Interpersonal strategies in international business emails: The intercultural pragmatics perspective

References

AlAfnan, Mohammad Awad. 2015a. Asynchronous communication: Investigating the influences of relational elements and background on the framing structure of emails. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 6(2). 44–50.10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.2p.44Suche in Google Scholar

AlAfnan, Mohammad Awad. 2015b. Language use in computer-mediated communication: An investigation into the genre of workplace emails. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 3(1). 1–11.10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.3n.1p.1Suche in Google Scholar

Ambrose, Yeo-chi King. 1991. Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Dædalus 120(2). 63–84.Suche in Google Scholar

Baron, S. Naomi. 1998. Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication 18. 133–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0271-5309(98)00005-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Baron, S. Naomi. 2000. Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it’s heading. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Baruch, Yehuda. 2005. Bullying on the net: Adverse behavior on e-mail and its impact. Information & Management 42. 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Boone, Griet, Nicolas Ruytenbeek & Sofie Decock. 2022. “The message is clear”: An L1 business perspective on non-target-like formulaic expressions in L2 German. Intercultural Pragmatics 19. 571–595. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2022-5002.Suche in Google Scholar

Bremner, Stephen. 2008. Intertextuality and business communication textbooks: Why students need more textual support. English for Specific Purposes 27. 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Bremner, Stephen. 2010. Collaborative writing: Bridging the gap between the textbook and the classroom. English for Specific Purposes 29. 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Suche in Google Scholar

Cassell, Justine & Dona Tversky. 2004. The language of online intercultural community formation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(2). 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00239.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, Hui-Ching & Richard Holt. 1991. More than relationship: Chinese interaction and the principle of Guan-hsi. Communication Quarterly 39. 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379109369802.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chi-Fen E. 2006. The development of email literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning & Technology 10(2). 35–55.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Yuan-shan. 2015. Developing Chinese EFL learners’ email literacy through requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics 75. 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 2009. Context and common ground. In Mey Jacob (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of pragmatics, 116–119. Oxford: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Darics, Erika & Veronika Koller. 2018. Language in business, language at work. London: Palgrave Higher Education.10.1057/978-1-349-93808-7Suche in Google Scholar

Decock, Sofie & Anneleen Spiessens. 2017. Customer complaints and disagreements in a multilingual business environment: A discursive-pragmatic analysis. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(1). 77–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0004.Suche in Google Scholar

DeKay, Sam H. 2010. Designing email messages for corporate readers: A case study of effective and ineffective rhetorical strategies at a Fortune 100 company. Business Communication Quarterly 73. 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909358103.Suche in Google Scholar

Ducheneaut, Nicolas & Leon Watts. 2005. In search of coherence. A review of e-mail research. Human-Computer Interaction 20. 11–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2001&2_2.10.1207/s15327051hci2001&2_2Suche in Google Scholar

Ehrenreich, Susanne. 2010. English as business lingua franca in a German multinational corporation. Journal of Business Communication 47. 408–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377303.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Stephen. 2012. Designing email tasks for the business English classroom: Implications from a study of Hong Kong’s key industries. English for Specific Purposes 31. 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Feng, Wei & Wei Ren. 2019. “This is the destiny, darling”. Relational acts in Chinese management responses to online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media 28. 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.09.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Frehner, Carmen. 2008. Email-SMS-MMS: The linguistic creativity of asynchronous discourse in the new media age. Berne: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Gains, Jonathan. 1999. Electronic mail – A new style of communication or just a new medium? An investigation into the text features of e-mail. English for Specific Purposes 18. 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00051-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Gimenez, Julio. 2000. Business email communication: Some emerging tendencies in register. English for Specific Purposes 19(3). 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(98)00030-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Gimenez, Julio. 2005. Unpacking business emails: message embeddedness in international business email communication. In Paul Gillaerts & Maurizio Gotti (eds.), Genre variation in business letters, 235–255. Peter Lang: Bern.Suche in Google Scholar

Gimenez, Julio. 2006. Embedded business emails: meeting new demands in international business communication. English for Specific Purposes 25. 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage Lambert. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 742–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Constance & Jessie Scanlon. 1999. Wired style: Principles of English usage in the digital age. New York: Broadway Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Ho, Victor. 2010a. Constructing identities in the workplace through request Email discourse – How does one benefit from it? GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 10(2). 3–18.Suche in Google Scholar

