Investigating the targeted use of (dis)agreement in leave to appeal decisions of the HKSAR appellate courts: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis

References

Boginskaya, Olga. 2022. Dissenting with conviction: Boosting in challenging the majority opinion. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7(2). 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2073.Search in Google Scholar

Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316410899Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell. 2011. Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3). 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Winnie & Le Cheng. 2014. Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland. English for Specific Purposes 33. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.006.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & King Kui Sin. 2008. A court judgment as dialogue. In Edda Weigand (ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric, 267–284. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/ds.2.21cheSearch in Google Scholar

Garzone, Giuliana. 2016. Polyphony and dialogism in legal discourse: Focus on syntactic negation. In Girolamo Tessuto (ed.), Constructing legal discourses and social practices: Issues and perspectives, 2–27. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Geng, Yifan & Sue Wharton. 2016. Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 22. 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Geng, Yifan & Sue Wharton. 2019. How do thesis writers evaluate their own and others’ findings? An appraisal analysis and a pedagogical intervention. English for Specific Purposes 56. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Ho, Victor. 2014. Managing rapport through evaluation in grounder – a qualitative study. Journal of Pragmatics 61. 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.019.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Guangwei & Guihua Wang. 2014. Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14. 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Lau, Ken, Chia-Yen Lin & Eric Odle. 2021. ‘I am just saying maybe …’: Engagement in dissertation defenses. Language and Education 35(1). 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1828450.Search in Google Scholar

Law, Jonathan. 2022. A dictionary of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Xin & Ranran Zhang. 2021. The diplomatic interpreter’s negotiation of power and solidarity through engagement choices: A case study of the Chinese Foreign Minister’s 2018 press conference. Discourse, Context & Media 39. 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100459.Search in Google Scholar

Liardét, Cassi L. & Sharyn Black. 2019. “So and so” says, states and argues: A corpus-assisted engagement analysis of reporting verbs. Journal of Second Language Writing 44. 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Loghmani, Zahra, Behzad Ghonsooly & Mohammad Ghazanfari. 2020. Engagement in doctoral dissertation discussion sections written by English native speakers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 45. 100851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100851.Search in Google Scholar

Mahoney, Dennis. 2003. Judgement writing: Form and function. In Ruth Sheard (ed.), A matter of judgement: Judicial decision-making and judgement writing, 103–116. Sydney: Judicial Commission of New South Wales.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation, appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, Anthony. 2003. The nature of the judicial process and judicial decision-making. In Ruth Sheard (ed.), A matter of judgement: Judicial decision-making and judgement writing, 1–14. Sydney: Judicial Commission of New South Wales.Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2001. Reflexive academic talk: Observation from MICASE. In Rita C. Simpson & John M. Swales (eds.), Corpus linguistics in North America, 179–194. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2023. Reflexively speaking: Metadiscourse in English as a lingua franca. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110295498Search in Google Scholar

Mazzi, Davide. 2015. “It must be obvious that this line of argument is utterly inconsistent …”: On attitudinal qualification in English judicial discourse across legal systems. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 2. 51–67.Search in Google Scholar

Mckeown, Jamie. 2022a. A comparative investigation of metadiscursive clarifying devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme Court. Discourse & Communication 16(6). 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221108827.Search in Google Scholar

McKeown, Jamie. 2022b. Stancetaking in the U.S. Supreme Court’s abortion jurisprudence (1973–present): Epistemic (im)probability and evidential (dis)belief. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7(2). 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2075.Search in Google Scholar

Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 519–549. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray.Search in Google Scholar

Singn, Shambhu D. 1993. Judgements and how to write them. Allahabad: Eastern Book Company.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Shuyi A. & Peter Crosthwaite. 2022. “The findings might not be generalizable”: Investigating negation in the limitations sections of PhD theses across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 59. 101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101155.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Zhenhua & Qingbin Zhang. 2014. How disputes are reconciled in a Chinese courtroom setting: From an appraisal perspective. Semiotica 2014(201). 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0020.Search in Google Scholar

White, Peter R. R. 2012. Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories—attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media 1(2–3). 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Siew M. 2007. The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(3). 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Youping. 2015. Dancing with shackles: Judge’s engagement in court conciliation of Chinese civil cases. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 28(1). 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9354-5.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Xiaoyu & Hilary Nesi. 2019. Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research article writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38. 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Zolfaghari, Fatemeh. 2023. The rhetoric of negation in research articles: A cross-disciplinary analysis of appraisal resources. English for Specific Purposes 70. 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.12.007.Search in Google Scholar

Zozula, Daria. 2019. Features of the language of law: A comparative study of Polish, English and Indonesian legal texts. International Journal of Legal Discourse 4(1). 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2013.Search in Google Scholar