Home Notetaking among nursing students
Article Publicly Available

Notetaking among nursing students

  • Lisa Cross ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Amy Kendrick
Published/Copyright: April 26, 2024

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this review was to determine the current state of the literature for notetaking among nursing students and identify implications for future nursing education and research. Notetaking is frequently used by college students and is a proven learning strategy. There has been less research for notetaking among nursing students than students in other disciplines.

Content

This narrative review was completed using the method described by Ferrari. Seven electronic databases were searched from 2018 to 2023 using the terms notetaking, students, and nursing.

Summary

Seven of 65 articles were included in this review. Upon analysis, three categories of research findings were identified: learning style, notetaking skill, and notetaking and technology.

Outlook

Nursing faculty should be aware of learning styles, notetaking strategies, and notetaking skill when designing assignments and course content for students. Future research should be done on this population to strengthen the findings of current literature.

The skill of notetaking is an essential part of the learning process and has long been studied in relation to students in a variety of settings. Notetaking is the act of recording key information from lectures, presentations, or reading material and many individuals, especially students, use this strategy for effective learning [18]. One landmark study found that taking notes during a lecture promoted encoding of information and further improved review of the content in preparation for assessment [9]. Notetaking is an active learning strategy, where the learner has placed a value on the content so as to recall the material for later use [9, 16]. To support these active learning strategies, educators can improve the environment to enhance notetaking activity. This includes being aware of different student learning styles and incorporating these styles in the classroom, so that students are afforded opportunities for critical thinking as they process learning [8].

There is literature that has examined notetaking for supporting the retention of lecture information among college students [1]. Students who took notes were almost twice as likely to recall content material from a lecture compared to those who did not take notes [1]. Notetaking also has been associated with increased understanding and recall of lecture content by college students [25]. Recall efficiency suggests that students who record information or ideas in fewer words or content recall more efficiently than students who record more detailed information [1].

Researchers have also demonstrated the link between strong notetaking skills and student success [16]. With emerging technologies, current college students may utilize laptops or tablets for notetaking, rather than traditional handwritten methods. These technologies have the capability to record information quickly and store it more efficiently, however, there is no consensus on the improvement for recall efficiency or the laptop-superiority effect of taking notes [7, 17]. Additional to speed and the ability to search and locate notes more efficiently, students can maintain legible notes with digital options [22]. There have been no significant differences in outcomes between students who take notes by hand compared to those who used notes by laptop [5]. However, students who were assigned to a certain notetaking methodology rather than using the method of their choosing performed slightly worse on assessments [5]. These negative outcomes may have been associated with distractions presented by the digital methods rather than the actual notetaking method itself. Further, students who specifically utilized laptops for notetaking scored slightly lower on assessments in general than those who took notes on paper [5].

In addition to the risk of lower performance, students who use laptops for notetaking may also become distracted by technologies such as texting or the use of online websites that are accessible to them while they are taking notes. Student distractions while using a laptop for notetaking contribute to taking less notes, having less complete ideas, and having less recall than those who were not distracted while using a laptop [12]. Stacy and Cain [22] found that in comparison, students who used tablets instead of laptops tended to not have the interruptions presented by technology during lecture.

Additional research has found that students who use laptops for notetaking tend to document the lecture verbatim and end up with longer notes as a result [17]. These students are unable to transform this information into meaningful tools for learning. On the contrary, students who take handwritten notes are more adept at paraphrasing ideas and putting content into their own words [12]. These students can recall content and use the information for learning lecture content. Many learning theories suggest that the ability to summarize content may lead to a better understanding of the presented content and better outcomes [9, 17, 25]. Computerized tablets allow students to handwrite their notes, while adding drawings and other annotations and highlighting during lectures [22]. Many tablets are specifically designed for classroom learning with formal applications for notetaking [22].

Baccalaureate nurses are needed to fulfill current workforce demands and vacancies. Over 80 % of the nursing workforce holds a baccalaureate degree [3]. There are over 360,000 nursing students enrolled in baccalaureate programs in the United States; this number has increased by 5.6 % since 2020 [2]. Baccalaureate program content and strategies that support nursing student outcomes as they prepare themselves to enter the nursing workforce are necessary [3]. Overall, many college students take notes as a learning strategy during their classes [25], however, notetaking has not been extensively studied among nursing students. Nursing students who enter the workforce will continue notetaking as they interview, assess, and document. Nurse faculty have an important role in the didactic and clinical preparation of nursing students as nursing professionals [6]. However, there has been little research for notetaking among nursing students in the classroom or clinical setting. This review will determine the current state of the literature for notetaking among nursing students, as well as identify implications for future nursing education and research.

