Repair in Ghanaian judicial discourse

References

Aitchison, Jean. 2008. The articulate mammal: An introduction to psycholinguistics, 5th edn. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203934715Search in Google Scholar

Amissah, Austin. 1985. Criminal procedure in Ghana. Accra: Sedco.Search in Google Scholar

Amuzu, Evershed, Akua Campbell & Seth Ofori. 2020. “That’s not my understanding”: Interpretation in the Ghanaian multilingual court. Language and Dialogue 10(3). 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00076.amu.Search in Google Scholar

Benoit, William L. 2016. Effects of image repair strategies. In Joseph R. Blaney (ed.), Putting image repair to the test: Quantative applications to image restoration strategies, 7–28. Lanham (MD): Lexington Books.10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0103Search in Google Scholar

Burford-Rice, Rose & Martha Augoustinos. 2018. I didn’t mean that: It was just a slip of the tongue’: Racial slips and gaffes in the public arena. British Journal of Social Psychology 57. 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12211.Search in Google Scholar

Butterworth, Brian. 1975. Hesitation and semantic planning in speech. Journal of Psychological Research 1. 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01066991.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Akua & Samuel G. Obeng. 2023. Language and power: Discursive strategies employed by court interpreters in Ghanaian district courts. Interpreting: International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 26(1). 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00099.cam.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Winnie Cheng & Jian Li. 2015. Jury instructions in Hong Kong: A Gricean perspective. International Journal of Speech Language and Law 22(1). 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v22i1.15400.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert & Eve V. Clark. 1977. Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Available at: https://www.biblio.com/book/psychology-language-introduction-psycholinguistics-clark-hh/d/1530664879.Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting. 1996. Prosody in conversation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597862Search in Google Scholar

de Garcia, Jule G. 1995. Repair strategies in conversational Kickapoo. Colorado Research in Linguistics 14. 6–24.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira & Nick J. Enfield. 2013. Is “huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. Public Library of Science (PLOS) ONE 8(11). e78273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078273.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John E. 1974. Syntax in mid-sentence. In Berkeley studies in syntax and semantics Vol. 1. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Human Learning and Department of Linguistics, University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London/New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Finegan, Edward. 2008. Language: Its structure and use, 5th edn. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.Search in Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003Search in Google Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele & Johannes Wagner. 2014. Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34. 171–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190514000014.Search in Google Scholar

Kendrick, Kobin H. 2015. Other-initiated repair in English. Open Linguistics 1. 164–190. https://doi.org/10.2478/opli-2014-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Local, John. 1996. Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipt in everyday talk. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 177–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597862.007Search in Google Scholar

Manuh, Takyiwaa. 1988. The Asantehemaa’s court and its jurisdiction over women: A study in legal pluralism. Research Review 4(2). 50–66.Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as a lingua Franca communication. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 177. 123–150.10.1515/IJSL.2006.008Search in Google Scholar

Meredith, Joanne & Elizabeth Stoke. 2014. Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘chat’ with spoken interaction. Discourse and Communication 8(2). 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510815.Search in Google Scholar

Nakatani, Christine H. & Julia Hirschberg. 1994. A corpus-based study of repair cases in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95(3). 1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408547.Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel G. 2018. Conflict resolution in Africa: Language, law and politeness in Ghanaian (Akan) jurisprudence. Durham (NC): Carolina Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel G. 1999. Conversational strategies in Akan: Prosodic features and discourse categories. Köln, Germany: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel G. 1992a. On a morphosyntactic description of repair sequences: Exemplification from Akan discourse. Papers in Ghanaian Linguistics 8. 80–90.Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel G. 1992b. A phonetic description of repair sequences in Akan conversation. Text 12(1). 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1992.12.1.59.Search in Google Scholar

Obeng, Samuel G. & Akua Campbell. 2023. Turn-taking in Ghanaian judicial discourse. Legon Journal of Humanities 34(2). 80–108. https://doi.org/10.4314/ljh.v34i2.4.Search in Google Scholar

Quashigah, Kofi. 2008. The historical development of the legal system of Ghana: An example of the coexistence of two systems of law. Studocu. https://www.studocu.com/row/document/ghana-institute-of-management-and-public-administration/law/quashigah-the-historical-development-of-ghana/20094961 (accessed 10 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Anne S. & Dorthe Berntsen. 2009. Emotional valence and the functions of autobiographical memories: Positive and negative memories serve different functions. Memory & Cognition 37(4). 477–492. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.37.4.477.Search in Google Scholar

Röde, Silja. 2018. English as a Lingua Franca in Political Talk The use of self-repair and repetition as clarification strategies in political interviews with Jean-Claude Juncker. Stockholm: Stockholms Universitet MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation, Volumes I and II. In Gail Jefferson (ed.) with Introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In John Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1987. On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham Button & John R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418226-004Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Rintaro. 2012. Self-initiated self-repair attempts by Japanese high school learners while speaking English. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience 3(2). 17–28.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2006. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics 21(2). 205–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.2.205.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1979. The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Talmy Givon (ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax, 261–286. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_012.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of `uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Text and Talk. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1992. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97(5). 1295–1345. https://doi.org/10.1086/229903.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Harvey Sacks & Gail Jefferson. 1978. The relevance of repair to syntax for conversation. In Talmy Givon (ed.), Discourse and syntax, 261–288. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368897_012Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. & Gail Jefferson. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53. 361–382.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53. 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041.Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret. 2009. Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 231–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597862.008Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack & Tanya Stivers. 2013. The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781118325001Search in Google Scholar

Tiara, Ari. 2018. Repair strategies in online chat: A conversation analysis. Passage 6(3). 1–19.Search in Google Scholar

Toury, Gideon. 1997. What is it that renders a spoonerism (un)translatable? London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Travers, Max. 2006. Understanding talk in legal settings: What law and society studies can learn from a conversation analyst. Law & Social Inquiry 31(2). 447–465.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00017.xSearch in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun, A. 2002. Ideology and discourse. A multidisciplinary introduction. Barcelona Pompeu Fabra University. Available at: https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2003-Ideology-and-discourse.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Watterson, Matthew. 2008. Repair of non-understanding in English in international communication. World Englishes 27(3–4). 378–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2008.00574.x.Search in Google Scholar

Wen, Wei-chun, Tzu-hsiang Yu & William L. Benoit. 2009. Our hero can’t be wrong! A case study of collectivist image repair in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Communication 2(2). 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750902826707.Search in Google Scholar

West, Tamera A. 2013. Women constructing identities: The discursive construction of “stressed-out” in women’s conversations. Santa Barbara, USA: Fielding Graduate University Unpublished PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Zaferanieh, Elaheh. 2012. Conversation analysis of online chat. Paper presented at the First Conference on Language Learning & Teaching. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/11527371/Conversation_Analysis_of_Online_Chat.Search in Google Scholar