Startseite Teasing out the role of age and exposure in EFL learners’ lexical profiles: A comparison of children and adults
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Teasing out the role of age and exposure in EFL learners’ lexical profiles: A comparison of children and adults

  • M.Pilar Agustin-Llach EMAIL logo und Rosa M. Jiménez-Catalán
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Februar 2018

Abstract

The present paper examines the lexical profiles of children and adult EFL learners in an attempt to untangle the roles of age and hours of exposure and their effect on lexical knowledge. Both age and exposure time have generally been acknowledged as relevant factors influencing foreign language acquisition, and vocabulary learning specifically. Participants in the study, who share the same amount of exposure to the target language but differ in age, were asked to write an informal letter introducing themselves. Their letters were scrutinized and mean production of tokens and types was found together with word frequencies and some lexical inconsistencies. In addition, the children participating in the study were enrolled in a CLIL program to match their hours of instruction with those of the adults. Their lexical profiles are characterized by fewer tokens and types and words of lower frequency related to the fields of school, home and science, the CLIL subject. They also use more cognates and commit more lexical inconsistencies than adult learners, who in turn produce more general words in longer letters. We interpret our results in light of the relevant role of age and instructional program.

Funding statement: This work was suported by Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Grant Number: FFI2010-19334/FILO.

References

Agustín-Llach, Mа Pilar. 2011. Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847694188Suche in Google Scholar

Agustín-Llach, Mа Pilar & Melania Terrazas-Gallego. 2012. Development and gender differences in a second language. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada [Studies of English Applied Linguistics], 12. 45–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnaud, Pierre J. L. 1984. The lexical richness of L2 written productions and the validity of vocabulary tests. In Terry Culhane, Christine Klein-Braley & Douglas K. Stevenson (eds.), Practice and problems in language testing, 14–28. Colchester: University of Essex.Suche in Google Scholar

Bialystok, Ellen. 1997. The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13(2). 116–137.10.1191/026765897677670241Suche in Google Scholar

Celaya, Mа Luz & Yolanda Ruiz De Zarobe. 2010. First languages and age in CLIL and non-CLIL contexts. International CLIL Research Journal 1(3). http://www.icrj.eu/13/article6.htm.Suche in Google Scholar

Celaya, Mа Luz & Mа Rosa Torras. 2001. L1 influence and EFL vocabulary. Do children rely more on L1 than adult learners? Proceedings of the XXV AEDEAN Conference. Granada: Universidad de Granada. CD format.Suche in Google Scholar

Cenoz, Jasone. 2002. Age differences in foreign language learning. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 135-136. 125–142.10.1075/itl.135-136.06cenSuche in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim. 1979. Cognitive/Academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism 19. 198–203.Suche in Google Scholar

Cummins, Jim & Merril Swain. 1986. Linguistic interdependence: A central principle of bilingual education. In Jim Cummins & Merril Swain (eds.), Bilingualism in education: Aspects of theory, research and practice, 80–95. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

David, Annabelle. 2008. A developmental perspective on productive lexical knowledge in L2 oral interlanguage. Journal of French Language Studies 18(3). 315–331.10.1017/S0959269508003475Suche in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert. 2000. The robustness of Critical Period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22. 499–533.10.1017/S0272263100004022Suche in Google Scholar

Durán, Pierre, David Malvern, Brian Richards & Ngoni Chipere. 2004. Developmental trends in lexical diversity. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 220–242.10.1093/applin/25.2.220Suche in Google Scholar

Fernández, Almudena. 2015. Motivation and vocabulary breadth in CLIL and EFL contexts. Different age, same time of exposure. Complutense Journal of English Studies 79(23). 79–96.10.5209/rev_CJES.2015.v23.51214Suche in Google Scholar

García Mayo, Mа Pilar & Mа Luisa García Lecumberri (eds.). 2003. Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596407Suche in Google Scholar

Horst, Marlisle & Laura Collins. 2006. From Faible to strong: How does their Vocabulary grow?. The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1). 83–106.10.3138/cmlr.63.1.83Suche in Google Scholar

