Home Applying CFD for Studying the Dynamic and Thermal Behavior of Solar Chimney Drying System with Reversed Absorber
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Applying CFD for Studying the Dynamic and Thermal Behavior of Solar Chimney Drying System with Reversed Absorber

  • Souheyla Khaldi EMAIL logo , A. Nabil Korti and Said Abboudi
Published/Copyright: September 16, 2017

Abstract

This article provides numerical study of the solar chimney (SC) assembled with a reversed absorber and packed bed for the indirect-mode solar dryer. The present study was designed to determine the effects of using the SC in three configuration and physical proprieties of the packed (thickness and porosity) on the dynamic and thermal behavior of airflow. The results reveal that (1) using SC without storage material can increase the maximum mass flow rate up to 5%. However, integrating a storage material in the SC can improve the mass flow rate up to 32% during nighttime; (2) the use of a packed bed can decrease the crops temperature fluctuation until about 76% and increase the operating time of the solar dryer up to 12.5 hours rather than 10 hours in the case without packed bed; (3) increasing the porosity from 0.1 to 0.8 can increase the maximum temperature by about 10°C.

Appendix

Constant parameters used in the equations are presented in Table 3.

Table 3:

Different coefficients used in calculations.

Constants of the turbulence model
cμ0.09
c11.44
c21.92
σk1
σε1.3
σt1
The permeability and inertial resistance factor of the packed bed eq. (15)
θ6.29 10–7
C1719.4 m−1
The coefficients of eq. (16)
C0,0.029
C10.6849
ϵ50.61%,
Wind velocity
Vw3 m/s

Nomenclature

Latin letters
At

mirror surface, m2

C

inertial resistance factor

C0

empirical coefficients of eq. (16)

C1

empirical coefficients of eq. (16)

C1

constant for the turbulence model

C2

constant for the turbulence model

c

specific heat at constant pressure, J kg−1K−1

cμ

constant for the turbulence model

Dp

particle diameter

d

air outlet, m

e

air inlet, m

Gsun

solar irradiations, W.m−2

Gk

turbulence model coefficient

g

gravitational acceleration, m.s−2

h0

convective heat transfer coefficient due to wind, W.m−2.K−1

Hb

height of packed bed, m

K

thermal conductivity, W.m−1.K−1

k

turbulence kinetic energy

N

normal coordinate, m

P

pression, Pa

Pa

atmospheric pressure, Pa

Pr

Prandtl number

R

universal gas constant, J K−1 mol−1

S

source term

T

temperature, °C or K

Vv

wind velocity; m/s

x

horizontal coordinate, m

y

vertical coordinate, m

Greek symbols
α

coefficient of absorbtion

β

coefficient of thermal expansio

vj

velocity magnitude y direction, m.s−1

va

air velocity, m.s−1

ε

dissipation rate of turbulence energy (m2.s)

τ

coefficient of transmissivity

ρ’

coefficient of reflectivity of mirrors

μt

turbulent dynamic viscosity, kg (m s)-1

µ

dynamic viscosity, kg (m s)-1

σ

radiation coefficient

σt

constant for the turbulence model

σk

constant for the turbulence model

σε

constant for the turbulence model

ϵ

porosity

θ

coefficient of permeability

ρ

density, kg.m−3

Subscripts
a

ambient

a1

absorber-1

a2

absorber-2

c1

crops in tray-1

c2

crops in tray-1

eff

effective

f

fluid phase in packed bed

G

glass cover

m

average

ref

reference

s

solid phase in packed bed

w

wood

References

[1] Sharma A, Chen CR, Lan NV. Solar energy drying systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13:1185–1210.10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.015Search in Google Scholar

[2] Ekechukwu OV, Norton B. Design and measured performance of a solar chimney for natural circulation solar energy dryers. Renew Energy. 1997;10:81–90.10.1016/0960-1481(96)00005-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Dawit AT, Mulu B, Meseret T, Ftwi YH. Modeling and experiment of solar crop dryer for rural application. J Chem Pharm Sci. 2015;9:109–118.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Afriyie JK, Nazha MAA, Rajakaruna H, Forson FK:. Experimental investigations of a chimney-dependent solar crop dryer, School of Engineering and Technology, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK. Renewable Energy J. 2009;34:217–222.10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.010Search in Google Scholar

[5] Elias PO Analyzes of solar chimney design. Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, July 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Neama MA, Farkas I. Influencing of solar drying performance by chimney effect. Hungarian Agric Eng. 2016;30:11–16.10.17676/HAE.2016.30.11Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kant K, Shukla A, Sharma A, Kumar A, Jain A. Thermal Energy storage based solar drying systems: A review. Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset0.2016.01.007Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lalit MB, Santosh S, Naik SN. Solar dryer with thermal energy storage systems for drying agricultural food products: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2010;14:2298–2314.10.1016/j.rser.2010.04.014Search in Google Scholar

[9] El-Sebaii AA, Aboul-Enein S, Ramadan MRI, El-Gohary HG. Experimental investigation of an indirect type natural convection solar dryer. Energy Convers Manag. 2002;43:2251–2266.10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00152-2Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mirade PS. Prediction of the air velocity field in modern meat dryers using unsteady computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. J Food Eng. 2003;60:41–48.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00009-8Search in Google Scholar

[11] Om P, Vinod L, Anukul, Anil K, Arbind K. Review on various modeling techniques for the solar dryers. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2016;62:396–417.10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.028Search in Google Scholar