Methods

A narrative literature review was conducted. An initial search showed that there was not enough literature to generate an expanded review on the topic. This article is a summary of the current literature findings to add clarity on the topic [11]. The benefit of a narrative literature review is that the articles from the literature search may be critically appraised and added to the knowledge on the topic, allowing for future interventions to be considered [11].

The search methods outlined by Ferrari [11] were followed for this review: identify search terms, define the selection criteria, perform a critical assessment, and draft the text. The steps are described herein.

Problem

There has not been a literature review of nursing studies exploring notetaking for nursing students. The purpose of this review is (1) to determine the current literature for notetaking among nursing students, and (2) to identify implications for nursing education and research. Nursing students uniquely use notetaking as a learning strategy and continue to utilize this skill in their nursing profession as a means for ongoing success in communication and documentation. Identification of strategies that promote nursing student outcomes, such as notetaking, may assist in positive outcomes for future nursing careers.

Literature search and terms

A literature review was performed using CINAHL, Gale, ERIC, Medline, Journals@OVID, and Complementary Index for the search period of 2018–2023. The decision was made to search literature from the Google Scholar database from the same time period. Searches were performed and replicated by both researchers. The keywords were chosen as terms related to the topic of interest as well as terms that were appropriate for indexing [11]. The keywords were “notetaking OR note-taking OR note taking” AND “students,” AND “nursing.” The initial search yielded 65 results. A summary table was created to track searches. Initial searches used the keywords as general search terms and then “notetaking” and “students” were restricted to abstract terms. Restricting “notetaking OR note-taking OR note taking” did not change any results. Adding “education” or “educat*” to “nursing” did not generate any new results.

Literature selection criteria

The searches were limited to peer-reviewed items that were in the English language during 2018 and 2023. The date was chosen to represent the current literature. The aim was to identify notetaking for nursing students. Items not related to nursing students or to notetaking were removed. Such items included similar related concepts such as notemaking. The results from each database were reviewed independently by each author and synthesized from the summary table into a matrix by author, year, article type, aim, sample, and relevant findings for comparison. Duplicate results, abstracts, posters, and book reviews were omitted. One book, two brief “teaching tip” articles, one descriptive article, 29 miscategorized or inappropriate findings, and 25 duplicates were removed from the final analysis. After removal of items that did not meet criteria for review parameters, a total of seven studies remained for discussion (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: 
Flow chart of literature search and selection criteria.
Figure 1:

Flow chart of literature search and selection criteria.

Critical assessment and synthesis of literature

An iterative process of comparison and discussion was used to confirm that the articles were appropriate for the aims of the narrative literature review. The articles were appraised using critical appraisal tools from the literature [13], [14], [15]. The articles were evaluated for the results, interpretations, and contributions to the topic [11]. With the scarce number of studies returned, and all studies meeting the topic of discussion, all seven studies were retained for the discussion (see Table 1).

Table 1:

Articles for discussion.

First author, year

Study type

Aim

Sample

Relevant findings

Amhout et al. [4]

Quantitative: cross-sectional study

To determine the effect of the Cornell method on the quality of note production and learning performance among second-semester students

128 nursing students over three nursing courses: general, family and community, intensive care nursing

There was significant difference in the students’ performance scores for the two groups tested (p<0.05); use of the Cornell method impacted the students’ performance

Cowen et al. [8]

Quantitative: descriptive survey

To examine nursing students’ excitement re: clinical, expectations for learning, anticipated prep time per day; student learning styles

96 first semester nursing students

Notetaking noted as best learning style for many; faculty should be aware of various learning styles and incorporate all into teaching

Emory et al. [10]

Mixed methods: descriptive survey, narrative

To determine baccalaureate nursing students’ attitudes and preferences towards notetaking methods

217 baccalaureate nursing students

More prefer e-notes but almost half use both methods at times; speed is influencing factor in choice of method; recall of information is better with handwritten notes

Patidar [20]

Quantitative: cross-sectional survey

To assess study skills among nursing students

200 baccalaureate nursing students

Students may benefit from better notetaking

Seid and Teklay [21]

