Home Technology The influence pulse-like near-field earthquakes on repairability index of reversible in mid-and short-rise buildings
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The influence pulse-like near-field earthquakes on repairability index of reversible in mid-and short-rise buildings

  • Mohammad Bavandi ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 6, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Author Information
International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation
From the journal International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation Volume 24 Issue 8

Abstract

Conventional earthquake-resistant systems, often experience inelastic behavior in a part of the structure during a large earthquake and eventually causing residual deformation and damage to the structure. Repairing these damages are unaffordable and often leads to structure destruction. Therefore, the use of structures with the ability to focus damage on interchangeable elements, which leads to reduced earthquake damage, is very important. Due to the importance of the performance of self-centering structures to reduce their damage against various earthquakes, in this study, the Repairability Index of Post-tensioned Self-Centering Frame for Near-Field earthquake (RIPSCF-N) has been developed. According to the 12 models of the studied building, a building that can be repaired, that the maximum rotation in its connection after the earthquake does not exceed the rotation of the immediate occupancy performance. Based on this, the output data of Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) in OpenSees were drawn according to the connection of relative rotation and spectral acceleration. According to the predicted performance levels of Garlock for each acceleration level, the value of the connection opening is divided by the opening of the Design Basis Earthquake (DBE) level. The resulting curve shows the repairability index according to spectral acceleration, which if less than one, the repairability target is achieved. To evaluate the damage of angles, the Angle Failure Probability of Post-tensioned Self-Centering Frame for Near-Field earthquake (AFPPSCF-N) has been developed. This index equation is determined according to the fragility curve and the intensity of damage in each building.

Keywords: angle failure index; damage reduction; incremental dynamic analysis; repairability index; self-centering connections
Corresponding author: Mohammad Bavandi, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] G. Pekcan, J. B. Mander, and S. S. Chen, “Experiments on steel MRF building with supplemental tendon system,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 437–444, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. Christopoulos, A. Filiatrault, C. M. Uang, and B. Folz, “Posttensioned energy dissipating connections for moment-resisting steel frames,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 128, no. 9, pp. 1111–1120, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[3] T. Hitaka and C. Matsui, “Experimental study on steel shear wall with slits,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 586–595, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. R. Eatherton, J. F. Hajjar, G. G. Deierlein, H. Krawinkler, S. Billington, and X. Ma, “Controlled rocking of steel-framed buildings with replaceable energy-dissipating fuses,” in Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2008, pp. 12–17. Available at: https://b2n.ir/189909.Search in Google Scholar

[5] G. G. Deierlein, X. Ma, M. Eatherton, J. Hajjar, H. Krawinkler, and T. Takeuchi, “Collaborative research on development of innovative steel braced frame systems with controlled rocking and replaceable fuses,” in Proc. 6th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, 2009, pp. 413–416. Available at: https://b2n.ir/457158.Search in Google Scholar

[6] I. D. Aiken, P. Clark, F. Tajirian, K. Kasai, I. Kimura, and E. Ko, “Unbonded braces in the United States—design studies, large-scale testing, and the first building application,” in Japan Passive Control Symp, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. Saeki, K. Iwamatu, and A. Wada, “Analytical study by finite element method and comparison with experiment results concerning buckling-restrained unbonded braces,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., vol. 484, pp. 111–120, 1996. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.61.111_2.Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. Sabelli, S. Mahin, and C. Chang, “Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces,” Eng. Struct., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 655–666, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00175-x.Search in Google Scholar

[9] M. Iwata, T. Kato, and A. Wada, “Buckling-Restrained Braces as Hysteretic Dampers,” in Behavior of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, 2000, pp. 33–38. Available at: https://b2n.ir/037819.10.1201/9781003211198-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] G. Deierlein, H. Krawinkler, X. Ma, et al.., “Earthquake resilient steel braced frames with controlled rocking and energy dissipating fuses,” Steel Constr., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 171–175, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/stco.201110023.Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Pollino, “Seismic design for enhanced building performance using rocking steel braced frames,” Eng. Struct., vol. 83, pp. 129–139, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.005.Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. Dimakogianni, G. Dougka, and I. Vayas, “Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS1-2),” Eng. Struct., vol. 90, pp. 83–95, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.054.Search in Google Scholar

[13] I. Vayas, P. Karydakis, D. Dimakogianni, G. Dougka, C. A. Castiglioni, and A. Kanyilmaz, Dissipative Devices for Seismic-Resistant Steel Frames (Fuseis), Research Fund for Coal and Steel, European Commission, EU, 2013, p. 25901. Available at: https://b2n.ir/934505.Search in Google Scholar

[14] P. Dusicka and R. Iwai, “Development of linked column frame system for seismic lateral loads,” in Structural Engineering Research Frontiers, 2007, pp. 1–13.10.1061/40944(249)63Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. H. Powell and R. Allahabadi, “Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: concepts and procedures,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 719–734, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160507.Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. A. Sozen, Review of Earthquake Response of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with a View to Drift Control. State-of-the-Art in Earthquake Engineering, 1981, pp. 383–418. Available at: https://b2n.ir/684035.Search in Google Scholar

[17] A. Ghobarah, H. Abou-Elfath, and A. Biddah, “Response-based damage assessment of structures,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 79–104, 1999.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<79::AID-EQE805>3.0.CO;2-JSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Y. H. Chai, P. Fajfar, and K. M. Romstad, “Formulation of duration-dependent inelastic seismic design spectrum,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 124, no. 8, pp. 913–921, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y. J. Park and A. H. S. Ang, “Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 722–739, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. Banon and D. Veneziano, “Seismic safety of reinforced concrete members and structures,” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 179–193, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100202.Search in Google Scholar

[21] J. Faleiro, S. Oller, and A. H. Barbat, “Plastic–damage seismic model for reinforced concrete frames,” Comput. Struct., vol. 86, nos 7-8, pp. 581–597, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.08.007.Search in Google Scholar

[22] X. Zhang, K. K. Wong, and Y. Wang, “Performance assessment of moment resisting frames during earthquakes based on the force analogy method,” Eng. Struct., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2792–2802, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.024.Search in Google Scholar

[23] M. Eatherton, J. Hajjar, X. Ma, H. Krawinkler, and G. Deierlein, “Seismic design and behavior of steel frames with controlled rocking—part I: concepts and quasi-static subassembly testing,” in Structures Congress 2010, 2010, pp. 1523–1533.10.1061/41130(369)138Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. Bavandi, A. S. Moghadam, M. R. Mansoori, and A. Aziminejad, “Introducing a new seismic efficiency index of post-tensioned self-centering steel moment connections,” Structures, vol. 33, pp. 463–483, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.015.Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. Bavandi, A. S. Moghadam, M. R. Mansoori, and A. Aziminejad, “Development of repairability index for steel moment frames with post-tensioned self-centering connections,” Construct. Build. Mater., vol. 318, p. 126009, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126009.Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. Bavandi, A. S. Moghadam, M. R. Mansoori, and A. Aziminejad, “Assessment of repairability index of building connections with posttensioned strands,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Construct., vol. 27, no. 1, p. 04021076, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000650.Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Bavandi, A. S. Moghadam, M. R. Mansoori, and A. Aziminejad, “Computation of the repairability index of short buildings with rocking connections,” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.: Forensic Eng., vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 7–20, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1680/jfoen.21.00007.Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Bavandi, A. S. Moghadam, M. R. Mansoori, and A. Aziminejad, “The proposal of the repairability index for post-tensioned self-centering steel moment frames under far-field earthquakes,” J. Steel Struct., vol. 15, no. 31, pp. 39–53, 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Bavandi, A. Sarvghad Moghadam, M. R. Mansoori, and A. Aziminejad, “Development of efficiency index for steel moment frames with Self-Centering Connections,” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 62–81, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2020.223402.2106.Search in Google Scholar

[30] M. M. Garlock, J. M. Ricles, and R. Sause, “Experimental studies of full-scale posttensioned steel connections,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 438–448, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[31] J. M. Ricles, R. Sause, S. W. Peng, and L. W. Lu, “Experimental evaluation of earthquake resistant posttensioned steel connections,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 128, no. 7, pp. 850–859, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[32] S. Moradi and M. S. Alam, “Lateral load–drift response and limit states of posttensioned steel beam-column connections: parametric study,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 143, no. 7, p. 04017044, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001772.Search in Google Scholar

[33] M. M. Garlock, R. Sause, and J. M. Ricles, “Behavior and design of posttensioned steel frame systems,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 133, no. 3, pp. 389–399, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445.Search in Google Scholar

[34] FEMA 355C, State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking, Washington, D.C, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000. Available at: https://b2n.ir/992631.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Applied Technology Council, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA P695, 2009. Available at: https://b2n.ir/679951.Search in Google Scholar

[36] S. Mazzoni, F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves, The Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees) User Command-Language Manual, 2006. Available at: https://b2n.ir/551305.Search in Google Scholar

[37] A. Gupta and H. Krawinkler, “Seismic demands for the performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 1998. Available at: https://b2n.ir/039258.Search in Google Scholar

[38] X. Guan, H. Burton, and S. Moradi, “Seismic performance of a self-centering steel moment frame building: from component-level modeling to economic loss assessment,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 150, pp. 129–140, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.07.026.Search in Google Scholar

[39] ASCE 7-16, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Reston, VA, 2016. Available at: https://b2n.ir/745887.Search in Google Scholar

[40] G. M. Herning, “Reliability-based evaluation of seismic design and performance of steel self-centering moment-resisting frames,” Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, 2011. Available at: https://b2n.ir/279414.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2022-04-08
Accepted: 2022-08-28
Published Online: 2022-10-06

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Testing of logarithmic-law for the slip with friction boundary condition
  4. A new clique polynomial approach for fractional partial differential equations
  5. The modified Rusanov scheme for solving the phonon-Bose model
  6. Delta-shock for a class of strictly hyperbolic systems of conservation laws
  7. The Cădariu–Radu method for existence, uniqueness and Gauss Hypergeometric stability of a class of Ξ-Hilfer fractional differential equations
  8. Novel periodic and optical soliton solutions for Davey–Stewartson system by generalized Jacobi elliptic expansion method
  9. The simulation of two-dimensional plane problems using ordinary state-based peridynamics
  10. Reduced basis method for the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation regularized by the range-separated canonical tensor format
  11. Simulation of the crystallization processes by population balance model using a linear separation method
  12. PS and GW optimization of variable sliding gains mode control to stabilize a wind energy conversion system under the real wind in Adrar, Algeria
  13. Characteristics of internal flow of nozzle integrated with aircraft under transonic flow
  14. Magnetogasdynamic shock wave propagation using the method of group invariance in rotating medium with the flux of monochromatic radiation and azimuthal magnetic field
  15. The influence pulse-like near-field earthquakes on repairability index of reversible in mid-and short-rise buildings
  16. Intelligent controller for maximum power extraction of wind generation systems using ANN
  17. A new self-adaptive inertial CQ-algorithm for solving convex feasibility and monotone inclusion problems
  18. Existence and Hyers–Ulam stability of solutions for nonlinear three fractional sequential differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions
  19. A study on solvability of the fourth-order nonlinear boundary value problems
  20. Adaptive control for position and force tracking of uncertain teleoperation with actuators saturation and asymmetric varying time delays
  21. Framing the hydrothermal significance of water-based hybrid nanofluid flow over a revolving disk
  22. Catalytic surface reaction on a vertical wavy surface placed in a non-Darcy porous medium
  23. Carleman framework filtering of nonlinear noisy phase-locked loop system
  24. Corrigendum
  25. Corrigendum to: numerical modeling of thermal influence to pollutant dispersion and dynamics of particles motion with various sizes in idealized street canyon
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2022-0147
Keywords for this article
angle failure index; damage reduction; incremental dynamic analysis; repairability index; self-centering connections

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Testing of logarithmic-law for the slip with friction boundary condition
  4. A new clique polynomial approach for fractional partial differential equations
  5. The modified Rusanov scheme for solving the phonon-Bose model
  6. Delta-shock for a class of strictly hyperbolic systems of conservation laws
  7. The Cădariu–Radu method for existence, uniqueness and Gauss Hypergeometric stability of a class of Ξ-Hilfer fractional differential equations
  8. Novel periodic and optical soliton solutions for Davey–Stewartson system by generalized Jacobi elliptic expansion method
  9. The simulation of two-dimensional plane problems using ordinary state-based peridynamics
  10. Reduced basis method for the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation regularized by the range-separated canonical tensor format
  11. Simulation of the crystallization processes by population balance model using a linear separation method
  12. PS and GW optimization of variable sliding gains mode control to stabilize a wind energy conversion system under the real wind in Adrar, Algeria
  13. Characteristics of internal flow of nozzle integrated with aircraft under transonic flow
  14. Magnetogasdynamic shock wave propagation using the method of group invariance in rotating medium with the flux of monochromatic radiation and azimuthal magnetic field
  15. The influence pulse-like near-field earthquakes on repairability index of reversible in mid-and short-rise buildings
  16. Intelligent controller for maximum power extraction of wind generation systems using ANN
  17. A new self-adaptive inertial CQ-algorithm for solving convex feasibility and monotone inclusion problems
  18. Existence and Hyers–Ulam stability of solutions for nonlinear three fractional sequential differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions
  19. A study on solvability of the fourth-order nonlinear boundary value problems
  20. Adaptive control for position and force tracking of uncertain teleoperation with actuators saturation and asymmetric varying time delays
  21. Framing the hydrothermal significance of water-based hybrid nanofluid flow over a revolving disk
  22. Catalytic surface reaction on a vertical wavy surface placed in a non-Darcy porous medium
  23. Carleman framework filtering of nonlinear noisy phase-locked loop system
  24. Corrigendum
  25. Corrigendum to: numerical modeling of thermal influence to pollutant dispersion and dynamics of particles motion with various sizes in idealized street canyon
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2026 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 5.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnsns-2022-0147/html
Scroll to top button