Housen, Alex, Michel Pierrard, Siska Van Daele & Bram Bulté. 2008. Investigating lexical proficiency development over time? the case of Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels. Journal of French Language Studies 18(3). 277–298.10.1017/S0959269508003451Suche in Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, Kenneth. 1988. Lexical characteristics of near-native second-language learners of Swedish. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9. 67–84.10.1080/01434632.1988.9994320Suche in Google Scholar

Jarvis, Scott. 2002. Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19. 57–84.10.1191/0265532202lt220oaSuche in Google Scholar

Jasone., Cenoz. 2003. The influence of age on the acquisition of English: General proficiency, attitudes and code mixing. In Mа Pilar García Mayo & Mа Luisa García Lecumberri (eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language, 77–93. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596407-005Suche in Google Scholar

Jiménez Catalán, Rosa Mа & Tess Fitzpatrick. 2014. Frequency profiles of EFL learners’ lexical availability. In Rosa Mа Jimenez Catalan (ed.), Lexical availability in English and Spanish as a second language, 83–100. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1_6Suche in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen, Michael Long & Robin Scarcella. 1982. Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. In Stephen Krashen, Robin Scarcella & Michael Long (eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition, 161–172. Rowley, Mas: Newbury House Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Lasagabaster, David & Aintzane Doiz. 2003. Maturational constraints on foreign-language written production. In Mа Pilar García Mayo & Mа Luisa García Lecumberri (eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language, 136–160. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596407-008Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, Batia & Paul Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16(3). 307–323.10.1093/applin/16.3.307Suche in Google Scholar

Lightbown, Patsy. 2008. Easy as pie? Children learning languages. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 1. 5–29.Suche in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Peter, Susan Baker, Richard Clément & Leslie Donovan. 2002. Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning 52(3). 537–564.10.1111/1467-9922.00194Suche in Google Scholar

Malvern, David & Brian Richards. 2002. Investigating accommodation in language proficiency interviews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing 19(1). 85–104.10.1191/0265532202lt221oaSuche in Google Scholar

Milton, Jim. 2008. French vocabulary breadth among learners in the British school and university system: Comparing knowledge over time. Journal of French Language Studies 18(3). 333–348.10.1017/S0959269508003487Suche in Google Scholar

Miralpeix, Imma. 2006. Age and vocabulary acquisition in English as a foreign language (EFL). In Carmen Muñoz (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 89–106. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598937-006Suche in Google Scholar

Miralpeix, Imma. 2007. Lexical knowledge in instructed language learning: The effects of age and exposure. International Journal of English studies 7. 61–83.Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen. 2001. Factores escolares e individuales en el aprendizaje formal de un idioma extranjero. In Susana Pastor Cesteros & Ventura Salazar García (eds.), Estudios de Lingüística. Anexo 1. Tendencias y Líneas de Investigación en Adquisición de Segundas Lenguas. Alicante: Departamento de Filología Española, Lingüística General y Teoría de la Literatura, Universidad de Alicante.Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen (ed.). 2006. Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598937Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen. 2008. Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics 29. 578–596.10.1093/applin/amm056Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen & David Singleton. 2011. A critical review of age-related research on L2-attainment. Language Teaching 44(1). 1–35. http://journals.cambridge.org/lta/Muñoz.10.1017/S0261444810000327Suche in Google Scholar

Naves, Teresa, Imma Miralpeix & Mа Luz Celaya. 2005. Who transfer more … and what? Cross-linguistic influence in relation to school grade and language dominance in EFL. International Journal of Multilingualism 2(2). 113–134.10.1080/14790710508668380Suche in Google Scholar

Naves, Teresa & Imma Miralpeix. 2002. Short-term effects of age and exposure on writing development”. In Ignacio Palacios Martínez, Mа José López Couso, Patricia Fra López & Elena Seoane Posse (eds.), Fifty years of English Studies in Spain (1952-2002). A commemorative volume. Actas del XXVI Congreso de AEDEAN, 407–416. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Suche in Google Scholar

