Home Classical Magnetism and an Integral Formula Involving Modified Bessel Functions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Classical Magnetism and an Integral Formula Involving Modified Bessel Functions

  • Orion Ciftja EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 31, 2018

Abstract

We study an integral expression that is encountered in some classical spin models of magnetism. The idea is to calculate the key integral that represents the building block for the expression of the partition function of these models. The general calculation allows one to have a better look at the internal structure of the quantity of interest which, in turn, may lead to potentially new useful insights. We find out that application of two different approaches to solve the problem in a general-case scenario leads to an interesting integral formula involving modified Bessel functions of the first kind which appears to be new. We performed Monte Carlo simulations to verify the correctness of the integral formula obtained. Additional numerical integration tests lead to the same result as well. The approach under consideration, when generalized, leads to a linear integral equation that might be of interest to numerical studies of classical spin models of magnetism that rely on the well-established transfer-matrix formalism.

Funding statement: This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grants No. DMR-1410350 and DMR-1705084.

Acknowledgements:

The author thanks the anonymous referee for suggesting an analytical proof of the result as outlined in the Appendix.

Appendix

A Calculation Of F(a,θ)

The relation in eq. (25) can be written as:

(27)F(a,θ)=1+1dyeacosθyI0asinθ1y2=2πaI12(a),

based on the general definition of il(x) from eq. (5). We expand the modified Bessel function of the first kind that appears inside the integral sign by using eq. (10.25.2) of Ref. 25 that reads:

(28)Iν(z)=z2νk=0z24kk!Γ(ν+k+1),

where Γ represents the gamma function. For ν=0 one has:

(29)I0(z)=k=0z2k22k(k!)2.

We substitute the result from eq. (29) into eq. (27) and interchange summation and integration:

(30)F(a,θ)=k=0a2ksin2kθ22k(k!)21+1dyeacosθy(1y2)kdy.

We now rely on eq. (10.32.2) of Ref. 25 which reads:

(31)Iν(z)=z2νπΓ(ν+12)1+1(1t2)ν1/2e±ztdt.

For ν=k+1/2 such a formula leads to:

(32)1+1(1t2)ke±ztdt=πk!z2k+12Ik+12(z).

With help from eq. (32), one transforms eq. (30) into:

(33)F(a,θ)=2πacosθk=01k![asin2θ2cosθ]kIk+12(acosθ).

We now use eq. 5.7.6.(1) of Ref. 22 (pg.660) that gives:

(34)k=0tkk!Jk+ν(z)=zν/2(z2t)ν/2Jν(z22tz),

where Jk+ν(z) is a Bessel function of the first kind. This formula suggests that for ν=1/2 we should have:

(35)k=0tkk!Jk+12(z)=(zz2t)1/4J12(z(z2t)).

The formula in eq. (10.27.6) of Ref. 25 explains how a Bessel function of the first kind with imaginary argument is related to a modified Bessel function of the first kind:

(36)Iν(z)=eνπ2iJνzeπ2i.

This implies that, for our specific case, we have:

(37)Jν(iz)=eνπ2iIν(z).

The next step is to write z=iξ, t=iτ and use eq. (37) to transform eq. (35) in terms of modified Bessel functions of the first kind. After some careful algebraic manipulations of eq. (35) (note that a factor eπ4i appears in both sides of the equation and, thus, cancels out), one obtains:

(38)k=0τkk!Ik+12(ξ)=(ξξ+2τ)1/4I12(ξ(ξ+2τ)).

The formula in eq. (38) can be immediately applied to eq. (33) with the understanding that:

(39)τ=asin2θ2cosθ;ξ=acosθ.

As a result, one obtains F(a,θ)=2πaI12(a) as in eq. (27).

References

[1] H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. 158 (1967), 537.10.1103/PhysRev.158.537Search in Google Scholar

[2] Nanomagnetism, (NATO Asi Series E: Applied Sciences, Vol. 247, A. Hernando, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[3] O. Kahn, Magnetism Molecular, Wiley-VCH, York New, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. L. Taft, C. D. Delfs, G. C. Papaefthymiou, S. Foner, D. Gatteschi and S. J. Lippard , J. Am Chem. Soc. 116 (1994), 823.10.1021/ja00082a001Search in Google Scholar

[5] D. Gatteschi, A. Caneschi, L. Pardi and R. Sessoli, Science 265 (1994), 1054.10.1126/science.265.5175.1054Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. E. Fisher, Am. J. Phys. 32 (1964), 343.10.1119/1.1970340Search in Google Scholar

[7] G. B. Arfken and H. J. Weber, Mathematical Methods For Physicists, Fifth Edition, Harcourt/Academic Press, San Diego, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. L. Barra, A. Caneschi, A. Cornia, F. Fabrizi de Biani, D. Gatteschi, C. Sangregorio, R. Sessoli and R. Sorace, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999), 5302.10.1021/ja9818755Search in Google Scholar

[9] A. Bino, D. C. Johnston, D. P. Goshorn, T. R. Halbert and E. I. Stiefel, Science 241, 1479 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

[10] O. Ciftja, Physica A 286 (2000), 541.10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00326-5Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. A. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th Edition, Dover Publications Inc, New York, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. C. Andrews, Special Functions of Mathematics for Engineers, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.10.1093/oso/9780198565581.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of Mathematical Physics, Volume 1, Chapter 3, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1953.Search in Google Scholar

[14] G. S. Joyce, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967), 478.10.1103/PhysRev.155.478Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. Blume, P. Heller and N. A. Lurie, Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975), 4483.10.1103/PhysRevB.11.4483Search in Google Scholar

[16] O. Ciftja, M. Luban, M. Auslender and J. H. Luscombe, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999), 10122.10.1103/PhysRevB.60.10122Search in Google Scholar

[17] P. J. Cregg, J. L. Garcia-Palacios and P. Svedlindh, Phys J. Math A:. Theor. 41 (2008), 435202.10.1088/1751-8113/41/43/435202Search in Google Scholar

[18] P. A. Martin, J. Phys Math A:. Theor. 41 (2008), 015207.10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015207Search in Google Scholar

[19] O. Ciftja, Physica B 407 (2012), 2803.10.1016/j.physb.2012.04.031Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Al-Sharif, M. Hajja and P. T. Krasopoulos, Math Results. 55 (2009), 231.10.1007/s00025-009-0417-6Search in Google Scholar

[21] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, Fourth Edition, Academic Press, New York,1965.Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Prudnikov, A. Yu. A. Brychkov and O. I. Marichev, Integrals and Series, Volume 2, Special Functions, Third Printing, Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[23] See http://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/Search in Google Scholar

[24] M. L. Glasser and E. Montaldi, J. Math Anal. and Appl. 183 (1994), 577.10.1006/jmaa.1994.1164Search in Google Scholar

[25] F. W. J. Olver and L. C. Maximon, Chapter 10: Bessel Functions in Handbook NIST of Functions Mathematical, pages 215-286, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010. http://dlmf.nist.gov/10.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-08-31
Accepted: 2015-03-15
Published Online: 2018-03-31
Published in Print: 2018-06-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. A Robust Algorithm for Nonlinear Variable-Order Fractional Control Systems with Delay
  3. Numerical Methods for the Derivative Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
  4. Lax Integrability and Exact Solutions of a Variable-Coefficient and Nonisospectral AKNS Hierarchy
  5. Modeling of Supersonic/Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition Using a Single-Point Approach
  6. A Novel Macromodel based on Krylov Subspace Projection Method for Micromixers with Serpentine Channels
  7. Approaches to the Numerical Estimates of Grid Convergence of NSE in the Presence of Singularities
  8. Numerical Solutions of Stochastic Volterra–Fredholm Integral Equations by Hybrid Legendre Block-Pulse Functions
  9. Positivity and Stability of Standard and Fractional Descriptor Continuous-Time Linear and Nonlinear Systems
  10. Dynamics of Almost Periodic Solution for a Delayed Facultative Mutualism Model Involving Negative Feedback Terms
  11. Controllability of Fractional Evolution Inclusions with Noninstantaneous Impulses
  12. Analysis of a Delayed Predator–Prey System with Harvesting
  13. Nonlinear Bending of Rectangular Magnetoelectroelastic Thin Plates with Linearly Varying Thickness
  14. Numerical Method for a Class of Nonlinear Singularly Perturbed Delay Differential Equations Using Parametric Cubic Spline
  15. Numerical Simulation for Shale Gas Flow in Complex Fracture System of Fractured Horizontal Well
  16. Real-Time Control of a Rotary Inverted Pendulum using Robust LQR-based ANFIS Controller
  17. A Study of an Extended Generalized (2+1)-dimensional Jaulent–Miodek Equation
  18. RBFPUM with QR Factorization for Solving Water Flow Problem in Multilayered Soil
  19. Classical Magnetism and an Integral Formula Involving Modified Bessel Functions
  20. Lie Symmetry Analysis of Boundary Layer Stagnation-Point Flow and Heat Transfer of Non-Newtonian Power-Law Fluids Over a Nonlinearly Shrinking/Stretching Sheet with Thermal Radiation
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnsns-2017-0193/html
Scroll to top button