Abstract
Objectives
This systematic review of qualitative studies explored interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes or willingness to work with older people. Student nurses are likely to encounter older people in all health and aged care settings, however, research demonstrates that few have career aspirations in gerontological nursing.
Methods
Qualitative systematic review method based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Results
Search of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, EBSCOhost and Scopus yielded 1841 articles which were screened to include primary research about educational interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and/or willingness to work with older people. Data extraction was performed on the 14 included studies, and data were analysed using directed content analysis. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used the assess the quality of the studies.
Conclusions
Educational interventions included theory or practice courses, or a combination of theory and practice. While most interventions changed nursing students’ negative attitudes towards older people, few increased their willingness to work with them. Practice courses had the most significant impact on willingness to work with older people. Quality assessment revealed methodical limitations. More research is needed to better understand the elements of practice interventions that enhance student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to work with older people, so that they can be replicated.
Introduction
People worldwide are living longer and by 2030 one-in-six people will be aged 60 years or older [1] with the pace of population ageing increasing rapidly [2]. Although there is heterogeneity in ageing, there is an increased risk of accumulating chronic diseases with age, which makes older people the demographic that nurses are most likely to encounter in their practice [2, 3]. Moreover, except for the oldest old (those 90+), older people tend to experience increased hospitalization in the last year of their lives [4] leading to increased healthcare service use. While most older people live in the community with a spouse or other family members, 45 % live alone [5]. Older people living alone who become frail from chronic diseases may require assistance [6], which is often provided by unregulated health workers, such as care aides under the supervision of licensed or registered nurses. Thus, given the worldwide population ageing and older people’s increased need for healthcare services in community and healthcare settings, there is a demand for a healthcare workforce with the specific knowledge and skills to care for older people with complex health issues.
Nurses comprise the largest occupational group worldwide, accounting for close to 60 % of the healthcare workforce [7], and are pivotal to the provision of quality care and better outcomes for older people [8]. However, alarmingly, there is a global shortage of nurses (estimated to be 6.6 million in 2016) and workforce projections show that there will be an insufficient number of nurses to meet the increasing care needs of the world’s ageing population [7]. These factors – population ageing, increased likelihood of chronic diseases with age, and a projected shortage of nurses worldwide – should be signals to education providers that future nurses need to be adequately prepared and willing to care for older people. The WHO recommendations for optimising the nursing workforce worldwide to deliver healthcare includes consideration of population ageing in nursing curricula to “align with national health priorities … to prepare nurses to work effectively in interprofessional teams” (2020, p. xix).
Literature review
Systematic reviews of the literature report that nurses are graduating with inadequate education related to care of older people [9, 10]. For instance, student nurses acknoweldge that they lack knowledge about working with older people living with with dementia [11]. Furthermore, new graduates report they did not recognize that most of the patients they would be caring for would be older until they graduated and felt ill-prepared to care for this population [12]. Overall, the literature indicates that student nurses: hold ageist views [10, 13, 14]; have negative attitudes towards caring for older people [15–17]; do not consider a career working with older people to be satisfying or worthwhile [15, 18]; and that their career choices continue to reflect a preference for working in acute healthcare with younger people [18]. Neville and Dickie’s [19] literature review suggested that undergraduate nurses’ decision not to work with older people is related to their educational experiences, in particular, the curricula and experiences on clinical placements; the working conditions of specific healthcare settings, especially in nursing homes; and ageism. Similarly, Dobrowolska and colleagues [20] found that over half of nursing students had witnessed negative care practices with older people in their clinical placements.
The literature also indicates that nursing curricula tend to be acute care-focused with limited attention to chronic diseases, ageing, and ageing-specific services; content regarding older people and their care tends to be integrated across subjects rather than having standalone units specific to care of older people [21, 22]. Nurse academics and clinical educators play a significant role in shaping student nurses’ attitudes towards nursing older people (Dahlke et al. [12]). However, there are few nurse academics with expert gerontological knowledge to teach the care of older persons in nursing programs [23] and nurse educators often have negative attitudes towards older people [24].
Educational interventions aimed at providing students with ageing-related educational content and more opportunities to work with older people who are well has been shown to: increase empathy; enable students to provide care more confidently to older people; reduce students’ negative attitudes toward ageing and older people; and increase their willingness and intention to care for older people [25, 26, 27]. However, educational interventions vary in type, setting, and year of delivery and may include theoretical content (knowledge) alone, content and clinical placement experiences, and/or simulations. No previous systematic review of these interventions could be found. This paper describes findings from the qualitative component of a mixed-methods systematic review of interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and/or desire to work with older people. To allow sufficient space to explicate the results of the qualitative and quantitative reviews in detail, the quantitative portion will be reported on in a separate publication.
Methods
Aim
Our research question was “what are the findings of qualitative studies on educational interventions that target nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people?”
Methods
Methodological guidance for our qualitative systematic review was taken from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [28]. We report on this review based on PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses: extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines [29, 30]. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) was used to examine the quality of the included studies [31].
Screening
All articles were screened for eligibility based on pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, which were developed and used to filter studies written in English. Eligible studies were focused on undergraduate Bachelor of Nursing students or nursing programs and reported on an educational intervention aimed at enhancing student knowledge, attitudes, confidence or willingness in working with older people. Studies that focused on interventions targeting post-licensure/pre-registration nurses, including education in clinical settings, or not published in English, were excluded.
Search strategy
The search strategy for this review is reported in accordance with PRISMA for Searching (PRISMA-S) extension [32]. Methodological guidance was taken from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [28]. A health science librarian familiar with comprehensive systematic searching methods was responsible for the design and execution of search strategies using the following bibliographic databases: Medline (1946-present), EMBASE (1974-present), and APA PsycINFO (1806-present) via OVID, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature (CINAHL, 1936-present) and ERIC via EBSCOhost and Scopus (1976-present). All databases were searched from 1990 to May 10, 2022. Systematic searches were completed using a combination of controlled vocabulary/subject headings (e.g., Medical Subject Headings, MeSH) wherever they were available and natural language keywords. The overall search strategy was derived from three primary search concepts: (1) undergraduate (BScN) nursing education or curriculum; (2) elderly people or aging populations; (3) values, attitudes, beliefs, or preferences. Results were limited to qualitative literature using an adapted qualitative filter outlined by McKibbon, and colleagues [33]. To increase search sensitivity, no publication date or language limits were applied (see Appendix 1 for full search strategies by database). The synthesis review software, Covidence [34] was used to complete de-duplication of results and manage the phases of literature screening. In total, 1841 records were imported for screening and 919 were removed as duplicate records leaving 922 records for title/abstract screening.
Data analysis
After duplicates were removed, two researchers independently screened the titles and abstracts and then the full-text manuscripts, with a third researcher reviewing the decisions of the first two. Please see Figure 1 [35]. Any conflicts were resolved through discussion.

PRISMA diagram.
A standardized data extraction form was used to systematically extract background information (purpose, research design, methods of data collection, findings etc.) from the 14 eligible studies (see Table 1). Directed content analysis was used to provide subjective interpretation of the content in included studies by grouping the data from the studies to answer our research aim about the knowledge, attitudes, and willingness of student nurses to work with older people [36]. This type of analysis was used as it provides the opportunity to direct analysis based on our research interests. We also grouped studies by the type of educational intervention they reported on: content (theory course), practice (clinical placement), simulation (simulation laboratory) or mixed (content and practice).
Qualitative data.
Title, year, country | Intervention | Aims/objectives | Study design/method | Sample | Main findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cao et al. 2021, China |
Content
A “Geriatric Nursing” course for sophomore undergraduate nursing students |
To deeply understand student nurses’ experience of learning the course of “Geriatric Nursing”, in order to train more professional geriatric nursing talents |
Qualitative
Data collection involved semi-structured interviews and phenomenological data analysis |
27 sophomore nursing students in the department of geriatric nursing (majoring in “elderly nursing”) | Themes:
|
Davies et al., 2013, United States |
Placement
A 16-week course ‘N352, Caring for the Older Adult’ The older adults are recruited to receive visits from a designated student every 1–2 weeks |
How does a practicum involving sequential visits with an older adult accompanied by reflective journaling contribute to nursing students’ understanding of experiences of ageing? |
Qualitative
An illuminative evaluation of reflective journals. Interviews with students (n=32) Modified framework analysis Comparison and integration of findings from different data set |
80 4th year nursing students’ journals 32 nursing students were interviewed |
Themes:
|
Fox and Wold, 1996, United States |
Mixed
A senior capstone course on gerontological nursing emphasizing maximizing individuals capacities in the elderly and quality of life |
To evaluate student-perceived learning and attitude changes towards care of the elderly population as a result of a concentrated course in selected gerontological concepts and clinical experiences at the end of the baccalaureate program | Mixed methods | 144 final year nursing students | Themes:
|
Garbarino and Lewis, 2020, United States |
Placement
Gerontological nursing course with a service-learning component |
The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of required gerontological nursing course with a service-learning component on student attitudes towards working with older adults |
Convergent parallel mixed methods
Two open-ended questions were used to add qualitative context to quantitative data |
All students enrolled in course were invited 53 (62 %) students pre-course 59 (69 %) students post-course |
Five major themes emerged from the qualitative strand of this study that emphasized the benefits of this course
|
Hsu et al., 2022, Taiwan |
Content
Implementation of a course on narrative medicine education |
This study aims to discuss how narrative pedagogy of improving the positive attitude toward older people among nursing students and increasing students willingness to practice older peoples care |
Mixed methods
Qualitative-reflective journal |
87 students (n=43 experimental group) (n=44 control group) |
Themes:
|
Lai et al., 2015, China |
Placement
A service-learning project for undergraduate nursing students |
For students to
|
Qualitative
Data collection involved participating students keeping reflective journals of their service-learning experience analysis involved content analysis of similarities/differences in the reflective journals |
52 Nursing students enrolled in “Personal and Professional Development”, a required course for all first- and second-year undergraduate nursing students at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Nursing | Four themes from the four waves of data
|
Lin et al., 2016, Taiwan |
Mixed
Music therapy training |
To explore whether incorporating music therapy into a practical geriatric nursing course at a nursing home cultivates positive attitudes toward older adults, raises students willingness to work with older adults, and in-creases their interest in specializing in gerontological nursing after graduation |
Qualitative
Focus groups were conducted to collect data from three participant groups (n=20). Verbatim transcripts of audio recorded interviews were analyzed using content analysis |
Intervention Year 2 students in a 4-year baccalaureate program enrolled in an gerontological nursing elective n=20 |
Themes:
|
Potter et al., 2013, Canada |
Placement
1 h session teaching about the SPICES (sleep disorders, problems with feeding, incontinence, confusion, evidence of falls, skin breakdown) Participants then engaged in a six-week consolidated practice experience |
To examine the influence of specific geriatric knowledge on 2nd and 3rd year nursing students in their provision of care to older adults, to address the paucity of research examining geriatric education for nursing students or their attitudes about working with older adults |
Qualitative