Quantitative: cross-sectional survey

To assess notetaking skills of nursing students and identify gaps

22 nursing students

Note taking facilitates recall. Students may not take notes if they expect faculty will provide them with slides or handouts

Su et al. [23]

Mixed methods: questionnaire, action research

To examine notetaking course for nursing students and explore the outcomes of implementation

49 nursing students

Writing competency improved after the course; 90 % preferred online notetaking

Tavener-Smith [24]

Qualitative: semi-structured interviews

To identify lecturers’ perspectives of students’ notetaking to identify factors that limit the development of this skill

3 senior nursing practice visitors

Observations that students had limitations in vocabulary and literacy which leads to inability to accurately capture notes; this issue transfers to professional nursing notes in clinical settings; classroom support required

Results

There were seven studies identified [4, 8, 10, 20, 21, 23, 24]. Four studies were quantitative [4, 8, 20, 21], two studies were mixed methods [10, 23], and one study was qualitative [24]. Two articles were from the United States [8, 10] and five articles were from other countries: Ethiopia [21], Great Britain [24], India [20], Morocco [4] and Taiwan [23].

Discussion

Common themes found in the literature were learning style, notetaking skill, and notetaking and technology. Each theme is discussed herein.

Learning style

Two articles discussed notetaking as applicable to student learning style [4, 8]. Learning styles include multimodal approaches incorporating auditory, visual, kinesthetic, and written techniques to support learning [8]. Many students will prefer more than one style [8]. Nursing students may shift approaches as they move from different content areas or gain new experiences, particularly as they transition from didactic to clinical experiences; sedentary preferences may be different than hands-on (kinesthetic) activities in the laboratory or clinical areas [8].

Findings by Cowen et al. [8] support previous research that notetaking is one of the most favorable student learning methods [9]. Notetaking involves a combination of tactics including the facilitation of acquisition, retention, and recall of material, and using auditory, visual, and written techniques [9]. Students are able to listen to (auditory), look at (visual), and write out content. After writing their notes, they can review their notes (reflect) for recall and further apply the knowledge. In their descriptive survey, Cowen et al. [8] asked 96 junior level students to rate how they learned best. Visual aids (34 %) and notetaking (25 %) were identified as the top learning methods, and the “best ways to learn new content” [8], consistent with the previous findings outlined for learners [9].

A study by Amhout et al. contributed to notetaking being a preferred learning style. The researchers examined the results of the Cornell method on intervention and control groups in 128 nursing students over three nursing courses. They administered pre-tests before implementing this note-taking method and compared results to post-test scores after using this style that has been reported in the literature [18]. They found that there was a significant result on student performance in the intervention groups (p<0.05) and determined that notetaking was a valuable learning style.

Notetaking skill

Six studies discussed the importance of notetaking skills [4, 10, 20, 21, 23, 24]. In addition to supporting the critical importance of notetaking for learning clinical skills, Tavener-Smith [24] found that the skill varied. They conducted a phenomenological study to describe faculty perspectives of student notetaking experiences. Students struggled with vocabulary and medical terms, having the inability to relay experiences, and not having the time to adequately describe thoughts or ideas in few words. Additionally, Tavener-Smith [24] determined that notetaking was not only an important skill for the nursing student, but an integral skill for the professional nurse. In this qualitative study, nursing students were observed during their clinical placements for accuracy and clarity, articulation, and vocabulary in nursing notetaking. Observers noted that students struggled with notetaking and lacked an understanding for the importance of notetaking and the perspective for the significance of notes in contributing to learning nursing concepts [24]. These findings are significant for nursing students as they enter the nursing profession and take on roles such as transcribing and documenting. Consistency and accuracy are essential skills for nurses to have prior to entering the profession.

Similarly, another study found that while notetaking is an essential skill for learning fundamental skills, there is a need for students to change their notetaking approach (43 %) [20]. They assessed student study strategies, including notetaking, and found that the 77.24 % of 200 students used notetaking to study. The study identified a need for students to revise the way that they were performing this notetaking skill for future success in their nursing program. Su et al. [23] designed a notetaking course and found support for previous findings. They examined 49 students during their note writing and notetaking course activities and found that student classroom outcomes improved after the course completion. The addition of a course for notetaking helped students with their notetaking skills. Results by Amhout et al. support these findings; they found that using a notetaking course or method, such as the Cornell method as in their study, could strengthen the quality of note production and learning by supporting and improving nursing student notetaking skills including recall.

