Home Fast penetration of Ga in Al: liquid metal embrittlement near the threshold of grain boundary wetting
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fast penetration of Ga in Al: liquid metal embrittlement near the threshold of grain boundary wetting

  • E. E. Glickman EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 3, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The thermodynamic conditions for spontaneous grain boundary wetting and stress driven liquid metal embrittlement are related to each other and the kinetic mechanism responsible for fast GB penetration under small stress is described. The dissolution – condensation mechanism of liquid metal embrittlement and linear fracture mechanics for calculation of a crack profile are applied to the classical system “Al – liquid Ga”. The results tend to support the idea that the recently observed fast linear penetration of Ga along 150° tilt <110> GB of Al should be considered as propagation of a liquid metal embrittlement crack under a small residual stress rather than as spontaneous grain boundary wetting. With the residual tensile stress σ ≈ 0.5 MPa acting normal to the GB plane, all major findings reported for this model system are explained in a semiquantitative way assuming that the GB spreading coefficient is extremely small by its absolute value, i. e. that the system is near the threshold of spontaneous grain boundary wetting.


Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Tel.: +97 23 640 6632 Fax: +97 23 642 3508

Dedicated to Professor Dr. Lasar Shvindlerman on the occasion of his 70th birthday


References

[1] A.P. Sutton, R.W. Balluffi, in: Interfaces in Crystalline Materials, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1996).Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Glickman, M. Nathan:J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 3185.10.1063/1.369659Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. Chatain, E. Rabkin, J. Derenne, J. Bernardini:Acta mater. (2001) 1123.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00039-8Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Vilenkin, in: B. Bokstein, B. Straumal (Eds.), Diffusion Segregation and Stresses in Materials, Scitec Publications, Switzerland (2003).Search in Google Scholar

[5] B. Joseph, M. Piscat, F. Barbier:Eur. Phys. J. AP5 (1999) 19.10.1051/epjap:1999108Search in Google Scholar

[6] E. Glickman, in: J. Lepinoux et al. (Eds.), Multiscale Phenomena in Plasticity, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, Netherlands,383–401.Search in Google Scholar

[7] E. Glickman:Interface Science11 (2003) 451.10.1023/A:1026100112248Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Gorse, J.-L. Boutard:J. de Physique IV, 12 (2002) 8.Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. Rostoker, J.M. Mc Caughey, H. Marcus, in: Embrittlement by Liquid Metals, Nostrad-Rheinhold(1960).Search in Google Scholar

[10] P. Fernandez, R. Clegg, D.R. Jones:Eng. Fail. Anal. 1 (1994) 51.10.1016/1350-6307(94)90029-9Search in Google Scholar

[11] V.I. Nikitin, in: Physico-chemical Phenomena in Interaction of Liquid and Solid Metals, Atomizdat Publ. House, Moscow (in Russian) (1967).Search in Google Scholar

[12] V.I Likhtman, E.D. Shchukin, P.A. Rhebinder, in: Physico-Chemical Mechanics of Metals, AS USSR Publ., Moscow (in Russian) (1962).Search in Google Scholar

[13] A.R.C. Westwood, C.M. Preece, M.H. Kamdar:Trans. ASM60 (1967) 723.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y.J. Su, Y. Bowing, W.Y. Chu, in: Key Engineering Materials,Trans. Techn. Publications, Switzerland145 (1998) 1053.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.145-149.1053Search in Google Scholar

[15] A.P. Reynolds, E. Stoner:Metallurgical Transactions A22 (1991)1849.10.1007/BF02646509Search in Google Scholar

[16] J.F. Knott, in: Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics, Butterworth,London (1974).Search in Google Scholar

[17] R.F. Cook, Z. Suo:MRS Bulletin27 (2002) 45.10.1557/mrs2002.19Search in Google Scholar

[18] W. Ludwig. E. Pereiro-Lopez, D. Bellet:Acta Mater. 53 (2005)151.10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.012Search in Google Scholar

[19] W.M. Robertson:Trans. Met. Soc. AIME236 (1966) 1478.Search in Google Scholar

