Abstract
This article examines the legal protection of ex-tenants after disasters in Japan. The “Act Providing Temporary Measures concerning Land Lease and Building Lease in the Cities Damaged by War” of 1946 conferred not only the right to lease rebuilt buildings, but also the right of ex-tenants to lease the land of destroyed buildings. Therefore, many victims of the war disaster were entitled to construct and keep self-made shelters on the site of destroyed buildings. Thus, emergencies created exceptions to general rules or principles. The implementation of the Lease Act of 1946 was initially limited to the war disaster, but the government later issued the implementation Cabinet Orders of the Lease Act of 1946 to major disasters until 2004. However, in the case of the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011, the local communities and local bar associations raised strong oppositions against the Lease Act of 1946 on the motif that the implementation of the Lease Act of 1946 would cause complicated legal and social problems. The Ministry of Justice decided not to enact an implementation Cabinet Order of the Lease Act of 1946. The Japanese Diet adopted a new Act regarding the lease in time of disaster in June 2013 to abolish the right to lease land and to lease newly rebuilt buildings as well. In a highly developed modern society, it is difficult to justify exceptions to general principles even in the case of emergencies caused by large-scale disasters.
©2015 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Introduction – The Problem of Law in Response to Disasters
- Articles
- “Beyond Imagination”: Government Blind Spots Regarding Catastrophic Risks
- Regulation of Coastal Zones and Natural Disasters: Mitigating the Impact of Tsunamis in Chile Through Urban and Regional Planning
- Disaster and Protection of Tenants in Japanese Law: General Principles in Time of Emergencies
- Japan’s News Media, The Information Disclosure Law, and The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
- Is International Ocean Law Capable of Preventing or Mitigating the Impacts of Nuclear Disaster?
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Introduction – The Problem of Law in Response to Disasters
- Articles
- “Beyond Imagination”: Government Blind Spots Regarding Catastrophic Risks
- Regulation of Coastal Zones and Natural Disasters: Mitigating the Impact of Tsunamis in Chile Through Urban and Regional Planning
- Disaster and Protection of Tenants in Japanese Law: General Principles in Time of Emergencies
- Japan’s News Media, The Information Disclosure Law, and The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
- Is International Ocean Law Capable of Preventing or Mitigating the Impacts of Nuclear Disaster?