Abstract
Interlanguage is a concept that is manifest in any trajectory of language change in a learner: typical first language, second language or language disorder. To understand those trajectories we need a rich psychological model of what creates them. This paper applies one such model–Sharwood Smith and Truscott’s Modular On-Line Growth and Use of Language model (MOGUL)–to childhood developmental language disorders, and suggests that the model’s components of language processing and their interaction shed significant light on why children with a wide range of different language disorders exhibit the language behaviours that are the characteristic of their diagnoses. Following a brief summary of the MOGUL model, the paper explores the impact on language development of differences in sensori-motor input, in the functioning of the various modules and the interfaces between them, and in the storage and activation of memory. Like Relevance Theory, with which the paper makes a direct connection, MOGUL encourages one to take a view of developmental language disorder as emerging from the same set of psychological resources as typical development (first or second) but as being the result of adjustments to, or compensations for, differences in how the various modules function and connect with each other.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks to Mike Sharwood Smith for feedback on my summary of MOGUL; and to Jan Murphy and Anne van Bysterveldt for feedback on the clinical aspects of this paper.
References
Bailey, Donald, John Bruer, Frank Symons & Jeff Lichtman (eds.). 2001. Critical thinking about critical periods. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brooks.Suche in Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert & Noam Chomsky. 2016. Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Bishop, Dorothy, Margaret Snowling, Paul Thompson & Trisha Greenhalgh, the Catalise-consortium. 2017. Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry doi:10.1111/jcpp.12721.Suche in Google Scholar
Botting, N., A. Bean-Ellawadi & D. Williams. 2016. Language impairments in childhood – A range of profiles, a variety of reasons. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 1. 1–2. doi:10.1177/2396941516654609.Suche in Google Scholar
Brock, Jon. 2007. Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review. Development and Psychopathology 19. 97–127.10.1017/S095457940707006XSuche in Google Scholar
Chapman, Robin, Linda Hesketh & Doris Kistler. 2002. Predicting longitudinal change in language production and compreheneison in individuals with Down syndrome: Hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 45. 902–915.10.1044/1092-4388(2002/073)Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H. 1993. Directions of influence in first and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research 9(2). 140–152.10.1177/026765839300900204Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H. 2001. First language acquisition … second language acquisition:‘What’s Hecuba to him or he to Hecuba?’. Second Language Research 17(4). 329–344.10.1177/026765830101700403Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H. 2004. Relevance Theory and second language learning/behaviour. Second Language Research 20(3). 189–192.10.1191/0267658304sr236edSuche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H. 2015. Relevance theory and second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published Online: 16 December 2015. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1473.Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H. & A. K. Van Bysterveldt. in press. Pragmatic competence in down syndrome. In K. P. Schneider & E. Ifantidou (eds.), Handbook of developmental and clinical pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H, A. K. Van Bysterveldt & V. Papp. (2017). Identifying pragmatic triggers for multi-word expressions in children with complex developmental delays. Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Child Language, Lyon, France.Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H, A. K. Van Bysterveldt & Beth Rees. 2016. Parent observations of the language use of preschool children with Down syndrome. Paper presented at the IASSID, Melbourne.Suche in Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan H & Tze-Peng Wong. 2016. Early Intervention at the Interface: Semantic-Pragmatic Strategies for facilitating conversation with children with developmental disabilities. In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (eds.), Drawing a line – perspectives on the semantics-pragmatics interface, 163–181. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_10Suche in Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky. 2007. Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer?. Brain and Language 101(1). 50–63.10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.006Suche in Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2005. The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. Abingtdon, UK: Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203943267Suche in Google Scholar
Green, Shulamite, Lauren Berkovits & Bruce Baker. 2015. Symptoms and development of anxiety in children with or without intellectual disability. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 44(1). 137–144. doi:10.1080/15374416.2013.873979.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1994. Patterns in the mind: Language and human nature. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1995. Languages of the mind: Essays on mental representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar
Jarrold, Christopher, Annabel Thorn & Emma Stephens. 2009. The relationships among verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness, and new word learning: Evidence from typical development and Down syndrome. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102(2). 196–218.10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.001Suche in Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1992. Beyond modularity: A Developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Krashen, Steven. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Suche in Google Scholar
Mitchell, Anita Witt, Elizabeth Moore, Emily Roberts, Kristen Hachtel & Melissa Brown. 2015. Sensory processing disorder in children ages birth–3 years born prematurely: A systematic review. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 69(1). doi::6901220030p1-6901220030p11.10.5014/ajot.2015.013755Suche in Google Scholar
Nelson, Katherine. 2009. Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael. 2007. Pragmatic impairment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486555Suche in Google Scholar
Peters, Ann M. 1983. The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10(2). 209–232.10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209Suche in Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry. 1992. Rediscovering interlanguage. Essex/New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar
Selinker, Larry, Merrill Swain & Guy Dumas. 1975. The Interlanguage hypothesis extended to children. Language Learning 25(1). 139–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00114.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Sharwood Smith, Michael & John Truscott. 2014. The multilingual mind: A modular processing perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar
Van Der Lely, Heather KJ & Jackie Battell. 2003. Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language 79(1). 153–181.10.1353/lan.2003.0089Suche in Google Scholar
Vuong, Helen E & Elaine Y. Hsiao. 2017. Emerging roles for the gut microbiome in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry 81(5). 411–423.10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.08.024Suche in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Making the most of MOGUL: Reflections on interlanguage in childhood language disorders
- Developing interlanguage: Driving forces in children learning Dutch and German
- Applying the interlanguage approach to language teaching
- Using the discourse domain hypothesis of interlanguage to teach scientific concepts: Report on a case study in secondary education
- Erratum
- Erratum to: The role of formal features in the acquisition of early L3 French DPs by adult Chinese speakers of L2 English
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Making the most of MOGUL: Reflections on interlanguage in childhood language disorders
- Developing interlanguage: Driving forces in children learning Dutch and German
- Applying the interlanguage approach to language teaching
- Using the discourse domain hypothesis of interlanguage to teach scientific concepts: Report on a case study in secondary education
- Erratum
- Erratum to: The role of formal features in the acquisition of early L3 French DPs by adult Chinese speakers of L2 English