In addition to serving as a source for learning acquisition and recall, notetaking provides students with a frame of reference for material [21]. Few students master the ability to organize notes and use minimal words, so that while they are recording information during notetaking, they can benefit from the complexity of listening and learning the information [21]. In a study of third year nursing students, Seid and Teklay [21] found that 36.4 % were poor notetakers, while only 54.5 % were moderate notetakers; very few students had mastered the skill. Their questionnaire found that discrepancies in notetaking skills were related to students not having the motivation to clarify any questions during the lecture; they found that 54.1 % were less motivated to ask questions and this was related to not having to take notes (r=0.663, p=0.001). Slides that were prepared by faculty in advance offered the notion that all questions would be addressed in the slide content. In addition to having slides in advance, many students preferred to have slides to take notes electronically alongside the advance content. Emory et al. [10] found that 69.3 % of students preferred to have the slides available to take their electronic notes during class, supporting the previous college student literature [22]. Having advance access to handouts or slides with much of the content emphasized often replaces notetaking during class time [22].

Notetaking and technology

Two articles discussed notetaking in relation to technology [10, 23]. Su et al. [23] examined an electronic platform that was implemented to facilitate notetaking skills in nursing students. This module allowed the time and space for reflective notes and learning with instructor feedback. Student writing competencies for notetaking improved after this semester long notetaking course (p<0.001). Students indicated the pace was appropriate for learning and to allow for feedback from instructors [23]. Students in this notetaking course also preferred taking notes online with technology as compared to traditional handwritten methods. This was comparable to previous findings that supported that students have a connectedness to technology and online environments [7, 16, 22].

Additional research was performed regarding the use of technology to take notes. Emory et al. [10] found that most nursing students utilized laptops to take notes during class. Students often chose to use a laptop for notetaking when the speed of the information delivery outpaced their ability to keep up with handwriting notes. These students also acknowledged their tendency to become distracted when using technology for notetaking. However, they felt that this risk was worth the benefit of gathering information at a quicker pace [10]. There were no significant differences identified between the preferred methods of notetaking, and there were no significant differences found between method of notetaking and GPA.

Implications for nursing

The purpose of this literature review was to determine the state of literature for notetaking among nursing students and identify implications for nursing education and research. While current literature is limited, nursing faculty must be aware of these findings in order to promote optimum learning among their students. Assessing student learning styles and notetaking ability are components of nursing education that faculty should incorporate into their practice. Identifying the learning styles of nursing students is a key factor in achieving learning outcomes [8, 17]. Faculty can assist students in self-identification of learning strategies and tactics, which often includes notetaking, as well as revise both pre-class assignments and classroom learning activities to include notetaking [8, 9]. Classroom assignments might include assigning notetaking activities, reflective activities for notes taken, or peer activities to collaboratively review or revise notes. In addition to acknowledging the varied learning methods students use, faculty need to assess nursing students’ notetaking ability. Current literature suggests that nursing students struggle with notetaking in the classroom as well as in the clinical setting [10, 20, 21, 23, 24]. This has implications not only for classroom content organization and mastery, but for the care and outcomes of their future patients. Some curricular strategies for success may include incorporating a separate notetaking course or considering instances that allow students to view lecture slides ahead of class for better notetaking during class time [4, 10, 20, 22, 23]. Notetaking is a critical part of nursing practice as medical terminology and patient information must be accurately represented and documented. Faculty must find ways to assist students with taking notes for future success.

Using technology to take notes has recently become a common practice among nursing students. Current students are more connected and adjusted to online learning environments [17]. Nursing students most often prefer the use of electronic platforms or laptops for notetaking compared to the traditional method of handwriting notes [10, 23]. Faculty should be simultaneously aware of distractions when students have access to other online websites or platforms while in class while also acknowledging the preference for use [10]. Faculty often have concerns regarding electronic notetaking and learning outcomes, however, previous research among nursing students has not demonstrated a significant difference between notetaking methods and student GPAs when comparing those who take notes by hand with those who use laptops [10]. This finding is in agreement with previous literature among college students [5].

There was a paucity of research in the area of notetaking for nursing students. Future studies could examine longitudinal success throughout nursing curricula in didactic and clinical settings to identify the best strategies for success. Both nursing student and nursing faculty perspectives on notetaking practices would increase the knowledge in this area of research.

