“We speak a topsy-turvy language”: Self-declared language purism versus language use among the speakers of Western Huasteca Nahuatl

References

Anderson, Tyler Kimball & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio. 2007. Attitudes towards lexical borrowing and intra-sentential code-switching among Spanish-English bilinguals. Spanish in Context 42(2). 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.05and.Search in Google Scholar

Bergier, Aleksandra & Justyna Olko. 2016. “Is my Nahuatl coherent?” A comparative analysis of language attitudes among modern speakers of Nahuatl. In Justyna Olko, Tomasz Wicherkiewicz & Robert Borges (eds.), Integral strategies for language revitalization, 295–343. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Cámara de Diputados del, H. 2003. Ley general de derechos lingüísticos de los pueblos Indígenas. https://site.inali.gob.mx/Micrositios/LGDLPI/pdf/LGDLPI.pdf (accessed 10 October 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Clague, Marie. 2007. The developing Manx of immersion educated children. Liverpool: University of Liverpool Centre for Manx Studies PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

COESPOSLP. 2021. Perfil sociodemográfico y socioeconómico de la población indígena en el estado de San Luis Potosí. https://slp.gob.mx/coespo/Documentos%20compartidos/AaPoblaci%C3%B3nInd%C3%ADgena_COESPO_2021.pdf (accessed 30 June 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Dauenhauer, Nora Marks & Richard Dauenhauer. 1998. Technical, emotional, and ideological issues in reversing language shift: Examples from Southeast Alaska. In Lenore A. Grenoble & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Endangered languages: Language loss and community response, 57–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166959.004Search in Google Scholar

Dexter-Sobkowiak, Elwira. 2022. Language contact in the Huasteca: The impact of Spanish on Nahuatl and Tének. Warsaw: University of Warsaw PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. (ed.). 1989. Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620997Search in Google Scholar

Dorian, Nancy C. 1994. Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival. Language in Society 23(4). 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500018169.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, John R. 1982. Language attitudes and their implications among English speakers. In Bouchard Ryan Ellen & Howard Giles (eds.), Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts (social psychology of language), vol. 1, 20–33. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Clare & Julia Sallabank. 2011. Ideologies of “authenticity” in an endangered language: Change and “correctness” in Guernsey French. In Paper presented at the British Association of Applied Linguistics annual conference. Bristol: University of the West of England (accessed 1 September 2011).Search in Google Scholar

Flores, Farfán & Antonio José. 2008. The Hispanicization of modern Nahuatl varieties. In Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker & Rosa Salas Palomo (eds.). Hispanisation: The impact of Spanish on the lexicon and grammar of the indigenous languages of Austronesia and the Americas (empirical approaches to language typology), vol. 39, 27–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207231.1.27Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, Peter, Nikolas Coupland & Angie Williams. 2003. Investigating language attitudes. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620553Search in Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar. 1953. The Norwegian language in America: A study in bilingual behavior. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9781512820522Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. & Kenneth C. Hill. 1986. Speaking Mexicano: Dynamics of syncretic language in Central Mexico. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hilts, Craig. 2003. From taxonomy to typology: The features of lexical contact phenomena in Atepec Zapotec-Spanish linguistic contact. The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 57. 58–99.Search in Google Scholar

INEGI. 2020. Censo de población y vivienda 2020. Principales resultados por localidad. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/scitel/Default?ev=9 (accessed 27 November 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Anne. 2008. Hispanisation in classical Nahuatl. In Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker & Rosa Salas Palomo (eds.), Hispanisation: The impact of Spanish on the lexicon and grammar of the indigenous languages of Austronesia and the Americas (empirical approaches to language typology), vol. 39, 13–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207231.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns (conduct and communication), vol. 4. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Wallace E., Richard C. Hodgson, Robert C. Gardner & Samuel Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 50(1). 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430.Search in Google Scholar

Law, Howard W. 1961. Linguistic acculturation in Isthmus Nahuat. In Benjamin Elson & Juan Comas (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, 555–561. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Lockhart, James. 1992. The Nahuas after the conquest: A social and cultural history of the Indians of central Mexico, Sixteenth through eighteenth centuries. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Daniel & Dennis R. Preston (eds.). 1999 Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel. 2007. Introduction. In Yaron Matras & Jeanette Sakel (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (empirical approaches to language typology), vol. 38, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199192.1Search in Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1974. Pidginization and simplification of language. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2006. Multiple voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Nettle, Daniel & Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world’s languages. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195136241.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nutini, Hugo G. & Barry L. Isaac. 2009. Social stratification in Central Mexico, 1500–2000. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

O’Shannessy, Carmel. 2011. Language contact and change in endangered languages. In Peter K. Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds.), The Cambridge handbook to endangered languages, 78–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975981.005Search in Google Scholar

Olko, Justyna. 2020. Nahuas and Spaniards in contact: Cross-cultural transfer as seen through the Nahuatl lexicon. In Agnieszka Brylak, Julia Madajczak, Justyna Olko & John Sullivan (eds.), Loans in colonial and modern Nahuatl: A contextual dictionary (trends in linguistic documentation), vol. 35, 10–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110591484-002Search in Google Scholar

Olko, Justyna, Andrzej Galbarczyk, Joanna Maryniak, Karolina Krzych-Miłkowska, Humberto I. Tepec, Eduardo de la Cruz, Elwira Dexter-Sobkowiak & Grażyna Jasieńska. 2023. The spiral of disadvantage: Ethnolinguistic discrimination, acculturative stress and health in Nahua indigenous communities in Mexico. American Journal of Biological Anthropology 181(3). 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24745.Search in Google Scholar

Pieras-Guasp, Felipe. 2002. Direct vs. indirect attitude measurement and the planning of Catalan in Mallorca. Language Problems and Language Planning 21(1). 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.26.1.04pie.Search in Google Scholar

Poplack, Shana, Susan Wheeler & Anneli Westwood. 1987. Distinguishing language contact phenomena: Evidence from Finnish-English bilingualism. In Pirkko Lilius & Mirja Saari (eds.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, vol. 6, 33–54. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.Search in Google Scholar

Preston, Dennis R. (ed.). 1999 Handbook of perceptual dialectology, vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.hpd1Search in Google Scholar

Sallabank, Julia. 2013. Attitudes to endangered languages: Identities and policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139344166Search in Google Scholar

Sallabank, Julia. 2017. Purism, variation, change and ‘authenticity’: Ideological challenges to language revitalisation. European Review 26(1). 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1062798717000400.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Allan R. (ed.). 1992. Language obsolescence, shift and death in several Native American communities. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 93.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, George. 1991. Linguistic purism. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520912793Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1983. On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, Olivia. 2014. Les anglicismes polluent la langue française. Purist attitudes in France and Quebec. Journal of French Language Studies 24(3). 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959269513000227.Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. 1963. Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Winford, Donald. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Search in Google Scholar