Home Comparison of different time discretization schemes for solving the Allen–Cahn equation
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comparison of different time discretization schemes for solving the Allen–Cahn equation

  • Sana Ayub , Abdul Rauf , Hira Affan and Abdullah Shah ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 17, 2021

Abstract

This article aims to solve the nonlinear Allen–Cahn equation numerically. The diagonally implicit fractional-step θ-(DIFST) scheme is used for the discretization of the time derivative term while the space derivative is discretized by the conforming finite element method. The computational efficiency of the DIFST scheme in terms of CPU time and temporal error estimation is computed and compared with other time discretization schemes. Several test problems are presented to show the effectiveness of the DIFST scheme.

Chinese library classification: 0177.91
2010 Mathematics subject classification: 65M60; 65M22; 65F10

Corresponding author: Abdullah Shah, Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Park Road, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan, E-mail:

Funding source: Higher Education Commission, Pakistan

Award Identifier / Grant number: NRPU-7781

Acknowledgements

The work of S. Ayub is financially supported by Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan under indigenous PhD scholarship scheme. The work of A. Shah and A. Rauf was supported by HEC under NRPU No. 7781.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The work of A. Shah and A. Rauf was supported by HEC under NRPU No. 7781 while S. Ayub was financially supported by Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan under the indigenous PhD scholarship scheme.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] M. Katsoulakis, G. Kossioris, and F. Reitich, “Generalized motion by mean curvature with Neumann conditions and the Allen–Cahn model for phase transitions,” J. Geomet. Anal., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 255, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02921677.Search in Google Scholar

[2] F. Yang, B. Liu, and D. N. Fang, “Analysis on high-temperature oxidation and growth stress of iron-based alloy using phase field method,” Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 757–764, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-011-1455-8.Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Evans and J. Spruck, “Motion of level sets by mean curvature I,” J. Geomet. Anal., vol. 2, p. 2, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02921385.Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Evans, H. Soner, and P. Souganidis, “Phase transitions and generalized motion by mean curvature,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1097–1123, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160450903.Search in Google Scholar

[5] C. Liu and J. Shen, “A phase field model for the mixture of two incompressible fluids and its approximation by a Fourier-spectral method,” Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom., vol. 179, nos 3-4, pp. 211–228, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2789(03)00030-7.Search in Google Scholar

[6] X. Yang, J. Feng, C. Liu, and J. Shen, “Numerical simulations of jet pinching-off and drop formation using an energetic variational phase-field method,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 417–428, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.02.021.Search in Google Scholar

[7] V. I. Münch and M. Krauß, “An enhanced finite element technique for diffuse phase transition,” Comput. Mech., vol. 56, pp. 691–708, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1195-5.Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. Alexander, “Diagonally implicit Runge–Kutta methods for stiff ODEs,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 14, pp. 1006–1021, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1137/0714068.Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Li and R. X. Liu, “The space-time finite element method for parabolic problems,” Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 687–700, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016314405090.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Thomee, “Galerkin finite element methods for parabolic problems,” in Springer Series Computational in Mathematics, vol. 25, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 2016–2024.10.1007/978-3-662-03359-3Search in Google Scholar

[11] W. Q. Wang and Y. P. Chen, “Numerical stability of Heun methods for nonlinear stochastic delay differential equations,” Math. Numer. Sin., vol. 33, pp. 69–76, 2011. https://doi.org/10.12286/jssx.2011.1.69.Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Shu and B. E. Richards, “Application of generalized differential quadrature to solve two-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluid., vol. 15, pp. 791–798, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650150704.Search in Google Scholar

[13] W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Blatt and P. Bastian, “On the generic parallelization of iterative solvers for the finite element method,” Physica D, vol. 4, pp. 56–69, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcse.2008.021112.Search in Google Scholar

[15] P. Bastian, M. Blatt, C. Engwer, et al.., “The distributed and unified numerics environment,” in Proc. 19th Sympo. Simul. Techn., 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[16] X. Feng and A. Prohl, “Numerical analysis of the Allen–Cahn equation and approximation for mean curvature flows,” Numer. Math., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 33–65, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-002-0413-1.Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. Shin, S. K. Park, and J. Kim, “A hybrid FEM for solving the Allen–Cahn equation,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 244, pp. 606–612, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.07.040.Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Shah, M. Sabir, M. Qasim, and P. Bastain, “Efficient numerical scheme for solving the Allen–Cahn equation,” Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ., vol. 34, pp. 1820–1833, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.22255.Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Shah, M. Sabir, and P. Bastain, “An efficient time-stepping scheme for numerical simulation of dendritic crystal growth,” Eur. J. Comput. Mech., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 475–488, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/17797179.2016.1276395.Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. C. Elman, D. J. Silvester, and A. J. Wathen, Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics, USA, Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678792.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. J. Hughes, The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Mineola, New York, Dover Publications, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[22] J. C. Butcher, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016.10.1002/9781119121534Search in Google Scholar

