Figurative language in intercultural communication – a case study of German-Southern African international academic discourse

References

Barcelona, Antonio. 2001. On the systematic contrastive analysis of conceptual metaphors: Case studies and proposed methodology. In Martin Pütz, Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics, 117–148. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1). 617–645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639Suche in Google Scholar

Bublitz, Wolfram & Neal R. Norrick (eds.). 2011. Foundations of pragmatics. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214260Suche in Google Scholar

Bührig, Kristin & Jan D. ten Thije (eds.). 2006. Beyond misunderstanding: Linguistic analyses of intercultural communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.144Suche in Google Scholar

Caballero, Rosario & Javier E. Díaz-Vera. 2013. Metaphor and culture: A relationship at a crossroads? Intercultural Pragmatics 10(2).10.1515/ip-2013-0009Suche in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230000612Suche in Google Scholar

Cienki, Alan. 1997. Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kee Dong Lee & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Current issues in linguistic theory, 205–208. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.150.04cieSuche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794414Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2014. Figurative language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2014. Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107775404Suche in Google Scholar

Dorst, A. G. 2011. Personification in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and Literature 20(2). 113–135.10.1177/0963947010395522Suche in Google Scholar

Ehlich, Konrad. 1993. HIAT – a transcription system for discourse data. In Jane Anne Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 123–148. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Evans, Vyvyan & Paul A. Chilton (eds.). 2010. Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox Pub.Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624582Suche in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2003. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2006. Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind & Language 21(3). 434–458.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.xSuche in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 2007. Washing the brain – metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.23Suche in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph E. 2010. Metaphor. In Dirk Geeraerts (ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 188–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate & Joseph E. Grady (eds.). 2005. From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197532.0.1Suche in Google Scholar

Herrmann, Julia Berenike. 2013. Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Utrecht: LOT.Suche in Google Scholar

Horton, William S. 2011. Shared knowledge, mutual understanding and meaning negotiation. In Wolfram Bublitz & Neal R. Norrick (eds.), Foundations of pragmatics, 375–398. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214215.375Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2014. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2012. The importance of unveiling conceptual metaphors in a minority language: The case of Basque. In Anna Idström, Elisabeth Piirainen & Tiber Falzett (eds.), Endangered metaphors, 253–275. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/clscc.2.12ibaSuche in Google Scholar

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2013. The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics 10(2). 315–340.10.1515/ip-2013-0014Suche in Google Scholar

Kecskés, István. 2014. Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kimmel, Michael. 2004. Metaphor variation in cultural context: Perspectives from anthropology. European Journal of English Studies 8(3). 275–294.10.1080/1382557042000277395Suche in Google Scholar

Koole, Tom & Jan D. ten Thije. 2001. The reconstruction of intercultural discourse: Methodological considerations. Journal of Pragmatics 33(4). 571–587.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00035-7Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2007. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Leigh, James. 2000. Implications of universal and parochial behavior for intercultural communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication 4. n.p.Suche in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas, Fiona MacArthur & Giulio Pagani (eds.). 2014. Metaphor and intercultural communication. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781472593610Suche in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas & Jörg Zinken (eds.). 2009. Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230594647Suche in Google Scholar

Redder, Angelika. 2008. Functional pragmatics. In Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, 133–178. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211399.1.133Suche in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1911. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series 11. 108–128.10.1093/aristotelian/11.1.108Suche in Google Scholar

Scarvaglieri, Claudio. 2017. “I a hundred per cent agree” – Konsensuelles Argumentieren in der interkulturellen Wissenschaftskommunikation. In Kristin Bührig & Stephan Schlickau (eds.), Argumentieren und diskutieren. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Schlickau, Stephan. 2017. Argumentieren im Wissenschaftsumfeld: Beobachtungen aus interkultureller Projektkommunikation. In Kristin Bührig & Stephan Schlickau (eds.), 2017. Argumentieren und diskutieren. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.10.3726/b10813Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg (ed.). 2012. Cognitive pragmatics. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110214215Suche in Google Scholar

Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015Suche in Google Scholar

Senkbeil, Karsten. 2017.Image schemas across modes and across cultures: Communicating horror in Philip Roth’s Nemesis and Ridley Scott’s Alien. Language and Literature (forthcoming).10.1177/0963947017739741Suche in Google Scholar

Senkbeil, Karsten & Vasco da Silva. 2017. Widerspruch und Widerstand: Konfliktäres sprachliches Handeln in interkulturellen Arbeitsgruppen. Eine linguistisch-kulturwissenschaftliche Perspektive. In Kristin Bührig & Stephan Schlickau (eds.), Argumentieren und diskutieren. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Senkbeil, Karsten & Nicola Hoppe. 2016. “The sickness stands at your shoulder …”: Embodiment and cognitive metaphor in Hornbacher’s Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia. Language and Literature 25(1). 3–17.10.1177/0963947015608084Suche in Google Scholar

ten Thije, Jan D. 2003. The transition from misunderstanding to understanding in intercultural communication. In Laszlo I. Komlosi, Peter Houtlosser & Michiel Leezenberg (eds.), Communication and culture: Argumentative, cognitive and linguistic perspectives, 197–214. Amsterdam: Sic Sac.Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark (ed.). 2006. The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Tyler, Andrea & Vyvyan Evans. 2007. The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2003. Metaphor, body, and culture: The Chinese understanding of gallbladder and courage. Metaphor and Symbol 18(1). 13–31.10.1207/S15327868MS1801_2Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Ning. 2008. Metaphor from body and culture. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 247–261. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016Suche in Google Scholar