Strengths and limitations

A strength in this review was that multiple databases were searched for current literature. A narrative literature review was performed, and steps were taken to strengthen the review. A method from the literature was used to frame the review strategy. Two reviewers screened the literature with an iterative approach to review using methodology from the literature. Critical appraisal tools from the literature were used to evaluate the literature [13], [14], [15]. Results were reported in a flow diagram outlining the data search, selection, evaluation, and synthesis process [19]. Few studies involving nursing students were identified in this literature search, indicating a gap in the literature. None of the identified studies utilized educational frameworks to guide the analyses, indicating a theoretical gap. Most studies that were found were located outside of the United States, suggesting a need for national-level research. All but one of the articles found used some statistical analyses in study methods, and many were designed as cross sectional surveys. Future research approaches may consider longitudinal designs across nursing student curricula to capture rich data. This review was limited to articles published in English and may have excluded relevant literature on the topic.

Conclusions

This literature review identified notetaking as an essential skill and strategy for student success in nursing programs. Nurse faculty are involved in content delivery as well as in directing students toward becoming lifelong learners. Assisting students in identifying their best learning techniques through reflection and guiding them in the skill of notetaking is a path toward achieving optimal outcomes and lifelong learning. Considering the types of methods for notetaking preference may pose challenges for faculty when creating learning environments for successful notetaking. Time, space, resources, and internet access may need to be examined. Consistency and accuracy in notetaking are essential for nursing students as they become practicing nurses. Thus, future research identifying available classroom technologies for enhancing student notetaking are needed.


Corresponding author: Assistant Professor, Dr. Lisa Cross, PhD, RN, CNE, CRRN, CHPN, School of Nursing, MCPHS, Boston, MA, USA, Phone: 617 274 3357, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: Authors state no competing interests.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Aiken, EG, Thomas, GS, Shennum, WA. Memory for a lecture: effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. J Educ Psychol 1975;67:439–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076613.Search in Google Scholar

2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Student enrollment surged in U.S. schools of nursing in 2020 despite challenges presented by the pandemic; 2021. https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/Press-Releases/View/ArticleId/24802/2020-survey-data-student-enrollment [Accessed 19 Feb 2023].Search in Google Scholar

3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Baccalaureate education; 2023. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Nursing-Education-Programs/Baccalaureate-Education [Accessed 19 Feb 2023].Search in Google Scholar

4. Amhout, A, Kharbach, A, Naciri, A, Lahlou, L. The effect of the Cornell method on the qulaity of grade production and learning performance of nursing students. Pedagogical Res 2023;8:em0153. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12787.Search in Google Scholar

5. Artz, B, Johnson, M, Robson, D, Taengnoi, S. Taking notes in the digital age: evidence from classroom random control trials. J Econ Educ 2020;51:103–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1731386.Search in Google Scholar

6. Briscoe, GS, Brown, LG. Self-regulated e-learning modules for prenursing success. Nurs Educ Perspect 2019;40:186–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000356.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Chabot, M, Potvin, MC, Hass, R, Garrity, A. Development, preliminary validation, and reliability of the notetaking abilities and strategies of univeristy students: NASUS questionnaire. Department of Occupational Therapy Faculty Papers. Thomas Jefferson University. Paper 81; 2021. Available from: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/otfp/81.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cowen, KJ, Hubbard, LJ, Hancock, DC. Expectations and experiences of nursing students in clinical courses: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today 2018;67:15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Di Vesta, FJ, Gray, GS. Listening and note taking: II. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. J Educ Psychol 1973;64:278–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034589.Search in Google Scholar

10. Emory, J, Teal, T, Holloway, G. Electronic note taking technology and academic performance in nursing students. Contemp Nurse 2021;57:235–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1997148.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Ferrari, R. Writing narrative style literature reviews. Med Writ 2015;24:232–5. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329.Search in Google Scholar

12. Flanigan, AE, Titsworth, S. The impact of digital distraction on lecture note taking and student learning. Instr Sci 2020;48:495–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09517-2.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hong, QN, Pluye, P, Fabregues, S, Bartlett, G, Boardman, F, Cargo, M, et al.. The mixed methods appraisal tool, Version 2018; 2018. http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf [Accessed 25 Nov 2022].Search in Google Scholar

