243. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847694072-010Search in Google Scholar

Pochon-Berger, Evelyne. 2011. A participant’s perspective on tasks: From task instruction, through pre-task planning, to task accomplishment. Novitas-ROYAL 5. 71–90.Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Jeffrey D. & Galina B. Bolden. 2010. Preference organization of sequence-initiating actions: The case of explicit account solicitations. Discourse Studies 12. 501–533. 10.1177/1461445610371051Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1987. On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham Button & John R. E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. vol. I. Gail Jefferson (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1995. Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28. 185–211. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_2Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23. 499–545. 10.1080/01638539709545001Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Gene H. Lerner. 2009. Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to Wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42. 91–115. 10.1080/08351810902864511.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Krishna B. 2012. Conceding in disagreements during small group interactions in academic writing class. Classroom Discourse 3. 4–29. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20166.10.1080/19463014.2012.666024Search in Google Scholar

Vuchinich, Sam. 1987. Starting and stopping spontaneous family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family 49. 591–601. 10.2307/352204Search in Google Scholar

Vuchinich, Sam. 1990. The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict. In Allen D Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversations, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, Steve. 2011. Exploring classroom discourse. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203827826Search in Google Scholar

Wells, Gordon & Rebeca Mejia-Arauz. 2009. Dialogue in the classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15. 379–428. 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Lawrence L., Adam Gamoran, Susie Zeiser & Daniel A. Long. 2003. Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes 35. 135–196. 10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan R. 2006. Initiating repair and beyond: The use of two repeat-formatted repair initiations in Mandarin conversation. Discourse Processes 41. 67–109. 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_5.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Ruey-Jiuan R. 2009. Repetition in the initiation of repair. In Jack Sidnell (ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, 31–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511635670.003Search in Google Scholar