Ho, Victor. 2010b. Constructing identities through request Email discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8). 2253–2261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Ho, Victor. 2011a. What functions do intertextuality and interdiscursivity serve in request e-mail discourse? Journal of Pragmatics 43. 2534–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Ho, Victor. 2011b. A discourse-based study of three communities of practice: How members maintain a harmonious relationship while threatening each other’s face via email. Discourse Studies 13(3). 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611400673.Suche in Google Scholar

Ho, Victor. 2018. Using metadiscourse in making persuasive attempts through workplace request emails. Journal of Pragmatics 134. 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet & Maria Stubbe. 2015. Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315750231Suche in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet & Meredith Marra. 2004. Relational practice in the workplace: women’s talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society 33(3). 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404504043039.Suche in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 2007. Making humour work: creativity on the job. Applied Linguistics 28. 518–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm048.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Daphne Li-jung. 2004. Code-switching and language use in emails: A case study of a network of Chinese-English bilinguals in Taiwan. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Hsin-chou. 2016. Openings and closings in intercultural email communication: A case study of Taiwanese, Japanese, and Italian students. In Yuan-Shan Chen, Der-Hwa Victoria Rau & Gerald Rau (eds.), Email discourse among Chinese using English as a Lingua Franca, 185–204. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-287-888-5_9Suche in Google Scholar

Incelli, Ersilia. 2013. Managing discourse in intercultural business email interactions: A case study of a British and Italian business transaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34(6). 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.807270.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Bruce. 1979. A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliance: Kang-ch’ing and Kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. China Quarterly 78. 237–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000040467.Suche in Google Scholar

Jensen, Astrid. 2009. Discourse strategies in professional e-mail negotiation: A case study. English for Specific Purposes 28. 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Job-Sluder, Kirk & Sasha A. Barab. 2004. Shared “we” and shared “they” indicators of group identity in online teacher professional development. In Sasha A. Barab, Rob Kling & James H. Gray (eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, 377–403. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805080.017Suche in Google Scholar

Kankaanranta, Anne & Brigitte Planken. 2010. Belf competence as business knowledge of internationally operating business professionals. Journal of Business Communication 47. 380–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377301.Suche in Google Scholar

Kankaanranta, Anne. 2006. “Hej seppo, could you pls comment on this!” – Internal email communication in lingua franca English in a multinational company. Business Communication Quarterly 69(2). 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/108056990606900215.Suche in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan & Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition 17(2). 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec.Suche in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892655.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kerkeb, Amina. 2013. A genre analysis of business English emails: The case of a multinational’s Algerian employees. Multidisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research 1(2). 34–47.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy. 1991. Information sequencing in Mandarin in letters of request. Anthropological Linguistics 33(2). 183–203.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, Andy. 1993. Information sequencing in modern standard Chinese. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 16. 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.16.2.03kir.Suche in Google Scholar

Koester, Almut. 2006. Investigating workplace discourse. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203015742Suche in Google Scholar

Kong, Kenneth. 2006. Accounts as a politeness strategy in the internal directive documents of a business firm in Hong Kong. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 16(1). 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.16.1.05kon.Suche in Google Scholar

Levy, Mike & Margaret Murphy. 2006. Politeness in intercultural email communication. Australian and Korean Perspectives. Journal of Intercultural Communication 6(2). 1–11.10.36923/jicc.v6i2.427Suche in Google Scholar

Louhiala-Salminen, Leena, Mirjaliisa (Charles) & Anne Kankaanranta. 2005. English as a lingua franca in Nordic corporate mergers: Two case companies. English for Specific Purposes 24(4). 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen & María-del-Carmen Méndez-García. 2022. “I would like to complain”: A study of the moves and strategies employed by Spanish EFL learners in formal complaint e-mails. Intercultural Pragmatics 20(2). 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-2003.Suche in Google Scholar

Marsden, Elizabeth. 2020. “Music for your breakfast” relational work in a sole trader’s intercultural business emails. In Dawn Archer, Karen Grainger & Piotr Jagodziński (eds.), Politeness in professional contexts, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.311.10marSuche in Google Scholar