14. Lockwood, C, Munn, Z, Porritt, K. Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. JBI Evid Implement 2015;13:179–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Moola, S, Munn, Z, Tufanaru, C, Aromataris, E, Sears, K, Sfetcu, R, et al.. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris, E, Munn, Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis; 2020. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.10.46658/JBIRM-17-06Search in Google Scholar

16. Morehead, K, Dunlosky, J, Rawson, KA. How much mightier is the pen than the keyboard for note-taking? A replication and extension of Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014). Educ Psychol Rev 2019;31:753–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09468-2.Search in Google Scholar

17. Morehead, K, Dunlosky, J, Rawson, KA, Blaisman, R, Hollis, RB. Note-taking habits of 21st century college students: implications for student learning, memory and acheivement. Memory 2019;27:807–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Nordquist, R. How to take better notes during lectures, discussions, and interviews: tried and true methods and tips from expert note-takers; 2019. Available from: https://www.thoughtco.com/note-taking-research-1691352.Search in Google Scholar

19. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffman, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Patidar, J. Evaluation of study skills in nursing students. Int J Nurs Educ 2019;11:26–31. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-9357.2019.00058.8.Search in Google Scholar

21. Seid, A, Teklay, H. Training improved the note taking skill of nursing students in Aksum University; Northern Ethiopia: a classroom-based action research. BMC Res Notes 2018;11:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3614-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Stacy, EM, Cain, J. Note-taking and handouts in the digital age. Am J Pharmaceut Educ 2015;79:107. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe797107.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Su, S, Tsai, Y, Tai, H. An ESP approach to teaching nursing note writing to university nursing students. Educ Sci 2022;12:223. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030223.Search in Google Scholar

24. Tavener-Smith, T. Note-taking by nursing students: the case for implementing writing strategies to encourage best practice. Br J Nurs 2021;30:172–6. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.3.172.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Van Meter, P, Yokoi, L, Pressley, M. College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. J Educ Psychol 1994;86:323–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.3.323.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-01-06
Accepted: 2024-04-12
Published Online: 2024-04-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Literature Reviews
  2. Gerontological educational interventions for student nurses: a systematic review of qualitative findings
  3. Educational interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people: a systematic review of quantitative findings
  4. Barriers to and facilitators of accelerated BSN students’ success: a scoping review with possible strategies for success
  5. Formal nursing focused academic practice partnerships for advancing nursing research and scholarship: a scoping review protocol
  6. Notetaking among nursing students
  7. Nursing students’ experiences of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
  8. Research Articles
  9. International experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula
  10. Relationship between tutor support, caring self-efficacy and intention to leave of nursing students: the roles of self-compassion as mediator and moderator
  11. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward infection control precautions among nurses in Palestinian hospitals
  12. AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection
  13. Nursing students’ experience of a transformative approach to teaching cross cultural clinical decision making
  14. Supporting nursing faculty to teach veteran’s care: a mixed method, multi-intervention study
  15. Nursing students’ evaluation of patient safety culture in three central European countries: a cross-sectional study
  16. Development of clinical decision-making among undergraduate nursing students: the effect of unfolding case-based learning
  17. Developing competency of nursing students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation using Resuscitation Quality Improvement technology
  18. Value creation in a learning community: an interprofessional partnership between nursing home care, education and students
  19. Development and validation of satisfaction with clinical practice questionnaire for mentors and students
  20. Norwegian nurse educators’ self-rating of competencies: a nationwide cross-sectional web-survey
  21. Perceptions of nursing staff and students regarding attrition: a qualitative study
  22. A nurturing and caring environment to facilitate nursing students’ professional development in Rwanda: a focused ethnographic study
  23. Comparison of the traditional and block mode of delivery on undergraduate nursing students’ perceived levels of preparedness to use evidence-based practice: a two-group experimental study
  24. Educational Process, Issue, Trend
  25. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a detailed examination
  26. Simulation design – peer-to-peer training as preparation for full-scale scenarios
  27. Don’t interrupt me! development of a handoff education bundle to simulate the real world
  28. The effectiveness of badging systems in engaging, motivating, and incentivizing students in the mastery of nursing licensure materials
  29. The effects of using a flipped classroom pedagogy in nursing anesthesia education: a program evaluation
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijnes-2024-0002/html
Scroll to top button