Data collection involved structured focus groups prior to their attendance at the 1 h teaching session on SPICES A second focus group was conducted with each participant group to gather impressions about their implementation of the assessment tools. Analysis involved thematic analysis |
All 2nd and 3rd year students in the winter semester n=57 | Pre-teaching focus group responses – students in both years recognized that values and beliefs about older adults were informed by numerous factors and that personal experience with the elderly affected how they viewed this age group. They were influenced by staff and the environment as well. While the program did make participants aware of negative attitudes and ageism, many felt their education did not necessarily prepare them to deal with ageing in varied ethnic cultures, on tight schedules not conducive to personalized care, or in task-oriented work environments. Theoretical knowledge about the complexity of elder care became real patient. They were also used as education tools with patients and families. Use of the tools created opportunities for relational practice and provided a chance to start a dialogue about the patient’s experience |
Reitmaier, et al., 2015, United States |
Placement
Intergenerational placement – sequential visits with an older adult as part of a gerontological nursing course |
To explore the ways in which the practicum component of a course in gerontological nursing, incorporating sequential visits with an older adult, contributes to undergraduate nursing students and older adults understanding of experiences of ageing |
Qualitative
Data drawn from the experiences of two cohorts of students who completed the intergenerational programme in 2010/2011 |
Students who had completed the intergenerational programme. The participants were divided into two classes randomly. n=43 students in experimental group and n=44 students in t control group | Four shared themes across the data sets:
|
Rogan and Wyllie, 2003, Australia |
Placement
An educational program designed to give nursing students optimum support while attending clinical placements in nursing homes |
To explore students’ perceptions of the effect of the educational program on their knowledge, skills and attitudes towards the elderly |
Qualitative
Data collection involved using an open-ended questionnaire and focus groups with a subset of students (n=18) to explore their responses to the questions in greater depth. All qualitative data were analyzed using a descriptive interpretative approach |
112 first semester undergraduate nursing students | Five themes:
|
Sakamoto, 2022, United States |
Placement
A new clinic to provide basic health assessment and health education promotion to older community dwellers around the campus |
To analyze students’ perceptions of clinical experiences at the Robust Ageing Program clinic, a community wellness outpatient senior center |
Mixed methods
Two open-ended questions were used to add qualitative context to quantitative data |
13 nursing students | Five themes:
|
Sari et al., 2020, Turkey | Simulation with the “aged simulation suit” Comprised of tools that simulate a variety of physiological changes that occur due to ageing | To explore the effect of use of an aged simulation suit on the empathy and attitudes of nursing students towards older persons |
Mixed methods
Data collection involved two sequential phases. Semi-structured interviews to gather information about the students’ feelings opinions and awareness regarding their experiences completing the aged simulation suit tasks. Analysis involved directed content analysis |
30 nursing students in their senior year of university who registered for a Geriatric Nursing Course | Four themes:
|
Shellman, 2005, United States |
Placement
A 2-h reminiscence education program for nursing students during their community health clinical practicum |
To examine baccalaureate students’ experiences of reminiscing with older adults to gain further insight into the effects of a reminiscence education program on nursing students and their ability to deliver high-quality and culturally sensitive care to this population |
Qualitative
Embedded in a survey design (participants answered three open-ended questions at the end of a survey) |
41 senior nursing students nursing class of 2002 who had reminisced with an older adult during the clinical rotation | Three themes:
|
Walton and Blossom, 2013, United States |
Placement
A home visiting program called healthy partners (HPs). This program paired up two nursing students with one older adult living in the community in Montana |
To explore the experiences of nursing students working with older adults in rural communities, the experiences of older adults, and the development of relationships |
Qualitative
Phenomenological research method and data analysis. Data collection involved in-depth interviews with older adults and students |
96 nursing students and older adults participating in the healthy partners program | Six themes:
|
The quality of the studies was also assessed, and the results of the quality appraisal are presented in Table 2.
Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT).
Qualitative studies or qualitative portion of a mixed methods study | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citation | Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question? | Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question? | Are the findings adequately derived from the data? | Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data? | Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation? |
Cao et al. [37] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Davies et al. [38] | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Fox and Wold [39] | Yes | Yes, but limited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Garbarino and Lewis [40] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Hsu et al. [41] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Lai et al. [42] | Yes | Yes, but limited | No | No | Yes |
Lin et al. [43] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Potter et al. [44] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Reitmaier et al. [45] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rogan and Wyllie [46] | Yes | Yes, but limited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sakamoto [47] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Sari et al. [48] | Yes | Yes, but limited | Yes, but limited | Yes, but limited | Yes, but limited |
Shellman [49] | Yes, but limited | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Walton and Blossom [50] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rigor
Our study employed evidence-based tools and checklists (i.e., PRISMA, MMAT), and strategies to ensure trustworthiness [51] based on the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses (Lockwood et al. [52]) were implemented throughout the research process. Specifically, our review question was clearly and explicitly stated, and the inclusion criteria, search strategy, criteria for quality appraisal, methods used to combine studies and specific directives for new research were all appropriate; the sources and resources used to search for studies were adequate; critical appraisal was conducted independently by all research team members; methods to minimize error in data extraction were employed and the likelihood of publication bias was assessed. Finally, our recommendations for educational practice are well-supported by the data.