Ojima, Shiro, Hiroko Matsuba-Kurita, Naoko Nakamura, Taihei Hoshino & Hiroko Hagiwara. 2011. Age and amount of exposure to a foreign language during childhood: Behavioral and ERP data on the semantic comprehension of spoken English by Japanese children. Neuroscience Research 70. 197–205.10.1016/j.neures.2011.01.018Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz De Zarobe, Yolanda. 2002. Edad y tipología pronominal en la adquisición del inglés como tercera lengua. In Ignacio Palacios Martínez, Mа José López Couso, Patricia Fra López & Elena Seoane Posse (eds.), Fifty years of English Studies in Spain (1952-2002). A commemorative volume. Actas del XXVI Congreso de AEDEAN, 417–428. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz De Zarobe, Yolanda. 2005a. Age and third language production: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Multilingualism 2(2). 105–112.10.1080/14790710508668379Suche in Google Scholar

Ruiz De Zarobe, Yolanda. 2005b. Perspectiva longitudinal de la edad en producción escrita. Proceedings of the II Simposio Internacional de Bilingüismo: 333–341.Suche in Google Scholar

Sanchez-Casas, Rosa Mа, Christian Davis & José E. García-Albea. 1992. Bilingual lexical processing: Exploring the cognate/non-cognate distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 4. 293–310.10.1080/09541449208406189Suche in Google Scholar

Serrano, Raquel. 2012. Is intensive learning effective? Reflecting on the results from cognitive psychology and the SLA literature. In Carmen Muñoz (ed.), Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning, 3–23. Bristol; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847698063-004Suche in Google Scholar

Singleton, David. 1989. Language acquisition: The age factor. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar

Thordardottir, Elin. 2011. The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary Development. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(4). 426–445.10.1177/1367006911403202Suche in Google Scholar

Tidball, Francoise & Jeannine Treffers-Daller. 2008. Analysing lexical richness in French learner language: What frequency lists and teacher judgements can tell us about basic and advanced words. Journal of French Language Studies 18(3). 299–313.10.1017/S0959269508003463Suche in Google Scholar

Tonzar, Claudio, Lorella Lotto & Remo Job. 2009. L2 vocabulary acquisition in children: Effects of learning method and cognate status. Language Learning 59. 623–646.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00519.xSuche in Google Scholar

Torras, Rosa Mа & Mа Luz Celaya. 2001. Age-related differences in the development of written production. An empirical study of EFL school learners. International Journal of English Studies 1(2). 103–126.Suche in Google Scholar

Tragant, Elsa & Mia Victori. 2006. Reported strategy use and age. In Carmen Muñoz (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 208–236. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598937-011Suche in Google Scholar

Treffers-Daller, Jeannine, Michael Daller, David Malvern, Brian Richards, Paul Meara & Jim Milton (eds.). 2008. Knowledge and use of the lexicon in French as a second language. Journal of French Language Studies 18(3). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Special issue 03). 269–276.10.1017/S095926950800344XSuche in Google Scholar

Victori, Mia & Elsa Tragant. 2003. Learner strategies: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high-school EFL learners. In Mа Pilar García Mayo & Mа Luisa García Lecumberri (eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language, 182–209. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853596407-010Suche in Google Scholar

Villarreal, Izaskun. 2013. CLIL, age or something else? Paper presented at the 37th AEDEAN Conference, November 13-15 2013, Universidad de Oviedo.Suche in Google Scholar

Yamada, Jun, Shigenobu Takatsuka, Nobuko Kotake & Junko Kurusu. 1980. On the optimum age for teaching foreign vocabulary to children. International Review of Applied Linguistics 18(3). 245–247.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Guoxing. 2007. Lexical diversity in MELAB writing and speaking task performances. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 5. 79–116.Suche in Google Scholar

Zareva, Alla, Paula Schwanenflugel & Yordanka Nikolova. 2005. Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: Variable sensitivity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(4). 567–595.10.1017/S0272263105050254Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-14
Published in Print: 2018-2-23

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 27.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2015-0075/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen