Home International experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

International experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula

  • Krystle Waltrovitz EMAIL logo , Tiffany Conroy and Rebecca Feo
Published/Copyright: December 27, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

To explore university-based nurse educators’ experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula.

Methods

A qualitative research design employing interpretative phenomenological analysis was used. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews with eight nursing educators in five different countries.

Results

The analysis identified three main themes: (1) Participants’ positive experiences when utilising the framework to link theory to practice; (2) strategies for implementing the framework, including considering the context for teaching, introducing the relationship dimension of the framework first, utilising case-based learning, and integrating the framework into laboratory skills sessions; and (3) limited availability of teaching and learning resources, highlighting the need for further resource availability.

Conclusions

This study has generated new knowledge from the perspectives of university-based nursing educators. Several strategies have been identified resulting in the formation of recommendations to help guide nurse educators. The Fundamentals of Care Framework was developed to address global deficits in how patients’ fundamental care needs are addressed. The knowledge from this study can assist nurse educators from different countries to implement the framework into nursing curricula. Utilising the framework in nursing curricula could help to transform nursing practice, by assisting nursing students to identify and meet their patients’ fundamental care needs.


Corresponding author: Krystle Waltrovitz, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd 5042, Bedford Park, SA, Australia; and Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, Adelaide Nursing School, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank all the participants who gave their time and discussed their experiences to contribute to the study.

  1. Research ethics: Ethics approval was granted on the 21st of August 2020 by the Flinders University Human Research Ethics Committee (project number 2122).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. [Krystle Waltrovitz]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing-Original Draft, Writing – Review and Editing, Visualization, Project administration. [Tiffany Conroy]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review and Editing. [Rebecca Feo]: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review and Editing.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The first author is a member of the International Learning Collaborative, participants did not have to (but could) be members also. The first author was a relatively recent member so there were limited pre-existing relationships with participants. The remaining authors on the study are administrators of the International Learning Collaborative and could have had pre-existing relationships with potential participants. To minimise any potential conflict of interest and to ensure voluntary participation, the second and third authors did not recruit participants or conduct any interviews. They were blinded to recruitment and to participants. The second and third authors only had access to interview transcripts and coding that had been deidentified by the first author using participant pseudonyms.

  6. Research funding: No external funding.

  7. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Kitson, A, Conroy, T, Kuluski, K, Locock, L, Lyons, R. Reclaiming and redefining the Fundamentals of Care: nursing’s response to meeting patients’ basic human needs, Adelaide, South Australia: School of Nursing. The University of Adelaide; 2013. https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/75843/1/hdl_75843.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. Feo, R, Conroy, T, Jangland, E, Muntlin Athlin, Å, Brovall, M, Parr, J, et al.. Towards a standardised definition for fundamental care: a modified Delphi study. J Clin Nurs 2017;27:2285–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14247.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Chaboyer, W, Harbeck, E, Lee, B, Grealish, L. Missed nursing care: an overview of reviews. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2020;37:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/kjm2.12308.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Voldbjerg, SL, Nielsen, GN, Klit, MO, Larsen, KL, Laugesen, B. Clinical supervisors’ perceptions and use of the fundamentals of care framework in supervision of nursing students. J Adv Nurs 2022;78:4199–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15408.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. MacMillan, K. The hidden curriculum: what are we actually teaching about the fundamentals of care? Nurs Leader 2016;29:37–46. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2016.24644.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Jangland, E, Kitson, A, Muntlin Athlin, A. Patients with acute abdominal pain describe their experiences of fundamental care across the acute care episode: a multi‐stage qualitative case study. J Adv Nurs 2016;72:791–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12880.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Sugg, HVR, Richards, DA, Russell, A-M, Burnett, S, Cockcroft, EJ, Thompson Coon, J, et al.. Nurses’ strategies for overcoming barriers to fundamental nursing care in patients with COVID-19 caused by infection with the SARS-COV-2 virus: results from the “COVID-NURSE” survey. J Adv Nurs 2022;79:1003–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15261.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Feo, R, Donnelly, F, Frensham, L, Conroy, T, Kitson, A. Embedding fundamental care in the pre-registration nursing curriculum: results from a pilot study. Nurse Educ Pract 2018;31:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.04.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Aiken, LH, Sloane, DM, Bruyneel, L, Van den Heede, K, Griffiths, P, Busse, R, et al.. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: a retrospective observational study. Lancet 2014;383:1824–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62631-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. International Learning Collaborative. ILC history; n.d. https://ilccare.org/ilc-history/.Search in Google Scholar

11. International Council of Nurses. International nurses day 2023 report – our nurses. Our future. Geneva, Switzerland: International Council of Nurses; 2023. https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/2023-07/ICN_IND_2023_Report_EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

12. Peat, G, Rodriguez, A, Smith, J. Interpretive phenomenological analysis applied to healthcare research. Evid Base Nurs 2019;22:7–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Tuffour, I. A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a contemporary qualitative research approach. J Health Commun 2017;2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100093.Search in Google Scholar

14. Leighton, K, Kardong-Edgren, S, Schneidereith, T, Foisy-Doll, C. Using social media and snowball sampling as an alternative recruitment strategy for research. Clinical Simulation in Nursing 2021;55:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

15. The National Health and Medical Research Council. 2007 (updated 2018). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. The Australian Research Council and Universities Australia.Search in Google Scholar

16. Guba, EG, Lincoln, Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N, Lincoln, Y, editors. Handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage Publishing; 1994:105–17 pp.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cook, SH. Mind the theory/practice gap in nursing. J Adv Nurs 1991;16:1462–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01594.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Kalogirou, MR, Chauvet, C, Yonge, O. Including administrators in curricular redesign: how the academic–practice relationship can bridge the practice–theory gap. J Nurs Manag 2020;29:635–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13209.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Saifan, A, AbuRuz, ME, Masa’deh, R. Theory practice gaps in nursing education: a qualitative perspective. J Soc Sci 2015;11:20–9. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2015.20.29.Search in Google Scholar

20. Sulaiman, MH, Jasim, MS, Ahmed, AA, Ahmed, AA, Ibrahim, RH, Al-Mashhadany, OI. A winning formula for nursing education: effective study strategies and techniques. Teach Learn Nurs 2023;18:e142–e145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

21. Hendricks, SM, Wangerin, V. Concept-based curriculum: changing attitudes and overcoming barriers. Nurse Educat 2017;42:138–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000335.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Elder, RL, Lewis, PA, Windsor, CA, Wheeler, M, Forster, E, Foster, J, et al.. Engaging undergraduate nursing students in face-to-face tutorials. Nurse Educ Pract 2011;11:314–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.02.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Cheng, Y-C, Huang, L-C, Yang, C-H, Chang, H-C. Experiential learning program to strengthen self-reflection and critical thinking in freshmen nursing students during COVID-19: a Quasi-experimental study. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:5442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155442.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Forsgren, S, Christensen, T, Hedemalm, A. Evaluation of the case method in nursing education. Nurse Educ Pract 2014;14:164–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Li, S, Ye, X, Chen, W. Practice and effectiveness of “nursing case-based learning” course on nursing student’s critical thinking ability: a comparative study. Nurse Educ Pract 2019;36:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2024-05-26
Accepted: 2024-11-08
Published Online: 2024-12-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Literature Reviews
  2. Gerontological educational interventions for student nurses: a systematic review of qualitative findings
  3. Educational interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people: a systematic review of quantitative findings
  4. Barriers to and facilitators of accelerated BSN students’ success: a scoping review with possible strategies for success
  5. Formal nursing focused academic practice partnerships for advancing nursing research and scholarship: a scoping review protocol
  6. Notetaking among nursing students
  7. Nursing students’ experiences of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
  8. Research Articles
  9. International experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula
  10. Relationship between tutor support, caring self-efficacy and intention to leave of nursing students: the roles of self-compassion as mediator and moderator
  11. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward infection control precautions among nurses in Palestinian hospitals
  12. AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection
  13. Nursing students’ experience of a transformative approach to teaching cross cultural clinical decision making
  14. Supporting nursing faculty to teach veteran’s care: a mixed method, multi-intervention study
  15. Nursing students’ evaluation of patient safety culture in three central European countries: a cross-sectional study
  16. Development of clinical decision-making among undergraduate nursing students: the effect of unfolding case-based learning
  17. Developing competency of nursing students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation using Resuscitation Quality Improvement technology
  18. Value creation in a learning community: an interprofessional partnership between nursing home care, education and students
  19. Development and validation of satisfaction with clinical practice questionnaire for mentors and students
  20. Norwegian nurse educators’ self-rating of competencies: a nationwide cross-sectional web-survey
  21. Perceptions of nursing staff and students regarding attrition: a qualitative study
  22. A nurturing and caring environment to facilitate nursing students’ professional development in Rwanda: a focused ethnographic study
  23. Comparison of the traditional and block mode of delivery on undergraduate nursing students’ perceived levels of preparedness to use evidence-based practice: a two-group experimental study
  24. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  25. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a detailed examination
  26. Simulation design – peer-to-peer training as preparation for full-scale scenarios
  27. Don’t interrupt me! development of a handoff education bundle to simulate the real world
  28. The effectiveness of badging systems in engaging, motivating, and incentivizing students in the mastery of nursing licensure materials
  29. The effects of using a flipped classroom pedagogy in nursing anesthesia education: a program evaluation
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0048/html
Scroll to top button