[23] J. T. Smith, “Conservative modeling of 3-D electromagnetic fields, Part II: Biconjugate gradient solution and an accelerator,” Geophysics, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1319–1324, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444055.Search in Google Scholar

[24] H. C. Elman, D. J. Silvester, and A. J. Wathen, Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: with Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics, USA, Oxford University Press, 2014.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678792.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Gottlieb, C. W. Shu, and E. Tadmor, “Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods,” SIAM Rev., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 89–112, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1137/s003614450036757x.Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. Guo, L. Ji, and Y. Xu, “High order local discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Allen–Cahn equation: analysis and simulation,” J. Comput. Math., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 135–158, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4208/jcm.1510-m2014-0002.Search in Google Scholar

[27] M. Verani and A. Nicolo, Implementation of a C++ Code to Solve the Allen–Cahn Equation, 2015. Available at: http://www1.mate.polimi.it/forma/Didattica/ProgettiPacs/Nicolo14-15/relazione.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[28] A. Shah, M. Sabir, and S. Ayub, “An adaptive time stepping scheme for the numerical simulation of Cahn–Hilliard equation with variable mobility,” J. Appl. Math. Mech., vol. 99, p. e201800246, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201800246.Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Verani and A. Nicolo, Implementation of a C++ Code to Solve the Allen–Cahn Equation, 2015. Available at: http://www1.mate.polimi.it/forma/Didattica/ProgettiPacs/Nicolo14-15/relazione.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[30] X. Feng, Y. He, and C. Liu, “Analysis of finite element approximations of a phase field model for two-phase fluids,” Math. Comput., vol. 76, no. 258, pp. 539–571, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0025-5718-06-01915-6.Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Shah and L. Yuan, “Numerical solution of a phase-field model for incompressible two-phase flows based on artificial compressibility,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.10.021.Search in Google Scholar

[32] M. Xu, H. Guo, and Q. Zou, “Hessian recovery based finite element methods for the Cahn–Hilliard equation,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 386, pp. 524–540, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.056.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-13
Revised: 2020-10-12
Accepted: 2021-02-22
Published Online: 2021-03-17
Published in Print: 2022-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original Research Articles
  3. Dynamics of synthetic drug transmission models
  4. Collision-induced amplitude dynamics of pulses in linear waveguides with the generic nonlinear loss
  5. Global dissipativity of non-autonomous BAM neural networks with mixed time-varying delays and discontinuous activations
  6. On the inverse problem for nonlinear strongly damped wave equations with discrete random noise
  7. A second-order nonlocal regularized variational model for multiframe image super-resolution
  8. Algebro-geometric integration of a modified shallow wave hierarchy
  9. Singularity analysis of a 7-DOF spatial hybrid manipulator for medical surgery
  10. Propagation of diffusing pollutant by kinetic flux-vector splitting method
  11. Limit cycles in a tritrophic food chain model with general functional responses
  12. Local and parallel stabilized finite element methods based on full domain decomposition for the stationary Stokes equations
  13. Stress concentration effect on deflection and stress fields of a master leaf spring through domain decomposition and geometry updation technique
  14. Electrostatically actuated double walled piezoelectric nanoshell subjected to nonlinear van der Waals effect: nonclassical vibrations and stability analysis
  15. Traveling wave solutions of the generalized Rosenau–Kawahara-RLW equation via the sine–cosine method and a generalized auxiliary equation method
  16. A predictor–corrector compact finite difference scheme for a nonlinear partial integro-differential equation
  17. Parameter inference with analytical propagators for stochastic models of autoregulated gene expression
  18. DCSK performance analysis of a chaos-based communication using a newly designed chaotic system
  19. On successive linearization method for differential equations with nonlinear conditions
  20. Comparison of different time discretization schemes for solving the Allen–Cahn equation
  21. The homoclinic breather wave solution, rational wave and n-soliton solution to a nonlinear differential equation
  22. Diversity of interaction phenomenon, cross-kink wave, and the bright-dark solitons for the (3 + 1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili–Boussinesq-like equation
Downloaded on 23.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnsns-2019-0283/html
Scroll to top button