[20] E. Pereiro-Lopez:PhD Thesis, Institut National Polytechnic de Grenoble (2004) (cited by [18]).Search in Google Scholar

[21] G. Hasson, J.-Y. Boos, I. Herbeuval:Surf. Sci. 31 (1972) 115.10.1016/0039-6028(72)90256-7Search in Google Scholar

[22] A.P Miedema, J. van Broeder:Z. Metallkd. (1979) 14.10.1515/ijmr-1979-700103Search in Google Scholar

[23] E. Rabkin:private communication.Search in Google Scholar

[24] I. Kaur, W. Gust, L.Kozma, in: Handbook of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion Data,Vol. 1, Ziegler Press, Stuttgart (1989).Search in Google Scholar

[25] E.D. Hondros, M.P. Seah:Interfacial and surface microchemistry,in: R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen (Eds.), Physical Metallurgy, 3rd edition, part I, North-Holland Physics Publ., Amsterdam (1983) 855.10.1016/B978-044489875-3/50018-1Search in Google Scholar

[26] D. McLean, in: Mechanical Properties of Metals, John Wiley,New York (1963).10.1115/1.3636604Search in Google Scholar

[27] B. Joseph, F. Barbier, M. Aucouturier:Mater. Sci. Forum294–296 (1999) 735.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.294-296.735Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Wolski, V. Laporte, N. Marie, M. Biscondi:Interface Sci. 9 (2001) 183.10.1023/A:1015142324557Search in Google Scholar

[29] W.W. Mullins:Trans. Metal. Soc. AIME233 (1965) 1232.Search in Google Scholar

[30] W.W. Mullins:Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A26 (1995) 1917.10.1007/BF02670663Search in Google Scholar

[31] B.C. Allen:Trans. Metal. Soc. AIME236 (1966) 915.Search in Google Scholar

[32] E. Pereiro-Lopez:private communication, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

  1. 1

    Note that Eq. (5) is Eq. (14) from [6] in which we have used the notations h and H instead of δGB and δ, respectively, just to avoid confusion in the use of the two δ-notations.

Received: 2005-06-20
Accepted: 2005-07-11
Published Online: 2022-02-03

© 2005 Carl Hanser Verlag, München

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial
  4. Articles Basic
  5. Thermodynamics of grain boundary adsorption in binary systems with limited solubility
  6. Microstructural characteristics of 3-d networks
  7. On the three-dimensional twin-limited microstructure
  8. Grain growth kinetics in 2D polycrystals: impact of triple junctions
  9. Thermal stability of polycrystalline nanowires
  10. Conservative motion of parent-martensite interfaces
  11. Enthalpy – entropy compensation effect in grain boundary phenomena
  12. Thermodynamic stabilization of nanocrystallinity
  13. On the relation between the anisotropies of grain boundary segregation and grain boundary energy
  14. Influence of faceting-roughening on triple-junction migration in zinc
  15. The influence of triple junction kinetics on the evolution of polycrystalline materials during normal grain growth: New evidence from in-situ experiments using columnar Al foil
  16. Grain boundary dynamics and selective grain growth in non-ferromagnetic metals in high magnetic fields
  17. Grain boundary mobility under a stored-energy driving force: a comparison to curvature-driven boundary migration
  18. Diffusional behavior of nanoscale lead inclusions in crystalline aluminum
  19. Quantitative experiments on the transition between linear to non-linear segregation of Ag in Cu bicrystals studied by radiotracer grain boundary diffusion
  20. Room-temperature grain boundary diffusion data measured from historical artifacts
  21. Solid state infiltration of porous steel with aluminium by the forcefill process
  22. A mechanism of plane matching boundary-assisted α/γ phase transformation in Fe–Cr alloy based on in-situ observations
  23. Fast penetration of Ga in Al: liquid metal embrittlement near the threshold of grain boundary wetting
  24. High-pressure effect on grain boundary wetting in aluminium bicrystals
  25. Grain boundary segregation and fracture
  26. Notifications/Mitteilungen
  27. Personal/Personelles
  28. Press/Presse
  29. Conferences/Konferenzen
Downloaded on 16.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2005-0207/pdf
Scroll to top button