Results
Fourteen studies were ultimately included in this qualitative review [37–50]. Quality assessment using the MMAT for qualitative research revealed that some the studies were of low quality (see Table 2). Of the 14 studies included, six had significant methodological limitations: three studies partially met the quality criteria [39, 46, 49]; one was missing two of the five quality criteria [38]; one was missing three of the five quality criteria [42]; and another study was only strong in one quality criteria [48]. The countries represented in the studies numbered six; seven from the United States (US), two from Taiwan and China, and one from Australia, Canada, and Turkey, respectively. All the studies reported that the interventions they implemented improved student nurses’ knowledge about older people. All but one [44] reported improvements in student nurses’ attitudes toward older people because of their intervention. Yet only four studies reported an increase in student nurses’ increased willingness to work with older people following the intervention [37, 40, 46, 47]. Since many of the studies assessed increases in one or more of knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people and we were interested it which type of interventions are effective, we report on the studies in detail according to the type of intervention. See Table 3 for a summary of the included studies by type of intervention: content, simulation, placement, or mixed. In what follows, we report on each type of intervention in turn.
Elements of interventions.
Citation | Knowledge | Attitudes | Desire to work with older people | Type of intervention |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cao et al. [37] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Content |
Davies et al. [38] | Yes | Yes | Placement | |
Fox and Wold [39] | Yes | Yes | Mixed | |
Garbarino and Lewis [40] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Placement |
Hsu et al. [41] | Yes | Yes | Content | |
Lai et al. [42] | Yes | Yes | Placement | |
Lin et al. [43] | Yes | Yes | Mixed | |
Potter et al. [44] | Yes | Mixed | ||
Reitmaier et al. [45] | Yes | Yes | Placement | |
Rogan and Wyllie [46] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Placement |
Sakamoto [47] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Placement |
Sari et al. [48] | Yes | Yes | Simulation | |
Shellman [49] | Yes | Yes | Placement | |
Walton and Blossom [50] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Placement |
Content
Two studies reported interventions that focused on introducing gerontological content into undergraduate nursing curricula [37, 41]. Cao et al. [37], introduced a geriatrics course for sophomore undergraduate students. In semi-structured interviews, students reported that prior to the course they lacked awareness of both physiological and psychological aspects of ageing. Through the course they learned about ageing, the life of older people, and left the course with an interest in engaging with older people and possibly of a career practising with this population. Hsu et al. [41] reported on the reflective journals of nursing students after a narrative medicine intervention in which students designed assistive devices for older people. The course challenged students’ negative stereotypes about ageing and older people. Students developed self-awareness of the negative perceptions they held about older people and began to think about how to better assist in delivery of care to this population.
Simulation
Sari et al. [48] was the only study reporting on a simulation intervention. Students wore an ageing simulation suit and goggles to simulate poor vision. This intervention stimulated students’ awareness and empathy for people who have disabilities that restrict their physical activity. In their semi-structured interviews, students reported that they recognized that complaints they had previously heard from older people with disabilities were legitimate and gained insights into the isolation that may be experienced by older people with disabilities. It is noteworthy that this intervention seemed to perpetuate perceptions of older people as dependent and disabled, rather than providing a heterogeneous view of this population.
Placement
Eight studies reported on a placement intervention [38, 40, 42, 45–47, 49, 50]. The placements included students visiting older people in their homes [38, 40, 42, 45, 47, 49, 50], or clinical placements in nursing homes [46]. Students who visited students in their home settings and those who were taking care of an older person for their clinical experience reported having their negative perceptions about ageing challenged. They began to see older people as individuals and learned to develop a relationship with them that was meaningful for both them and the older person. In all these interventions, students were with older people for a prolonged period ranging from four 90-minute sessions to an entire semester. In Lai et al. [42], students’ placement with “disadvantaged” community-dwelling older people caused them to reflect on gaps in healthcare systems in their reflective journals.
Mixed
Three studies reported interventions that included theoretical content as well as a clinical experience [39, 43, 44]. Like the clinical placement studies, those using mixed interventions found that students’ preconceived notions about ageing and older people were challenged, and they learned to develop a relationship with older people. Students in focus groups in the study by [43] reported that they were afraid of older people prior to receiving the music therapy intervention but after the intervention they were able to connect with them. Students in focus groups in the [44] study began to see gerontology as a specialty area and to self-reflect on ageism. Similarly, students in Fox and Wald’s [39] study began to reflect on healthcare system changes that could enhance care of older people.
Discussion
To our knowledge this is the first review of qualitatively evaluated educational interventions for nursing students. We provide the nursing community with a valuable overview of what has been tried in various nursing programs. Our key finding is that although all the educational interventions employed in the studies in this review reported that nursing students had increased knowledge about older people and shed misconceptions about this patient population [37–50], only four reported on interventions aimed at enhancing students’ willingness to work with older people [37, 40, 46, 47].
Moreover, most of the studies reported that their interventions challenged nursing students’ negative attitudes toward older people [37–43, 45, 46, 48–50], and although the simulation helped students develop empathy, it also fostered perceptions of older people as disabled [48]. Furthermore, most of the interventions included a clinical component that was likely to be associated with students viewing older people as unique human beings, thus challenging previously held ageist views about this population and yet few students wanted to work with older people. One possible explanation may be that the student nurses were expressing unconscious ageism – unfortunately, this is unknown because none of the studies formally assessed ageist attitudes. The World Health Organization [53] suggests that ageism is prevalent around the world and often not recognized in individuals’ own culture. As well, a review of the literature examining ageism in student nurses reported that ageism directed towards older people was related to not wanting to work with this population [54].
Although clinical experiences with community-dwelling older people, either through service learning or clinical placements, resulted in nursing students’ negative stereotypes about ageing and older people being challenged as they acquired more accurate information through their experiences with this population [38, 40, 42, 45, 47, 49, 50], perhaps more is needed in order for nursing students to become willing to work with older people. We recommend addressing the ageism that many people unconscously hold towards older people early in nursing programs, and then integrating learning about older people and ageism throughout nursing curricula. The World Health Organization [53] suggests that two ways to counter ageism are education and intergenerational contact. Thus, the service learning interventions that included education and practice with community-dwelling older people would seem to be the most promising type of intervention to encourage nursing studentsto work with this population.
None of the studies in this review discussed conducting research about what was needed to enhance nursing students’ knowledge or attitudes prior to implementing their educational interventions. In other words, the interventions did not appear to have been designed based on evidence. Nor were the interventions tested to determine their effectiveness. We recommend that researchers consider using a systematic model, such as the Assessment Design Development Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE) model to develop evidence-based educational interventions [55]. According to the ADDIE, research should first be conducted to assess gaps in student nurses’ knowledge; followed by designing an intervention using evidence to meet this gap; then further development the intervention through pilot testing; and, finally, implementing and evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention using pre-and-post measurements, as well as self-report data from student nurses. Evidence-based educational interventions developed using such a model could then be replicated by many nursing programs.
Based on our findings we recommend that student nurses be exposed to well older people, whether it be by service learning or clinical rotations in the community, to provide them with opportunities to develop their knowledge of well older people. In Canada, 85 % and in Australia, 80 %, of older people live independently in the community [56, 57], thus, learning about community-dwelling older people is essential. Many student nurses first clinical rotation is in residential/aged care; scholars have critiqued this practice because the focus is usually on body care rather than a person-centred approach to the fundamentals of nursing care [19, 58–60]. These practices also re-enforce already negative stereotypes about ageing and older people that student nurses may have held prior to entering their nursing program [61, 62].
Implications for an international audience
We suggest a national curriculum that includes an evidence-based, stand-alone gerontological course as well as gerontological content threaded throughout the curriculum. Given the prevalence of ageism throughout the world [53], it is also essential that curriculum be developed to challenge ageist beliefs. Moreover, education content and experiences that challenge the negative stereotypes of older people as dependant, confused and incontinent (to name a few) need to be developed [63–65]. Furthermore, nursing students should acquire theoretical knowledge of older people’s functional needs that includes health and social care as well as recognition of cultural diversity and the challenges faced by older members of marginalized groups such as the LGBTIQ community [21]. Given the prevalence of older people [2], student nurses must all have foundational gerontological knowledge as they will encounter older people in all types of healthcare settings.
Limitations
Given the methodological limitations of some of the studies (see Table 1), conclusions about intervention effectiveness should be made with caution. Methodical issues included lack of detailed information about the interventions, how the studies were conducted, and in some of the studies the findings appeared to be a synthesis of students’ self-report data. Due to these challenges, we were unable to do a meta synthesis of the qualitative data. As well the studies were only conducted in one educational setting; thus, they may not be suitable to all nursing programs. Moreover, we only examined studies written in English and thus could have missed some interventions included in non-English studies.
Conclusions
This systematic qualitative review provides the nursing community with an overview of research related to educational interventions that have been developed to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and/or willingness to work with older people. All the interventions improved knowledge about older people and some disrupted negative attitudes student nurses held about them, yet only a few increased their willingness to work with older people. We recommend that nursing education that disrupts negative stereotypes about older people begin early in nursing programs and continue throughout students’ education. Also, providing education and clinical experiences with community-dwelling older people may be a promising intervention to increase student nurses’ willingness to work with this population.
In terms of directions for future research, more research is needed that employs a model or systematic approach to the development and testing of educational interventions for nursing students on older people’s care.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Hartford Institute’s Special Interest Group International Growth and Development for bringing us together, as well as feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript from board members Dr Ellarene Sanders and Dr Jenny Alderden.
-
Research ethics: This was a systematic review of the published literature. No research ethics approval was required.
-
Informed consent: This was a systematic review of the published literature. No informed consent was required.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: There was no funding for this systematic review. In-kind support was provided by La Trobe University and the University of Alberta.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Beard, JR, Officer, A, de Carvalho, IA, Sanda, R, Pot, AM, Michel, J-P, et al.. The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016;387:2145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. World Health Organization. Ageing and health. Key facts. 1 October 2020; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.Search in Google Scholar
3. Ofori-Asenso, R, Chin, KL, Mazidi, M, Zomer, E, Ilomaki, J, Zullo, AR, et al.. Global incidence of frailty and prefrailty among community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2019;2:e198398. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8398.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Chroinin, DN, Goldsbury, DE, Beveridge, A, Davidson, PM, Girgis, A, Ingham, N, et al.. Health-services utilisation among older persons during the last year of life: a population-based study. BMC Geriatr 2018;13:1–18. https://doi.org.101186/s12877-018-1006-x.10.1186/s12877-018-1006-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Kamiya, Y, Hertog, S. Measuring household and living arrangements of older persons around the world: The United Nations Database on the households and living arrangements of older persons 2019; 2020. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available from: https://file:///Users/sherrydahlke/Downloads/undesa_pd_2020_TP_living_arrangements_of_older_persons.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
6. Kojima, G. Increased healthcare costs associated with frailty among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2019;84:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2029.06.003.Search in Google Scholar
7. World Health Organization. (2020). State of the worlds nursing. Investing in education, jobs and leadership. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331677.Search in Google Scholar
8. World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/186463.Search in Google Scholar
9. Beltran, SJ, Miller, VJ. Breaking out of the silo: a systematic review of University-level gerontological curricula in social work and nursing programs. J Soc Work Educ 2020;56:753–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1656689.Search in Google Scholar
10. Koskinen, S, Salminen, L, Stolt, M, Leino-Kilpi, H. The education received by nursing students regarding nursing older people: a scoping literature review. Scand J Caring Sci 2015;29:15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Khait, AA, Menger, A, Hamaideh, SH, Al-Modallal, H, Abdalrahim, A. Nursing students’ knowledge about behavioral and biopsychosocial domains of dementia: a cross-sectional survey design. Int J Nurs Knowl 2021;33:116–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12343.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Dahlke, S, Kalogirou, MR, Swoboda, NL. Registered nurses’ reflections on their educational preparation to work with older people. Int. J. Nurs Older People 2021;16:e12363. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12363.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
13. Rayner, J, Fetherstonhaugh, D, Beattie, E, Harrington, A, Jeon, Y-H, Moyle, W, et al.. “Oh, old people, it’s boring”: nurse academics’ reflections on the challenges in teaching older person’s care in Australian undergraduate nursing curricula. Collegian 2022;30:141–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.08.009.Search in Google Scholar
14. Sarabia-Cobo, C, Pfeiffer, CC. Changing negative stereotypes regarding aging in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:e60–e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.06.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Hunt, G, Verstappen, A, Stewart, L, Kool, B, Slark, J. Career interest of undergraduate nursing students: a ten-year longitudinal study. Nurse Educ Pract 2020;43. 102702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102702.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Rush, KL, Hickey, S, Epp, S, Janke, R. Nurses’ attitudes towards older people care: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2017;26:4105–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13939.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Lui, Y, Norman, IJ, While, AE. Nurses’ attitudes towards older people: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2013;50:1271–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnursstu.2012.11.021.Search in Google Scholar
18. Hebditch, M, Daley, S, Wright, J, Sherlock, G, Scott, J, Banerjee, S. Preferences of nursing and medical students for working with older adults and people with dementia: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02000-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
19. Neville, C, Dickie, R. The evaluation of undergraduate nurses’ attitudes, perspectives and perceptions toward older people. Nurse Educ Today 2014;34:1074–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Dobrowolska, B, Jędrzejkiewicz, B, Pilewska-Kozak, A, Zarzycka, D, Ślusarska, B, Deluga, A, et al.. Age discrimination in healthcare institutions perceived by seniors and students. Nurs Ethics 2019;26:443–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017718392.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Fetherstonhaugh, D, Rayner, J, Solly, K, Beattie, E, Harrington, A, Jeon, Y-H, et al.. Teaching the care of older people in Australian nursing schools: survey findings. Collegian 2022;29:873–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.02.007.Search in Google Scholar
22. Garbrah, W, Valimaki, T, Palovaara, M, Kankkunen, P. Nursing curriculums may hinder a career in gerontological nursing: an integrative review. Int J Older People Nurs 2017;12:e121152. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12152.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Fulmer, T. A retrospective/prospective on the future of geriatric nursing. Geriatr Nurs 2020;41:29–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.01.02.012.Search in Google Scholar
24. Sizer, SM, Burton, RL, Harris, A. The influence of theory and practice on perceptions about caring for ill older people – a literature review. Nurse Educ Pract 2016;19:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.04.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Dukes, C, Dahlke, S, Pietrosanu, M, Kaligouri, MR. Improving student nurses’ perspectives towards older people with an e-learning activity. Int J Older People Nurs 2022;17:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12425.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
26. Venables, H, Wells, Y, Fetherstonhaugh, D, Wallace, H. Factors associated with nursing students’ attitudes toward older people: a scoping review. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 2023;44:131–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2021.2012466.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Gibbs, SS, Kulig, JC. “We definitely are role models”: exploring how clinical instructors’ influence nursing students’ attitudes towards older adults. Nurse Educ Pract 2017;26:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.07.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Cumpston, MS, Li, T, Page, MJ, Chandler, J, Welch, VA, Higgins, JP, et al.. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; 2019, vol 10:ED0000142 p. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current.10.1002/14651858.ED000142Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
29. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Telzlaff, J, Alman, DG, the PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
30. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.Search in Google Scholar
31. Hong, Q, Fàbregues, S, Bartlett, G, Boardman, F, Cargo, M, Dagenais, P, et al.. The mixed methods appraisal tool (mmat) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf 2018;34:285–91. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180221.Search in Google Scholar
32. Rethlefsen, ML, Kirtley, S, Waffenschmidt, S, Ayala, AP, Moher, D, Page, MJ, et al.. PRISMA-S Group. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev 2021;10:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33. McKibbon, A, Eady, A, Marks, S. PDQ Evidence-based principles and practice. Hamilton, Ontario: BC Decker; 1999 and Evans DJ. Database searches for qualitative research. J Med Libr Assoc 2002;90:290–3.Search in Google Scholar
34. Covidence systematic review software. Veritas health innovation, Melbourne, Australia; 2022. Available from: www.covidence.org.Search in Google Scholar
35. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
36. Hsieh, HF, Shannon, SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
37. Cao, ZD, Wang, Y, Hu, YZ, Wang, Z. Real experience among undergraduate nursing students in learning the course of geriatric nursing: a qualitative study. TMR Integr Nurs 2021;5:49–55. https://doi.org/10.12032/TMRIN2021042502.Search in Google Scholar
38. Davies, SM, Reitmaier, AB, Reveling Smith, L, Mangan-Danckwart, D. Capturing intergenerativity: the use of student reflective journals to identify learning within an undergraduate course in gerontological nursing. J Nurs Educ 2013;52:139–51. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20120213-01.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Fox, SD, Wold, JE. Baccalaureate student gerontological nursing experiences: raising consciousness levels and affecting attitudes. J Nurs Educ 1996;35:348–55. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19961101-05.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
40. Garbarino, JT, Lewis, LF. The impact of a gerontology nursing course with a service-learning component on student attitudes towards working with older adults: a mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Pract 2020;42:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102684.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Hsu, PT, Ho, YF, Chen, JJ. The effect of integrating service learning and learning portfolio construction into the curriculum of gerontological nursing. Healthcare 2022;10:652–67. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10040652.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
42. Lai, CKY, Chan, JH, Wong, EYP, Fung, JTS, Pang, PCP, Fung, KHK, et al.. Gains and development of undergraduate nursing students during a 2-year community service program. J Nurs Educ 2015;54:s21–25. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-2015-06.Search in Google Scholar
43. Lin, YC, Wang, CJ, Wang, JJ. Effects of a gerotranscendence educational program on gerotranscendence recognition, attitude towards and behaviour intention towards the elderly in long-term care. Nurse Educ Today 2016;36:324–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
44. Potter, G, Clarke, T, Hackett, S, Little, M. Nursing students and geriatric care: the influence of specific knowledge on evolving values, attitudes and actions. Nurse Educ Pract 2013;13:449–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.02.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
45. Reitmaier, A, Davies, S, Reveling Smith, L, Mangan-Danckwart, D, Hongerholt, K, Linker, J. Discovering intergenerativity: an evaluation of learning partnerships between student nurses and older adults. Int J Older People Nurs 2015;10:115–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12061.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
46. Rogan, F, Wyllie, A. Engaging undergraduate nursing students in the care of elderly residents in Australian nursing home. Nurse Educ Pract 2003;3:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-5953(02)00085-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Sakamoto, RR. Influence of “RAP” experiences on nursing students’ career choices in aging: a qualitative exploration. Nurse Educ Today 2022;109:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105218.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
48. Sari, D, Taskiran, N, Baysal, E, Acar, E, Akyil, RC. Effect of an aged simulation suit on nursing students’ attitudes and empathy. Eur Geriatr Med 2020;11:667–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s419999-020-00316-z.Search in Google Scholar
49. Shellman, J. The effects of a reminiscence education program on baccalaureate nursing students’ cultural self-efficacy in caring for elders. Nurse Educ Today 2005;27:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/nedt.2006.02.009.Search in Google Scholar
50. Walton, J, Blosson, H. The experience of nursing students visiting older adults living in rural communities. J Prof Nurs 2013;29:240–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/profnurs.201205.010.Search in Google Scholar
51. Shenton, AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf 2004;22:63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.Search in Google Scholar
52. Lockwood, C, Porritt, K, Munn, Z, Rittenmeyer, L, Salmond, S, Bjerrum, M, et al.. Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In: Aromataris, E, Munn, Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.10.46658/JBIRM-17-02Search in Google Scholar
53. World Health Organization. Ageism is a global challenge. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/18-03-2021-ageism-is-a-global-challenge-un.Search in Google Scholar
54. Gallo, V. Ageism in nursing education: a review of the literature. Teach Learn Nurs 2019;14:208–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.04.004.Search in Google Scholar
55. Kim, S, Choi, S, Seo, M, Kim, DR, Lee, K. Designing a clinical ethics education program for nurses based on the ADDIE model. Res Theor Nurs Pract 2020;34:205–22. https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-D-19-00135.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
56. Dyer, SM, Valeri, M, Arora, N, Tilden, D, Crotty, M. Is Australia over‐reliant on residential aged care to support our older population? Med J Aust 2020;213:156–7.e1. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50670.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
57. Public Health Agency of Canada. (2020). Aging and chronic diseases: a profile of Canadian seniors. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada; 2020.Search in Google Scholar
58. Algoso, M, Peters, K, Ramjan, L, East, L. Exploring undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of working in aged care settings: a review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today 2016;36:275–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
59. Hovey, S, Dyck, MJ, Reese, C, Kim, MJ. Nursing students’ attitudes toward persons who are aged: an integrative review. Nurse Educ Today 2017;49:145–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
60. Naughton, C, O’Shea, KL, Hayes, N. Incentivising a career in older adult nursing: the views of student nurses. Int J Older People Nurs 2019;14:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/opn.12256.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
61. Cary, LA, Chasteen, AL, Remedios, J. The ambivalent ageism scale: developing and validating a scale to measure benevolent and hostile ageism. Gerontologist 2017;57:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw118.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
62. Marquet, M, Chasteen, AL, Plaks, JE, Balasubramaniam, L. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the effects of negative age stereotypes and perceived age discrimination on older adults’ well-being. Aging Ment Health 2019;23:1666–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1514487.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
63. Fox, MT, Butler, JI, Persaud, M, Tregunno, D, Sidani, S, McCague, H. A multimethod study of the geriatric learning needs of acute care hospital nurses in Ontario, Canada. Res Nurs Health 2016;39:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21699.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
64. Kjorven, M, Rush, K, Hole, R. A discursive exploration of the practices that shape and discipline nurses’ responses to postoperative delirium. Nurs Inq 2011;18:325–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00534.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
65. McCarthy, MC. Detecting acute confusion in older adults: comparing clinical reasoning of nurses working in acute, long-term and community health care environments. Res Nurs Health 2003;26:203–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10081.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2023-0042).
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Literature Reviews
- Gerontological educational interventions for student nurses: a systematic review of qualitative findings
- Educational interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people: a systematic review of quantitative findings
- Barriers to and facilitators of accelerated BSN students’ success: a scoping review with possible strategies for success
- Formal nursing focused academic practice partnerships for advancing nursing research and scholarship: a scoping review protocol
- Notetaking among nursing students
- Nursing students’ experiences of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
- Research Articles
- International experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula
- Relationship between tutor support, caring self-efficacy and intention to leave of nursing students: the roles of self-compassion as mediator and moderator
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward infection control precautions among nurses in Palestinian hospitals
- AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection
- Nursing students’ experience of a transformative approach to teaching cross cultural clinical decision making
- Supporting nursing faculty to teach veteran’s care: a mixed method, multi-intervention study
- Nursing students’ evaluation of patient safety culture in three central European countries: a cross-sectional study
- Development of clinical decision-making among undergraduate nursing students: the effect of unfolding case-based learning
- Developing competency of nursing students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation using Resuscitation Quality Improvement technology
- Value creation in a learning community: an interprofessional partnership between nursing home care, education and students
- Development and validation of satisfaction with clinical practice questionnaire for mentors and students
- Norwegian nurse educators’ self-rating of competencies: a nationwide cross-sectional web-survey
- Perceptions of nursing staff and students regarding attrition: a qualitative study
- A nurturing and caring environment to facilitate nursing students’ professional development in Rwanda: a focused ethnographic study
- Comparison of the traditional and block mode of delivery on undergraduate nursing students’ perceived levels of preparedness to use evidence-based practice: a two-group experimental study
- Educational Process, Issue, Trend
- Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a detailed examination
- Simulation design – peer-to-peer training as preparation for full-scale scenarios
- Don’t interrupt me! development of a handoff education bundle to simulate the real world
- The effectiveness of badging systems in engaging, motivating, and incentivizing students in the mastery of nursing licensure materials
- The effects of using a flipped classroom pedagogy in nursing anesthesia education: a program evaluation
Articles in the same Issue
- Literature Reviews
- Gerontological educational interventions for student nurses: a systematic review of qualitative findings
- Educational interventions to improve student nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, or willingness to work with older people: a systematic review of quantitative findings
- Barriers to and facilitators of accelerated BSN students’ success: a scoping review with possible strategies for success
- Formal nursing focused academic practice partnerships for advancing nursing research and scholarship: a scoping review protocol
- Notetaking among nursing students
- Nursing students’ experiences of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
- Research Articles
- International experiences of implementing the Fundamentals of Care Framework in nursing curricula
- Relationship between tutor support, caring self-efficacy and intention to leave of nursing students: the roles of self-compassion as mediator and moderator
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward infection control precautions among nurses in Palestinian hospitals
- AI-generated vs. student-crafted assignments and implications for evaluating student work in nursing: an exploratory reflection
- Nursing students’ experience of a transformative approach to teaching cross cultural clinical decision making
- Supporting nursing faculty to teach veteran’s care: a mixed method, multi-intervention study
- Nursing students’ evaluation of patient safety culture in three central European countries: a cross-sectional study
- Development of clinical decision-making among undergraduate nursing students: the effect of unfolding case-based learning
- Developing competency of nursing students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation using Resuscitation Quality Improvement technology
- Value creation in a learning community: an interprofessional partnership between nursing home care, education and students
- Development and validation of satisfaction with clinical practice questionnaire for mentors and students
- Norwegian nurse educators’ self-rating of competencies: a nationwide cross-sectional web-survey
- Perceptions of nursing staff and students regarding attrition: a qualitative study
- A nurturing and caring environment to facilitate nursing students’ professional development in Rwanda: a focused ethnographic study
- Comparison of the traditional and block mode of delivery on undergraduate nursing students’ perceived levels of preparedness to use evidence-based practice: a two-group experimental study
- Educational Process, Issue, Trend
- Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a detailed examination
- Simulation design – peer-to-peer training as preparation for full-scale scenarios
- Don’t interrupt me! development of a handoff education bundle to simulate the real world
- The effectiveness of badging systems in engaging, motivating, and incentivizing students in the mastery of nursing licensure materials
- The effects of using a flipped classroom pedagogy in nursing anesthesia education: a program evaluation