[12] Sami S, Etesami N, Rahimi A. Energy and exergy analysis of an indirect solar cabinet dryer based on mathematical modeling results. Int J Energy. 2011;36:2847–2855.10.1016/j.energy.2011.02.027Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bolaji BO, Olalusi AP. Performance evaluation of a mixed-mode solar dryer. Au J. 2008;11:225–231.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Bolaji BO, Olayanju TM, Falade TO. Performance evaluation of a solar wind-ventilated cabinet dryer. West Indian Eng. 2011;33:12–18.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Motevali A, Minaei S. Comparison of energy parameters in various dryers. Energy Convers Manage. 2014;87:711–725.10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.012Search in Google Scholar

[16] Goyal RK, Tiwari GN. Parametric study of a reverse flat plate absorber cabinet dryer: a new concept. Solar Energy. 1997;60(1):41–48.10.1016/S0038-092X(96)00144-2Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dilip J. Modeling the performance of the reversed absorber with packed bed thermal storage natural convection solar crop dryer. J Food Eng. 2007;78:637–647.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.10.035Search in Google Scholar

[18] Goyal RK, Tiwari GN. Performance of a reverse flat plate absorber cabinet dryer: a new concept. Energy Conversion & Manage. 1999;40:385–392.10.1016/S0196-8904(98)00123-XSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Norton T, Sun DW. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) an effective and efficient design and analysis tool for the food industry: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2006;17:600–620.10.1016/j.tifs.2006.05.004Search in Google Scholar

[20] Amanlou Y, Zomorodian A. Applying CFD for designing a new fruit cabinet dryer. Food Eng. 2010;101(1):1018–1015.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[21] Verboven P, Scheerlinck N, De Baerdemaeker J, Nicolaï BM. Computational fluid dynamics modeling and validation of the temperature distribution in a forced convection oven. J Food Eng. 2000a;43:61–73.10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00133-8Search in Google Scholar

[22] Verboven P, Scheerlinck N, De Baerdemaeker J, Nicolaï BM. Computational fluid dynamics modeling and validation of the isothermal airflow in a forced convection oven. J Food Eng. 2000b;43:41–53.10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00131-4Search in Google Scholar

[23] Xia B, Sun DW. Applications of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in the food industry: a review. In: Dw S, editor(s). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture Vol. 34. 1–3 2002:5–24.10.1016/S0168-1699(01)00177-6Search in Google Scholar

[24] Darabi H, Zomorodian A, Akbari MH, Lorestani AN. Design a cabinet dryer with two geometric configurations using CFD. J Food Sci Technol. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-013-0983-1Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ghaffari Ali, Mehdipour Ramin. Modeling and Improving the Performance of Cabinet Solar Dryer Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. International Journal of Food Engineering. 2015 1 19;11(2):157–172. DOI: 10.1515/ijfe-2014-0266.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Asan H, Sancarktar YS. Effect of wall’s thermophysical properties on time lag and decrement factor. Energy Build. 1998;28(2):28159–28166.10.1016/S0378-7788(98)00007-3Search in Google Scholar

[27] Trivittayasil V, Tanaka F, Hamanaka D, Uchino T. Prediction of surface temperature of figs during infrared heating and its effect on the quality. Biosystems Eng. 2014;122:12216–12222.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[28] Bohner M, Barfuss I, Heindl A, Muller J. Improving the airflow distribution in a multi-belt conveyor dryer for spice plants by modifications based on computational fluid dynamics. Biosystems Eng. 2013;115:339–345.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.03.012Search in Google Scholar

[29] Wei C, Man Q. Analysis of the heat transfer and airflow in solar chimney drying system with porous absorber. Renewable Energy. 2014;63:511–518.10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.006Search in Google Scholar

[30] Margaris DP, Ghiaus AG. Dried product quality improvement by air flow manipulation in tray dryers 2006;75:542–550.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.037Search in Google Scholar

[31] Sung JK. Convective heat transfer in porous and overlying fluid layers heated from below. Int J Heat Mass Transfer . 1996;39(2):319–329.10.1016/0017-9310(95)00118-SSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Capderou M. Atlas solaire de l’Algerie, tome 2: aspect énergétique. Edition n°2075.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Météo Tlemcen Zenata: https://www.meteoblue.com/fr/meteo/prevision/semaine/tlemcen%20zenata_alg%C3%A9rie_6296381.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Watmuff JH, Charters WWS, Proctor D Solar and wind induced external coefficients for solar collectors. Cooperation Mediterraneenne pour l’Energie Solaire COMPLES, Revue Internationale d’Heliotechnique, 1977; 2nd Quarter, p. 56.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Swinbank WC. Long-wave radiation from clear skies. Q J Royal Meteorological Soc. 1963;9:339–348.10.1002/qj.49708938105Search in Google Scholar

[36] Jyotirmay M, Sanjay MA. Summer performance of inclined roof solar chimney for natural ventilation. Energy Build. 2006;38(10):381156–381163.10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.01.006Search in Google Scholar

[37] Benkhelfellah R, El Mokretar S, Miri R, Belhamel M, Séchoirs solaires. Etudes comparative de la cinétique de séchage des produits agroalimentaires dans des modèle de types direct et indirect », (2005) 12ièmejournée mondiale thermique Maroc.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-3-7
Accepted: 2017-8-31
Published Online: 2017-9-16

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2017-0081/html
Scroll to top button