Common ground as (inter)cultural in-betweenness in human-machine communication: A literary pragmatic perspective

References

Allan, Keith. 2013. What is common ground? In Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo & Marco Carapezza (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, 285–310. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_11Search in Google Scholar

Allardice, Lisa. 2021. Kazuo Ishiguro: ‘AI, gene editing, big data…I worry we are not in control of these things any more. The Guardian. February 20 https://www.theguardian.com/books/2021/feb/20/kazuo-ishiguro-klara-and-the-sun-interview (accessed 28 August 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Bachman, Lyle F. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2). 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740450001037x.Search in Google Scholar

Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Canale, Michael & Merrill Swain. 1981. A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In Adrian S. Palmer, Peter J. M. Groot & George A. Trosper (eds.), The construct validation of test of communicative competence, 31–36. Washington, D. C.: TESOL.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Elysha. 2015. A language that conceals: An interview with Kazuo Ishiguro, author of the buried giant. Electric Lit, March 27. https://electricliterature.com/a-language-that-conceals-an-interview-with-kazuo-ishiguro-author-of-the-buried-giant/ (accessed 28 August 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Common ground. In Using language, 92–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539.005Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. 2015. Common ground. In Brian MacWhinney & William O’Grady (eds.), The handbook of language emergence, 328–353. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118346136.ch15Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert. H. & Susan E. Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 127–149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10096-006Search in Google Scholar

Dingwaney, Anuradha & Carol Maier. 1995. Between languages and cultures: Translation and cross-cultural texts. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/jj.10677896Search in Google Scholar

Dombi, Judit, Tetyana Sydorenko & Veronika Timpe-Laughlin. 2022. Common ground, cooperation, and recipient design in human-computer interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 193. 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Giesen, Bernhard. 2017. Inbetweenness and ambivalence. In Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ronald N. Jacobs & Philip Smith (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural sociology, 788–804. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195377767.013.30Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Herbert P. 1981. Presupposition and conversational implicature. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 183–198. New York: Academic Press. [Reprinted in Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the way of words, 86-116. Cambridge: Harvard University Press].Search in Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrea L. (ed.). 2018. Rethinking communication, technology and ourselves human-machine communication : Rethinking communication, technology, and ourselves. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Horie, Kaoru, Miya Shimura & Prashant Pardeshi. 2006. Overt anaphoric expressions, empathy, and the uchi-soto distinction. In Satoko Suzuki (ed.), Emotive communication in Japanese (Pragmatics and Beyond Series), 173–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.151.09horSearch in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell H. 1972. On communicative competence. In John B. Pride & Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Selected readings, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 1982. Japanese sociolinguistics. Politeness and women’s language. Lingua 57. 357–385.10.1016/0024-3841(82)90009-2Search in Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko. 2005. How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance: The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic rituals. In Robin T. Lakoff & Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness (Politeness and Beyond New Series 139), 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.139.06ideSearch in Google Scholar

Ishiguro, Kazuo. 1982. A Pale View of Hills. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Ishiguro, Kazuo. 1986. An Artist of the floating world. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar

Ishiguro, Kazuo. 2021. Klara and the sun. London: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Jovanović, Aleksandra V. & Ivana Trbojević Milošević. 2020. Kulturno slivanje u jezičkom prostoru japanskih romana Kazua Išigura. [Cultural blending in the linguistic space of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Japanese novels]. In Aleksandra Vraneš (ed.), Savremeni roman: Zbornik radova, 121–151. Andrićgrad: Andrićev institut.10.18485/ai_savremeni_roman.2020.ch8Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1(1). 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec.Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2014. Intercultural pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2023. Impoverished pragmatics? The semantics-pragmatics interface from an intercultural perspective. In Istvan Kecskes (ed.), The socio-cognitive approach to communication and pragmatics (Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, 33), 65–87. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-30160-5_4Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan & Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition 17(2). 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec.Search in Google Scholar

Kiesler, Sara B. 2005. Fostering common ground in human-robot interaction. In ROMAN 2005. IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, 729–734. Nashville, TN, USA.10.1109/ROMAN.2005.1513866Search in Google Scholar

Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. 2012. Achieving common ground under asymmetric agency and social sentience in communication for human-robot teaming. In 2012 IEEE international symposium on safety, security, and rescue robotics (SSRR), 1–6. College Station, TX, USA.10.1109/SSRR.2012.6523921Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Benny P. H. 1998. Establishing common ground in written correspondence. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Benny P. H. 2001. Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 21–44.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00128-9Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Kangwoo, Jung Hoon Hwang, Dong Soo Kwon & Hyunsung Choo. 2011. Bring common ground into robotics. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 8(3). 607–629. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021984361100254x.Search in Google Scholar

Marotta, Vince. 2011. The idea of the in-between subject in social and cultural thought. In Michele Lobo, Vince Marrota & Nicole Oke (eds.), Intercultural relations in a global world, 179–200. Champaign, Illinois: Common Ground Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. 1999. When voices Clash. Berlin, New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110801415Search in Google Scholar

Moore, Thomas. 2000. Neither here nor there. Parabola 25(1).Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen R. 1972. Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skantze, Gabriel & A. Seza Doğruöz. 2023. The open-domain paradox for chatbots: Common ground as the basis for human-like dialogue. In Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue, 605–614. Prague, Czechia: Association for Computational Linguistics.10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.57Search in Google Scholar

Song, Min Jeong. 2014. Mechanisms of in-betweenness: Through visual experiences of glass. London: Royal College of Art dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert C. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 701–721.10.1023/A:1020867916902Search in Google Scholar

Tolzin, Antonia & Andreas Janson. 2023. Mechanisms of common ground in human-agent interaction: A systematic review of conversational agent research. In Proceedings of Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 342–351. Maui, Hawaii, USA: HICSS.10.24251/HICSS.2023.042Search in Google Scholar

Trbojević Milošević, Ivana. 2019. Skidding on common ground: A socio-cognitive approach to problems in intercultural communicative situations. Journal of Pragmatics 151. 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.024.Search in Google Scholar

Trbojević Milošević, Ivana. 2023. Working offline: Common ground in written discourse. In Istvan Kecskes (ed.), Common ground in first language and intercultural interaction, 263–279. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110766752-012Search in Google Scholar

Verschueren, Jeff. 1999. Understanding pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Vukčević, Radojka. 2019. Razgovorom kroz Ameriku. [Talking through America]. Novi Sad: Akademska Knjiga.Search in Google Scholar

Wray, Robert, James Kirk & Jeremiah Folsom-Kovarik. 2022. Improving common ground in human-machine teaming: Dimensions, gaps, and priorities. In Tareq Ahram, Jay Kalra & Waldemar Karwowski (eds.), Artificial intelligence and social computing 28, 1–8. Proceeding of the 13th AHFE international conference. New York: AHFE International.10.54941/ahfe1001463Search in Google Scholar

Yoshida, Megumi & Chikako, Sakurai. 2005. Japanese honorifics as a marker of sociocultural identity: A view from non-western perspective. In Robin T. Lakoff & Sachiko Ide (eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness (Politeness and Beyond New Series 139), 197–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.139.18yosSearch in Google Scholar