Meierkord, Christiane. 2002. “Language stripped bare” or “linguistic masala”? Culture in lingua franca conversation. In Karlfried Knapp & Christiane Meierkord (eds.), Lingua Franca communication, 109–133. Peter Lang: Germany & Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Millot, Philippe. 2017. Inclusivity and exclusivity in English as a business Lingua Franca: The expression of a professional voice in email communication. English for Specific Purposes 46. 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Nadler, Janice & Donna Shestowsky. 2006. Negotiation, information technology and the problem of the faceless other. In Leigh L. Thompson (ed.), Negotiation theory and research, 145–172. New York: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nickerson, Catherine. 1999. The use of English in electronic mail in a multinational corporation. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini & Catherine Nickerson (eds.), Writing business: Genres, media and discourses, 35–56. London: Longman.10.4324/9781315840246-2Suche in Google Scholar

Nickerson, Catherine. 2000. Playing the corporate language game: An investigation of the genres and discourse strategies in English used by Dutch writers working in multinational corporations, vol. 15. Amsterdam & Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004483842Suche in Google Scholar

Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2007. Telephone conversations in Greek and German: Attending to the relationship aspect of communication. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures, 121–142. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2012. Collective aspects of subjectivity: The subject pronoun εμείς (‘we’) in Modern Greek. In Nicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois, and Juliane House (eds.), Subjectivity in language and in discourse, 33–65. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004261921_004Suche in Google Scholar

Richard, Erin & Michael McFadden. 2016. Saving face: Reactions to cultural norm violations in business request emails. Journal of Business and Psychology 31. 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9414-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Schnurr, Stephanie & Olga Zayts. 2013. ‘I can’t remember them ever not doing what I tell them:’ negotiating face and power relations in ‘upward’ refusals in multicultural workplaces in Hong Kong. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(4). 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0028.Suche in Google Scholar

Senft, Theresa. 2008. Camgirls, community and celebrity in the age of social networks. New York: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Skovholt, Karianne. 2015. Doing leadership in a virtual team. Addressing devices, requests, and emotion in a leader’s e-mail messages. In Erika Darics (ed.), Digital business discourse, 101–121. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137405579_6Suche in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen & Jianyu Xing. 1998. Relational management in Chinese-British business meetings. British Studies in Applied Linguistics 13. 31–46.Suche in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory, 11–47. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Herck, Rebecca, Babette Dobbenie & Sofie Decock. 2021. Person-versus content-oriented approaches in English and German email responses to customer complaints: A cross-cultural analysis of moves and first-person pronouns. Intercultural Pragmatics 18(2). 203–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-2003.Suche in Google Scholar

van Mulken, Margot & Wouter van der Meer. 2005. Are you being served? A genre analysis of American and Dutch company replies to customer inquiries. English for Specific Purposes 24. 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-4906(04)00043-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Virkkula-Räisänen, Tïna. 2010. Linguistic repertoires and semiotic resources in interaction: A Finnish manager as a mediator in a multilingual meeting. Journal of Business Communication 47. 505–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377315.Suche in Google Scholar

Volkema, Roger, Denise Fleck & Ágnes Hofmeister. 2011. Getting off on the right foot: The effects of critical email messages on negotiation process and outcome. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications 54. 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2011.2161804.Suche in Google Scholar

Waldvogel, Joan. 2007. Greetings and closings in workplace email. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(2). 456–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00333.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Warren, Martin. 2016. Signaling intertextuality in business emails. English for Specific Purposes 42. 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard. 2005. Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? In Richard Watts, Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in language: Studies in history, theory and practice, 2nd edn., xi–xlvii. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199819Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Doreen & Minfen Lin. 2017. Relational acts and facework by Chinese celebrities on Weibo. In Xinren Chen (ed.), Politeness phenomena across Chinese genre, 119–133. London: Equinox.Suche in Google Scholar

Yates, JoAnne & Wanda J. Orlikowski. 1993. Knee-jerk anti-LOOPism and other email phenomena: Oral, written, and electronic patterns in computer-mediated communication (MIT Sloan School Working Paper No. 3578-3593). Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management MA paper.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, Wuhan. 2012. Polite requestive strategies in emails: An investigation of pragmatic competence of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal 43(2). 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212449936.Suche in Google Scholar