Arguing with “at least” constructions

References

Adler, Meni. 2007. Hebrew morphological disambiguation: An unsupervised stochastic word-based approach. Beersheba: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot. 1976. L’argumentation dans la langue. Langages 42. 5–27.10.3406/lgge.1976.2306Suche in Google Scholar

Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot. 1977. Deux mais en français? Lingua 43(1). 23–40.10.1016/0024-3841(77)90046-8Suche in Google Scholar

Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Oswald Ducrot. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue. Brussels: Mardaga.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791314Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2015. Doubling up: Two upper bounds for scalars. Linguistics 53(3). 561–610.10.1515/ling-2015-0013Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. in preparation. Repair and trailing or. Tel Aviv University.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira & Caterina Mauri. 2018. Why use or? Linguistics 56(5). 939–994.10.1515/ling-2018-0020Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira & Caterina Mauri. 2019. An “alternative” core for or. Journal of Pragmatics 149. 40–59.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.004Suche in Google Scholar

Baroni, Marco, Silvia Bernardini, Adriano Ferraresi & Eros Zanchetta. 2009. The waCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43. 209–226.10.1007/s10579-009-9081-4Suche in Google Scholar

Beaver, David & Brady Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1002/9781444304176Suche in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A Thompson. 2005. A linguistic practice for retracting. In Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation, 257–288. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.17.14couSuche in Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald. 1980. Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6(3). 353–375.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Suche in Google Scholar

Hirschberg, Julia. 1985. A theory of scalar implicature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Suche in Google Scholar

Katzir, Nicole. 2019. Non-optimal argumentation: The case of ‘at most’ constructions. Journal of Pragmatics 154. 1–17.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.004Suche in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul. 1990. Even. Inguistics and Philosophy 13(1). 59–111.10.1007/BF00630517Suche in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul. 1992. At least. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization, 309–331. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Kay, Paul. 2004. Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In Laurence R Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 675–700. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch30Suche in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychly, Pavel Smrz & David Tugwell. 2004. The sketch engine. In G Williams & S Vessier (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Euralex Conference, 105–116. Lorient: Université de Bretagne-Sud.Suche in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In Ken Turner (ed.), The Semantics/pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View 1, 257–291. Oxford: Elsevier.Suche in Google Scholar

Lewis, Diana M. 2000. Some emergent discourse connectives in English. Oxford: University of Oxford dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Moxey, Linda M. & Anthony J. Sanford. 1993. Communicating quantities. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Moxey, Linda M. & Anthony J. Sanford. 2000. Communicating quantities: A Review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14(3). 237–255.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200005/06)14:3<237::AID-ACP641>3.0.CO;2-RSuche in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita M. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9. 219–230.10.1093/oso/9780190927431.003.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwarz, Bernhard, Brian Buccola & Michael Hamilton. 2012. Two types of class B numeral modifiers: A reply to Nouwen 2010. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(1). 1–25.10.3765/sp.5.1Suche in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar