Home Technology The simulation of two-dimensional plane problems using ordinary state-based peridynamics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The simulation of two-dimensional plane problems using ordinary state-based peridynamics

  • Jingjing Zhao EMAIL logo , Guangda Lu , Qing Zhang and Wenchao Du
Published/Copyright: June 13, 2022

Abstract

The ordinary state-based peridynamics (OSB PD) model is an integral nonlocal continuum mechanics model. And the three-dimensional OSB PD model can deal with linear elastic solid problems well. But for plane problems, the calculation results of existing models have large deviations. In this paper, a set of OSB PD models for plane problems is established by theoretical derivation. First, through the strain energy density function equivalence of peridynamics and classical continuum mechanics, the equivalent coefficients of the plane strain and plane stress problems of OSB PD are deduced. Then, consider the cantilever beam deformation simulation under concentrated load. The simulation results show that the maximum displacements are in good agreement with the corresponding analytical solutions in all directions. Finally, in the simulation of the slab with a hole, the two cases of uniform displacement and uniform load are considered, respectively. The simulation results are consistent with the ANSYS analysis results, and the deviation is small, which verifies the validity of the model.


Corresponding author: Jingjing Zhao, Nanjing Institute of Railway Technology, Nanjing 210031, China, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11932006

Award Identifier / Grant number: 12002118

Award Identifier / Grant number: U1934206

  1. Author contribution: The publication has been approved by all co-authors. We have no conflict of interest to declare, all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

  2. Research funding: This research is financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11932006, U1934206, 12002118). The snapshots were performed using the visualization tool Ensight.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors claim that none of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere. We have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

[1] R. W. Clough, “The finite element method in plane stress analysis,” Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Electronic Computation of American Society of Civil Engineers, Pittsburgh, USA, 1960, pp. 345–378.Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Schöllmann, M. Fulland, and H. A. Richard, “Development of a new software for adaptive crack growth simulations in 3D structures,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 249–268, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7944(02)00028-0.Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. N. Wells and L. J. Sluys, “A new method for modelling cohesive cracks using finite elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2667–2682, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.143.Search in Google Scholar

[4] T. Belytschko and T. Black, “Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 601–620, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::aid-nme598>3.0.co;2-s.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-SSearch in Google Scholar

[5] S. A. Silling, “Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces,” J. Mech. Phys. Solid., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 175–209, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5096(99)00029-0.Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. A. Silling, M. Epton, O. Weckner, J. F. Xu, and E. Askari, “Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling,” J. Elasticity, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 151–184, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9125-1.Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. A. Silling, “Linearized theory of peridynamic states,” J. Elasticity, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 85–111, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-009-9234-0.Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. A. Silling and R. B. Lehoucq, “Peridynamic theory of solid mechanics,” Adv. Appl. Mech., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 73–168, 2010.10.1016/S0065-2156(10)44002-8Search in Google Scholar

[9] E. Madenci, M. Dorduncu, N. Phan, et al.., “Weak form of bond-associated non-ordinary state-based peridynamics free of zero energy modes with uniform or non-uniform discretization,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 218, p. 106613, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106613.Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Cui, C. Li, and H. Zheng, “The generation of non-ordinary state-based peridynamics by the weak form of the peridynamic method,” Math. Mech. Solid, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1544–1567, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286520910221.Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. Hao, A. Cl, and Z. C. Hong, “A higher-order stress point method for non-ordinary state-based peridynamics,” Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem., vol. 117, pp. 104–118, 2020.10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.03.016Search in Google Scholar

[12] P Li, Z. Hao, S. Yu, et al.., “Implicit implementation of the stabilized non-ordinary state-based peridynamic model,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 121, no. 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6234.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Q. V. Le, W. K. Chan, and J. Schwartz, “A two-dimensional ordinary, state-based peridynamic model for linearly elastic solids,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 547–561, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4642.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Q. V. Le, “Relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties in Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox round wires using peridynamic simulation,” [D], Phd Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. Sarego, Q. V. Le, F. Bobaru, M. Zaccariotto, and U. Galvanetto, “Linearized state-based peridynamics for 2-D problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1174–1197, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5250.Search in Google Scholar

[16] C. W. V. D. Merwe, “A peridynamic model for sleeved hydraulic fracture,” [D], Phd Thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[17] H. Ouchi, A. Katiyar, J. York, J. T. Foster, and M. M. Sharma, “A fully coupled porous flow and geomechanics model for fluid driven cracks: a peridynamics approach,” Comput. Mech., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 561–576, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1123-8.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Z. Liu, Y. Bie, Z. Cui, et al.., “Ordinary state-based peridynamics for nonlinear hardening plastic materials’ deformation and its fracture process,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 223, p. 106782, 2019.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106782Search in Google Scholar

[19] T. N. Cong and S. Oterkus, “Ordinary state-based peridynamic model for geometrically nonlinear analysis,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 224, p. 106750, 2019.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106750Search in Google Scholar

[20] L. Wu and D. Huang, “Peridynamic modeling and simulations on concrete dynamic failure and penetration subjected to impact loadings,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 259, p. 108135, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108135.Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. Delorme, P. Diehl, I. Tabiai, et al.., “Extracting constitutive mechanical parameters in linear elasticity using the virtual fields method within the ordinary state-based peridynamic framework,” Peridyn Nonlocal Model, vol. 2, pp. 111–135, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-019-00025-7.Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Shimbo, R. Itto, K. Inaba, et al.., “Seismic response analysis for ordinary state-based peridynamics in a linear isotropic elastic material,” J. Peridyn Nonlocal Model, vol. 2, pp. 185–204, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-020-00029-8.Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Mo, C. Akb, D. Mi, et al.., “Dynamic fracture analysis of functionally graded materials using ordinary state-based peridynamics,” Compos. Struct., vol. 244, p. 112296, 2020.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112296Search in Google Scholar

[24] H. Zhang and P. Qiao, “A two-dimensional ordinary state-based peridynamic model for elastic and fracture analysis,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 232, p. 107040, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107040.Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Kulkarni, “An ordinary state based peridynamic correspondence model for metal creep,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 233, p. 107042, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107042.Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. N. Rahimi, A. Kefal, M. Yildiz, et al.., “An ordinary state-based peridynamic model for toughness enhancement of brittle materials through drilling stop-holes,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 182, p. 105773, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105773.Search in Google Scholar

[27] P. Seleson, M. L. Parks, M. Gunzburger, and R. B. Lehoucq, “Peridynamics as an upscaling of molecular dynamics,” Multiscale Model. Simul., vol. 8, pp. 204–227, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1137/09074807x.Search in Google Scholar

[28] J. T. Foster, S. A. Silling, and W. W. Chen, “Viscoplasticity using peridynamics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 81, pp. 1242–1258, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2725.Search in Google Scholar

[29] G. R. Liu and Y. T. Gu, “A meshfree method: meshfree weak–strong (MWS) form method, for 2-D solids,” Comput. Mech., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 2–14, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-003-0477-5.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-12
Accepted: 2022-04-26
Published Online: 2022-06-13

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Testing of logarithmic-law for the slip with friction boundary condition
  4. A new clique polynomial approach for fractional partial differential equations
  5. The modified Rusanov scheme for solving the phonon-Bose model
  6. Delta-shock for a class of strictly hyperbolic systems of conservation laws
  7. The Cădariu–Radu method for existence, uniqueness and Gauss Hypergeometric stability of a class of Ξ-Hilfer fractional differential equations
  8. Novel periodic and optical soliton solutions for Davey–Stewartson system by generalized Jacobi elliptic expansion method
  9. The simulation of two-dimensional plane problems using ordinary state-based peridynamics
  10. Reduced basis method for the nonlinear Poisson–Boltzmann equation regularized by the range-separated canonical tensor format
  11. Simulation of the crystallization processes by population balance model using a linear separation method
  12. PS and GW optimization of variable sliding gains mode control to stabilize a wind energy conversion system under the real wind in Adrar, Algeria
  13. Characteristics of internal flow of nozzle integrated with aircraft under transonic flow
  14. Magnetogasdynamic shock wave propagation using the method of group invariance in rotating medium with the flux of monochromatic radiation and azimuthal magnetic field
  15. The influence pulse-like near-field earthquakes on repairability index of reversible in mid-and short-rise buildings
  16. Intelligent controller for maximum power extraction of wind generation systems using ANN
  17. A new self-adaptive inertial CQ-algorithm for solving convex feasibility and monotone inclusion problems
  18. Existence and Hyers–Ulam stability of solutions for nonlinear three fractional sequential differential equations with nonlocal boundary conditions
  19. A study on solvability of the fourth-order nonlinear boundary value problems
  20. Adaptive control for position and force tracking of uncertain teleoperation with actuators saturation and asymmetric varying time delays
  21. Framing the hydrothermal significance of water-based hybrid nanofluid flow over a revolving disk
  22. Catalytic surface reaction on a vertical wavy surface placed in a non-Darcy porous medium
  23. Carleman framework filtering of nonlinear noisy phase-locked loop system
  24. Corrigendum
  25. Corrigendum to: numerical modeling of thermal influence to pollutant dispersion and dynamics of particles motion with various sizes in idealized street canyon
Downloaded on 5.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnsns-2021-0320/html
Scroll to top button